Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 20 comments on the Aug 4, 2010, www.cnn.com story titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Big D

Los Angeles, CA

#192590 May 18, 2013
hallelujah wrote:
<quoted text>
You are funny.
You should see him in heels and a pleated pink skirt. Sad.... but a laugh riot!
hallelujah

Harrisonburg, VA

#192591 May 18, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You should see him in heels and a pleated pink skirt. Sad.... but a laugh riot!
If that is what he wants to do, more power to him you must be part of the gay cult on topix.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#192593 May 18, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
And still, not one rational argument against gay marriage. If you are against gay marriage, it's because of bigotry. Pure and simple.
it can't be bigotry. There is no such thing as gay 'marriage'.

Smirk.
WrongDoor

Covina, CA

#192594 May 18, 2013
Those cities in California who were caught cheating and stealing from the tax payers of the state of California were rewarded by being punished for their misdeeds.

The City of West Covina: On May 1, 2013, the City of West Covina filed a lawsuit in superior court along with other cities who are under the misconception (and or more bad advice from greedy lawyers) that they are ENTITLED to monies from Redevelopment Loans.

Steve Lambert of the San Gabriel Tribune newspaper was given some BAD information from those cities involved in this lawsuit, more lies and half-truths are being spread.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#192595 May 18, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
167K or so posts later, still not one rational argument against gay marriage.
And now:
"Rhode Island joins New England states in legalizing gay marriage"
http://pbn.com/Rhode-Island-joins-New-England...
Wow, 30,000+ post's from Rose and we still haven't seen a rational post by you.

When can we expect one so I will be sure to check back?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#192596 May 18, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
"Rhode Island now 10th state to allow gay marriage"
http://www.pjstar.com/free/x1213311767/Rhode-...
And still, no plague of locusts.
Homophobes need to realize there isn't a rational argument against gay marriage.
It's amazing what happens when the Republic is allowed to operate the way those old racist slave owning fogies designed it to in 1787 isn't it?
Bruno

Westminster, CA

#192597 May 18, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
And still, not one rational argument against gay marriage. If you are against gay marriage, it's because of bigotry. Pure and simple.
You really need to change your rediculous response, you sound like a broken record. There is no truth to what you say, you haven't proved anything ever. The cult you live in is a second class group of no bodies. No bananas for you !!!

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#192598 May 18, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
it can't be bigotry. There is no such thing as gay 'marriage'.
Smirk.
Delusional as usual...

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#192599 May 18, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>

And there is same sex sex in nature. That's the definition of natural, dummy.
"Although homosexual behavior is very common in the animal world, it seems to be very uncommon that individual animals have a long-lasting predisposition to engage in such behavior to the exclusion of heterosexual activities. Thus, a homosexual orientation, if one can speak of such thing in animals, seems to be a rarity." Simon Levay

BTW Rose, Simon Levay is a HIGHLY regarded scientist. He is also HOMOSEXUAL.

"Properly speaking, homosexuality does not exist among animals.... For reasons of survival, the reproductive instinct among animals is always directed towards an individual of the opposite sex. Therefore, an animal can never be homosexual as such. Nevertheless, the interaction of other instincts (particularly dominance) can result in behavior that appears to be homosexual. Such behavior cannot be equated with an animal homosexuality. All it means is that animal sexual behavior encompasses aspects beyond that of reproduction."- Dr. Antonio Pardo, Professor of Bioethics at the University of Navarre, Spain

BTW Rose, those lovely gay penguins in San Francisco- they broke up as soon as a female became available. Harry dumped poor Pepper as soon as Linda became available.
girly mann

Tempe, AZ

#192601 May 18, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Excellent post.
Thanks.

Rosie O'Donnell must have liked it too. She went nuts with the smilies again.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#192602 May 18, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
"Although homosexual behavior is very common in the animal world, it seems to be very uncommon that individual animals have a long-lasting predisposition to engage in such behavior to the exclusion of heterosexual activities. Thus, a homosexual orientation, if one can speak of such thing in animals, seems to be a rarity." Simon Levay
BTW Rose, Simon Levay is a HIGHLY regarded scientist. He is also HOMOSEXUAL.
"Properly speaking, homosexuality does not exist among animals.... For reasons of survival, the reproductive instinct among animals is always directed towards an individual of the opposite sex. Therefore, an animal can never be homosexual as such. Nevertheless, the interaction of other instincts (particularly dominance) can result in behavior that appears to be homosexual. Such behavior cannot be equated with an animal homosexuality. All it means is that animal sexual behavior encompasses aspects beyond that of reproduction."-, Professor of Bioethics at the University of Navarre, Spain
BTW Rose, those lovely gay penguins in San Francisco- they broke up as soon as a female became available. Harry dumped poor Pepper as soon as Linda became available.
You do know that a bioethicist does not necessarily have a medical degree of any sort. These professionals may have dabbled in a few biology classes, but they are not medical professionals. Nor are they research scientists.

Dr. Antonio Pardo gave his OPINION abut the sexual behavior of animals.

But his comments cannot ne taken as proven science.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#192603 May 19, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
it can't be bigotry. There is no such thing as gay 'marriage'.
Smirk.
wrong!!

try again

smirk

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#192604 May 19, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
it can't be bigotry. There is no such thing as gay 'marriage'.
Smirk.
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Delusional as usual...
Hardly Queen of DeNial.

A sterile duplicate gendered couple is clearly not equal to marriage.

At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior. Literally 'unmarriage'.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#192605 May 19, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
You do know that a bioethicist does not necessarily have a medical degree of any sort. These professionals may have dabbled in a few biology classes, but they are not medical professionals. Nor are they research scientists.
Dr. Antonio Pardo gave his OPINION abut the sexual behavior of animals.
But his comments cannot ne taken as proven science.
When the Queen of DeNial can't argue the merits of the message, he assaults the messenger.

Gay troll twirling.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#192606 May 19, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
wrong!!
try again
smirk
No, it's spot on reality.

That's why you gave your opinion instead of a logical retort.

Smirk.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#192607 May 19, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
it can't be bigotry. There is no such thing as gay 'marriage'.
Smirk.
<quoted text>
Hardly Queen of DeNial.
A sterile duplicate gendered couple is clearly not equal to marriage.
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior. Literally 'unmarriage'.
Smile.
Hey schlemiel, why don't you back up your assertions with some proof?

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#192608 May 19, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
When the Queen of DeNial can't argue the merits of the message, he assaults the messenger.
Gay troll twirling.
Smile.
Yeah, it's kind of like when I point out the fact that you have NO scientific training, yet you spread more "scientific" manure than a man with a 1,000 acre farm.

You claim knowledge about biology, genetics, sociology, psychology, medicine, anatomy,(have I missed any?). You're a washed up pastor, who reads a couple of articles, which you rarely understand, then get on here and start lying about what the authors say.

Your only goal is to incite ignorance, fear, and hatred of homosexuality. That's the only REAL cross-cultural behavior you know anything about.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#192609 May 19, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
wrong!!
try again
smirk
You're a big dope!!

Sneer.
Prompting

Covina, CA

#192610 May 19, 2013
The armed intruder was holding Rebello in a headlock and pointing a gun at her head before he turned his pistol at the officer, prompting the shooting.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#192611 May 19, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
You do know that a bioethicist does not necessarily have a medical degree of any sort. These professionals may have dabbled in a few biology classes, but they are not medical professionals. Nor are they research scientists.
Dr. Antonio Pardo gave his OPINION abut the sexual behavior of animals.
But his comments cannot ne taken as proven science.
First, you should proofread your posts.

Second, tell us again how you, with your little MSW degree from some no name school, are smarter than the neuroscientist whom attended Cambridge, Göttingen, and Harvard?

Third, isn't it funny how quickly you dismiss anything that doesn't reinforce your narrative? If it agrees with you it is "proven science" if it doesn't it is simply nonsense.

BTW, what agenda was the good doctor whom is homosexual pushing when he said this line of thinking was wrong?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hemet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Hemet eye care center on Morton place FRAUD (Mar '11) Sun miss debbie12 47
Albertsons in Hemet (Sep '07) Sat amanda castro 18
News HEMET: Information, not cash, for panhandlers (Feb '12) Apr 24 Chris 18
Abandoned Insane Asylum In Hemet.... (Jun '09) Apr 23 Flora 69
Lou Pittam's Store (Apr '10) Apr 21 Iremember 6
HemetHEMET: Water future murky Apr 21 Badskpr 1
Netflix Apr 20 Cassierae 1
More from around the web

Hemet People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]