“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#80106 Apr 14, 2013
seriously wrote:
Dawgs and Dan's picture. That explains a little. LMAO
http://api.ning.com/files/9j6Yzd1dNCThFo5Zef3... *jJ-cUVNlWvHYvam0MKaRh5z8ERcR- Tg8UllZjBna3UZWZPNc8cQeC2ng0Q4 ftkb/hillbilly.jpg
Incompetence is its own reward.
seriously

Houston, MO

#80107 Apr 14, 2013
Licking PUSSSEEEEEEE wrote:
<quoted text>
Seriously ...don't you mean your small member? Theat explains alittle. LMAO
U R "Licking" P-U-S-S-S-E-E-E-E-E
Yep Im a Licking P-U-S-S-S-E-E-E-E-E and you are

Suckingg D-I-C-K-K. LOL

“On Nov. 4 -- NO Tea Party”

Since: Sep 09

Say "NO" to TeaPub Elephants!

#80108 Apr 14, 2013
seriously wrote:
LYAO if you choose. You are still incompetent. Further, I am much older than Dan, and I wear glasses.

Can't you get ANYTHING right? Typical conservative with a small anterior cingulate cortex.
Norton

Kansas City, MO

#80109 Apr 14, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Easy answer. The "word of God" was written by Man, and the Bible is chock full of errors and contradictions. I can believe some portions of the Bible, except for those pesky errors and contradictions. But don't you worry, "Norton." The "Rapture" is nigh upon us, and you will soon be snatched heavenwards. Have a nice trip. Don't forget to write.
You always have to be a little arrogant, don't you? Of course, we all know the Bible was written by man inspired by God. All the Bible is true or none of it is true! You can't have it both ways. It is not full of errors and contradictions. It is because you don't want to understand it that makes you think that. Yeah, the Rapture is nigh upon us. I just have one question for you. Since you are an atheist and I suppose you believe when you die....you're just dead, then why are you spending your time on here. Shouldn't you be living it up, spend all your money, just do whatever you want all the time.....unless you just enjoy fussing with people all the time.

CHEERS!
Norton

Kansas City, MO

#80110 Apr 14, 2013
Norton lives on Kolob wrote:
<quoted text>
You didn't pay attention ...You voted for a NON CHRISTIAN Mormon!!!
Norton your walk don't match the talk!
Have fun on Kolob!
Perhaps you voted for a non-christian Muslim.

CHEERS!
Norton

Kansas City, MO

#80111 Apr 14, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
To the contrary. I have no doubt that you and "seriously" have it all correct. I am humbled to be in the presence of such Bible scholars.
Incidentally, how are you doing, explaining the Bible to God?(He always takes things out of context, as you know.)
OK, you just proved your stupidity. We get it!

CHEERS!
GOP the Party of STUPID

Saint Louis, MO

#80112 Apr 15, 2013
seriously wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep Im a Licking P-U-S-S-S-E-E-E-E-E and you are
Suckingg D-I-C-K-K. LOL
Forget your STUPID claims about Obama ...you're the DICK-Taster LOL
U R A "Licked -ing" P-U-S-S-S-E-E-E-E
ROLMFAO!
GOP the Party of STUPID

Saint Louis, MO

#80113 Apr 15, 2013
Norton wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps you voted for a non-christian Muslim.
CHEERS!
No ...because there wasn't one...just like there isn't any RAPTURE!

God Bless Your Ignorant Heart
CHEERS
GOP the Party of STUPID

Saint Louis, MO

#80114 Apr 15, 2013
Norton wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps you voted for a non-christian Muslim.
CHEERS!
OK, you just proved your stupidity. We get it!
CHEERS!
Guest

United States

#80115 Apr 15, 2013
Smrt. I live to post on Topix. I rule. No one is smrter than me behind my computer!! Baaaaahaaaaaa!

“What can I do to get the Topix”

Since: Jan 11

cops upset?

#80117 Apr 15, 2013
One who knows wrote:
<quoted text>You have a dirty mind, but I must admit that I laughed despite myself. Do you think this XxX understands what karyotype refers to or that you are making fun of him?
Despite what many say on here, it is clear there is a difference in the education and intelligence between posters on here. Maybe no difference though in the ability to turn everything into a dirty joke, but some are better executed than others.
Yes I do. I consider it high art to be able to come up with the intelligent but off color remarks I make.

XxX is a long time poster pretending he is new here. He hasn't got the sense to know when he has lost so I don't expect he would begin to know cytogenetic references or even that he is being made fun of.

I see that you have gotten the ire of that "visceral camp" raised. You will notice that when they haven't got anything important to say, they attack your spelling. As usual they are so ignorant and stupid they can't even carry that off successfully.

Don't worry, the intelligent posters on here recognize the limitations of Topix and modern computer equipment and don't really consider spelling errors unless it is quite obvious that the person is really struggling or an idiot like Gun Gobbler.

“What can I do to get the Topix”

Since: Jan 11

cops upset?

#80118 Apr 15, 2013
seriously wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep Im a Licking P-U-S-S-S-E-E-E-E-E and you are
Suckingg D-I-C-K-K. LOL
I didn't know inmates had web access.

“What can I do to get the Topix”

Since: Jan 11

cops upset?

#80119 Apr 15, 2013
seriously wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep Im a Licking P-U-S-S-S-E-E-E-E-E and you are
Suckingg D-I-C-K-K. LOL
Do you need a list of the other forums I frequent in case you want to continue stalking me. I thought it might be easier for you with your limited capacity and all.

“What can I do to get the Topix”

Since: Jan 11

cops upset?

#80120 Apr 15, 2013
Gun Grabbing Commies wrote:
<quoted text>
I have come to the conclusion that you are a DumbAssLiberal just like DawgShit.
You can't spell shit! Go back to school and get your GED! It's "educational" not "educational", "would" not "wouold", "target" not "targest", "actually" not "actaully".
Now that is amazing. I couldn't tell anything about the political views of this particular poster. Are you saying because he sounds intelligent he must be a liberal. It sure sounds like you are saying that.

I don't believe he used the word "shit" anywhere in his post and could thus not have misspelled it. As usual you are just seeing "shit" that isn't there.

Since you offered no real debate for this poster I assume he was on target as far as you are concerned. You must agree since you were kind enough to provide him an example of just the kind of morons he was talking about.
Gun Grabbing Commies

Reeds Spring, MO

#80121 Apr 15, 2013
NO JOKE: AL NUSRA FRONT GETTING CREDIT FOR AMERICAN HUMANITARIAN AID IN SYRIA…
~ Thanks to obozo, our country is about to go under and we're giving money to the people who would love to behead us! DumbAss MFs
http://weaselzippers.us/2013/04/15/no-joke-al...
Gun Grabbing Commies

Reeds Spring, MO

#80122 Apr 15, 2013
MICHELLE OBAMA SAYS KILLING A BABY WHO SURVIVES AN ABORTION A “LEGITIMATE MEDICAL PROCEDURE”…
First Lady Michelle Obama has come under criticism before for a fundraising letter she wrote for her husband during his 2004 campaign for the U.S. Senate that has her defending partial-birth abortions.

Today, LifeNews is posting a rarely-seen image showing the copy of the actual letter, written to Obama financial supporters, which opposes a ban on the gruesome abortion procedure.

In February 2004, Michelle Obama penned a fundraising letter to help her husband Barack raise funds for his Illinois-based Senate seat. The letter contends the federal ban on partial-birth abortions “is clearly unconstitutional” and “a flawed law.”

Though the three-day-long partial-birth abortion procedure involves the partial birth of a baby during the middle trimester of pregnancy and the jamming of scissors into the back of her head to kill her, Obama’s wife describes it as “legitimate” medicine.

“The fact remains, with no provision to protect the heath of the mother, this ban on a legitimate medical procedure is clearly unconstitutional and must be overturned,” Michelle Obama writes in the letter.

http://weaselzippers.us/2013/04/15/flashback-...
GunGrabbing STUPIDITY

Saint Louis, MO

#80123 Apr 15, 2013
Gun Grabbing Commies wrote:
MICHELLE OBAMA SAYS KILLING A BABY WHO SURVIVES AN ABORTION A “LEGITIMATE MEDICAL PROCEDURE”…
First Lady Michelle Obama has come under criticism before for a fundraising letter she wrote for her husband during his 2004 campaign for the U.S. Senate that has her defending partial-birth abortions.
Today, LifeNews is posting a rarely-seen image showing the copy of the actual letter, written to Obama financial supporters, which opposes a ban on the gruesome abortion procedure.
In February 2004, Michelle Obama penned a fundraising letter to help her husband Barack raise funds for his Illinois-based Senate seat. The letter contends the federal ban on partial-birth abortions “is clearly unconstitutional” and “a flawed law.”
Though the three-day-long partial-birth abortion procedure involves the partial birth of a baby during the middle trimester of pregnancy and the jamming of scissors into the back of her head to kill her, Obama’s wife describes it as “legitimate” medicine.
“The fact remains, with no provision to protect the heath of the mother, this ban on a legitimate medical procedure is clearly unconstitutional and must be overturned,” Michelle Obama writes in the letter.
http://weaselzippers.us/2013/04/15/flashback-...
No Kidding U R STUPID!!!!

“What can I do to get the Topix”

Since: Jan 11

cops upset?

#80125 Apr 15, 2013
One who knows wrote:
<quoted text>And yet here you are posting on this thread yourself. That seems to rather stupid in and of itself. Yet you go on to make claims you could not possibly have the evidence to support. How do you know how many people are posting on this thread in total? Again, you are another person that seems deeply troubled how others exercise their Constitutional rights. Why is that?
From reading on here, I saw a post referring to you actually following another poster onto an obscure thread in another forum. With that in mind it seems like you are transferring your own faults and weaknesses onto others. Perhaps it is you that wants to post here and garner some measure of attention for yourself. Perhaps you are the joke. It isn't for me to say, but the evidence does not support your having a full life, much education or the ability to think critically. Or even honestly for that matter.
I will go you one better on this. I have never seen Dawg, Poos, or any other poster in the smart camp including myself try and force other posters to leave this site.

Reading a post by Gun Gobbler put me on this track. Neither of the two posters you responded to nor any of their cohorts have ever suggested that Gun Gobbler find something better to do with his time. They have never ridiculed him for spending hours on here. I could go on but it is obvious that there arguement is purely political and a desperate effort by whiners that can't find any other arguement to put forth.

“What can I do to get the Topix”

Since: Jan 11

cops upset?

#80126 Apr 15, 2013
Gun Grabbing Commies wrote:
MICHELLE OBAMA SAYS KILLING A BABY WHO SURVIVES AN ABORTION A “LEGITIMATE MEDICAL PROCEDURE”…
First Lady Michelle Obama has come under criticism before for a fundraising letter she wrote for her husband during his 2004 campaign for the U.S. Senate that has her defending partial-birth abortions.
Today, LifeNews is posting a rarely-seen image showing the copy of the actual letter, written to Obama financial supporters, which opposes a ban on the gruesome abortion procedure.
In February 2004, Michelle Obama penned a fundraising letter to help her husband Barack raise funds for his Illinois-based Senate seat. The letter contends the federal ban on partial-birth abortions “is clearly unconstitutional” and “a flawed law.”
Though the three-day-long partial-birth abortion procedure involves the partial birth of a baby during the middle trimester of pregnancy and the jamming of scissors into the back of her head to kill her, Obama’s wife describes it as “legitimate” medicine.
“The fact remains, with no provision to protect the heath of the mother, this ban on a legitimate medical procedure is clearly unconstitutional and must be overturned,” Michelle Obama writes in the letter.
http://weaselzippers.us/2013/04/15/flashback-...
You being a survivor of multiple attempts, I can understand your concern. I think you are safe now that you have reached the mental age of 12.
Guest

United States

#80127 Apr 15, 2013
Finally!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hayti Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
My dog 1 hr Not A Fan 1
Cemeteries (Sep '10) 2 hr Justme 13
Juvenal officer (Sep '13) 4 hr needing asap 138
River 8 hr guest 2
Bobby Watkins For Mayor (Feb '07) 19 hr Citizen 449
Jim's 20 hr wow 1
How many females in hayti are missing wit Solo ... Fri wtf 4
Hayti Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Hayti People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 5:36 pm PST

Yahoo! Sports 5:36PM
Falcons release veteran running back Steven Jackson
Bleacher Report 8:55 PM
St. Louis Rams: 5 Best Options to Replace Joe Barksdale This Offseason
Bleacher Report 4:00 AM
Why the Browns Need to Stay Far Away from Bradford
NFL 7:00 AM
Weinke makes a Luck-Bradford collegiate comparison
Bleacher Report 9:58 AM
Vince Young Registered at NFL Vet Combine