Discussion, serious debate, and compr...
Gene

Caruthersville, MO

#21 Mar 29, 2013
Focus? LMAO, yea you're focusing alright. Focusing on attention.
well

Amherst, OH

#22 Mar 29, 2013
John Doe wrote:
Alumni,
If you want to end all of the right wing commentary then all of the left wing commentary must start at the same time. You are so blinded by the left dogma that you can't even see either both go at once or none of it goes. There can't be this get rid of the right wing commentary because the left wing commentary will die on the vine. It doesn't work that way.
Well, you're right. What young said was reprehensible and it was wrong for him to say. I wouldn't even thing of proposing any different.
Your comment about someone call the Obama children monkey children would be just as wrong. I don't know who said that, I haven't heard about it before now. Would you please tell me where you saw it so I can read up on it?
You have mentioned two vile attacks from the republicans. Well one came from a Republican and those comments are usual chastised by the rest of the party. When Todd Aiken made his ridiculous statements he was chastised had all RNC funding terminated.
What do you have to say about the attacks made by Democrats on Romney's religion. You might not agree with his religion but he certain has the right to whatever religious beliefs he has.
Catfish, you're right. I did say some vile things about Alumni in the past. I hung back at first by one day, I was in a bad mood and I saw the insults that were being hurled at me and I fired back. Was it right? No, I was wrong to do it.
I had nothing to do with the name that was pinned on Gene. If you want to know why, you will have to ask the person who called the name.
I have made my mistakes in the past but isn't a person allowed to change? That is what I am trying to do. I am trying to change, to focus on the issues, discussing the issues and to see what sort of a compromise those on here could reach.
OK this 1 time

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/jule...
Gene

Caruthersville, MO

#23 Mar 30, 2013
John Doe wrote:
Alumni,

I had nothing to do with the name that was pinned on Gene. If you want to know why, you will have to ask the person who called the name.
No you just support Comrade Winston on every name he can call me and others and supportive of any hate issue he can dish out, kiss his ass every time he shows it, and in the meanwhile bash me and other for name calling. Your a damn liar John Doe.

Pillsbury Doe Boy, do yourself a favor and shut up. Your not serious about anything.
John Doe

Poplar Bluff, MO

#24 Mar 30, 2013
well wrote:
Thank you. I appreciate that. It is obvious to any sane person that this man is racist fanatic. There are fanatics on both sides of aisle. I can name more than one off of the top of my head and from both sides.

These types are to be pitied for their ignorance and yes, their positions should be condemned.

In the final analysis it is still one person. Do you blame all Republicans for the actions of one? If so, then do we blame all Democrats for a Michael Moore?
well

Amherst, OH

#25 Mar 30, 2013
John Doe wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you. I appreciate that. It is obvious to any sane person that this man is racist fanatic. There are fanatics on both sides of aisle. I can name more than one off of the top of my head and from both sides.
These types are to be pitied for their ignorance and yes, their positions should be condemned.
In the final analysis it is still one person. Do you blame all Republicans for the actions of one? If so, then do we blame all Democrats for a Michael Moore?
Go ahead and name them. Name the some racist fanatic on the left.
Over and over again people have posted and proved how racist the right wing is. Your answer is the same. It's only 1 person.

Start adding them up and you get a whole group of people-tea party

While your at it give names of all on the left that has said ignorant anti woman statements.

You know- women who get pregnant from rape it was God plan.
women should just relax and enjoy the rape
woman have a way 2 stop a pregnancy if it's real rape

Come on give me names and prove it. You may not like Moore politics but he's not racist or anti woman. Your so "fair" so give me names and prove it. I'll be waiting.
John Doe

Poplar Bluff, MO

#26 Mar 30, 2013
well wrote:
<quoted text>
Go ahead and name them. Name the some racist fanatic on the left.
Over and over again people have posted and proved how racist the right wing is. Your answer is the same. It's only 1 person.
Start adding them up and you get a whole group of people-tea party
While your at it give names of all on the left that has said ignorant anti woman statements.
You know- women who get pregnant from rape it was God plan.
women should just relax and enjoy the rape
woman have a way 2 stop a pregnancy if it's real rape
Come on give me names and prove it. You may not like Moore politics but he's not racist or anti woman. Your so "fair" so give me names and prove it. I'll be waiting.
I never said there were racists on the left, I was talking about fanatics. I am right when i say that there are fanatics on both side.

I admit that there stupid, uneducated comments have been made and that it was wrong.

You want names who made, as you call it, anti woman statements. How about the Democrats in Colorado when holding hears about rape and the right to carry concealed while on college campuses.

http://coloradopeakpolitics.com/2013/03/05/re...

The points I wanted to make is that you can't brand an entire group a certain way because of the words and the actions of the few. I was also pointing out that there are fanatics on both sides who made stupid states.

Do you remember Rep Debbie Wasserman Schultz being caught telling lies during the campaign?
well

Amherst, OH

#27 Mar 30, 2013
John Doe wrote:
<quoted text>
I never said there were racists on the left, I was talking about fanatics. I am right when i say that there are fanatics on both side.
I admit that there stupid, uneducated comments have been made and that it was wrong.
You want names who made, as you call it, anti woman statements. How about the Democrats in Colorado when holding hears about rape and the right to carry concealed while on college campuses.
http://coloradopeakpolitics.com/2013/03/05/re...
The points I wanted to make is that you can't brand an entire group a certain way because of the words and the actions of the few. I was also pointing out that there are fanatics on both sides who made stupid states.
Do you remember Rep Debbie Wasserman Schultz being caught telling lies during the campaign?
Colorado's Conservative Bully Pit

That's on their web site. Is that were u get ur non partisan information. HEHE HAHA

What u going to say now, that u didn't say that non pertains is the only thing u read

If you can believe this web site

And the democrat said to the woman that had been raped

“I just want to say that, actually statistics are not on your side even if you had had a gun. You said that you were a marshal arts student, I mean person, experienced in tae kwan do, and yet because this individual was so large, he was able to overcome you, even with your skills. And, chances are that if you would have had a gun, then he would have been able to get that from you and possibly use it against you….”

Talking about concealed weapons on campus IS NOT
anti woman.

He didn't say she wasn't really raped
He never denied she was raped
He didn't tell her to put an aspirin between her knees
He didn't tell her she was a slut because she wants birth control

Jd that wasn't even a good try.

Come on give me names of all the fanatic people on the left. I'm waiting

Please use ur "non partisan" that u preach about
Gene

Caruthersville, MO

#28 Mar 31, 2013
well wrote:
<quoted text>
Colorado's Conservative Bully Pit
That's on their web site. Is that were u get ur non partisan information. HEHE HAHA
What u going to say now, that u didn't say that non pertains is the only thing u read
If you can believe this web site
And the democrat said to the woman that had been raped
“I just want to say that, actually statistics are not on your side even if you had had a gun. You said that you were a marshal arts student, I mean person, experienced in tae kwan do, and yet because this individual was so large, he was able to overcome you, even with your skills. And, chances are that if you would have had a gun, then he would have been able to get that from you and possibly use it against you….”
Talking about concealed weapons on campus IS NOT
anti woman.
He didn't say she wasn't really raped
He never denied she was raped
He didn't tell her to put an aspirin between her knees
He didn't tell her she was a slut because she wants birth control
Jd that wasn't even a good try.
Come on give me names of all the fanatic people on the left. I'm waiting
Please use ur "non partisan" that u preach about
Back them into a corner and they cry foul.

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#29 Mar 31, 2013
Yep that's what the web site said.

JD prolly won't be on here today he's too holy to be here on Sunday.
If he answers back he will change the subject to concealed guns and gun control. He will DIVERT to if the woman had a gun she wouldn't be raped.

The problem with that is the republicans will say to a woman that shot her perpetrator just cause he had your pants down Don't mean he was going to rape you. Therefore, She was in no danger of being raped.

That all sounds stupid but that is the right wing nuts.

WEll, you got it right, all these incidents from ONE person does make a group.

Gene, you got it right too.

Happy EASTER, God LOVES US ALL.

Red, yellow, black, and white men and yes women

Democrat and republicans.

And that is nothing the republicans can do about that no matter how hard they try.
John Doe

Poplar Bluff, MO

#30 Mar 31, 2013
well wrote:
<quoted text>
Colorado's Conservative Bully Pit
That's on their web site. Is that were u get ur non partisan information. HEHE HAHA
What u going to say now, that u didn't say that non pertains is the only thing u read
If you can believe this web site
And the democrat said to the woman that had been raped
“I just want to say that, actually statistics are not on your side even if you had had a gun. You said that you were a marshal arts student, I mean person, experienced in tae kwan do, and yet because this individual was so large, he was able to overcome you, even with your skills. And, chances are that if you would have had a gun, then he would have been able to get that from you and possibly use it against you….”
Talking about concealed weapons on campus IS NOT
anti woman.
He didn't say she wasn't really raped
He never denied she was raped
He didn't tell her to put an aspirin between her knees
He didn't tell her she was a slut because she wants birth control
Jd that wasn't even a good try.
Come on give me names of all the fanatic people on the left. I'm waiting
Please use ur "non partisan" that u preach about
I admit that i could have grabbed a better link but I can't change the pace.

You don't consider it to be anti woman to minimize this woman by telling her that statics don't agree with her. Can't read what he said and see how he minimized this woman and by doing so demeaned her? You don't consider that to be anti woman.

As to your question about left wing fanatics. As with many on the left you have read into what I said. Let me see if I can say so that you will understand it.

There are fanatics on the left and right. In my opinion, None of the fanatics helps their cause, left or right. I have noticed something though. When a conservative screws up and says something bad, he or she is chastised by the right. Never once have I seen a left wing fanatic say something bad or wrong and get chastised or it.

Where was the outrage from the west when Debbie Wassernan Schultz liked during the 2012 campaign? Who on the left chastised her?

Oh and before you say she didn't lie, you better check the records. There is an audio tape that proves she lied
Gene

Caruthersville, MO

#31 Apr 1, 2013
Never answers a question, always asks another because he knows his ass is on the line and about to made a fool of.

Pillsbury, you dont need anyone besides you to make yourself look like an ass in here.

You're another right wing lying hypocrite afraid to answer any question directed to you. But you defend your buddy Comrade Winston for name calling people "child molesters". Are you catholic Pillsbury?
John Doe

Poplar Bluff, MO

#32 Apr 1, 2013
Gene wrote:
Never answers a question, always asks another because he knows his ass is on the line and about to made a fool of.
Pillsbury, you dont need anyone besides you to make yourself look like an ass in here.
You're another right wing lying hypocrite afraid to answer any question directed to you. But you defend your buddy Comrade Winston for name calling people "child molesters". Are you catholic Pillsbury?
My religious beliefs are none of your business. There is nothing i can say to change your mind. You have judged me and in your opinion that is it. It is sad that you can judge others but you can't look in the mirror and see your own faults
Gene

Caruthersville, MO

#33 Apr 1, 2013
Judge you? No thats Comrades job. I call it like I see it and you my friend are a Catholic alter boy!
John Doe

Poplar Bluff, MO

#34 Apr 1, 2013
Gene wrote:
Judge you? No thats Comrades job. I call it like I see it and you my friend are a Catholic alter boy!
That shows how much you can be wrong. You do judge people, rather you admit or not, you do it.
Gene

Caruthersville, MO

#35 Apr 1, 2013
Strike a nerve Pillsbury? Told you boy, I call it like I see it, and if the truth hurts...oh well.
John Doe

Poplar Bluff, MO

#36 Apr 1, 2013
Gene wrote:
Strike a nerve Pillsbury? Told you boy, I call it like I see it, and if the truth hurts...oh well.
You struck nothing. The truth is that you are portraying yourself as a petty man. You add nothing to discuss except for lies and name calling.
Gene

Caruthersville, MO

#37 Apr 2, 2013
John Doe wrote:
<quoted text>
You struck nothing. The truth is that you are portraying yourself as a petty man. You add nothing to discuss except for lies and name calling.
And?? What do you bring to the discussion table? Questions, demands, insults, name calling and unwilling to answer any questions asked directly to you. You are no better than those you accuse of doing the same as you.

You see Pillsbury, you dont get it exactly and I doubt you ever will. You want to play games. So I play games with you,.. and when you see you're losing at your own game, you do what?

Cry foul every time.
John Doe

Poplar Bluff, MO

#38 Apr 2, 2013
Gene,

You know what? I have decided I am going to do my best to ignore you. You said it, you play games and you add nothing to discussion
Gene

Caruthersville, MO

#39 Apr 2, 2013
John Doe wrote:
Gene,
You know what? I have decided I am going to do my best to ignore you. You said it, you play games and you add nothing to discussion
LMAO,... again???? HAHAHAHAHAHA

Well we'll see how long it lasts this time Pillsbury. LMAO

Hey kid, Im proud of you tho. You posted and didnt ask a question demanding proof or links. LMAO
Gene

Caruthersville, MO

#42 Apr 3, 2013
Well Doe Comrade's latest post insinuating me with being a "child molester" ..there's the proof you've been asking for.

Doug, you're going to pay for that. Dearly.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hayti Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
spanky crawford 22 min Tommy 1
Whitney 34 min whatever 3
Lee 1 hr Amy 7
Trinity layoff 2 hr Get Real 2
Jermika Covington Wed Venus 1
sugar momma Wed who 3
Police Dept Aug 22 Local Citizen 6

Hayti Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hayti Mortgages