Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
155,841 - 155,860 of 200,578 Comments Last updated 3 min ago

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178743
Feb 7, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
If you actually gave a damn about polygamy, you'd start a topic about it. But you don't care. You are just against gay marriage, yet can't come up with an argument against it, so you bring up the red herring of polygamy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring
You're a trip...me think thouest protest too much.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178744
Feb 7, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
You're a trip...me think thouest protest too much.
You don't even know what "protest too much" means.
Gunney

Monrovia, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178745
Feb 7, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

The Department of Homeland Security is set to purchase a further 21.6 million rounds of ammunition.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178746
Feb 7, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
If you actually gave a damn about polygamy, you'd start a topic about it. But you don't care. You are just against gay marriage, yet can't come up with an argument against it, so you bring up the red herring of polygamy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring
If you actually gave a damn about ",marriage equality", you'd see that others, polygamists, just might want in on that too.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178747
Feb 7, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
If you actually gave a damn about ",marriage equality", you'd see that others, polygamists, just might want in on that too.
Polygamists already have marriage equality.
Next.
GlassEye

Monrovia, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178752
Feb 7, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

The glass eye of fate is watching you.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178753
Feb 7, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Polygamists already have marriage equality.
Next.
Rose

Why not include polygamists/ plural marriage practioners in the marriage equality movement? If the objective is to "expand" who can marry, it makes sense to include plural marriage. What exactly is the issue?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178754
Feb 7, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Rose
Why not include polygamists/ plural marriage practioners in the marriage equality movement? If the objective is to "expand" who can marry, it makes sense to include plural marriage. What exactly is the issue?
Polygamists already have marriage equality.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178756
Feb 7, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Rose
Why not include polygamists/ plural marriage practioners in the marriage equality movement? If the objective is to "expand" who can marry, it makes sense to include plural marriage. What exactly is the issue?
Why not come up with a fresh argument that actually details why SSM should be illegal?

Kimare says SSM is here and there's nothing "y'all" can do about it.

Man up and get on with your lives (so says Kimare).

“Get it right”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178757
Feb 7, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You are fading out.
And boring.
Must be humiliating...
Smirk smile.
... I am also correct.

“Get it right”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178758
Feb 7, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Rose
Why not include polygamists/ plural marriage practioners in the marriage equality movement? If the objective is to "expand" who can marry, it makes sense to include plural marriage. What exactly is the issue?
I would like to understand your viewpoint on a couple items. Would you kindly please clarify:
1) Are you in favor of polygamy or against it?
2) Are you in favor of SSM or against it?
Thank you in advance.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178759
Feb 7, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

chance47 wrote:
<quoted text>
I would like to understand your viewpoint on a couple items. Would you kindly please clarify:
1) Are you in favor of polygamy or against it?
2) Are you in favor of SSM or against it?
Thank you in advance.
I am in favor of same sex marriage and polygamy.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178760
Feb 7, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Imprtnrd wrote:
<quoted text>There is NO equality in a polygamy marriage. Other than that.....it's a go.
?
Nay Nay

Corona, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178761
Feb 7, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>Government healthcare? What have you got against Medicare?
That I have to pay a penalty if I don't want it, mainly.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178762
Feb 8, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

chance47 wrote:
<quoted text>
... I am also correct.
In the Egyptian sense of the word...

Smile.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178763
Feb 8, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Why not come up with a fresh argument that actually details why SSM should be illegal?
There's no compelling need for it. Why, in the 21st century, is there a sudden need for men to "marry" men, or women to "marry" women?
Kimare says SSM is here and there's nothing "y'all" can do about it.
Maybe....maybe not. Perhaps its "growth" can be halted.
Man up and get on with your lives (so says Kimare).
Or "woman up", I suppose.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178764
Feb 8, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Why not come up with a fresh argument that actually details why SSM should be illegal?
Kimare says SSM is here and there's nothing "y'all" can do about it.
Man up and get on with your lives (so says Kimare).
There is no such thing as ssm. Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. Gay couples would only qualify as 'unmarriage'.

8000 years of human history has repeatedly affirmed that any minor rise of homosexual couple acceptance is extremely short lived. I'm betting on a repeat.

Man up and quit trying to infringe on benefits and rights of women and children!

Smirk.
Largelanguage

Chester, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178765
Feb 8, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes he is using it as the standard diversionary tactic used by most opposed to same sex marriage, which is why most of us donít believe him when he says he is for it.
No one has been able to come up with any valid reason not to allow same sex marriage, not even in court, that is why you are losing court battle after court battle.
So they go after the bait and switch diversionary tactic.
It will still fail of course, justice will win and you will lose.
It is already legal in a growing number of states and countries, you are on the wrong side of history.
Missouri put its ban back into place.
Largelanguage

Chester, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178766
Feb 8, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

3

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Even funnier? The fact you think that analogy is apt.
Stupid, you don't have to be able to spawn in order to marry.
Period.
<quoted text>
Is your mutation a blunder? A defect? Should you have been aborted?
After all, you don't just say you are a mutation, but a monster mutation.
LOL!
You have to spawn and be born in order to exist, and you have to exist in order to marry.

Since: Mar 07

The entire US of A

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178767
Feb 8, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

4

Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
You have to spawn and be born in order to exist, and you have to exist in order to marry.
Actually, many people exist who have never spawned.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Hemet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 8 hr Bee Keepers 4,977
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 14 hr facts faced 15,929
McDonalds 22 hr tye 1 4
EBT Cards Tue TellThem 3
HEMET: Confusion over write-in votes cleared up (Nov '12) Tue Teabag Sanchez 10
Home Wrecker Mon mad mom 6
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) Mon Mudflys to 7,901

Search the Hemet Forum:
•••

Hemet News Video

•••
•••

Hemet Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Hemet People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Hemet News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Hemet
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••