Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Frankie Rizzo]

sheesh void of hate wrote:

<quoted text>
Now you want to play with my danglies! Great! Thanks but no thanks. Are you still WINNING!? Mind if I refer to you as Charlie Sheen? How about Chuckie Glisten?

Winner winner Largelanguage dinner.

[Bandannas]

No more today, your still a out of towners blowhard

[sheesh void of hate]

Badnannas wrote:

No more today, your still a out of towners blowhard

No more what?

[KiMare]

KiMare wrote:
Here is a simple explanation of the difference;
A fruit tree bearing fruit.
A fruit tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A nut tree who never bears fruit wanting to be a fruit tree.
A nut tree hanging fruit on it's branches pretending to be a fruit tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' fruit trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call nut trees fruit trees too!
Hilarious!!!
<quoted text>
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples are the picture of defective failure. Mating behavior gone abusive with NOTHING to show for it.
Sociologist say marriage would not exist if it were not for children.
But of more importance, someone who murders their own child has no platform to claim children are not a part of marriage. You should be in jail.
Sad.

sheesh void of hate wrote:

<quoted text>
Anthropomorphisation of trees - DUMB!
Did it give you wood?

You took that literally? Really?

Are you really, really really sure you were not just playing dumb to avoid admitting using the trees as a type exposed the ridiculousness of gay twirl?

SMirk.

[sheesh void of hate]

KiMare wrote:

KiMare wrote:
Here is a simple explanation of the difference;
A fruit tree bearing fruit.
A fruit tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A nut tree who never bears fruit wanting to be a fruit tree.
A nut tree hanging fruit on it's branches pretending to be a fruit tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' fruit trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call nut trees fruit trees too!
Hilarious!!!
<quoted text>
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples are the picture of defective failure. Mating behavior gone abusive with NOTHING to show for it.
Sociologist say marriage would not exist if it were not for children.
But of more importance, someone who murders their own child has no platform to claim children are not a part of marriage. You should be in jail.
Sad.
<quoted text>
You took that literally? Really?
Are you really, really really sure you were not just playing dumb to avoid admitting using the trees as a type exposed the ridiculousness of gay twirl?
SMirk.

Are you really so dumb to not know that I didn't take it literally? Nope, it is a dumb analogy. Plain and simple. I'm quite happy you took the time to compose it though. It speaks volumes about you. Or was it something you copied? Which sheds more light.

DUMB!

[Bandannas]

No more today, your still a out of towners blowhards, P.S. get your hang nails cut and filed.

d-CON works wonder's have you tried any lately?

Will it work on those shanks callingthemselves tea party community members?

[Bag O beans]

Keep the lamp lite so you can blow the windows out again after to out gas from those beans, UK poster.

[Frankie Rizzo]

Bandannas wrote:

No more today, your still a out of towners blowhards, P.S. get your hang nails cut and filed.
d-CON works wonder's have you tried any lately?
Will it work on those shanks callingthemselves tea party community members?

They oughta d-CON your whole town. It sucks.

[Frankie Rizzo]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
So now you are attacking some else?

Pretty slow lately eh, Fruitloops? No bites? Change your bait. Change your depth and presentation too. Then they'll bite!

[Frankie Rizzo]

Bag O beans wrote:

Keep the lamp lite so you can blow the windows out again after to out gas from those beans, UK poster.

His bean digesting outgas is drifting straight to your town! Because your town sucks.

[sheesh void of hate]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
So now you are attacking some else?

Why are you so friggin' parandoid Chuckie? I'm not attacking anyone. I simply point out dumb as dirt comments because it is FUN! You've got the short bus market cornered, Brian_G is a close second, and KiMare has his own niche market.

[sheesh void of hate]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Pretty slow lately eh, Fruitloops? No bites? Change your bait. Change your depth and presentation too. Then they'll bite!

He is a bit of a one trick pony, ain't he?

[Frankie Rizzo]

sheesh void of hate wrote:

<quoted text>
He is a bit of a one trick pony, ain't he?

He's a funny guy. Maybe it's because he's on the wrong side of the pond.

[sheesh void of hate]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
He's a funny guy. Maybe it's because he's on the wrong side of the pond.

He's also on the wrong side of 100 when it comes to IQ.

[Dusty Mangina]

KiMare wrote:

KiMare wrote:
twirl?
SMirk.

Wow, it sure is dusty up in here.

[Brian_G]

Big D wrote:

If you have to dig that deep into a barrel of crap to come up with an arguemnt, it means you are out of arguments.

I've heard hundreds of arguments to keep marriage male/female. Maybe Bid D misunderstood:

.

Big D wrote:

The argument you are useing could be used to say hetrosexual marrages should be illegal ( poorly of course,

How's that? The argument is, people in gender segregated institutions will be unfairly treated by same sex marriage because consent is problematic where rules supersede freedom. Prisons, professional sports teams, some universities and religious institutions are gender segregated so they never needed to adapt to marriage among its population. Same sex marriage would change that.

.

Big D wrote:

just as it is a poor argumnet as you are using it )

Everyone has their own reasons; even if the sound of same sex marriage doesn't feel right to you, that feeling is real. I'd like to help you express your protection of male/female marriage and your reasons to dislike same sex marriage.

[KiMare]

sheesh void of hate wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you really so dumb to not know that I didn't take it literally? Nope, it is a dumb analogy. Plain and simple. I'm quite happy you took the time to compose it though. It speaks volumes about you. Or was it something you copied? Which sheds more light.
DUMB!

There are only two options here.

1. Either you took it literally because you used the word Anthropomorphisation.

2. Or you used a word you had no understanding of what it meant.

I would suggest you be careful about throwing the word 'dumb' around...

If I copied it, it would be in quotes.

Smirk.

[Brian_G]

sheesh void of hate wrote:

All institutions? Universtities? Mental institutions?

No, just all gender segregated institutions. Especially those where consent is problematic and freedom is limited by regulation.

.

sheesh void of hate wrote:

Honestly Brian, why do you expect anyone to take you seriously and not call you an idiot when you come up with this garbage?

You have no sympathy for the institutionalized? Am I supposed to admire your enlightenment?

.

sheesh void of hate wrote:

There really is no way to field abject stupidity other than calling it what it is.

You refuse to engage the argument; what about prisoners and their families?

.

sheesh void of hate wrote:

Where do you live that makes you think marriage will be forced upon anyone and what basis, besides irrational hysteria, do you have for making such comments?

You've never heard of prison rape?

.

sheesh void of hate wrote:

You remind me of a classmate of mine from college that would just blurt out any load of bollox that popped into his head rather than remaining silent when the conversation was over his head (which was most of the time).

You remind me of sophomores in college who claimed men and women are essentially the same and that cultural roles are artificial constructs; thanks but no thanks.

[Karpet]

Those out of towners posters made another spot on the carpet

[Brian_G]

Jazybird58 wrote:

I wonder do you lay awake at night thinking of this crap to post?

I think about what I'll post before I click the Post Comment button.

.

Jazybird58 wrote:

You cant be for real,

Everybody has their own arguments to keep marriage male/female; all those arguments are real. Try to get out of your bubble and learn about the world.

.

Jazybird58 wrote:

surley your not that damn stupid are you?

I support the Manhattan Declaration:

http://manhattandeclaration.org/man_dec_resou...

You advocate the way you like and I'll advocate my way.