Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201853 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181436 Feb 26, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Ohhhhh.....so the "D" stands for denial? What frighten? Why would it matter to you if plural marriage in some form was given legal recognition? Would it crash your Big Fat Gay Wedding?
Big D is quite the ignorant bigot.

He says most people (not him of course!) see polygamists as child abusers and welfare cheats. That's the "face of polygamy" he says. And polygamists use polygamy to commit their crimes. Then he says not enough people want it for it to be worthy anyway.

Nice!

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#181437 Feb 26, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why can't I marry my sister?
Umm she hates your lying no good two timing dead beat azz???

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#181438 Feb 26, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Big D is quite the ignorant bigot.
He says most people (not him of course!) see polygamists as child abusers and welfare cheats. That's the "face of polygamy" he says. And polygamists use polygamy to commit their crimes. Then he says not enough people want it for it to be worthy anyway.
Nice!
Stuck on stupid.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#181439 Feb 26, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact is, when no-fault divorce was extended across the country, divorce skyrocketed. Quickly the rate of couples living together outside of marriage also shot up. Moreover, single parenthood also has become nearly as common as heterosexual parenthood.
In other words, when we diluted marriage by ignoring the consideration of children, marriage has become a cheap, disposable option. In every aspect of social measurement, the result has been devastating for everyone.
Now gays are demanding we totally remove the consideration of children. Rizzo is right. Monogamy and marriage will only accelerate in their demise.
Sad and stupid.
EXACTLY! Finally a ray of reason. Bravo
CXopo

Covina, CA

#181440 Feb 26, 2013
GOP, Republicans and Tea Bagger's are truely the filth of the land.

The sooner they are removed from holding office the better for all.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#181441 Feb 26, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact is, when no-fault divorce was extended across the country, divorce skyrocketed. Quickly the rate of couples living together outside of marriage also shot up. Moreover, single parenthood also has become nearly as common as heterosexual parenthood.
In other words, when we diluted marriage by ignoring the consideration of children, marriage has become a cheap, disposable option. In every aspect of social measurement, the result has been devastating for everyone.
Now gays are demanding we totally remove the consideration of children. Rizzo is right. Monogamy and marriage will only accelerate in their demise.
Rose's Law:
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"
You are lying, nobody is demanding anybody totally remove the consideration of children.
KiMare wrote:
Sad and stupid.
Yes, you are.
CXopo

Covina, CA

#181442 Feb 26, 2013
Give it a rest, I've said all that needs to be said on this matter so shut up.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#181443 Feb 26, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Rose's Law:
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"

You are lying, nobody is demanding anybody totally remove the consideration of children.
I'm shocked!!!

You undermine your own counter.

Ho, Ho, Ho.
Razored

Covina, CA

#181445 Feb 26, 2013
You know why so many Glendora, California politicans and their friends hate " TOPIX.COM , right?

Things get said here that nobody else will print.

The truth is their worst enemy, and that is what you get here.

But then you get nasty posting blogers who rant and rave, threated posters etc. typical Glendora Racists etc.

The Glendora Police Department knows who they are bu they are told by City Hall officials and City Council member's not to stop them from posting threatening messages.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181446 Feb 26, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Stuck on stupid.
Well try to get unstuck, stupid. Don't tell me. I know you are and it makes it easy for me.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#181448 Feb 26, 2013
Edgar wrote:
<quoted text>
You bet, buddy.
History has shown this: given enough momentum, a rights-activism movement in America cannot be stopped (i.e. racial equality, gender equality, the American revolution...)
Everyone has a purpose. That's what sets the two sides of this debate apart; one side's extreme is shown to consistently show more faith in human capability than the other.
And it ain't your side, if I may resort to briefly using Texan slang.
It's not my fault you are a bigot.

BTW, what is my side? We all know you can't answer that question.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#181449 Feb 26, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
Moreover, homosexuality is a far more promiscuous orientation than heterosexuality.
Jealous?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181450 Feb 26, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Umm she hates your lying no good two timing dead beat azz???
No, that's not it.

It's because it used to be believed that procreation between close relatives causes medical problems in the offspring.

This had proven to be greatly exaggerated and mostly false.

But the old law remains.

Try and get unstuck from stupid fruitcake.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#181451 Feb 26, 2013
Edgar wrote:
<quoted text>
If you want to legalize multiple-partner marriage than go right on ahead, see where you get.
Interesting, so you aren't for equal right's? I figured since you have claimed the moral high ground you would be.

But that's OK, bigot.
Paroolah Busw3aanaritsa

Sonoma, CA

#181452 Feb 26, 2013
Buy many disposable bags soonest. We have them on sale. Immediately when your dollar devalues you will want to sell them back but we will be only be able to offer a fraction of the money you have invested. We love a bargain and your stoopid sequester guarantees that all of Afrika will be able to buy you out cheap when the tumble of your economy has ended. Great plan. Haaaagh!
Strategic thinking.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#181453 Feb 26, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Stupid, don't have a right to be happy. As horrible as you are, you obviously aren't, and no law is being broken.
Wow, you need med's... Lots of them!!!!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#181454 Feb 26, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you have a point?
No, you don't. You're just a bitter troll.
I do, but we don't expect you to understand it.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#181455 Feb 26, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you have a point? You post doesn't have anything to do with arguments for or against gay marriage.
I can't help it if you are confused, that has been an issue of yours since long before I began posting here, I can hardly fix your ignorance.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181456 Feb 26, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not my fault you are a bigot.
BTW, what is my side? We all know you can't answer that question.
Like Pietro succinctly put it, what's good for the gay goose is not good for the poly gander.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#181457 Feb 26, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>
Please indicate how property disbursement will be allocated in a poly marriage where a man has say 4 wives.
wife # 1 , married 15 years, 5 children
wife #2, married 10 years, 4 children
wife #3 Married, 5 years,3 children
wife # 4 married 1 year, 1 child
The husband wishes to divorce wife #1. Will she get the house, and a bulk of his assets? How will that be fair to the 3 remaining wives.
He wants to divorce all 4, how will the property be split, will it be based on duration of each marriage.
The husband dies, at that point all 4 are widows, tell me Frank who will receive his social security, for the children, will each of them receive the same?
As you can see same sex marriages will not affect any standing laws.
Last I checked, the difficulty of applying equality wasn't a litmus test for granting it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hemet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Murder of TRACY WOODS (Jun '12) 1 hr jeannie 10
News Your Views - 06/03 (Jun '11) 23 hr positronium 8
Can white people call themselves African American? (Sep '12) Jul 25 who cares 113
News Would-be bird rescuers ticketed by officers (Jun '06) Jul 24 Tacy Hunt 4
GOScH Auto Group Sucks (Dec '11) Jul 21 chris 41
Menifee Authors Jul 20 286author 2
FUBU Clothing Company is Racist (Oct '12) Jul 20 fufbufan 50
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hemet Mortgages