Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,146

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#177823 Jan 31, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
That isnít a ballot measure or text of a court case
show me the official stuff you are representing, ballot measure, or court case text.
I am not going to agree with something like that until I see the official text you are bringing to court.
I'm not bringing a text to court jackass. But since you wish you could make it a requirement to allow me to discuss marriage rights, show me the official text YOU are bringing to court.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#177824 Jan 31, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>I get a good laugh from reading his ridiculous replies.
YUK!YUK!YUK!

That's a real dopey dodge! Try harder.

Why do you feel poly marriage doesn't deserve the same consideration as same sex marriage?

Please don't say "because it's illegal"! That is a ridiculous reply.
The hooders

Monrovia, CA

#177825 Jan 31, 2013
An aide to Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi claims that the Holocaust was a hoax.

This is what you get for letting the muslim brotherhood take control.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#177826 Jan 31, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I donít know why we are humoring him on this... it has nothing whatsoever to do with the subject at hand, and the courtís decision will have no effect on this.
I am not complaining at you, I am doing it to... why are we humoring him on this?
I dunno. Please tell us. Is it because you're too stupid to respond intelligently? Yeah. That's it!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#177827 Jan 31, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I will tell you that I have no problem with it in principal, but I am very untrusting of some of the most vocal adherents of it.
It through no fault of its own, has a steeper hill to climb than Homosexual marriage in the public eye, because of the activities of the most vocal, and the most fierce adherents of it. The religious overtones of it, and their defiance of our nations laws.
I honestly do not think anything will come of it for the next couple of decades, not because it is inherently wrong, but because of the activities of most adherents of it.
The concept I have no issue with, as long as everything is consensual.
I'm not asking you when you think it will go to court. Or who objects to it.

And I'm not asking you to relate your ignorance and bigotry, it shows in your ignorant bigoted comments about "it's adherents". That does give a good hint about your opinion of it's legalization though.

I am asking you if you support equality for poly MARRIAGE the same as you support equality for SAME SEX MARRIAGE.

It's a simple question. You and Janey Doody have evaded it and dodged it and straw manned it for way too long. Do you believe in equality or not? Spill the beans Big Dope!
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#177828 Jan 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I dunno. Please tell us. Is it because you're too stupid to respond intelligently? Yeah. That's it!
How would you know? You have shitty reading comprehension.
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#177829 Jan 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not asking you when you think it will go to court. Or who objects to it.
And I'm not asking you to relate your ignorance and bigotry, it shows in your ignorant bigoted comments about "it's adherents". That does give a good hint about your opinion of it's legalization though.
I am asking you if you support equality for poly MARRIAGE the same as you support equality for SAME SEX MARRIAGE.
It's a simple question. You and Janey Doody have evaded it and dodged it and straw manned it for way too long. Do you believe in equality or not? Spill the beans Big Dope!
Why are you so intent on hijacking this thread?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#177830 Jan 31, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>Ok.... maybe if I type slowly....
Where in the Constitution is the guarantee of equal rights?
OK then Your Honor, equal protection. The 14th amendment.

What a dope!

So your position is that poly should not be allowed because?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#177831 Jan 31, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
Arbitrary: Based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system.
Are you really going to sit there and say that the reason polygamy is illegal is arbitrary? Even though the topic was adjudicated by SCOTUS? Maybe you don't like the reason SCOTUS gave, but that hardly makes it arbitrary.
The number requirement is as arbitrary as the gender requirement.

On what grounds do you insist on the traditional, ARBITRARY and discriminatory number of two?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#177832 Jan 31, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
How would you know? You have shitty reading comprehension.
There you go again! Start a reading comprehension thread and get a better straw man. I don't think you'll convince many people that I have poor reading skills.

Maybe break out the arithmetic one and try that again! Poly shouldn't be allowed because 3 is not equal to two!

What a dope!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#177833 Jan 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not asking you when you think it will go to court. Or who objects to it.
And I'm not asking you to relate your ignorance and bigotry, it shows in your ignorant bigoted comments about "it's adherents". That does give a good hint about your opinion of it's legalization though.
I am asking you if you support equality for poly MARRIAGE the same as you support equality for SAME SEX MARRIAGE.
It's a simple question. You and Janey Doody have evaded it and dodged it and straw manned it for way too long. Do you believe in equality or not? Spill the beans Big Dope!
and I gave my response, take an English reading course.

I have no problem with the concept, I have a huge problem with many of the adherents of it.

I dont see any movemnet on this issue for the next couple of decades because of those adherents actions and beliefs, If even then.

I donít think I can get any simpler than that for you, do you want me to have my 9 year old grandchild answer for you in language you will understan?

and I gave my response, take an english reading course
The hooders

Monrovia, CA

#177834 Jan 31, 2013
To be a member of any radical muslim group is to part of a ignoprant group that will bring down those members.

An aide to Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi claims that the Holocaust was a hoax.

The myth of the Holocaust is an industry that America invented.

Once an idiot country, always a idiot country, thats why GOD made sand.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#177835 Jan 31, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you so intent on hijacking this thread?
Asking you provocative questions about the ban on alternate forms of marriage is not "hijacking this thread".
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#177836 Jan 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
OK then Your Honor, equal protection. The 14th amendment.
What a dope!
So your position is that poly should not be allowed because?
Equal protection, yes.... unless the State can show a legitimate interest in denying it. Do you think simple arithmetic might come into play when talking about equal? How is 3 equal to 2? How is 5 equal to two? How is 3 equal to 5?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#177837 Jan 31, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
and I gave my response, take an English reading course.
I have no problem with the concept, I have a huge problem with many of the adherents of it.
I dont see any movemnet on this issue for the next couple of decades because of those adherents actions and beliefs, If even then.
I donít think I can get any simpler than that for you, do you want me to have my 9 year old grandchild answer for you in language you will understan?
and I gave my response, take an english reading course
Most homophobes have a "huge problem" with the adherents of same sex marriage.

Your "huge problem" with the adherents of polygamy is no better.

You and Janey-Doody really ought to start that reading thread!

What a dope!
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#177838 Jan 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Asking you provocative questions about the ban on alternate forms of marriage is not "hijacking this thread".
This thread is: Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Ok?

The judge did not overturn the ban on polygamy.
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#177839 Jan 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
There you go again! Start a reading comprehension thread and get a better straw man. I don't think you'll convince many people that I have poor reading skills.
Maybe break out the arithmetic one and try that again! Poly shouldn't be allowed because 3 is not equal to two!
What a dope!
Are you trying to say three is equal to two? Maybe on your planet. Is 5 equal to two? Is 5 equal to three?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#177840 Jan 31, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>Equal protection, yes.... unless the State can show a legitimate interest in denying it. Do you think simple arithmetic might come into play when talking about equal? How is 3 equal to 2? How is 5 equal to two? How is 3 equal to 5?
The arithmetic argument against poly marriage again!(Heard it, remember dummy?).

Priceless!
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#177841 Jan 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
There you go again! Start a reading comprehension thread and get a better straw man. I don't think you'll convince many people that I have poor reading skills.
I don't need to convince anybody. It's evident from your posts that you don't understand what you read.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#177842 Jan 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Most homophobes have a "huge problem" with the adherents of same sex marriage.
Your "huge problem" with the adherents of polygamy is no better.
You and Janey-Doody really ought to start that reading thread!
What a dope!
Lean to read English.... is English you native language? Maybe I can have what I am saying translated into whatever language is used where you come from.

I donít have a huge problem with poly marriage. I have a problem with other crimes that are nearly always associated with it. And will not tolerate many of the current adherents of it and their cruel molestation and mistreatment of their young, or the fraud they use to gain multiple government assistance checks at our expense.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hemet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
HemetHEMET: Supervisors deny development in Rei... 3 hr Hemet cleanup dept 1
Cost of School District Unification Remains a C... Thu Victim 1
One dead, one wounded after incident in Hemet p... (Dec '08) Wed whoever 46
what keeps hemet from going bankrupt? (Sep '12) Nov 26 Chris 35
Black People in Hemet (Jan '10) Nov 24 PleasePlease 465
Charges dismissed in court Nov 24 unknown 4
Is sun city that quiet that I'm seeing and repl... Nov 24 Chris 2

Hemet News Video

Hemet Dating
Find my Match

Hemet People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Hemet News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Hemet

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 9:41 pm PST