Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201887 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Neil Andblowme

West New York, NJ

#179478 Feb 13, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
On what grounds might that be? And no, not the "they're already kin" dodge either.
But they ARE, Blanche.
FatOffs

Covina, CA

#179479 Feb 13, 2013
New Jersey, that's where that FAT governor lives?

Maybe Chris Christie has eaten too many "heart Attack Burgers".
Neil Andblowme

West New York, NJ

#179480 Feb 13, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>That one is so gonna run up your vote total.
He must be up to about 500 by now.
Frankie RIzzo

Hayward, CA

#179481 Feb 13, 2013
Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>But they ARE, Blanche.
So what? So's my cousin and I can marry her.

She won't even have to change her name. Please explain that to us Miss Thing.
Frankie RIzzo

Hayward, CA

#179482 Feb 13, 2013
Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>He must be up to about 500 by now.
Not quite, Jizzy cannot effectively rig the votes that fast. Takes him a little time. It's a rather tedious process, and a very challenging one for an idiot like Jizzy!

Not to mention childishly silly. But that's our dopey Jizmbirdy58! He's an arrested development loser/idiot.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#179483 Feb 13, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I have no idea
still that idea would work
every religion could define "marriage" for their own little private cult
and the government would only recognize the contract of a civil union, which is all the government needs, the legal contract.
One church could call marriage between only a man and a woman
Another church could do same sex marriages
and even Mormon boy could have his poly marriage and call it that
and all would be recognized equally by the law governing civil unions
and they could point fingers at each other all day long calling the other heathens and it would mean absolutely nothing.
The nice part about doing it that way is that even non-relationship unions could be done. 2 older women for example not in a sexual relationship, but close friends with no family could join in such a civil contract for mutual support.
Hmmmmmm....can't say that it doesn't have any merit.....perhaps the gov't could issue a "relationship coupon" good for one relationship of one's choice complete with gov't benefits. Kody uses his for wife number 1, she uses it for wife #2, who in turn uses it for wife #3. That would help the fundamentalist Mormons.

I don't think it'd fly though.. Let's just keep marriage as a conjugal union of husband and wife. But we'll use the civil union concept for non conjugal marital unions. Everybody wins. Thanks for the idea Big D.
Tops

Covina, CA

#179484 Feb 13, 2013
You were not invited to comment.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#179485 Feb 13, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>

One church could call marriage between only a man and a woman
Another church could do same sex marriages
Lawsuits idiot! Just like the Boy Scouts. Churches would have their tax exemption taken away if they discriminate against gays being married and sued.
Frankie RIzzo

Hayward, CA

#179486 Feb 13, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Hmmmmmm....can't say that it doesn't have any merit.....perhaps the gov't could issue a "relationship coupon" good for one relationship of one's choice complete with gov't benefits. Kody uses his for wife number 1, she uses it for wife #2, who in turn uses it for wife #3. That would help the fundamentalist Mormons.
I don't think it'd fly though.. Let's just keep marriage as a conjugal union of husband and wife. But we'll use the civil union concept for non conjugal marital unions. Everybody wins. Thanks for the idea Big D.
Of course Big D's plan is stupid. His first job to initiate it would be to tell all the gay married couples that he's downgrading their marriages to civil unions. I'd love to see how that works out for him!

Then of course he'll have to sell it to all the hetero married couples.

Big D is a simplistic dummy and we can safely dismiss his views on the subject as naivety and dopiness.

I don't mean to be so rude, it's just that he is insignificant.
Neil Andblowme

West New York, NJ

#179487 Feb 13, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
Let's just keep marriage as a conjugal union of husband and wife. But we'll use the civil union concept for non conjugal marital unions. Everybody wins. Thanks for the idea Big D.
That ship has sailed..... sorry.
Neil Andblowme

West New York, NJ

#179488 Feb 13, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Lawsuits idiot! Just like the Boy Scouts. Churches would have their tax exemption taken away if they discriminate against gays being married and sued.
What a liar.
Frankie RIzzo

Hayward, CA

#179489 Feb 13, 2013
Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>
That ship has sailed..... sorry.
Yes! And soon other ships will sail too. In it's wake.

Oh that's right! Those ships are "illegal"! So that can't happen. Silly me.
Frankie RIzzo

Hayward, CA

#179490 Feb 13, 2013
Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>
What a liar.
What a jackass!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179491 Feb 13, 2013
Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>
What a liar.
Yeah we have noticed that
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179492 Feb 13, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course Big D's plan is stupid. His first job to initiate it would be to tell all the gay married couples that he's downgrading their marriages to civil unions. I'd love to see how that works out for him!
Then of course he'll have to sell it to all the hetero married couples.
Big D is a simplistic dummy and we can safely dismiss his views on the subject as naivety and dopiness.
I don't mean to be so rude, it's just that he is insignificant.
Yes, I have heard that from Gay friends of mine, they didnt like the idea either.

But I still think it would solve all the issues

It wont happen I know... it is a shame
Frankie RIzzo

Hayward, CA

#179493 Feb 13, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, I have heard that from Gay friends of mine, they didnt like the idea either.
But I still think it would solve all the issues
It wont happen I know... it is a shame
I call bullsh!t, you don't have any gay friends.

Another dopey fake Big D story.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#179495 Feb 13, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Lawsuits idiot! Just like the Boy Scouts. Churches would have their tax exemption taken away if they discriminate against gays being married and sued.
Not true.

Churches have always had the right to turn away anyone for any reason.

The states that already have marriage equality have stated that churches are under no obligation whatever to marry people.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#179496 Feb 13, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Not true.
Churches have always had the right to turn away anyone for any reason.
The states that already have marriage equality have stated that churches are under no obligation whatever to marry people.
True...right now. Of course no gay in their right mind would file suit against a Church until it's legal in all States. The cause comes first, I'm talking about the future.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#179497 Feb 13, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I call bullsh!t, you don't have any gay friends.
Another dopey fake Big D story.
He's a sad old man that lives in the past thinking he is smarter then everyone else. He hates to be challenged.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#179498 Feb 13, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Good point.....Dusty, your response.
My response, you and your fellow troll are trying to kill the forum by flooding it with red herring posts. Guess you know there is no real argument against gay marriage, and that is why you are doing it. Your fellow troll is clearly flying under false colors, and is really against gay marriage, just like you are.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hemet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Legalized Panhandling @ Stater Bros!!! Menifee (Apr '10) 10 hr Well Well 10
truth about scientology Tue ex - scientologis... 1
soboba indains beat teen girls 2x while walking... (Sep '09) Dec 3 Hpinkmi 13
News Gay priest from Redlands discusses sexuality, r... (Feb '15) Nov 29 Mike 11
Are black people afraid of if crosswalks? (Jan '12) Nov 28 Regolith Based Li... 22
young gay guys in hemet (Oct '14) Nov 28 tellinitlikeitis 17
Can white people call themselves African American? (Sep '12) Nov 26 Realest 154

Hemet Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hemet Mortgages