LOL. You are so dumb.<quoted text>
F the majority? Wow, isn't that how Obama won, twice, by a majority vote?
OK so fudge the majority who voted for him!
Do you understand that?
Was that supposed to make sense, or was it written by a random word generator?The constitution does promise equal rights, but it does not mention having a legal definition having equal rights?
A man's right is being violated, because he doesn't have a right to marry a man. That's a right a woman has.A definition is just that and nothing more, a definition, and it can not deny anything, it's just a definition under the law of what the majority of society says marriage is, it does not refuse gays to marry or to be happy.
No ones rights are being violated,
And a woman's right is being violated because she doesn't have a right a man does.
Fk 'em. The Constitution promises equal rights.all you want is to change a legal definition, by which the majority of voters in this country still want to be that marriage is by this legal definition, between a man and a woman.
What about "idiots"?Gays can and do get married all over this country in any way shape and form they want, and this definition has not stopped them from doing so.
And just a suggestion, if you want people, that is the majority of Americans to understand and be sympathetic to your point of view, calling them all "Morons" is not going to help!