Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201881 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#189901 Apr 23, 2013
Marram and Jizzy have been spotted buying backpacks, pressure cookers and a batteries at Walmart.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#189902 Apr 23, 2013
Can anyone imagine what kind of obsessed jackass loser (Jizzy) gets so obsessed with another poster that he (Jizzy) creates dopey troll threads complete with rigged polls?

Anyone?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#189903 Apr 23, 2013
I am Jizzy's special project.
FRizzohasntslept for10days

Sacramento, CA

#189904 Apr 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I get a good solid eight hours a night, and I don't do speed, you shouldn't either.
I wouldn't know about the quality of crank in Union City but I'll take your word on it.
Do u post in your sleep? I noticed the other day u had atleast 1 post an hour for about 2 days straight. Proof u r a gay marriage obsessed speed freak.

See u in about 45 seconds.

Sincerely,
Frankie Rizzo hasn't slept for 10 days and counting.
FRizzohasntslept for10days

Sacramento, CA

#189905 Apr 23, 2013
Wtf is Rizzo? He must be in a straitjack on suicide watch again, there's no other explanation, since we all know he doesn't sleep. O wait maybe he's making more crank...my fault.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#189906 Apr 23, 2013
FRizzohasntsleptfor10days wrote:
<quoted text>
Do u post in your sleep? I noticed the other day u had atleast 1 post an hour for about 2 days straight. Proof u r a gay marriage obsessed speed freak.
See u in about 45 seconds.
Sincerely,
Frankie Rizzo hasn't slept for 10 days and counting.
Can anyone imagine what kind of jackass loser would count and time some other jackass's posts and think that's real slick and witty?

C'mon dummy, get some schtick.
FRizzohasntslept for10days

Sacramento, CA

#189907 Apr 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Can anyone imagine what kind of jackass loser would count and time some other jackass's posts and think that's real slick and witty?
C'mon dummy, get some schtick.
There u r I was getting worried something happened to u. Guess it doesn't take very long to cook up a batch these days does it?

But anyways what's up bro how's your day going?
FRizzohasntslept for10days

Sacramento, CA

#189908 Apr 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Can anyone imagine what kind of jackass loser would count and time some other jackass's posts and think that's real slick and witty?
C'mon dummy, get some schtick.
Well in all fairness, I was almost dead on.

See u in about 1 minute, 12 seconds.

Come on Rizzo, make me a winner!!

Since: Jan 10

Lewis Center, OH

#189909 Apr 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
Marram and Jizzy have been spotted buying backpacks, pressure cookers and a batteries at Walmart.
Why would you say such a thing? It’s not the least bit funny.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#189910 Apr 23, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would you say such a thing? It’s not the least bit funny.
I know.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#189911 Apr 23, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
Those are all great reasons, but, you forgot the most important one. Gay Marriage should be legal because we deserve equal rights and we’re Americans.
Why do u continue to argue for a right which you already possess, but do not wish to exercise it like any other American?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#189913 Apr 23, 2013
.~

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#189915 Apr 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>You silly twit, the law is a mockery when it denies reality.
I do hope you're not trying to impose your reality on anyone. As it is you're dishonest about your identity, so the rest of your blathering is suspect.
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It is not my 'opinion' that ss couples will only ever be a duplicated sterile half of marriage.
Oh really? Then why do you keep repeating this opinion?
Frankie Rizzo

Los Angeles, CA

#189916 Apr 23, 2013
The first time I did it, the guy told me to pretend its candy. He gave me five dollars afterwards as I wiped my mouth on my sleeve.
SOft Racing

United States

#189917 Apr 23, 2013
Where the Hottei ?
An observer

Mountain View, CA

#189918 Apr 23, 2013
Huge misguding and propaganda goes around.

Marriage institute is not a personal preference and it is not about the rights or love.
It is a privilege establish by the society to the women, let her comfortable to have a child and be financially protected if man decide to live her after having sex with her.
If the married couple have love and live together they don't need a goverment to secure that living.

That institution made to share responsibility for the result of sex relationship which could end up with birth of child.
In many cultures marriage without children is annulled or could be annulled by that reason. Christian based culture more generos and not making the birth a contegency on the protection guaranties to the women.

If people want to have a protection on contract they need to write one and enforce it under regular law regardless to the fact that they have sexull intercourse or not.

But the real motive is a goverment benefits to the marriage institute.
The vote result shows that general public has no interest in sponsoring tax breaks for inheritance of individual who could not produce children. That tax break was design to protect children and women who could earn money because she was carring children.

Why are friends passing property to each other must be treated differently if they are f... or not? We all love friends, parents, siblings , children without sexual relationship and we want them the same privileges in the tax as well unfortunately we can't afford it now.(or may be we should vote on it?)

You see the question do we want to give tax brakes to rich homosectual or not, is the question for the majority and have nothing to do with human rights.
Unfortunaly the have huge money and good lobby to fix result of people vote.
SOft Racing

United States

#189919 Apr 23, 2013
Again 92832. The S.S. kicks.You Just dont see your BLESSING.I SO, WISH Coud LIVE THERE. I Could, But not Style... BrAmPp...
SOft Racing

United States

#189920 Apr 23, 2013
Sk8, Worship , Devotions,, Ride moto, DEVOTIONS ....

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#189921 Apr 23, 2013
An observer wrote:
Huge misguding and propaganda goes around.
Marriage institute is not a personal preference and it is not about the rights or love.
It is a privilege establish by the society to the women, let her comfortable to have a child and be financially protected if man decide to live her after having sex with her.
If the married couple have love and live together they don't need a goverment to secure that living.
That institution made to share responsibility for the result of sex relationship which could end up with birth of child.
In many cultures marriage without children is annulled or could be annulled by that reason. Christian based culture more generos and not making the birth a contegency on the protection guaranties to the women.
If people want to have a protection on contract they need to write one and enforce it under regular law regardless to the fact that they have sexull intercourse or not.
But the real motive is a goverment benefits to the marriage institute.
The vote result shows that general public has no interest in sponsoring tax breaks for inheritance of individual who could not produce children. That tax break was design to protect children and women who could earn money because she was carring children.
Why are friends passing property to each other must be treated differently if they are f... or not? We all love friends, parents, siblings , children without sexual relationship and we want them the same privileges in the tax as well unfortunately we can't afford it now.(or may be we should vote on it?)
You see the question do we want to give tax brakes to rich homosectual or not, is the question for the majority and have nothing to do with human rights.
Unfortunaly the have huge money and good lobby to fix result of people vote.
Newsflash!

We live in US of A, procreation isn't a requirement for marriage. Ergo the rest of your comment regarding financial benefits for women with children is a bit irrelevant in the matter of the question of validating same sex marriage in the US.

The real motive for most couples in the US, apparently, is a pronouncement of love which is recognised in marriage. The legal ramifications of the contract are icing on the cake.
Realtalkdotcom

Sacramento, CA

#189922 Apr 23, 2013
An observer wrote:
Huge misguding and propaganda goes around.
Marriage institute is not a personal preference and it is not about the rights or love.
It is a privilege establish by the society to the women, let her comfortable to have a child and be financially protected if man decide to live her after having sex with her.
If the married couple have love and live together they don't need a goverment to secure that living.
That institution made to share responsibility for the result of sex relationship which could end up with birth of child.
In many cultures marriage without children is annulled or could be annulled by that reason. Christian based culture more generos and not making the birth a contegency on the protection guaranties to the women.
If people want to have a protection on contract they need to write one and enforce it under regular law regardless to the fact that they have sexull intercourse or not.
But the real motive is a goverment benefits to the marriage institute.
The vote result shows that general public has no interest in sponsoring tax breaks for inheritance of individual who could not produce children. That tax break was design to protect children and women who could earn money because she was carring children.
Why are friends passing property to each other must be treated differently if they are f... or not? We all love friends, parents, siblings , children without sexual relationship and we want them the same privileges in the tax as well unfortunately we can't afford it now.(or may be we should vote on it?)
You see the question do we want to give tax brakes to rich homosectual or not, is the question for the majority and have nothing to do with human rights.
Unfortunaly the have huge money and good lobby to fix result of people vote.
OMG dude r u f'ing kidding me? U have the spelling and grammar of an 8 yr old. Please tell me u r a foreigner, that is currently enrolled in an English as a second language class.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hemet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Can white people call themselves African American? (Sep '12) Sep 26 Regolith Based Li... 153
News Teens protest legislation (Mar '06) Sep 25 Indo frank 213
Anything to do in Hemet for teenagers? Sep 25 David F Miller 3
Black People in Hemet (Jan '10) Sep 25 Nasty spill 483
Hemet Domestic violence. . bad and getting worst. Sep 24 Vic_Rode 58
Man assaults kids at McDonalds-east florida on ... (Jul '13) Sep 24 Vic_Rode 290
Hemet wife beaters (Jul '14) Sep 24 Dr Kruer MD 37

Hemet Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hemet Mortgages