Iraq War Killed 190,000 People!
Posted in the Hayti Forum
#1 Mar 27, 2013
Did you know that 190,000 people were killed in the Iraq war? This includes over 4,000 Americans, thousands of our allies, Iraqs & many innocent civilians.
Did you know that 190,000 people would fill Yankee Stadium 3 times over?
That' right George Bush's war not only cost over 4 trillion dollars & bankrupted our country - but it also took the lives of 190,000 people & maimed thousands & thousands of others.
All of this death & destruction because of a war that didn't have to happen.
All of this because George Bush had a personal vandetta againsg Hussain & Bush hoped to get cheap oil from Iraq.
When will our country realize that George Bush, Cheney & others in his inner circle are guilty of war crimes?
When will just be served for these 190,000 people & all those who received serious injures in the Iraq war?
I must admit, OBAMA MADE A HUGE MISTAKE WHEN HE FIRST CAME INTO OFFICE BY NOT SEEING THAT BUSH & HIS CRONIES WERE ALL PROSECUTED TO THE FULL EXTENT OF THE LAW FOR WAR CRIMES!
Hopefully someday, we will see justice served...
#2 Mar 27, 2013
we are living in a country that has been ruled by tyrants for a long time.fdr was one letting the japanese airforce hit pearlharbor he knew full well they were coming and did nothing to prevent it killing thousands of americans.that damn nixon was another one the vietnam war was to end in 1968 but nixon had an aid of his to talk the south vietnam ambassador to prolong the war so he could be the next president.that made the war last another 5 years killing another 20,000 americans. now we're to bush the only thing i have to say about him is he needs to be hung from the highest tree for everyone to see.there isnt any hope for our country we are going down the road to distruction.
#3 Mar 27, 2013
Did you know that your figures are way off? Are you shocked to learn that, depending on the source your numbers are far too low? Depending on source, the actual number of violent deaths is between 100,000 and 1,000,000 dead?
Bush did his job as president and acted upon the information he had. The left wants to make up all sorts of myths about why he acted but the truth is that he did his job.
You scream about prosecuting Bush, Cheney and others. Do you realize that is a two way street.
The right could yell for prosecution of Obama over his involvement of American Troops in Libya during the uprising that booted Khaddafy. Bush followed the constitution and had congressional approval for his actions. Obama did not.
The right could also yell for a criminal investigation and possible prosecution for Fast and Furious, Benghazi, and the stimulus plan.
Perhaps, before you point this finger and make this demand, you should realize the can of worms you could be opening.
#5 Mar 28, 2013
I don't know if your numbers of deaths in the Iraq war are correct, but if they are - THAT MAKE'S BUSH'S IRAQ WAR EVEN WORSE!!!
How can you (in all good conscience) say that George Bush Jr. DID HIS JOB AS PRESIDENT ON INFORMATION HE HAD RECEIVED? It's been proven over & over again that Bush & Cheney & their inner circle was strongly promoting the Iraq war!
Bush went to war with Iraq IN SPITE OF CREDIBLE EVIDENCE THAT THERE WERE NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION FROM ALL EXPERTS.
Before George Bush was even elected president - it was a know fact that he had a personal vandetta against Hussain. Seems he had something to prove to his dad (Bush Sr) over Hussain trying to kill him.
Even before Bush was elected president I kept telling anyone who would listen - that if Bush was elected president - HE'D HAVE US IN A WAR WITHIN 6 MONTHS!
Although my timing was a little off - sadly to say, MY PREDICTIONS CAME TRUE when George Bush declared war on Iraq. Even on C'ville Topix I was warning of George Bush being a WAR MONGER! I wish we could pull up some of my old posts from 2007 & 2008 on Topix to see that I clearly warned of Bush's intentions about going to war...
The rest of what you mentioned: Libya, Khaddafy, Fast & Furious Benghazi are all just right wing manufactured crisis propaganda to try to discredit Obama.
And as we all know, THE STIMULUS PLAN CAN BE PLACED RIGHT ON THE HEAD OF GEORGE BUSH - BECAUSE HE IS THE ONE WHO CREATED THE FINANCIAL CRISIS THAT NECESSITATED THE STIMULAS PLAN IN THE FIRST PLACE!
John Doe, you need to turn off Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity & Fox and join the world of reality...
#6 Mar 28, 2013
You can sure spout left wing rhetoric, I'll give you that. On another thread I gave you proof with links that we did find evidence of WMD's. The evidence is put out and the left either conveniently ignores it or spins it.
Please tell me how Obama putting troops into Libya without congressional approval is a right wing manufactured propaganda tool to discredit Obama.
Please tell me how four dead Americans in Benghazi, who called for help and had to go through 8 hours of hell without getting that help is right wing propaganda.
Please tell me how the justice department allowing over 2,000 guns, guns the Obama administration now wants to ban, to go to drug cartels in Mexico and even facilitating those guns going to Mexico, with two of those guns used to kill Brian Terry, how is all of that right wing propaganda.
If Bush was so bad, if Bush was such a war oriented monger, why did the Democrats in Congress vote for the war? Why did Democrats who saw the same intelligence that there WMD's in Iraq agree? If there were no WMD's, what did Hussein use against the Kurds and Iranians during his war with Iran? Did he spray them with spoiled whipped cream.
Not one expert before the war said there were no WMD's in Iraq. It was until after the war was underway did left wing so called experts come out and scream about no WMD's.
Finally, please try to dismiss the 550 meteric tons of yellow cake uranium that was removed from Iraq. That stuff could be enriched into weapons grade material or it can be used as it is when imbedded in high explosives. The explosives go off and the radioactive material is spread over large areas (a lot of that is dependent on the wind) and kill thousands if not hundreds of thousands of people.
#7 Mar 28, 2013
I have to laugh at your post. It seems you were so intent on spewing out you hateful remarks that THERE WAS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION IN IRAQ, you missed something...
Did you know tht George Bush himself has admitted that there were not WMBs in Iraq before we went to war?
Yes, it's funny you also failed to notice my glaring error in the post that you are responding to.
I stated I came on Topix in 2007 & 2008 warning readers that Bush Jr. was a war monger & would start a war 6 months after he was elected. I WAS WRONG WRONG WRONG!!1
Before Bush was elected the first time in 2001, I was still working at Brewer Science here in Rolla. I was debating politics with a couple engineers working there - they were the ones I was warning about Bush was a war monger.
Yes, I did make many posts in 2007 & 2008 warning people not to vote for George Bush Sr. But, there were no posts warning that he would take us to war within 6 months - because we had already been at war 4-5 years...
John Doe, you will stop at nothing (even making a big fool of yourself) to defend your precious Republican party. Just quit denying that you're not a Republican - BECAUSE YOU ARE...
#8 Mar 28, 2013
Again, I remind you that I am not a Republican. If I were I would totally and 100% agree with their platform and I do not. I am independent, conservative libertarian. Perhaps you need to learn what a libertarian is. No taxes, no government intervention into the lives of people, etc.
Again you have twisted the truth. President Bush admitted that WMD's were not found but he did say, "THE CAPABILITY" to gain those weapons was there. In short, we found the parts of a WMD but not a WMD as you on the left describe it.
There it is and in his own words.
Question: Obama and company are making comments about Syrian uses of chemical weapons (a type of WMD) during this uprising. He has said it is unacceptable and will not be tolerated. He said it is a red line. So, if the Syrians use those WMD's AGAIN! That's right there is one documented case of use of chemical weapons. But if it happens again and he sends our troops in, what are you going to call that?
Can you in all honesty defend him for using US troops during the Libya uprising when he did NOT have the congressional approval that he needed?
You can complain about Iraq but Bush had the approval of Congress and that is what really sticks in your craw. Bush did it all rightly and correctly. He had Congressional approval and that included Democrats. If you are going to attack him for the war, then you have to attack each and every Democrat who voted for the war and that includes Hillary Clinton.
#9 Mar 28, 2013
I won't even waste my time reading this ignorant ranting - I'm getting so sick & tired of you & your stupid posts. I could care less...
#10 Mar 29, 2013
Thanks for the insults. Those are appreciated.
We had a discussion going, a point and a counterpoint going. You were bringing up your points and you were bringing up your points. It was interesting and stimulating. Then you bring on the insults. Why?
Add your comments below
|recent excapes||32 min||lame||26|
|Stephanie murphy rayburn||45 min||honestly||4|
|Mayor /Newspaper||1 hr||guest||26|
|Jared and Ashley||10 hr||Bahahaha||7|
|Do you Remember (Jan '08)||Oct 14||Bill Hart||417|
|5 star general united states army chester davis||Oct 6||GOD HAMMER||1|
Find what you want!
Search Hayti Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC