Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,394

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

#190259 Apr 27, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
Drunken losers like you aren’t even on the train, you’re just too stupid to realize it.
"Drunken"? "Loser"? You are funny, minimum-wage-boy. Go and flip some more burgers, and hate me, when I walk into your McPlace of employment and pull out a wad of C-notes.
TexOpens

Covina, CA

#190260 Apr 27, 2013
Rick Perry's and Mitt Romney's IDEA OF HANDS OFF BUSINES JUST BLEW UP in there faces.

BOOM - it's all gone.

Texas has another opening for a replacement business?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#190261 Apr 27, 2013
Rock Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, that's an easy one. It's because the site is operated by biased moderators.
I actually appreciate the handicap. When I get banished, I know I have hit the sweet spot.
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

#190262 Apr 27, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
Those are all great reasons, but, you forgot the most important one. Gay Marriage should be legal because we deserve equal rights and we’re Americans. By the way, who is the “we” you are referring to? Could it be the arrogant elitist ignorant haters? When are “we”(being you and all your hater friends) going to realize you have no say when it comes to people’s rights. That’s why “we”(being you and all your hater friends) are losing the fight to suppress Gay Americans right to marriage. But, thanks for the silly tantrum, you always amuse me.
As an American, you have equal rights, to marry according to the dictates of the majority. That's it. Elitist haters? You steal my words. You have no rights to marry a man, you moron. you may be changing that, but you are making the law recognize monstrosities. Such as yourself.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#190263 Apr 27, 2013
Rock Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
I wish that we were both in the same place, at the same time. I'd throw a drink in your face, and then, we'd see who the weasel really is.
Call me first! I'll pay for that drink. And then a few more while we laugh as Big D dries off.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#190264 Apr 27, 2013
Rock Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
I wish that we were both in the same place, at the same time. I'd throw a drink in your face, and then, we'd see who the weasel really is.
hmmm.... let's see..... what was that post of yours? "You must be some kind of wimp, to threaten people on the internet."

Curious.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#190265 Apr 27, 2013
Rock Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, that's an easy one. It's because the site is operated by biased moderators.
Paranoia....... very sad.

It couldn't POSSIBLY be that you're a wing-nut, now could it?
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

#190267 Apr 27, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Gays don't force straight people to desecrate families by having 40,000,000 abortions each year.
Gays don't force straight people to spend more on a wedding ceremony, very often going into debt, than they do on a good, midsize sedan.
Gays don't force straight people to divorce at a rate unseen in human history.
You guys seem to think we're the cause of your marriage and family woes.
Go look in the mirror, you yutz! You're your own worst enemy!
Back to quoting non-relevant statistics again? And you wish to be seen as equals, when you use these stats, that prove how unequal you are.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

#190268 Apr 27, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
I am Jizzy's special project.
He wants to be you...
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

#190269 Apr 27, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would you say such a thing? It’s not the least bit funny.
Funny, no. But likely? Yes.
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

#190270 Apr 27, 2013
An observer wrote:
Huge misguding and propaganda goes around.
Marriage institute is not a personal preference and it is not about the rights or love.
It is a privilege establish by the society to the women, let her comfortable to have a child and be financially protected if man decide to live her after having sex with her.
If the married couple have love and live together they don't need a goverment to secure that living.
That institution made to share responsibility for the result of sex relationship which could end up with birth of child.
In many cultures marriage without children is annulled or could be annulled by that reason. Christian based culture more generos and not making the birth a contegency on the protection guaranties to the women.
If people want to have a protection on contract they need to write one and enforce it under regular law regardless to the fact that they have sexull intercourse or not.
But the real motive is a goverment benefits to the marriage institute.
The vote result shows that general public has no interest in sponsoring tax breaks for inheritance of individual who could not produce children. That tax break was design to protect children and women who could earn money because she was carring children.
Why are friends passing property to each other must be treated differently if they are f... or not? We all love friends, parents, siblings , children without sexual relationship and we want them the same privileges in the tax as well unfortunately we can't afford it now.(or may be we should vote on it?)
You see the question do we want to give tax brakes to rich homosectual or not, is the question for the majority and have nothing to do with human rights.
Unfortunaly the have huge money and good lobby to fix result of people vote.
It's nothing more, than a dash for the cash. "Gimme, gimme, gimme", nothing more.
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

#190271 Apr 27, 2013
sheesh void of hate wrote:
<quoted text>
Newsflash!
We live in US of A, procreation isn't a requirement for marriage. Ergo the rest of your comment regarding financial benefits for women with children is a bit irrelevant in the matter of the question of validating same sex marriage in the US.
The real motive for most couples in the US, apparently, is a pronouncement of love which is recognised in marriage. The legal ramifications of the contract are icing on the cake.
Not at all, sir. Nothing of the sort. It is about the "[enumerated] rights" that are to be had. If it was about "love", there'd be no need for any legislation, at all. they'd already have it. It's the icing on the cake that it is the REAL target, the $$. Children were the original reason for coupling and mating, and all the rest. Normal, natural family.
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

#190272 Apr 27, 2013
Fundamentalist wrote:
New revelation!!!
I think the gay hype is the alien invasion the world is talking about.... The whole idea around homosexuality reality is alien even to their DNA....
The transformation the human being must go through to become gay is alien..... They take up all levels of society demanding rights that is ALIEN....
Ya I can see the invasion and yes the Aliens are here....
Well my Alien friends your fight for rights is warping society to an alienated mind-set as never before, it is foreign to the norm that society should be building values on. This alien invasion is positioned in all levels of society influenced from right on top of world influence. Well you can draw in the Bible as a consion, but the fight all across the planet for an alien reasoning is big. Yes, the aliens are calling victim as far as they go....Victims of what? Society not wanting this invasion, I know the weed with the good seed will mature until the weed can be removed, plucked out from the human heart.
Outstanding post.
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

#190273 Apr 27, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh no... more churches today wish to be able to preform same sex marriages than 5 years ago.
But it hasn’t been fast enough
Your problem is that you are selling ignorance and hate, and that just does not sell as well as it used to
You have attempted in the last 50 years to shore up your numbers by aligning with a political party, but that has also backfired
Yes, the infiltration and subversion effort is far-reaching.
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

#190274 Apr 27, 2013
just the facts wrote:
<quoted text>
Why not try being honest? Your objection to same sex marriage is based upon your religion.
He IS being honest. You can't stand it. You should try to be honest, and admit that it is all about the money. Greedy little swine.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#190275 Apr 27, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Paranoia....... very sad.
It couldn't POSSIBLY be that you're a wing-nut, now could it?
Yeah right. You're very sad.

If I type f*** as you routinely type it, my post will be deleted. I have tried it several times.
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

#190276 Apr 27, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
The part where you think we should be denied marriage is where your opinion comes in.
Fact: there is no reason to deny SS marriage the same legal status as one penis/ one vagina marriages.
Fact: There is no compelling reason for us to fund SSM.
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

#190277 Apr 27, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
The part where you think we should be denied marriage is where your opinion comes in.
Fact: there is no reason to deny SS marriage the same legal status as one penis/ one vagina marriages.
Fact: There is no parity in what you seek.
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

#190278 Apr 27, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
The part where you think we should be denied marriage is where your opinion comes in.
Fact: there is no reason to deny SS marriage the same legal status as one penis/ one vagina marriages.
Fact: SSM is a rip-off.
Rock Hudson

Wooster, OH

#190279 Apr 27, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Procreation is a dead argument, even the Supreme Court joked about it.
Should they deny anyone over 55 a marriage license, how about Vets that lost the use of the lower half of their bodies, should they be denied marriage licenses?
There is no law, anywhere, that will deny a couple a marriage license because they do not intend or cannot have children.
Procreation is a dead argument with respect to same sex marriage.
They hang onto that, because they don’t have anything else to cling too, like rats running to the last dry spot on a sinking ship.
You, also, hang onto it, as if it solely validates your side, which it does not. Far from it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hemet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Man assaults kids at McDonalds-east florida on ... (Jul '13) 7 hr LoserDave 132
Is San Jacinto Dangerous? (Jun '10) Sun the investigator 25
The under ground tunnel , Florida ave. downtown... (Oct '11) Sun Jen 79
Scammed by Richardson RV; DO NOT do business w... Feb 26 hemet sucks 2
Husband, Wife Die In Apparent Murder-Suicide (Jan '07) Feb 26 tellinitlikeitis 18
Can white people call themselves African American? (Sep '12) Feb 24 TELETUBBIES CALL Me 102
Menifee Authors Feb 22 286author 1

Hemet News Video

Hemet Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Hemet People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 12:44 pm PST