Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

“KC's Son got a Meal Ticket!”

Since: Sep 09

Now the basement is clean!

#77198 Feb 22, 2013
Norton wrote:
<quoted text>
You are totally an 'nutso'!(off your rocker)...
Perhaps I should pay some attention to what you say. You are clearly an experts on being a 'nutso.'

(You and Betty White are both "off your rockers," but she makes money doing it.)

“KC's Son got a Meal Ticket!”

Since: Sep 09

Now the basement is clean!

#77199 Feb 22, 2013
TheJokster wrote:
<quoted text>
Again you just proved what I said. You seek approval. You need it so badly that you are even asking for it in this post by wanting people to vote. It will be alright you poor little old guy who so badly needs others approval to feel good about yourself. lol
I was not particularly "seeking approval." As a experiment, I proposed that readers of this thread vote either for you, or for me. That, in and of itself, is neutral, because the vote can go either way (biased or not.) So far, no one has voted. Thus, no one cares what YOU say, or what I say. Interesting.

“KC's Son got a Meal Ticket!”

Since: Sep 09

Now the basement is clean!

#77200 Feb 22, 2013
Norton wrote:
Did someone say Dawg was in a snow drift? Just Wondered!
...
No snow here, "Norton." This isn't Kansas City.

“KC's Son got a Meal Ticket!”

Since: Sep 09

Now the basement is clean!

#77201 Feb 22, 2013
Norton wrote:
<quoted text>I challenge you to check this out a little further, Dawg. You just proved to me that you don't have a clue....... and I knew you wouldn't!
P. S. I didn't copy and paste!...
As you "challenged" me to do, I checked out your original post to which I was alluding. In your Comment #77094, you said"

Acts 2:22,23
'Ye men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know,'Him (This Jesus), being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, Ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain:" What does the determinate counsel mean? It means the Trinity, the Triune God, Three Persons yet One, consulted within this Godhead before anything was ever created. They agreed within the Trinity, knowing everything that would take place: that fallen man would need a Redeemer, and salvation would be that Second Person of the Trinity who would step down from the invisible Godhead, take on flesh and go the way of the finished work of the Cross for man's redemption. Now all of that was foreknown and consummated in the thought process of the Trinity. It implies that all Three persons of the Godhead had agreed that this is the way it would be done ...... and that is exactly what this verse means,......... BY THE DETERMINATE COUNSEL. They are co-equal."

I responded that Acts 2 says no such things. You went to one of your apologists' explanations, and did in fact "copy-and-paste" their so-called expertise.(But if you did NOT "copy-and-paste," you went to an awful lot of trouble in your failing attempt to appear knowledgeable about the Bible and what it means.)

Acts 2 does NOT say, "What does the determinate counsel mean? It means the Trinity, the Triune God, Three Persons yet One, consulted within this Godhead before anything was ever created."

Acts 2 does NOT say, "They agreed within the Trinity, knowing everything that would take place: that fallen man would need a Redeemer, and salvation would be that Second Person of the Trinity who would step down from the invisible Godhead, take on flesh and go the way of the finished work of the Cross for man's redemption. Now all of that was foreknown and consummated in the thought process of the Trinity."

Acts 2 does NOT say, "It implies that all Three persons of the Godhead had agreed that this is the way it would be done ...... and that is exactly what this verse means,......... BY THE DETERMINATE COUNSEL. They are co-equal."

Here is the source of your comments, which you "copied and pasted" with absolutely NO attribution to that source:

http://www.havefaith.org/untitled28.htm

Have Faith and Copy and Paste, "Norton." Do let us know when you have an original thought. Did I "check it out" enough to suit you?_8-)

“I can never convince the ”

Since: Jan 11

stupid that they are stupid.

#77202 Feb 22, 2013
TheJokster wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly Danno, I do not care. So if I do not care and you know I don't care,,, why did you even take the time to reply? Because an idiot like you, if baited will reply back because the don't have enough sense not to. lol
I missed this reply to my posts that show how much you don't care by going into a rant about how if I didn't care you wouldn't respond to my posts. It is very self explanatory, but it is you that is responding to me. But, unlike you, I don't consider a response to be a litmus test of caring. It is the nature of the response and yours shows YOU CARE VERY MUCH.

“I can never convince the ”

Since: Jan 11

stupid that they are stupid.

#77203 Feb 22, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
I was not particularly "seeking approval." As a experiment, I proposed that readers of this thread vote either for you, or for me. That, in and of itself, is neutral, because the vote can go either way (biased or not.) So far, no one has voted. Thus, no one cares what YOU say, or what I say. Interesting.
I have been reading the escalating ad hominem attacks, lies and hypocrisy coming from the Jokster since he declared himself the self appointed God of this little thread. If you go back to the first post he made, it was an attack on everyone that posts on here. He was clearly trying to establish himself as above everyone here right from the start. When albtraum called him on that post and his plagarism he attacked her. He claims in an another post that he was singled out immediately upon posting to this thread. But the facts don't support that. His initial post is inflammatory. His next eight or 10 posts are attacks on Norton and Triple Negative. He has been escalating the level of his attacks and then he switched to attacking you and me. Hardly a person that was singled out by us or anyone else.

You notice how he twists things or spontaneously creates an argument that wasn't there. In a reply to you, I said "The jury was still out." He turned this into a misleading response about free speech and then gave an example that was not free speech and rabidly defended his error.

I don't believe he is a doctor. He has all the hallmarks of a former poster that was way to wrapped up in Topix and has returned to carry out his vengeance. If he is telling the truth, then you have to wonder what his problem is. On one hand it could be someone with a psychological pathology that drives them to create a whole new persona to attack those he perceives have wronged him on an anonymous forum. On the other hand, he is an intelligent, educated and trained perfessional that choses to waste his time attacking those he already believes to be weaker than him and to right the wrongs on this thread in some "game." Either way it speaks of mental illness. I am not trained in that field to any extent, so I don't know how some of these pathologies manifest themselves. Notice how he blythely comes up with plausible answers when confronted, but they don't fit the evidence. I made a comment about the jujit numbers being unusually and oddly high. His response was that it was because people were not posting but still leaving their feedback. Plausible, but the time was late when few would be on this particular thread, no one else was posting besides the two of us and there is no pattern that fits his explanation. He is playing to an audience but it isn't us. It all boils down to just another RF TROLL.

I am curious where he is going to go with this though. I have never witnessed first hand someone try to innovate insanity. I wonder what he expects. What is his motivation for seeking out and attacking anonymous strangers? Does he think the Topix gods are going to annoint him further. Maybe he thinks we will all run away. In any event he is the one that is trying to prevent free speech of others.

I think he is "going off the rails on a crazy train." Ozzy Osbourne, Blizzard of Ozz, 1980.

“I can never convince the ”

Since: Jan 11

stupid that they are stupid.

#77204 Feb 22, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
I was not particularly "seeking approval." As a experiment, I proposed that readers of this thread vote either for you, or for me. That, in and of itself, is neutral, because the vote can go either way (biased or not.) So far, no one has voted. Thus, no one cares what YOU say, or what I say. Interesting.
If anyone is seeking something, it is the Jokster.

“I can never convince the ”

Since: Jan 11

stupid that they are stupid.

#77206 Feb 22, 2013
TheJokster wrote:
<quoted text>
Aw gwarsh Dan. Did you dream about me? Did you think of me all day? lol You came on and I am the first one you address so I am guessing you are still rattled and have been thinking about the post of last night. I bet I have been in your head all day huh> LMAO >>> Got ya
Nah. I slept very well. I hit that little number at the top that tells me if I have a reply and how many. It took me to the page that post was on and I noticed I missed it. Since you are trending complete lies, I figured I would correct you. I am touched that you are concerned about me though. You apparently are wondering what I do in bed. A lot creepy, but still I am touched.

No I have been too busy working to think of you at all and probably not if I hadn't been busy. Again, I am touched that you care so much about me.

I don't know if I am going to be on much this weekend, but you hammer that refresh button as much as you can. I may still show up and I know you don't want to miss me.
Norton

Kansas City, MO

#77207 Feb 22, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
As you "challenged" me to do, I checked out your original post to which I was alluding. In your Comment #77094, you said"
Acts 2:22,23
'Ye men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know,'Him (This Jesus), being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, Ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain:" What does the determinate counsel mean? It means the Trinity, the Triune God, Three Persons yet One, consulted within this Godhead before anything was ever created. They agreed within the Trinity, knowing everything that would take place: that fallen man would need a Redeemer, and salvation would be that Second Person of the Trinity who would step down from the invisible Godhead, take on flesh and go the way of the finished work of the Cross for man's redemption. Now all of that was foreknown and consummated in the thought process of the Trinity. It implies that all Three persons of the Godhead had agreed that this is the way it would be done ...... and that is exactly what this verse means,......... BY THE DETERMINATE COUNSEL. They are co-equal."
I responded that Acts 2 says no such things. You went to one of your apologists' explanations, and did in fact "copy-and-paste" their so-called expertise.(But if you did NOT "copy-and-paste," you went to an awful lot of trouble in your failing attempt to appear knowledgeable about the Bible and what it means.)
Acts 2 does NOT say, "What does the determinate counsel mean? It means the Trinity, the Triune God, Three Persons yet One, consulted within this Godhead before anything was ever created."
Acts 2 does NOT say, "They agreed within the Trinity, knowing everything that would take place: that fallen man would need a Redeemer, and salvation would be that Second Person of the Trinity who would step down from the invisible Godhead, take on flesh and go the way of the finished work of the Cross for man's redemption. Now all of that was foreknown and consummated in the thought process of the Trinity."
Acts 2 does NOT say, "It implies that all Three persons of the Godhead had agreed that this is the way it would be done ...... and that is exactly what this verse means,......... BY THE DETERMINATE COUNSEL. They are co-equal."
Here is the source of your comments, which you "copied and pasted" with absolutely NO attribution to that source:
http://www.havefaith.org/untitled28.htm
Have Faith and Copy and Paste, "Norton." Do let us know when you have an original thought. Did I "check it out" enough to suit you?_8-)
Very good! However, I did not copy and paste! I have a study book. I'm impressed, Dawg!

CHEERS!
qaxyax

Pittsburgh, PA

#77208 Feb 23, 2013
youtube.com/watch...
Ill vote soon
GOP GAY Old People

Saint Louis, MO

#77210 Feb 23, 2013
TheJokster wrote:
<quoted text>
Aw gwarsh Dan. Did you dream about me? Did you think of me all day? lol You came on and I am the first one you address so I am guessing you are still rattled and have been thinking about the post of last night. I bet I have been in your head all day huh> LMAO >>> Got ya
WOW...this post is so GAY...LOL

“KC's Son got a Meal Ticket!”

Since: Sep 09

Now the basement is clean!

#77211 Feb 23, 2013
Norton wrote:
<quoted text>
Very good! However, I did not copy and paste! I have a study book. I'm impressed, Dawg!...
You TYPED all that stuff? Wow!

So now we know that you just copy stuff from books you have lying around the house, huh? I knew two-thirds of that comment was not original by you, and easily proved it by Googling a short unique phrase.

“KC's Son got a Meal Ticket!”

Since: Sep 09

Now the basement is clean!

#77212 Feb 23, 2013
"DFS": From the sparseness of the comments over the past 10 hours, apparently we have beaten the opposition into the ground. Only "Jokster" is typing "original" stuff, but that stuff mainly consists of school-yard taunts. I fear he has completely "run out of gas." I bet he is now sorry that his friend recommended that he come over to this thread. "Jokster" was simply not up to the task, and now he lies there sadly bleating. ROFL!

I have made a few brilliant observations about "Jokster." He is SO transparent. Perhaps I should share them with you through a private "message"?
Norton

Kansas City, MO

#77213 Feb 23, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
You TYPED all that stuff? Wow!
So now we know that you just copy stuff from books you have lying around the house, huh? I knew two-thirds of that comment was not original by you, and easily proved it by Googling a short unique phrase.
I most certainly did type that so that maybe you would understand something. All for you, Dawg! I had no idea I could copy and paste it or I wouldn't have wasted my time. However, I can type fast so.......no big deal! Of course, you are the 'Google King'!

CHEERS!

“KC's Son got a Meal Ticket!”

Since: Sep 09

Now the basement is clean!

#77215 Feb 23, 2013
Norton wrote:
<quoted text>
I most certainly did type that so that maybe you would understand something. All for you, Dawg! I had no idea I could copy and paste it or I wouldn't have wasted my time. However, I can type fast so....... no big deal! Of course, you are the 'Google King'!...
I am surprised that you typed all that. Impressive.

Yes, I attempt to use technology to make my tasks easier. Most folks do, if they are technically inclined.
Norton

Kansas City, MO

#77216 Feb 23, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
I am surprised that you typed all that. Impressive.
Yes, I attempt to use technology to make my tasks easier. Most folks do, if they are technically inclined.
I don't trust everything on the internet so I don't look up a lot of stuff. I usually want to know if my sources are honest and trustworthy. Sometimes you get fooled.

CHEERS!

“KC's Son got a Meal Ticket!”

Since: Sep 09

Now the basement is clean!

#77217 Feb 23, 2013
Norton wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't trust everything on the internet so I don't look up a lot of stuff. I usually want to know if my sources are honest and trustworthy. Sometimes you get fooled....
Yes. Your Bible is a good example of that.

Very few sources are "pure gold." You have to read several of them, judge their truthfulness, and then make up your mind.

Instead, you blindly "believe in" Fox News, and think that they are always telling you the truth. Thinking for yourself is highly under-rated.
krista

Montréal, Canada

#77218 Feb 23, 2013
I'm updating you as you asked
Illegal Muslim Prez

Forsyth, MO

#77220 Feb 23, 2013
Americans Paying $900 More A Year On Gas Under Obama
http://weaselzippers.us/2013/02/23/americans-...

Former U.S. Senate Candidate, on “People Control”, Not Gun Control:“We Live In A Society Of Wolves; You Do Not Fight Back By Creating More Sheep”
http://weaselzippers.us/2013/02/23/dan-bongin...
~ This man is great, a good speaker who speaks from the heart!

1 DEAD AFTER ALLEGED HOME INVASION IN NORTH CAROLINA:‘HE KEPT BEATING ME SO I FINALLY GOT OUT MY .38…
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/02/23/1-...

Homeland In-Security video advises Americans to use scissors to defend themselves from attacks during massacre
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/31/ne... (I see that they took the video down)

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039086_dhs_self_de...

~ Joe Biden’s(foolish and dangerous) instruction to shoot a warning shot off the balcony; not to mention that a school is behind the wooded area of Joe’s house.-ha!
~ A revolution would take placeacross this country if guns were to be seized; and that he would not participate in a seize.
~ That instead of Mexico asking for the names of US gun owners, Mexico should be asking for information about Fast and Furious
~ Chicago gang members should be gone after instead of law abiding gun owners.

~ What an amazing American.

FEDERAL SPENDING UP $822.90 PER PERSON SINCE OBAMA
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/real-federal-...

Secret energy lab spawns million dollar govt employee
http://watchdog.org/62420/co-secret-energy-la...
Norton

Kansas City, MO

#77221 Feb 23, 2013
Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. Your Bible is a good example of that.
Very few sources are "pure gold." You have to read several of them, judge their truthfulness, and then make up your mind.
Instead, you blindly "believe in" Fox News, and think that they are always telling you the truth. Thinking for yourself is highly under-rated.
I think for myself. That's why I watch Fox News. They are not totally liberal and biased as most of the others. I think they try to bring the truth to the people. Are they perfect......NO! Noboby is! They think more like I do I guess. I am old school about a lot of things.......like honesty, integrity, etc....! I do not believe in big government and hand-outs to lazy people. I believe in helping people but, for instance, people on Medicaid seem to hand it down from one generation to the next. Where are the checks and balances? And we wonder what has happened! Fox News gets the picture. I just wish the rest of them would wake up and realize our president is not a movie star he is suppose to be the leader of our country.

CHEERS!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hayti Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
johnson family 1 hr guest 2 9
pastor Jamie Jones 1 hr David 3
The Lion's Den (Aug '07) 2 hr assupcockdown 38
kayla mclevain 3 hr guest 3
Ricky Hooper 4 hr BiBoy2015 1
restarea Tue concerned 2
any guys wanna Sext Tue BiBoy2015 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hayti Mortgages