Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
166,781 - 166,800 of 200,331 Comments Last updated 1 hr ago

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190973
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Epigentics may EXPLAIN how homosexuality exists. It does not, however, make the "judgment" that homosexuality is wrong or unnatural.
It does say that 'normally' epi-markers are erased. Those not in denial understand that when something 'normal' doesn't happen in a genetic setting, it creates a mutation. A mutation is 'judged' defective when it cannot self-replicate, OR when it has no practical purpose.

Ss orientation cannot replicate, and it has no practical evolutionary purpose.

I keep warning you VV, that this exposure is coming, and the attempt of equate a 'not normal' condition with marriage will be exposed as incredibly foolish.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190974
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Stocking wrote:
<quoted text>
There relationships are equal in love. If they had been given equal legal rights and recognitions with 'Civil Partnerships' then may be wanting SS marriage wouldn't have come about.
Broken relationships? There are plenty enough dysfunctional hetero couple relationships... opposite sex partnerships does not guarantee cohesion.
More unnatural behaviour?'unnatural' means of having children has been going on sometime now for childless hetero couples.
Many relationships are 'equal' in love. That does not make them marriage.

I agree that gays have every right and opportunity to purse legitimate rights and an identity for their relationship. That is their responsibility. It is not legitimate to impose an imposter relationship on marriage.

As to children, two distinctions.

1. Children in the natural home of their biological parents are at a significant advantage over ANY default setting. That setting, or as close as possible should always be the primary pursuit of society.

2. A ss couple ALWAYS deprives a child of one parental role. To do so deliberately should be criminal. It is narcissistically diabolical.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190975
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It does say that 'normally' epi-markers are erased. Those not in denial understand that when something 'normal' doesn't happen in a genetic setting, it creates a mutation. A mutation is 'judged' defective when it cannot self-replicate, OR when it has no practical purpose.
Ss orientation cannot replicate, and it has no practical evolutionary purpose.
I keep warning you VV, that this exposure is coming, and the attempt of equate a 'not normal' condition with marriage will be exposed as incredibly foolish.
Smile.
First off, most gay and lesbian people have the ability to procreate. Our "plumbing" works just fine.

Secondly, even though you don't see the "practical purpose" of homosexuality DOES NOT mean that there isn't one.

I don't see a practical purpose for the horse shit you spew on here, but here you are, every chance you get, saying ignorant things about science, which you clearly known nothing about.

Finally, you get back to me when the "exposure" arrives. Until then, why don't you drop the prophecy crap. You're horrible at it.
Dorn

Ridgecrest, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190976
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Sexual orientation means just that . It does not mean that same sex attraction means sterility. The reason same sex orientation persons want to marry is to have the partner they love and can live with and have the acceptant of society and the financial support that opposite sex couples have.
Sexual attaction is inherited as are other traits such as eye color and hair color.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190977
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
How, exactly, are men and women different, other than body parts?
Are not the "body parts" sufficient? Is it not the joining of certain "body parts" and the natural result, that provides the biological foundation to marriage?
Appealing to tradition.
Logical fallacy.
Appealing to biology is logical though.
You make no sense.
"Sense" that you wish to acknowledge, and doesn't undermine your position....no.

Perhaps you can answer the questions I posed.

If its the consensus of society that marriage is simply a union of two consenting adults, there's no need to prohibit any two person, consenting adult, union, including blood relatives. Why should it matter who marries who, or who can't marry who?

Your argument seems to be no restriction, except possible number of participants, among consenting adults.

If that is so, why bother licensing marriage at all?
AppleTree

Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190978
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

I'm sure this topic's post was miss placed in the beginning.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190979
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
First off, most gay and lesbian people have the ability to procreate. Our "plumbing" works just fine.
As long as it's combined with the "plumbing" of the opposite sex, it does.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190980
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Stocking wrote:
<quoted text>
Hello Frankie, how are Bill and Jizzy?
too wordy = too caffeinated
Those two silly jackasses will never change. They're laying low lately, too embarrassed to post. Probably re-inventing themselves.

They both have many sock puppets. They'll be back with some silly new names but the same old dopey schtick.
Smolurjers

Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190982
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

As if it's a issue, Frankie zwizzo blow off.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190983
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Smolurjers wrote:
As if it's a issue, Frankie zwizzo blow off.
As if you matter, power ranger.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190984
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It does say that 'normally' epi-markers are erased. Those not in denial understand that when something 'normal' doesn't happen in a genetic setting, it creates a mutation. A mutation is 'judged' defective when it cannot self-replicate, OR when it has no practical purpose.
Ss orientation cannot replicate, and it has no practical evolutionary purpose.
I keep warning you VV, that this exposure is coming, and the attempt of equate a 'not normal' condition with marriage will be exposed as incredibly foolish.
Smile.
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
First off, most gay and lesbian people have the ability to procreate. Our "plumbing" works just fine.
Secondly, even though you don't see the "practical purpose" of homosexuality DOES NOT mean that there isn't one.
I don't see a practical purpose for the horse shit you spew on here, but here you are, every chance you get, saying ignorant things about science, which you clearly known nothing about.
Finally, you get back to me when the "exposure" arrives. Until then, why don't you drop the prophecy crap. You're horrible at it.
First off, you deliberately distorted what I said. Why does a legitimate cause need that deceit??? You never answer that question VV.

Of course homosexuals can procreate. Just not within their orientation, as I said. So the reality remains. That lack of ability within orientation is a clear indication of a defect.

Second, while it could be true homosexuality has a purpose, the fact remains there still is no valid reason, and science is quickly confirming it as a epi-marker mistake.

All this exposes your denial about my purpose here; Exposing your deceit and BS. Over and over. And trust me, I will get back to you. Soon.

Smirk.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190986
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Just the Facts wrote:
<quoted text>Still here jackass.
Glad to see that you are still full of shat.
Great post spice boy.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190987
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It does say that 'normally' epi-markers are erased. Those not in denial understand that when something 'normal' doesn't happen in a genetic setting, it creates a mutation. A mutation is 'judged' defective when it cannot self-replicate, OR when it has no practical purpose.
Ss orientation cannot replicate, and it has no practical evolutionary purpose.
I keep warning you VV, that this exposure is coming, and the attempt of equate a 'not normal' condition with marriage will be exposed as incredibly foolish.
Smile.
<quoted text>
First off, you deliberately distorted what I said. Why does a legitimate cause need that deceit??? You never answer that question VV.
Of course homosexuals can procreate. Just not within their orientation, as I said. So the reality remains. That lack of ability within orientation is a clear indication of a defect.
Second, while it could be true homosexuality has a purpose, the fact remains there still is no valid reason, and science is quickly confirming it as a epi-marker mistake.
All this exposes your denial about my purpose here; Exposing your deceit and BS. Over and over. And trust me, I will get back to you. Soon.
Smirk.
1.) One of your frequent downfalls in this issue is your continued belief that unless a person is popping out children, they are of no use to society--they are a "defect".

2.) You keep saying that science is going to prove that we are an epi-marker mistake. I'm waiting... And by the way, what, exactly, makes us a mistake? Is it our ability to function? Is it our ability to live a full and happy life? Is it our ability to contribute to society at large? I'm not finding many "mistakes" there.
On the other hand, however, I can look back at history and find multiple wars championed by heterosexuals. All of that death and mayhem... And while we're talking death and mayhem, let's not EVER forget the heterosexual impact on the deaths of 40,000,000 babies each year via abortion.
I wonder if there is an epi-marker mistake for war and abortion?
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190988
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Anybody else watching the news/propaganda agencies pretend that they are going after Obummer, After the election is over, when it can no longer matter? They were all in love with him before the election..Now, they pretend to want blood... Too late now.
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190989
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

We should have gotten Romney.
Hooters

Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190990
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Don't worry all those bad people aren't very sane anyway.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190991
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Just the Facts wrote:
<quoted text>Still here jackass.
Glad to see that you are still full of shat.
Jizzy! Someone was just asking about your sillyass. I thought you were still sulking.

Good that you got over it, we'll have some more fun together! It doesn't have to be joyless.
More Guns

Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190992
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Off LoneHill and market place.

A man with a gun robbed a woman customer of her purse in the Sam's Club parking lot, which is located in the "Glendora Market Place" April 04, 2013 Saturday around 5:25 p.m.

The suspect, described as a male white, 20-25 years old, she refused and the suspect yanked the purse from her, while brandishing a small pistol.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190995
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It does say that 'normally' epi-markers are erased. Those not in denial understand that when something 'normal' doesn't happen in a genetic setting, it creates a mutation. A mutation is 'judged' defective when it cannot self-replicate, OR when it has no practical purpose.
Ss orientation cannot replicate, and it has no practical evolutionary purpose.
I keep warning you VV, that this exposure is coming, and the attempt of equate a 'not normal' condition with marriage will be exposed as incredibly foolish.
Smile.
<quoted text>
First off, you deliberately distorted what I said. Why does a legitimate cause need that deceit??? You never answer that question VV.
Of course homosexuals can procreate. Just not within their orientation, as I said. So the reality remains. That lack of ability within orientation is a clear indication of a defect.
Second, while it could be true homosexuality has a purpose, the fact remains there still is no valid reason, and science is quickly confirming it as a epi-marker mistake.
All this exposes your denial about my purpose here; Exposing your deceit and BS. Over and over. And trust me, I will get back to you. Soon.
Smirk.
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
1.) One of your frequent downfalls in this issue is your continued belief that unless a person is popping out children, they are of no use to society--they are a "defect".
2.) You keep saying that science is going to prove that we are an epi-marker mistake. I'm waiting... And by the way, what, exactly, makes us a mistake? Is it our ability to function? Is it our ability to live a full and happy life? Is it our ability to contribute to society at large? I'm not finding many "mistakes" there.
On the other hand, however, I can look back at history and find multiple wars championed by heterosexuals. All of that death and mayhem... And while we're talking death and mayhem, let's not EVER forget the heterosexual impact on the deaths of 40,000,000 babies each year via abortion.
I wonder if there is an epi-marker mistake for war and abortion?
1. I've never one time said that unless people are 'popping out babies' they are useless. You blatantly lied again.

2. I didn't assert homosexuality is mistake, science does. Nor have I asserted that a person is a mistake.

If your mouth is moving, it is doing something foul

Snicker.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190997
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Just the Facts wrote:
<quoted text>Why you mad? Flat tire on your scotter? Stuck inside? Dirty diaper?
What would make you think I'm mad Jizzy!? It's a fine day and you stopped sulking so now we can have some more fun! What's to be mad about? Don't be silly.

P.S. What's a scotter?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

11 Users are viewing the Hemet Forum right now

Search the Hemet Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 55 min Abrahem 7,841
Black Hair salon in hemet 4 hr run 44
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 18 hr Mis kites 15,915
Vacationing family loses thousands in bicycle t... Wed Donny B 5
topix needs to remove ads Wed ads 5
Annoying Teachers! (Aug '11) Wed underpaid 72
Illegal immigrants in Menifee Wed thot 13
•••
•••

Hemet News Video

•••
•••

Hemet Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Hemet People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Hemet News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Hemet
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••