Families are the foundation of society, the building blocks. Especially marriages with children. Thus justified government perks. To encourage marriage. If there were no government perks for marriage, we wouldn't be having this discussion.<quoted text>
t is like saying since most people that are married have brown eyes, brown eyed marriages are directly related to marriage and so we should look down on people that marry that have blue eyes
I donít think there should be any "perks" for having children myself but that is a different subject.
The only connection they need to get out of their heads is that the ability to have, or intent to have children has not now nor ever been a requirement for a couple to marry.
Same Sex marriage does not change that one tiny little bit
I think it is dumb for them to keep bringing up a tactic that has already failed as they have been unable to show that procreation has ever been a requirement for a marriage license.
I believe there should only be government benefits for families with children regardless of their parents marital status or sexual preference. And lesser benefits if any for families without children since marriage is good for society. ALL marriage, even unpopular ones like those child molesting welfare cheating polygamists. And yes, siblings.
WOO HOOO! Gimme some lucky charms.