Assissination of JFK - CIA/ Bush Con...
guesT

Overland Park, KS

#21 Mar 31, 2013
Now is the time to move on to Elvis
John Doe

Poplar Bluff, MO

#22 Mar 31, 2013
1961 Alumni Rolla MO wrote:
<quoted text>
John Doe,
Obviously, you did not watch the video I mentioned (all the way through). If you had - you would not have made the statement you just made. ANY PERSON WHO HAS EVER SEEN THE ACTUAL FILM OF KENNEDY BEING SHOT CAN SEE THAT THE SHOT WAS FIRED FROM THE (right)FRONT.
No, the government's version of the shooting has been doctored up to support the "one shooter" version they want all of us to believe. But any body with one eye & half sense can look at the film of the actual shooting & see OUR GOVERNMENT IS LYING TO US!
You are as just as blinded by all the cover-up lies of JFK'S assissination as you are about the mess the conservatives got this country into.
You are pathetic. Almost every time you make a post YOU MAKE A BIG FOOL OF YOURSELF.
Why don't you just give it a rest...
Alumni,
I have viewed all of the independent evidence and it all shows one and only one shooter.
It is obvious to me that you have closed your mind to any opinion or thought but you own.
Thanks for the insults. It is so nice of you to prove my points by resorting to insults. When one results to insults is shows that person had nothing intelligent to say.
Jack Ruby

Poplar Bluff, MO

#23 Mar 31, 2013
John Doe wrote:
<quoted text>
Alumni,
I have viewed all of the independent evidence and it all shows one and only one shooter.
It is obvious to me that you have closed your mind to any opinion or thought but you own.
Thanks for the insults. It is so nice of you to prove my points by resorting to insults. When one results to insults is shows that person had nothing intelligent to say.
And you don't "think" that the government or other factions could or would
"change" the evidence? If you have not done so. Have the guts to watch the "Men Who Killed Kennedy". It suggests that even the actor Woody Harrleson's father was one of the "three tramps."
Or have you even heard of them? Let me guess, You voted for Johnson in 64'.
fedup
#25 Mar 31, 2013
thats just something how someone can watch any of that footage and say there was only one shooter.i guess oswald ran like the six million dollar man from the window where he fired the first shot out of the building to the grassy area where he fired the last shot.give me a break. you would have to be blind or plum brainwashed not to see that was a side shot.
Jack Ruby

Poplar Bluff, MO

#26 Mar 31, 2013
fedup wrote:
thats just something how someone can watch any of that footage and say there was only one shooter.i guess oswald ran like the six million dollar man from the window where he fired the first shot out of the building to the grassy area where he fired the last shot.give me a break. you would have to be blind or plum brainwashed not to see that was a side shot.
I cant understand if you are agreeing or what. All I can tell you is there were more than one gunman that day even if Oswald was one at all. Watch the series, you idiot. God, this world is full of idiots!
fedup
#27 Apr 1, 2013
thank god theres only one real jack ruby. dumb asses!
1961 Alumni Rolla MO

Rolla, MO

#28 Apr 1, 2013
guest wrote:
OMG and for a minute 61 I thought you were a person that could think for herself. Now you come up with this. I guess you also watched the documentary about Paul being killed in a wreck back in 64 or whatever and believe that. Ive seen the films of McGruter and I also believe there was more than one shooter. Who was involved? Guess we won't really know until 2027,37 or whatever time they have put on that info. If we are dead by then who cares. Personally, I think the movie JFK made perfect sense since we are talking theories.
Guest.
All you have to do to KNOW THAT OUR GOVERNMENT IS LYING TO US ABOUT JFK'S ASSISSIANATION IS - LOOK VERY CLOSELY & CAREFULLY AT THE FILM THAT WAS TAKEN OF THE SEEN OF THE ASSISSINATION ON NOV 22,1963!!!

There is no mistaking the shot that hit Kennedy in the head (the one that killed him) was fired from a /front/right side angle.

Otherwise, how in heavens name could Kennedy's head/body been suddenly jerked backwards when the shot hit him in the head? You can clearly see that he was jerked backwards (toward the left). No, this shot did not from behind.

This shot/shots would have come from the grassy-knoll area. Didn't you see in the film all the crowd of people (in that area) falling down on the ground to avoid being shot???(SOMEONE WAS FIRING A GUN FROM THE GRASSY KNOLL)!!!

Do you honestly think if this shot (to the head) was fired from the back (from the Texas School Book Depoistory - that JFK would have been jerked backwards to the left??? Just use a little common horse sense here...

I've always known there was more than one shooter (someone in the grassy knoll), but I didn't know who was responsible since there have been many different theories as to how it happened. However, the video I mentined earlier "The Assissination of JFK - CIA Bush Connection - fits all bits & pieces of the puzzle together.

All I have to do is watch this film & the only conclusion I can possibly come to - is that THIS FILM IS PROOF POSITIVE THAT OUR GOVERNMENT IS LYING TO US ABOUT KENNEDY'S ASSISSINAITON!!!

And yes, Guest - I AM THINKING VERY VERY CLEARLY (FOR MYSELF)!!!

Oh, and who in the heck is Paul McGruter???

Hey, if there was no big government cover-up (and people in very high places might be charged) why in the world would they be hiding the full story (and evidence) from the American people until 2027.

The reason for this is because by 2027 everyone involved in the Govenment cover-up of JFK'S assissination will be dead of old age!!!

Oh, and by the way, two-thirds of the American people believe there was a second shooter & that there was a big government cover-up.

November of this year will be the 50th anniversay of the JFK assissination, and I hope there will be a renewed effort to bring justice to the people responsible for taking the life our our President...
1961 Alumni Rolla MO

Rolla, MO

#29 Apr 1, 2013
Joe wrote:
Some people can be made to believe anything....as long as they see it on you tube! I guess our government attacked the world trade center too. Come on get real and stop believing these conspiracies.
Long before the personal computer was ever invented - I knew that there was a second shooter & big big cover - up in JFK's assissiantion.

I've known this for decades!!!

Did you know that two thirds of the American people also believe this???
1961 Alumni Rolla MO

Rolla, MO

#30 Apr 1, 2013
John Doe wrote:
<quoted text>
Alumni,
I have viewed all of the independent evidence and it all shows one and only one shooter.
It is obvious to me that you have closed your mind to any opinion or thought but you own.
Thanks for the insults. It is so nice of you to prove my points by resorting to insults. When one results to insults is shows that person had nothing intelligent to say.
Just what INDEPENDENT EVIDENCE ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT HERE - SINCE WE KNOW THAT THE GOVERNMENT LIED TO US?

ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THE EVIDENCE IN THE WARREN REPORT??

Neither I,(nor(two-thirds of the American people) consider the Warren Report to be credible evidence!!
Far Away

Anchorage, AK

#31 Apr 1, 2013
1961 gets on here bragging about her advanced age and how in possession of her faculties she is, but clearly she is proof positive that people with dementia don't know they have dementia.
fedup
#32 Apr 1, 2013
no alumni's pretty sharp its the government zombies we got to look out for.

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#33 Apr 1, 2013
Far Away wrote:
1961 gets on here bragging about her advanced age and how in possession of her faculties she is, but clearly she is proof positive that people with dementia don't know they have dementia.
The tea baggers are brain washed and they don't know it. If it's her age what's the tea bagger excuse?

It's proof positive that tea baggers are ignorant, hate filled, uneducated, no common sense people.

A tea bagger can't answer it cause they are brain washed.
John Doe

Poplar Bluff, MO

#34 Apr 1, 2013
1961 Alumni Rolla MO wrote:
<quoted text>
Just what INDEPENDENT EVIDENCE ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT HERE - SINCE WE KNOW THAT THE GOVERNMENT LIED TO US?
ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THE EVIDENCE IN THE WARREN REPORT??
Neither I,(nor(two-thirds of the American people) consider the Warren Report to be credible evidence!!
You said 2/3rd's of the American People don't believe the Warren report. Can you prove that or is it another exaggeration?

http://www.jfklancer.com/photos/Rifle_Bullets...

These two videos go together:

http://www.bing.com/videos/search...

http://www.bing.com/videos/search...

There is more, one heck of a lot more. If you really want to see it all just do a search on Kennedy Assassination Balistics
1961 Alumni Rolla Mo

Rolla, MO

#35 Apr 1, 2013
John Doe wrote:
<quoted text>
You said 2/3rd's of the American People don't believe the Warren report. Can you prove that or is it another exaggeration?
http://www.jfklancer.com/photos/Rifle_Bullets...
These two videos go together:
http://www.bing.com/videos/search...
http://www.bing.com/videos/search...
There is more, one heck of a lot more. If you really want to see it all just do a search on Kennedy Assassination Balistics
Again, I won't waste my time with on any so-called facts you mention. NO DOUBT, ALL YOUR "SO CALLED FACTS" CAME FROM THE WARREN REPORT - THE WARREN REPORT - IS NOTHING BUT A DOCTORED UP BUNCH OF LIES!!!
1961 Alumni Rolla Mo

Rolla, MO

#36 Apr 1, 2013
Far Away wrote:
1961 gets on here bragging about her advanced age and how in possession of her faculties she is, but clearly she is proof positive that people with dementia don't know they have dementia.
Far Away,
Looks like, it's the same ole same ole with you...

ISN'T IT TELLING - THAT IF ANYONE POSTS ANYTHING ON THIS FORUM THAT DOES NOT AGREE WITH THE CONSERVATIVE TALKING POINTS (or casts anything negative about any Republican (even if that includes possible murder)- then that person (who posts this information) is suddenly either nuts or (in my case has dementia)?

You know I am around lots of people all the time - and the only time I've been accused of having dementia is on C'ville Topix.

Why do you suppose that is???

YOU KNOW I'VE BROUGHT A VERY GOOD POINT ABOUT A POSSIBLE CONSPIRACY IN JFK'S ASSISSINATION - AND YOU WILL NOT ADMIT IT - BECAUSE MOST LIKELY THE CONSPIRATORS ARE REPUBLICAN...

Now, if the finger of suspision were pointing to a high profile Democrate - would you still be calling me crazy???
Far Away

Anchorage, AK

#37 Apr 1, 2013
1961 Alumni Rolla Mo wrote:
<quoted text>blah... blah... blah...
Now, if the finger of suspision were pointing to a high profile Democrate - would you still be calling me crazy???
Yep!
Jack Ruby

Poplar Bluff, MO

#38 Apr 1, 2013
Ok, I'm confused (haha no joke) I can't tell who is saying what. Please for the record, just say
whether you believe there was a conspiracy/coverup or you think Lee Oswald was the lone assassin?
That's about as simple as it gets. Ya'll have me all confused, like Woody Harrleson.
Jack Ruby

Poplar Bluff, MO

#39 Apr 1, 2013
John Doe, I'm glad you're a figment of my imaginaton, because you are about the dumbest SOB
I've ever seen on here. I just thank God that you
can't vote and/or decide what color to dye Easter Eggs.
John Doe

Poplar Bluff, MO

#40 Apr 1, 2013
1961 Alumni Rolla Mo wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, I won't waste my time with on any so-called facts you mention. NO DOUBT, ALL YOUR "SO CALLED FACTS" CAME FROM THE WARREN REPORT - THE WARREN REPORT - IS NOTHING BUT A DOCTORED UP BUNCH OF LIES!!!
This is what I have talked about with you. You are dismissive and your mind is closed to anything that disagrees with you.

For you information, the two videos that I said went together came from a British ballistic research company and it shows their technically accurate re-enactment of the Kennedy shooting.

You refuse to look as it might cause to realize that you are wrong.
Far Away

Anchorage, AK

#41 Apr 1, 2013
By the way, it's assassination, not assissination, which is all the more fitting for 1961 being an ass twice over for posting this nonsense in the first place. I gave her the benefit of the doubt that it was a typo in the thread title, but subsequent comments by her show otherwise.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hayti Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Twister's Cafe 3 hr Meme 42
Lauren 11 hr I do 5
Marshall Mayberry 15 hr OMG 7
Crystal Mohr 17 hr guest 7
pmhs ccc Apr 27 AprilT 49
Tommy Hooker Jr (Jun '16) Apr 27 Ana 17
Gigi the hair lady (Jan '10) Apr 26 Guest 16

Hayti Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hayti Mortgages