Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

[STO]

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
No, it's not! You're right, STO.
<wink>

Ha!

I see they pulled the same sh^t with you...

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<thud>
Neither of you has gotten what I've said. And you're both confusing topics, projecting your confusion on to me and stating these are my beliefs when not.
Thank you, though, for showing what level your comprehension rests at and how easy it is for you to be dishonest (to put it nicely).

"projecting your confusion on to me and stating these are my beliefs when not."

Often, I don't think they are confused. I think they got nuthin', so they have to make up sumthin.

[sasylicious]

STO wrote:

<quoted text>
God does not forbid killing.

Oh no?

So God has no problem with Mom killing her newborn or twelve yr old? Or man killing his gf?

[STO]

sasylicious wrote:

<quoted text> Prolifers disagree on abortion. Hes disagreeing with you on bible passages. So? Since when has THAT ever stopped you from debating?
Your avoiding answering.

Nope.

Disagreeing is fine and good. I welcome it. But ya gotta give me a reason you disagree. You and me and knit have disagreed, and if you guys couldn't argue from your own study you'd at least link me the Catholic POV, so I had something to debate.

Gtown's response is "No, it's not!". No rhyme or reason. There's nothing to debate. He's a crybaby who thinks the Bible is a joke.

[STO]

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
Nobody is trying to justify abortion. It needs no justification. It's a medical option for unwanted/unhealthy pregnancies.
STO, as far as I understand it, is disputing the oft made claim that abortion is forbidden due to what the bible says. Well, in Numbers 5, it wasn't forbidden. It was used to determine if a woman was guilty of adultery.
I don't know why, after all this time, you haven't used the excuse of Jesus' coming to wipe out the old ways of the old testament. Just as I don't know why you cherry pick parts of the old testament to confirm your own prejudice and hypocrisy.

"STO, as far as I understand it, is disputing the oft made claim that abortion is forbidden due to what the bible says. Well, in Numbers 5, it wasn't forbidden. It was used to determine if a woman was guilty of adultery."

Exactly.

[sasylicious]

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
Nobody is trying to justify abortion. It needs no justification. It's a medical option for unwanted/unhealthy pregnancies.
STO, as far as I understand it, is disputing the oft made claim that abortion is forbidden due to what the bible says. Well, in Numbers 5, it wasn't forbidden. It was used to determine if a woman was guilty of adultery.
I don't know why, after all this time, you haven't used the excuse of Jesus' coming to wipe out the old ways of the old testament. Just as I don't know why you cherry pick parts of the old testament to confirm your own prejudice and hypocrisy.

Yes, abortion DOES need justifying by your side and that is why you do it. Abortion is never justified. STO used the bible for his own agenda.

He claims to know" the bible and proudly proclaims to be the "bible expert" yet is continually misinterpreting it. Jesus said that although things were "allowed" at times, God NEVER intended it and NEVER wanted it that way(Divorce being an example). So for STO to bring up the OT to justify abortion TODAY is outright wrong.

BTW..you're being very deceitful when you claim that "abortion needs no justificatiion and that its a medical option for an unwanted pregnancy" when laws FORBID election abortion after viability AND you proaborts AGREE with the restrictions.

[STO]

sasylicious wrote:

<quoted text>Why are you afraid to reveal your personal opinion?. The abortion argument is based on our personal opinions. If you are against the act of abortion then you would never support a woman EVER choosing it. If you have NO issue with the act of abortion then you support a womans choice to abort.
Abortion kills an innocent humans life. I am against it.
You?

You're wrong.

"If you have NO issue with the act of abortion then you support a womans choice to abort."

It's not that black and white. PC opinions differ. What we agree on is that women must retain the right to choose. We don't necessarily always agree with her choice. I'm guessing some PC would never agree with her choice to terminate (perhaps unless the pregnancy was life threatening), but they will always give voice in support of her right to make the choice.

That's what you will never understand.

[sasylicious]

STO wrote:

<quoted text>
Nope.
Disagreeing is fine and good. I welcome it. But ya gotta give me a reason you disagree. You and me and knit have disagreed, and if you guys couldn't argue from your own study you'd at least link me the Catholic POV, so I had something to debate.
Gtown's response is "No, it's not!". No rhyme or reason. There's nothing to debate. He's a crybaby who thinks the Bible is a joke.

Google is your friend STO. You could find out the Catholic "POV" in less than a minute.

Gtown is telling you that what you are reading is being misunderstood. Hesnot doing what you claim by saying "No its not".

You refuse to answer a direct question and you know why. So do we.

Have a good night!

[STO]

sasylicious wrote:

<quoted text> Oh no?
So God has no problem with Mom killing her newborn or twelve yr old? Or man killing his gf?

That's murder. Not execution. Execution is killing.

[AyakaNeo]

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

I'd be interested in people's thoughts on this. I heard it yesterday on NPR's Radiolab, a story about a woman that started Project Prevention - that pays women - specifically drug addicts - to use birth control or to be sterilized. It takes about 40 minutes to listen to it in total.
http://www.radiolab.org/2012/nov/19/what-if-n...
One of her daughters, when asked if she would have rather been aborted than have been raised by an addicted mother or enter the foster care system, says quite frankly, she'd have rather not been born.
Its an interesting interview and concept, and if anyone takes the time to listen, could make for some interesting discussion.

Well given that the funds come from private donations and there is no guarantee that the funds go for bc and not more drugs, is she buying more crack for these drug addicts than bc? Her heart is in the right place, but imo these women need rehab first.

[sasylicious]

STO wrote:

<quoted text>
You're wrong.
"If you have NO issue with the act of abortion then you support a womans choice to abort."
It's not that black and white. PC opinions differ. What we agree on is that women must retain the right to choose. We don't necessarily always agree with her choice. I'm guessing some PC would never agree with her choice to terminate (perhaps unless the pregnancy was life threatening), but they will always give voice in support of her right to make the choice.
That's what you will never understand.

Laws aside ....do you support a woman killing her two day old baby? After all God gave her free will right? You may not agree with "her choice" but you will support her God given free will choices right?

Like HELL you would.

STO...you're living a very deceiving life.

[sasylicious]

STO wrote:

<quoted text>
You're wrong.
"If you have NO issue with the act of abortion then you support a womans choice to abort."
It's not that black and white. PC opinions differ. What we agree on is that women must retain the right to choose. We don't necessarily always agree with her choice. I'm guessing some PC would never agree with her choice to terminate (perhaps unless the pregnancy was life threatening), but they will always give voice in support of her right to make the choice.
That's what you will never understand.

If you support her choices then I suppose you personally support her choice to electively abort late term?

Oh that's right you do not.

So you are not for women "retaining the right to choose".

Next....

[sasylicious]

STO wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not angry.
The KJV is not perfect. Have you read its Preface?
That's why we study. That's why we use a Strong's Concordance.
I don't resent Gtown. I simply don't believe him.

"KJV is not perfect"

You've GOT to be kidding. The bible is the word of God guided /inspired by the Holy Spirit therefore it *is* perfect. If you claim you version is not then I suggest not readingit. Books were removed and words added. BOTH forbidden by God.

I never said that you resented gtown. What I said is that his conversion causez resentment from people living *in* their sin while refusing to follow God or to ask for Gods forgiveness. Wanting to change.

[Bit-O-Honey]

sasylicious wrote:

<quoted text> Abortion is forbidden for Catholics Jews Muslims and Christians. So their decision to abort goes against their faith.
There are many who are CIINO, JINOS AND MINOS. They abort and don't care about offending their God. That's nothing new dear.

You lie and not only dont care about offending your god, you dont care WHO you offend.

Its fortunate that everyone can see through you and those like you.

[Bit-O-Honey]

sasylicious wrote:

<quoted text>prove it

Read any news article about it idiot.

[Bit-O-Honey]

sasylicious wrote:

<quoted text> Oh no?
So God has no problem with Mom killing her newborn or twelve yr old? Or man killing his gf?

That would be MURDER dolt.

[feces for jesus]

sasylicious wrote:

<quoted text> Abortion is forbidden for Catholics Jews Muslims and Christians. So their decision to abort goes against their faith.
There are many who are CIINO, JINOS AND MINOS. They abort and don't care about offending their God. That's nothing new dear.

Total BS. I love how you boast about things that are untrue (on topix) and then live your life based on a lie. You're a typical liar who's full of feces for jesus.

[sasylicious]

Bit-O-Honey wrote:

<quoted text>
You lie and not only dont care about offending your god, you dont care WHO you offend.
Its fortunate that everyone can see through you and those like you.

I'll kindly ask you to show my lies. Can't link the post to my so called "lies " then hush up.

Kthanks.

[feces for jesus]

sasylicious wrote:

<quoted text>
"KJV is not perfect"
You've GOT to be kidding. The bible is the word of God guided /inspired by the Holy Spirit therefore it *is* perfect. If you claim you version is not then I suggest not readingit. Books were removed and words added. BOTH forbidden by God.
I never said that you resented gtown. What I said is that his conversion causez resentment from people living *in* their sin while refusing to follow God or to ask for Gods forgiveness. Wanting to change.

Hearsay on top of hearsay is your "evidence". It's hilarious and pathetic.

[sasylicious]

Bit-O-Honey wrote:

<quoted text>That would be MURDER dolt.

murder means to kill inhumanly and barbarically. The humans being killed via abortion are innocent. God has MUCH to say about shedding innocent blood. We arent here by fluke. God said that he new us and called us by name BEFORE he knitted us in our mothers womb. We were meant to be. God gives life and he takes life. Not us.

[STO]

sasylicious wrote:

<quoted text> Google is your friend STO. You could find out the Catholic "POV" in less than a minute.
Gtown is telling you that what you are reading is being misunderstood. Hesnot doing what you claim by saying "No its not".
You refuse to answer a direct question and you know why. So do we.
Have a good night!

"Hesnot doing what you claim by saying "No its not".
You refuse to answer a direct question and you know why. So do we."

That's all he's doing.

I'm not refusing. I can answer. I may, yet. Are you asking? I might answer you, but you'd have to first tell me why you wrongly believe I'm refusing. That'd be interesting to hear, since I've already told you why.