Any response, Feinstein?

Any response, Feinstein?

Posted in the Hawthorne Forum

Deal with it

Los Angeles, CA

#1 Jan 4, 2013
Senator Dianne Feinstein,
I will not register my weapons should this bill be passed, as I do not believe it is the government’s right to know what I own. Nor do I think it prudent to tell you what I own so that it may be taken from me by a group of people who enjoy armed protection yet decry me having the same a crime.
You ma’am have overstepped a line that is not your domain. I am a Marine Corps Veteran of 8 years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one.
I am not your subject. I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America.
I am the man who fought for my country. I am the man who learned. I am an American. You will not tell me that I must register my semi-automatic AR-15 because of the actions of some evil man.
I will not be disarmed to suit the fear that has been established by the media and your misinformation campaign against the American public.
We, the people, deserve better than you.
Respectfully Submitted,
Joshua Boston
Cpl, United States Marine Corps
2004-2012
anonymous california

Hillsboro, OH

#2 Jan 4, 2013
Dude, did you hear about the newspaper that published a list of all gunowners in that particular city the paper serves?

How the heck did they get that list?!

It's an obvious invasion of privacy worthy of a lawsuit straight to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Proof that Big Brother is out there and is watching with its all seeing eye!
Mark Winshel

Orinda, CA

#3 Jan 6, 2013
Deal with it wrote:
Senator Dianne Feinstein,
I will not register my weapons should this bill be passed, as I do not believe it is the government’s right to know what I own. Nor do I think it prudent to tell you what I own so that it may be taken from me by a group of people who enjoy armed protection yet decry me having the same a crime.
You ma’am have overstepped a line that is not your domain. I am a Marine Corps Veteran of 8 years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one.
I am not your subject. I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America.
I am the man who fought for my country. I am the man who learned. I am an American. You will not tell me that I must register my semi-automatic AR-15 because of the actions of some evil man.
I will not be disarmed to suit the fear that has been established by the media and your misinformation campaign against the American public.
We, the people, deserve better than you.
Respectfully Submitted,
Joshua Boston
Cpl, United States Marine Corps
2004-2012
As the above comnent alludes to, Feinstein herself carries a gun in her purse. In fact, she has insisted on her right to carry, and to continue to carry, a gun in her purse. so Feinstein is a San Francisco style "liberal," in other words a world class hypocrite, windbag, charlatan, and demagogue.

Also, some years ago Feinstein came out in favor at the time of the United States giving China the technology so that it could develop nuclear weapons. And just by "coincidence," of course, Feinstein's husband was making a fortune from his business interests in China. So Feinstein could always give us a big laugh by insisting that she is not so totally controlled by money that she would even be willing to increase the risk of having hundreds of millions of Americans killed in a nuclear war if it would make money for her and/or her husband.

So my suggestion is that the manufacturers of guns give Feinstein large election campaign contributions and/or find a way to further enrich her husband by sending a lot of business to him, and then I think Feinstein will suddenly become the most pro gun person in the entire United States.
Dane Thorsen

AOL

#5 Jan 7, 2013
anonymous california wrote:
Dude, did you hear about the newspaper that published a list of all gunowners in that particular city the paper serves?
How the heck did they get that list?!
It's an obvious invasion of privacy worthy of a lawsuit straight to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Proof that Big Brother is out there and is watching with its all seeing eye!
The list is a great tool. The list gives criminals a clear warning including addresses of where the homeowners are most likely to be protected. Gun permits have risen since the List was published. What parent wouldn't want to be on the LIST of parents who care about their families safety?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hawthorne Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Big talk about Big Move (Jan '13) 3 hr Pan Am no use HOV... 7
News Pot-Fed Pigs Grow Bigger, Tastier and Probably ... (May '13) 4 hr Icnoptnthis 19
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 10 hr No Justice 20,064
Doctor in Mexico removed wrong eye from infant ... 13 hr Juan 1
Marco Rubio in 2016! 14 hr feedback 49
Consumer Info: Stop Unsolicited Mail, Phone Cal... Sat Sherrie 1
News Play The Video Game Elon Musk Designed As A 12-... Jun 11 Keef 1
More from around the web

Hawthorne People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Hawthorne Mortgages