Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 8,015)

Showing posts 160,281 - 160,300 of199,087
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183604
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Same question.
If you don't know the cause how can you assert the result?
The epi-marker defect is all but proved. What does that say about the APA?
Snicker.
Do you know what's funny? If you google the words "epi-marker defect" or "epi-marker mistake" (with quotations) the only results you'll get are your comments on topix.

There aren't any scientists who use those terms. You made them up.

And what do you think will happen "if" someone finds out how to determine if an embryo has the potential to be gay--to have a "birth defect", as you like to say?

Obviously there's not going to be a "cure"--at least not for several generations.

Will you suddenly become an advocate for abortion? Will you want to kill the gay embryos? Will you demand that they be hacked to pieces and sucked out of their mother's wombs?

Bottom line, you're an idiot... You wouldn't know an "epi-marker" if it jumped up and slapped you in the face.

Get a life. Stop pretending to be a scientist.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183606
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Same sex sexual behavior is not new. Use of the term "homosexual" to describe it, or those who engage in such behavior, is relatively new.
So... Is there an argument in there somewhere?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183607
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
So... Is there an argument in there somewhere?
Argument that same sex sexual behavior is not new? No.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183608
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Apollo11911 wrote:
<quoted text>Are you stupid?
This from a person who claims, "I am a God". If that's the case, everyone is stupid to you. We are not worthy to be in your in presence. In the words of Bugs Bunny, "What a maroon"!
Robsan5

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183609
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>wow you are vile and vulgar and very nasty. Get some help, sounds like u might be a sex addict, what a waste of time that is.
How bout you fagg@t, want a d!ck up your a.ss?

Robert
Some Never Came Home

Tempe, AZ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183610
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Robsan5 wrote:
<quoted text>
How bout you fagg@t, want a d!ck up your a.ss?
Robert
So says the honor-less psychotic human POS who has butt sex on his mind 24/7/365 and posts incessantly about it! I'd have to say it is YOU who is jealous and wants him some of that action! YOU are a frigging idiot! Sorry but I'm not into the action you're yearning for,look somewhere else you sick fuque! LOLOL

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183611
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Argument that same sex sexual behavior is not new? No.
Yeah... Pretty much for eons.

Since: Jan 10

Lewis Center, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183612
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Same question.
If you don't know the cause how can you assert the result?
The epi-marker defect is all but proved. What does that say about the APA?
Snicker.
Dummy ďall but provedĒ means it hasnít been proved. The real question is what does that say about you?

Since: Jan 10

Lewis Center, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183615
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Argument that same sex sexual behavior is not new? No.
Do you realize that you wrote a double negative?
Robsan5

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183616
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

Some Never Came Home wrote:
<quoted text>So says the honor-less psychotic human POS who has butt sex on his mind 24/7/365 and posts incessantly about it! I'd have to say it is YOU who is jealous and wants him some of that action! YOU are a frigging idiot! Sorry but I'm not into the action you're yearning for,look somewhere else you sick fuque! LOLOL
Hey fagg@t, how bout a big d!ck up your a.ss?

Robert
Some Never Came Home

Tempe, AZ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183617
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Robsan5 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey fagg@t, how bout a big d!ck up your a.ss?
Robert
And like clock work! IT's back with more butt sex that he loves so very much! Sorry but I'm straight! No matter how many times you ask,the answer is NO! Now move along now and head for that part of town and get back to that toe tapping you love so much down at the grey hound station! Yur funny,and not in a ha,ha way! LOLOL

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183618
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for the assist.
You are more than welcome!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183619
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Same question.
If you don't know the cause how can you assert the result?
The epi-marker defect is all but proved. What does that say about the APA?
Snicker.
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
Dummy ďall but provedĒ means it hasnít been proved. The real question is what does that say about you?
You mean like the theory of evolution?

Snicker smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183620
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Same question.
If you don't know the cause how can you assert the result?
The epi-marker defect is all but proved. What does that say about the APA?
Snicker.
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you know what's funny? If you google the words "epi-marker defect" or "epi-marker mistake" (with quotations) the only results you'll get are your comments on topix.
There aren't any scientists who use those terms. You made them up.
And what do you think will happen "if" someone finds out how to determine if an embryo has the potential to be gay--to have a "birth defect", as you like to say?
Obviously there's not going to be a "cure"--at least not for several generations.
Will you suddenly become an advocate for abortion? Will you want to kill the gay embryos? Will you demand that they be hacked to pieces and sucked out of their mother's wombs?
Bottom line, you're an idiot... You wouldn't know an "epi-marker" if it jumped up and slapped you in the face.
Get a life. Stop pretending to be a scientist.
First, we both acknowledge how stupid your assertions were that;

1. There is no pursuit of understanding homosexuality by real professionals.

2. The undiagnosed condition of homosexuality can be arbitrarily defined as 'normal'.

Second, it is interesting that you decry my terminology, but fail to post what scientists DO say about epi-marker defects. Let me help you;

http://now.msn.com/
epigenetics-study-may-explain- how-homosexuality-is-passed-on -through-epi-marks

"A new study shows that homosexuality may be the result of epigenetics, which regulates how genes are expressed using epi-marks. These sex-specific triggers perform helpful tasks, such as regulating masculinization or feminization of fetuses during development. Normally, epi-marks vanish and aren't inherited by the next generation, but in some cases, a stubborn epi-marker from a parent may stick around and get passed on to an opposite-sex child, instilling Mom's fashion sense in Raul or Dad's baritone in Suzi. Lead researcher William Rice hopes to prove his theory in the next six months."

Normally, the use of the word 'normally' precludes a distinction between normal and abnormal. A defect or mistake. Would you prefer I use the word abnormal?

Third, you make the very mistake you falsely accuse me of, trying to be a scientist. I simply and accurately quote what they say. You on the other hand, foolishly attempt to predict when a cure will occur (an admission of defect by the way).

Fourth, I have already noted before, a cure will likely come. The vast majority of people do not want their children born with defects. Moreover, they would like grandchildren, so the one thing you are right about is the use of abortion or some other means to prevent it. However, I also have noted that abortion is not a choice for Christians. In essence, we are the gays ONLY hope for existence!

Which begs the question, why are you being so mean to us?

Finally, VV, do you understand how stupid all your gay twirling will look when homosexuality is understood and even cured? Think about it. The historical response to homosexuality by every culture vindicated. All the people, faiths and institutions gays maligned exonerated. Do you think there may be even a violent reaction by people who were deliberately deceived? Pretty sobering...

Since: Mar 07

The entire US of A

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183622
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Same question.
If you don't know the cause how can you assert the result?
The epi-marker defect is all but proved. What does that say about the APA?
Snicker.
<quoted text>
You mean like the theory of evolution?
Snicker smile.
You trying to prove that being gay is genetic, and that this is a good reason to deny gay folks equality under the law?

Since: Mar 07

The entire US of A

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183623
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Same sex sexual behavior is not new. Use of the term "homosexual" to describe it, or those who engage in such behavior, is relatively new.
But people who can only be attracted to the same gender are NOT new - only our knowledge of what that means and the terms used to describe it, are.

You would still need a valid state interest in denying equal protection under the law gay couples when it comes to marriage, though, regardless of how our knowledge has grown, or the changes in the terms we use.

Can you provide that?

Since: Mar 07

The entire US of A

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183624
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
.....
Ooooooooooo...."Other than hatred".....soooooo scary.....oh the humanity...you've been spiking the rainbow kool aid again. In your world, if anyone opposes legal ssm, the secular sacred cow, it's automatically done out of "hatred".......
We only consider things to be hate based if they harm others, with no rational basis for that harm.

So, if your basic argument boils down to the idea that you don't want gay Americans to be allowed the same basic civil rights that you demand, and you shudder at the idea that their families might have the same security and protections that you want for your family, simply because you don't understand or like them, then yes, that comes off as hate.

It's certainly not love, or even indifference.

Since: Mar 07

The entire US of A

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183625
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

5

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Same question.
If you don't know the cause how can you assert the result?
The epi-marker defect is all but proved. What does that say about the APA?
Snicker.
<quoted text>
You mean like the theory of evolution?
Snicker smile.
If it's been proven, why are the only mentions of it ANYWHERE on the Web, in your posts?

Isn't that odd?
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183627
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
XBox. Do you think (_________ is going to go away? You can either adapt to reality, or you can go extinct. What else could be put in that blank? Falling marriage rates? Rising cohabitation rates? Plural marriage?
So you see, there's more to it than that.
The only thing I see is a lame dodge at answering the question.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183628
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Same question.
If you don't know the cause how can you assert the result?
The epi-marker defect is all but proved. What does that say about the APA?
Snicker.
<quoted text>
First, we both acknowledge how stupid your assertions were that;
1. There is no pursuit of understanding homosexuality by real professionals.
2. The undiagnosed condition of homosexuality can be arbitrarily defined as 'normal'.
Second, it is interesting that you decry my terminology, but fail to post what scientists DO say about epi-marker defects. Let me help you;
http://now.msn.com/
epigenetics-study-may-explain- how-homosexuality-is-passed-on -through-epi-marks
"A new study shows that homosexuality may be the result of epigenetics, which regulates how genes are expressed using epi-marks. These sex-specific triggers perform helpful tasks, such as regulating masculinization or feminization of fetuses during development. Normally, epi-marks vanish and aren't inherited by the next generation, but in some cases, a stubborn epi-marker from a parent may stick around and get passed on to an opposite-sex child, instilling Mom's fashion sense in Raul or Dad's baritone in Suzi. Lead researcher William Rice hopes to prove his theory in the next six months."
Normally, the use of the word 'normally' precludes a distinction between normal and abnormal. A defect or mistake. Would you prefer I use the word abnormal?
Third, you make the very mistake you falsely accuse me of, trying to be a scientist. I simply and accurately quote what they say. You on the other hand, foolishly attempt to predict when a cure will occur (an admission of defect by the way).
Fourth, I have already noted before, a cure will likely come. The vast majority of people do not want their children born with defects. Moreover, they would like grandchildren, so the one thing you are right about is the use of abortion or some other means to prevent it. However, I also have noted that abortion is not a choice for Christians. In essence, we are the gays ONLY hope for existence!
Which begs the question, why are you being so mean to us?
Finally, VV, do you understand how stupid all your gay twirling will look when homosexuality is understood and even cured? Think about it. The historical response to homosexuality by every culture vindicated. All the people, faiths and institutions gays maligned exonerated. Do you think there may be even a violent reaction by people who were deliberately deceived? Pretty sobering...
You are the gays only hope for existence?????

hahahahaha
ahahahahhahaha
ahahahahahahah
ahahhahahahaha
ahahahahahahah

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 160,281 - 160,300 of199,087
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

14 Users are viewing the Hemet Forum right now

Search the Hemet Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Recall papers served on 3 Hemet council members 34 min Save Hemet 17
robert galetta is rebuild hemet (Nov '12) 40 min Franklin 12
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 1 hr The Dog 15,660
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 1 hr Drafty 4,559
Lt. Sue Trevino is taking over as San Jacinto p... (May '10) 2 hr Truth 13
ANTI-ABORTION: Roe v Wade commemorations in Hem... 21 hr NoahRS 4
sad sad sad:/ 23 hr Right 10
•••
•••

Hemet News Video

•••
Hemet Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Hemet Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Hemet People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••