By definition, you are a dumb-ass, because you have just proven Kimares point, beautifully.<quoted text>
It's funny watching a fundie trying to make an analogy!
By definition, a fruit tree is a type of tree that bears fruit.
But, stupid, the ability to reproduce isn't part of the definition of marriage.
You call yourself a monster mutation. Do you think you should have been aborted?
Here is a simple explanation of the difference;
A fruit tree bearing fruit.
A fruit tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A nut tree who never bears fruit wanting to be a fruit tree.
A nut tree hanging fruit on it's branches pretending to be a fruit tree.
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' fruit trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call nut trees fruit trees too!
1) We know that a fruit tree is a fruit tree, not a nut tree pretending to be a fruit tree.
2) We know that the nut tree doesn't bear fruit, so, by extension...
3) We know that the government doesn't require reproduction.
Thank you, for your self-fulfilled confirmation of your insanity, for arguing against the point that you have proven, perfectly.