Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201862 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#192834 May 21, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
The tone of your previous posts have led me to believe that you think that gay people must agree with gay scientists, regardless of what they say.
Umm, science is science, it really doesn't matter if you agree with it or not.

You can disagree with gravity all day long, you are still gonna hit the ground when you jump off the cliff.

The fact that he was homosexual was simply an added bonus, you are just pissed that I didn't pick someone you could claim had a bias agenda.
Mahmoud Abdullah

Sacramento, CA

#192837 May 21, 2013
U shood not have gay marrij!! Being gay is a crime in my cuntry, becuz its bad to be gay. If u marry man and man that is a bad thing to have!! U SHOOD NOT DO BAD THINGS!!!! Plus also it is not rite to be gay, I am not gay so y r u?? If woman cum up to u and ask for marrij u will have to explain her familee y u tell no to her. Pleez stop being gay and then have marrij!! Pleez lisin to what I tell u I no what Im talk about ok my frend. So next time if u think about gay things dont do it and dont be gay and then marrij.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#192839 May 22, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
So that means it's not in the state's best interest if the biological parents of the child are not married? Simply because the state has a procedure for dealing with unmarried parents doesn't not mean the state is discouraging the biological parents from marrying.
<quoted text>
Emphasized by who? SSMers who want to further disconnect procreation from marriage? Adult s who as who were born out of wedlock?
<quoted text>
How would the state do that?
<quoted text>
At one time societal pressure performed that function.....shotgun marriages.
<quoted text>
Seriously Vee Vee....think about it.
<quoted text>
Never the less it is legal grounds upon which to annul a marriage. Thus illustrating another difference between conjugal, husband and wife, marriage and SSM.
<quoted text>
What specific acts would constitute same sex "consummation"?
<quoted text>
I believe a judge would laugh you out of court if you claimed a SSC could "consummate" in the same manner as an opposite sex couple, and as "consummation" is commonly understood.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/feb/05...
The aim of the marriage (same-sex couples) bill is to ensure that all couples enjoy equal marriage rights. Some elements of legal asymmetry remain, however, under the legislation.
Those who draft the parliamentary bills have been unable to define what constitutes consummation of a same-sex union. Consequently there is no provision for divorce on the grounds of non-consummation of a gay marriage.
That problem also means that same-sex couples who wish to divorce will not be able to cite adultery with someone of the same sex – the civil servants similarly struggled to find a definition of adultery between two men or two women.
Adultery will, nonetheless, be a permitted grounds for divorce if it follows sexual intercourse between one of the couple and someone of the opposite sex. That, at least, is consistent with existing marriage laws: if a man decides he is gay and leaves his wife for a man, she can divorce him for unreasonable behaviour but not adultery, which is defined as sexual intercourse.
Excellent posts!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#192840 May 22, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Umm, science is science, it really doesn't matter if you agree with it or not.
You can disagree with gravity all day long, you are still gonna hit the ground when you jump off the cliff.
The fact that he was homosexual was simply an added bonus, you are just pissed that I didn't pick someone you could claim had a bias agenda.
Bingo!

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#192841 May 22, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Umm, science is science, it really doesn't matter if you agree with it or not.
You can disagree with gravity all day long, you are still gonna hit the ground when you jump off the cliff.
The fact that he was homosexual was simply an added bonus, you are just pissed that I didn't pick someone you could claim had a bias agenda.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the vast majority of scientists (doctors, psychologists, psychiatrists, geneticists, biologists, etc.) who have arrived at the conclusion that homosexuality is a natural and normal characteristic of human sexual expression are straight.

Do they have a bias?

Just because a gay scientists who has extensively studied sexuality in HUMANS does not mean that he is an expert when it comes to the study of sexuality in ANIMALS.

The same is true with a bioethicist who makes a similar comment.

The bottom line is that NO ONE knows why there is SSSB in the animal kingdom. We even don't know why there is homosexuality in mankind. And understanding human behavior is MUCH easier than understanding behavior in animals.

Scientists studying humans can ask questions and get feedback from their subjects. Studying animals requires human scientists to understand a subject that cannot communicate with them.

Anyone who says that they understand why animals participate in SSSB is stating an OPINION. There simply have not been any conclusive studies that explain this phenomenon.
honest person

Tempe, AZ

#192843 May 22, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text> We even don't know why there is homosexuality in mankind.
The main reason is to ease the population pressures. The secondary reason is that some people are desperate faddists. And then there are the dangerous mental defectives, the recruiters, the GLSEN types and the pinkos who just want to see Civilization fail.

Why are homosexuals so intellectually dishonest?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#192844 May 22, 2013
Oy vey.
Passed

San Dimas, CA

#192845 May 22, 2013
Fifteen states have already passed this, onward and upward.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#192846 May 22, 2013
Passed wrote:
Fifteen states have already passed this, onward and upward.
That's what she said.
BB pants

San Dimas, CA

#192847 May 22, 2013
Don't worry about it Frankie Rozzitories, the people with the big boy pants are handling it, so go away now.
laughing man

Tempe, AZ

#192848 May 22, 2013
BB pants wrote:
Don't worry about it Frankie Rozzitories, the people with the big boy pants are handling it, so go away now.
Aren't you one of those global warming zit grrrrls who believes in drowning polar bears??
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#192849 May 22, 2013
laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
Aren't you one of those global warming zit grrrrls who believes in drowning polar bears??
Yes. Covina is one of the "it's cold because it's warm" dummies.
Bruno

Redondo Beach, CA

#192850 May 22, 2013
The Gay cult community will not take down California.
drowning polar bear

Pulaski, TN

#192851 May 22, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. Covina is one of the "it's cold because it's warm" dummies.
I make ice cubes in the microwave oven. Don't you?

And just how can you "cook" a frozen pizza in an oven?

Capitalists are crazy! Save the baby seals! Vote for Castro!!!!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#192852 May 22, 2013
Bruno wrote:
The Gay cult community will not take down California.
Aw SHUDDUP Bruno you silly jackass. You're second rate.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#192854 May 22, 2013
just the facts wrote:
<quoted text>Wait, you have the nerve to call Bruno second class. LOL boy you are just a wannabe troll.
Yes, I can hardly wait until the day I become a full fledged troll like you Jizzy.

What a dope!
Blue Eyes

Modesto, CA

#192856 May 22, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong there are 18,000 legally married and legally recognized same sex marriages in California today.
They did not revoke any marriages, that would have been a legal nightmare.
Who's they? I won the Blue eyes Majority so "I revoked them". I have nothing, so sue me, and you get all the nothing I have.
Blue Eyes

Modesto, CA

#192857 May 22, 2013
Well a little more than nothing but not much.
Blue Eyes

Modesto, CA

#192858 May 22, 2013
The point is if it is made to be an exit it should be kept an exit, only.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#192859 May 22, 2013
Blue Eyes wrote:
The point is if it is made to be an exit it should be kept an exit, only.
Every time I go in for my 6 month doctor visit he wants to stick his finger up my ass! Then he swears he's not gay. Says it's to see how my prostate feels. Sounds gay to me. And it sure feels gay!

I'm thinking of getting a hot woman doctor, I got my eye on a 40ish Indian lady doctor. If I gotta have someone's finger up there once in a while to stay healthy, I might as well enjoy it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hemet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Abandoned Insane Asylum In Hemet.... (Jun '09) Jun 14 mishca 951 75
Hemet wife beaters (Jul '14) Jun 12 Riverside Dave 5
looking for new landlord Jun 12 White13China 1
Poll Has Hemet become a dumping ground for parolees ... (Jul '15) Jun 11 South will rise a... 11
News Earthquake along San Jacinto fault is wake-up c... Jun 10 He who knows 1
Hemet Valley Hospital Emergency Room (Jan '13) Jun 9 Melody 43
Cal Fire Sucks (Nov '11) Jun 9 Maestro 52
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hemet Mortgages