Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201854 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#179096 Feb 9, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You didnít understand what he was saying, you didnít understand my response
You donít have a clue what others are saying... you donít have enough information to be a part of the conversation.
You are like a little kid in the back seat that only gets about every 5th word said
You're getting to resemble Chongo, with the made up bullshit.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#179097 Feb 9, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope. If the married husband wants to marry another woman, the wife should have that right too....Equality for all, remember ? Eat your words, Chongo, eat them.
She has the right to want to, just like he does. Equal, Bigfoot, equal.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#179098 Feb 9, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
Top ten Asshats on topix
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Frankie RIzzo
Yeah, you sure fooled us all, with that list.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#179099 Feb 9, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>You asked for the list, I gave it to you. Did you see it? Therefore it a real list.
You're not married, you're a child.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#179100 Feb 9, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
No, they don't, fucktard.
Yes, they do, Bigfoot. If a polygamist walks into the JP and asks to marry more than one person, they will be told the same thing anybody else is told. That's equal. Should people be allowed to marry more than one person? Well, that's not really the topic here, why not start a forum and talk about it? Oh, yeah, you don't really give a damn about polygamy, you are just against gay marriage, but can't come up with a good argument against it, so you try to cloud the issue by bringing up polygamy.(Notice, I'm not taking a stand on polygamy.)
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#179101 Feb 9, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text> I asked Big D, Rose No-Ho that and myself are many. Judging from the Judgits there are many more. Would you care for more people to tell you the same thing? I can put it up for a vote if you like. Maybe a poll on Topix. Is Frankie Rizzo an asshat?
Chongo puts up all the judgits, when he has run out of crack, we all know where they come from.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#179102 Feb 9, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Um, so what?
Husbands and wives will still have sex.
Uh Rose...I didn't say they wouldn't.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#179103 Feb 9, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>It was private.
You ignorant moron, do you think that your shallow bullshit fools anyone ? you are seriously an embarrassment to all the people on this forum. "Private" ? If, and I say "if", you took a "private" poll, Why would you even bring it up in public ? you are seriously the most moronic ass-puppet in here. Childish evasions that even Chongo would be embarrassed to use.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#179104 Feb 9, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Your advocating asshatness.
Aw, STFU, I took a poll and everyone agreed that you're childish, beyond hope.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179105 Feb 9, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
No, they don't, fucktard.
She's using the same argument she hates when used against same sex marriage!

She's so dishonest. Or really, really stupid. Or both.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179106 Feb 9, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Aw, STFU, I took a poll and everyone agreed that you're childish, beyond hope.
Jizzybird has made a thread for me! But it backfired on him. Too funny!

Come over and rattle his cage for big fun!
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179107 Feb 9, 2013
The dummy Jizzybird's thread he made for me-

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/gay/TUNATFE41...
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#179108 Feb 9, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I was just laughing at him complaining about the link, it worked for me, maybe he is computer challenged.
There is a special living facility for the computer impaired
More lies, from Big Deceitful.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#179109 Feb 9, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh Rose...I didn't say they wouldn't.
Then, um, so what?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#179110 Feb 9, 2013
Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>
Not really sure what you mean by "all marriage equality" there Frankie boy but I hazard to guess you mean
1. Marrying children
2. Marrying blood relatives, i.e. mom & son, father & daughter, brother & sister.
3. Marrying your pet.
4. polygamy
First you are using the slippery slope fallacy. But just to answer your stupidity.
1. There is thing called AGE OF CONSENT. Children can not give their consent to sex and marriage. ergo it will remain illegal.
CASED CLOSED
2. Therre are health issues with marrying close relatives, which is why it is illegal. You can easily see what happens by studying British and Russian royalty in the 1600-1800's, particularly the Tsar family, you will notice the high rate of hemophilia. And that was with cousins marrying cousins. No telling what would have happened between direct family members...well I take that back...you are a prime example.
3. Besides from the obvious health issues, animals can not give their consent to marriage....so it would be rape.
4. marriage above all else is a social contract. Inheritances, medical decisions, etc are all part of that contract. With polygamy, the lines of who gets what, who makes what decisions are blurred and lead to legal battles. Does one of the wives who is not the mother of one of the children in the marriage get to make medical decisions for that child is a prime example of why polygamy is illegal.
These are all rational, logical reasons why the slippery slope fallacy is moot. However, judging by your previous posts, intelligent logical debate is not your forte. Debating with a wall has better results.
Just to clarify,#1 and #3 are your additions. As for #2, there is no risk of developing hemophilia by marrying your close/blood relatives. As we have been told that procreation is not a valid marriage point, there is no basis for worrying about children of these marriages. Slippery slope #1...
As for #4, these are issues that can be covered by a contract, so this is slippery slope #2...
Don't be so stupid, next time, if you can help it....
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#179111 Feb 9, 2013
Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>
are these rhetoric questions, or do you want answers?
You mean "rhetorical", not "rhetoric", and you meant to type "borne out", not "bore out"....No answers required.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#179112 Feb 9, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
The dummy Jizzybird's thread he made for me-
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/gay/TUNATFE41...
Yeah, I caught the subsequent one that he had to create, after the fact. The original one that he listed didn't work.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179113 Feb 9, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, I caught the subsequent one that he had to create, after the fact. The original one that he listed didn't work.
He has trouble posting links due to the fact that he is stupid.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179114 Feb 9, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
How silly. there is no list, else you'd be on it.
It's an imaginary list.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179115 Feb 9, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
You are spinning. The number is 41. Not 32. Actually, you are not spinning, you are flat out lying.
Big D is an unabashed liar. If you call him on it, he'll accuse you of lying.

I call it Big D's Liar Straw Man. He attempts to get you to defend yourself to take the attention away from his lies. Of course it only works for so long.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hemet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Poll Has Hemet become a dumping ground for parolees ... 7 hr Terry 2
Murder of TRACY WOODS (Jun '12) Wed jeannie 10
News Your Views - 06/03 (Jun '11) Tue positronium 8
Can white people call themselves African American? (Sep '12) Jul 25 who cares 113
News Would-be bird rescuers ticketed by officers (Jun '06) Jul 24 Tacy Hunt 4
GOScH Auto Group Sucks (Dec '11) Jul 21 chris 41
Menifee Authors Jul 20 286author 2
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hemet Mortgages