#1 Aug 17, 2012
I do not think the kids should have to pay to rent lockers especially as much as they are charging them. I think it goes against the No Child Left Behind Act. The taxpayer pays for school supplies and such. It's already started, a dollar here, a dollar there!
#2 Aug 17, 2012
I think it's wrong but there are those kids
that destroy them so we all have to pay for
a few peoples wrong doing,i think a deposit is
fine and then at the end of the year if the
locker is in good shape then they get it back
if not then the deposit is kept.
#3 Aug 17, 2012
I never really thought about it. Really why should they have to pay for a locker when they get free books and lunches? to beauty qween, i agree but you can't really destroy a locker. If it is destroyed or tore up, then you could charge the parents.
From what i heard they are charging $15 per kid. if that is right, that is wayyy too much anyways
#4 Aug 17, 2012
I don't know about other schools,but chapmamville is charging $2 for locker rent.but really,it should be free
#5 Aug 18, 2012
I had to pay for my locker when I was in school. So these ungrateful brats should have to pay too.
Everybody wants handout freebies these days!
#6 Aug 18, 2012
it is really hard when you have 3 kids in school! That is 3 times as hard to come up with money for each little thing. Is this how we are going to pay for the new school? School has just started and they are already sticking their hands out for money. My husband is out of work. I am the only one working now and I know there alot of people in the same boat. Give it a break.
Add your comments below
|Whose the sexiest MAN n Harts Creek? (Oct '11)||22 hr||anonymous tipper||37|
|Hiring the next Superintendent||23 hr||Citizen||1|
|Does anyone have free puppies to give away? (Jul '12)||Thu||John||63|
|Family escapes set fire in Peach Creek (May '14)||Oct 19||Truth||33|
|Jesse Kelley||Oct 19||CVILLE||3|
|Hot cashier at Piggly wiggly||Oct 19||Curious||1|
Find what you want!
Search Harts Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC