Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

[LiIrabbitfoofoo]

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
You mean you had no motive in saying, "'Lily,' you are such an obnoxious personality ..."? like those who have
obnoxious personalities in the PC camp, that you call "my friend" when you post don't exist?

ROFLMAO! Lynniekins, the DIFFERENCE between all of us and YOU is that WE are capable of thoughtful discussion. WE do not come here on a regular basis with the intent of fighting just to fight as you do.

You've lied here from day one about everyting from the topic of discussion to who you are. John NAILED you dead on when he says you twist what everyone says to fit your motives, and you motive is to tear down whoever is not walking in lockstep with you.

One thing that's NEVER changed about you no matter WHAT name you're using at the time, is when someone DARES speak out and disagrees with you, you turn on them like a rabid skunk.

There is LITERALLY not one single person here OTHER than the Skank, that you havent turned on since 2006 when you first started posting here.

You CONSTANTLY act like its just "you and you against the world" and you're claws are ALWAYS - without exception - out.

You consistantly make it very clear you're NOT here for debate OR discussion - you're ONLY here for the fight.

You're a petty, narcissistic, hypocritical harridan, and that's about it.

[LiIrabbitfoofoo]

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
You're not fooling anyone who isn't a PC bonehead with your bullshit.

And YOU aren't fooling ANYONE about ANYTHING Lynne D.

[Eddie M]

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
I also think there's something odd about both showing up and both complaining only about my behavior, and both considering it to be "obnoxious", while both ignored their own obnoxiousness and that of all the PCers here. I don't know if it's the same person or they know each other. But it's too weird to be mere coincidence.

Perhaps you and Guppy are one and the same. You both come on here and offer the same opinion of me and John. Coincidence?

[LiIrabbitfoofoo]

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text> Either PCers believe women should have "personal autonomy" and "medical privacy" as they've called it and believe a fetus shouldn't have equal rights to a woman, or they don't. At viability, it's still a fetus. Can't have it both ways without contradicting themselves.

You are, as usual, 100% wrong about this.

Normal people go through their lives believing in freedoms for people WITH LIMITATIONS.

We believe that people should be allowed the right to drink, but not to drink and drive. We believe in freedom of speech, until that speech hurts others - ie: inciting to riot or the like. That's just 2 of hundreds of examples that could be given.

FOr MOST, the concept of viability as a limit is a perfectly reasonable one. There is nothing contradictory about it.

But you're free to think otherwise. You have many views with NO basis in reality Lynne.

[LiIrabbitfoofoo]

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh, and here comes Eddie, who hasn't been here in how long, and first post is to me about my supposedly being "obnoxious", also ignoring the obnoxiousness coming from PCers. Both John and Eddie made no mention of the most obnoxious PC posters: CD, Cpeter, Foo etc. No, those people are ignored by both John and Eddie, and John calls Foo "friend". How sweet.
What a coinkidink that both John and Eddie think I'm obnoxious, both made sure they posted to me letting me know they think I'm "obnoxious", they did so posting to me with their own obnoxiousness about my supposed obnoxiousness. I can't make that stupidity up.
I haven't seen either posting here in awhile, I haven't posted to or about either of them, both post to me about the same thing; what's supposedly so "obnoxious" coming from me, and neither sees it from any other PLer or from anyone in the PC camp.
Their senseless stupidity couldn't be more obvious if they had tried for it to be.

As has been said before to you MANY times, its a shame you are incapable of actually HEARING what people are saying to you.

There's nothing "coincidental" about it. You're ignorance and obnoxiousness is SO glaring and SO CONSTANT, it would be unusual if you WEREN'T called on it.

When one see's your posts, one KNOWS exactly and precisely what is to follow will be yet just ANOTHER of your usual ranting missives.

You're not kidding anyone here Lynne, you crave the abuse, and you set out to be the recipiant of it, THEN act like the perennial victim.

Junket was right, you're to be pitied.

[LiIrabbitfoofoo]

Eddie M wrote:

<quoted text>
Perhaps you and Guppy are one and the same. You both come on here and offer the same opinion of me and John. Coincidence?

Nah, she doesn't think that. Lynne is simply incapable of expressing an original thought, and has to copy what she see's OTHERS say. Its really very sad.

[LiIrabbitfoofoo]

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
Exactly. Doesn't make sense. But then again, I've long ago given up on expecting anything sensible coming from PCers here.

You can't give up on something you didn't want to see to begin with Lynnekins. But nice suck up attempt there! LOL!

[Eddie M]

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
Nah, she doesn't think that. Lynne is simply incapable of expressing an original thought, and has to copy what she see's OTHERS say. Its really very sad.

I took notice that Lily offered her opinion on the matter after Guppy rendered the same opinion just some hours ago. I also took notice that Guppy is the one claiming some people on here are paranoid but then she goes on to make such an accusation. I could surely be accused of far worse things than being John.

[lil Lily]

Eddie M wrote:

<quoted text>
You just mentioned that I hadn't been here for awhile and now you claim I'm obsessing over you? Such a contradiction. That was good for a chuckle.
Madame Lily, everyone on here at some time will either be outright obnoxious or give unpopular incendiary opinions, the difference is that every post of yours that I read reeks of obnoxiousness, superiority and arrogance. You're just not as wonderful and intelligent as you seem to think you are, and that was and is my point. I like many of the people on both sides of this issue. Yes, they can be obnoxious but they can also be funny, insightful and rational. And interesting. You are none of those things. You are purely obnoxious.
Now if this quantifies in your self-absorbed little mind as obsession, then so be it.

You haven't posted here in months, and your 1st post since being back was about me. Yes, obsessed comes to mind, since the last time you were here, I was the subject matter of your posts then too. It's not about what I post, but about me.

Your opinions of me are meaningless, and it's obvious you haven't had a thing to say about anything I've posted on topic, or your posts would contain rebuttals. They don't. You're much more obvious than you think you are.

[LiIrabbitfoofoo]

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
If a woman is going to go the route of using an artificial womb, not only would she not have to have her developing child implanted into their own womb, but she wouldn't want to abort her child.

Ummmm......WHAT? If she's pregnant, she woudln't have to HAVE her ZEF implanted ANYWHERE Lynne, you idiot. Its already implanted via the pregnancy.

To suggest she would want to abort is like suggesting a woman using a gestational carrier would have the gestational carrier abort their developing child.

What in the holy fk are you babbling about now Lynnekins? Nobody even REMOTELY suggested that an artifical womb would abort.

Isn't it YOU that's usually complaining that others jump into a discussion without knowing what's being said prior?@@

Doc said that an artifical womb could eliminate the need for abortion. I pointed out - respectfully and CORRECTLY - as he himself attested the point to - that while it would be another option for those women who - say - didn't want to getstate but didn't want to abort either, it would NOT eliminate the need for abortion.

Many women would STILL want to abort, since they dont WANT bring a child into the world only to give a child up for adoption, which would be the most likely scenerio for an artifical womb usage.

For the purposes of the discussion of abortion, women that might avail themselves of the option of an artifical womb, would be those that would be willing to allow a baby to be adopted out, but didn't want to gestate simply for that purpose.

Kind of like the sperm donor that doesn't want a kid - doesn't want to know about a kid, but wants to help others have one. If an artifical womb is to be developed (and science is VERY close to that for humans) it would create another OPTION for women. That's all. It wouldn't eliminate other options, nor the NEED for other options.

[lil Lily]

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
You are, as usual, 100% wrong about this.
Normal people go through their lives believing in freedoms for people WITH LIMITATIONS.
We believe that people should be allowed the right to drink, but not to drink and drive. We believe in freedom of speech, until that speech hurts others - ie: inciting to riot or the like. That's just 2 of hundreds of examples that could be given.
FOr MOST, the concept of viability as a limit is a perfectly reasonable one. There is nothing contradictory about it.
But you're free to think otherwise. You have many views with NO basis in reality Lynne.

You don't believe in freedom of speech, or you idiots wouldn't be reporting PLers trying to get them banned.

Agreeing with the viability restriction is a contradiction of the arguments you PCers here have made.

Explain how the PC arguments of "medical privacy", "personal autonomy", and "fetus doesn't have rights" isn't contradicted at the point of viability?

[Eddie M]

Gtown71 wrote:

<quoted text>
What would you tell a christian, if they ask why Jesus had to die for their sins?

Hello Gtown. I'd like to answer your question. I am a Christian and I cannot answer such a question. I know it's supposed to be a way for the children of God to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Meaning through our faith and belief in Christ. I find it difficult to accept as it would leave all but the Christians barred from Heaven.

[Susanm]

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
You are, as usual, 100% wrong about this.
Normal people go through their lives believing in freedoms for people WITH LIMITATIONS.
We believe that people should be allowed the right to drink, but not to drink and drive. We believe in freedom of speech, until that speech hurts others - ie: inciting to riot or the like. That's just 2 of hundreds of examples that could be given.
FOr MOST, the concept of viability as a limit is a perfectly reasonable one. There is nothing contradictory about it.
But you're free to think otherwise. You have many views with NO basis in reality Lynne.

"Normal people go through their lives believing in freedoms for people WITH LIMITATIONS."

If this is true:

Why do pro"choicers" object to laws that limit who can provide abortions, safety measures on the places that provide abortions, and lowering the timeframe of when abortions are allowed as medical science advances?

"FOr MOST, the concept of viability as a limit is a perfectly reasonable one. There is nothing contradictory about it."

If this is true:

Why is it condradictory for a prolifer to defend allowing abortion in the cases of rape, incest, or the life of the mother?

[lil Lily]

You posted to Doc about artificial womb and abortion:

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
I have to respectfully disagree. Abortion would certainly be an issue, because there are women that wouldn't want to have their ZEF transplanted. It would open another option, but it wouldn't eliminate many of the issues themselves.

I posted:
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
If a woman is going to go the route of using an artificial womb, not only would she not have to have her developing child implanted into their own womb, but she wouldn't want to abort her child.

You reply:

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
Ummmm......WHAT? If she's pregnant, she woudln't have to HAVE her ZEF implanted ANYWHERE Lynne, you idiot. Its already implanted via the pregnancy.
...

The discussion was about "artificial womb" and your claim that abortion would be an issue if she refused to have the "ZEF" transplanted.

I said "implanted" talking about going from artificial womb to being implanted in her own womb. You said "transplanted", so beginning in artificial womb to where would it be "transplanted"?

I'm not reading the rest of your stupidity, because you couldn't even begin your post understanding what was said. Even if I provided definitions you wouldn't get it.

[feces for jesus]

Gtown71 wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry, but when I said "S O M E " hidus worship cows, according to "S O M E "websights, then it is a provable fact.

That is false, you brain dead idiot. Just because a website says something doesn't make it true. Then again, you believe a 2000 year old book of hearsay is your moral guide to the world.

[guest]

?

[lil Lily]

Eddie M wrote:

<quoted text>
I took notice that Lily offered her opinion on the matter after Guppy rendered the same opinion just some hours ago. I also took notice that Guppy is the one claiming some people on here are paranoid but then she goes on to make such an accusation. I could surely be accused of far worse things than being John.

Can't read for comprehension, Eddie? I didn't share Guppy's opinion. I said it was a coincidence you both came in stating your opinions about my behavior,(and not anyone else's), and that you both used the word "obnoxious".

Guppy suggested you were the same person, and I stated I didn't know if that was the case, and offered another explanation; that you knew each other.

Lil Lily, "I don't know if it's the same person or they know each other."

[feces for jesus]

Gtown71 wrote:

<quoted text>
Yea, not only is it against nature itself, but our country should be giving fanilies tax incentives, which does not apply to roomates. We should encourage strong fanilies, now more then ever, all hell has broke loose on the family unit.
Kids should be raised in the home with their birth parents.
Old people who had a spouse die, should not be forced to loose one of their checks, just becouse they get married.
We have young people shacking up, old people shacking up, and gays are the only one interested in getting married, and very few are interested in staying married.
That is just leaving God out of it. Which is impossible.
have you seen any websight that says some hindus worship cows? If yes they are some websights, and youtube vids, then I didn't lie about it. Some do worship cows.
Most in the US claim to be a christian, but sadly they are like you sto.
No offence, but I feel the reason you clash with those who speak about their God, or like me give a testimony, is becouse you don't have a testimony.
Atleast when I asked you you didn't , so I pray the God you've heard about all your life becomes real to you, before your death.
If you remember, this is what Jesus told Nicodemus, a religious ruler who knew way more about the first five books of the bible then you or I ever will, yet he didn't know the God of that bible. That's what matters.
I met, and became a child of God, and then learned about Him.
Many learn about Him, but do not know Him.

Yeah, the guy who cheated on his wife and had a child with his mistress really should be stressing the importance of marriage.

You're a hypocrite and nothing more.

[Eddie M]

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
You haven't posted here in months, and your 1st post since being back was about me. Yes, obsessed comes to mind, since the last time you were here, I was the subject matter of your posts then too. It's not about what I post, but about me.
Your opinions of me are meaningless, and it's obvious you haven't had a thing to say about anything I've posted on topic, or your posts would contain rebuttals. They don't. You're much more obvious than you think you are.

You're much more ignorant than you think you are. Do I care to rebut your posts kissing Doc's ass? No. I like Doc by the way so this is nothing against him. As for your other posts? You mean the long string of verbose missives that go on about the "mind boggling" ignorance and stupidity of anyone who dares to disagree with your most superior and learned opinions? The endless manifestos about the people you deem too stupid and too lacking in "comprehension skills" to be even worthy to walk in your most eminent shadow? The pages and pages of posts where you pat yourself on the back and exert your grandiose perceptions of self-importance? You want rebuttals to those posts? The very posts where you obsess endlessly over the lowly status of those ignorant members of the PC camp who in your mind clearly are not even worthy of wiping your royal ass? And then there's the petulant posts where you stomp your feet like a middle schooler and rage because people have the nerve to be friends with Foo. That is the content of your posts in a nutshell. The posts you think make you seem to superior in intelligence to everyone else, but only in your own little detestable mind, when they merely are screams for attention.

Enjoy your massive delusions of grandeur, Lynne. And yes, by now most everyone here "with any intelligence" seems to know you're the pathetic creature know as Lynn. Your pendulum has swung from one extreme to the other.

It's absolutely "mind boggling" that you still cling to this deception that you're not Lynne.

[elise in burque]

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh, and here comes Eddie, who hasn't been here in how long, and first post is to me about my supposedly being "obnoxious", also ignoring the obnoxiousness coming from PCers. Both John and Eddie made no mention of the most obnoxious PC posters: CD, Cpeter, Foo etc. No, those people are ignored by both John and Eddie, and John calls Foo "friend". How sweet.
What a coinkidink that both John and Eddie think I'm obnoxious, both made sure they posted to me letting me know they think I'm "obnoxious", they did so posting to me with their own obnoxiousness about my supposed obnoxiousness. I can't make that stupidity up.
I haven't seen either posting here in awhile, I haven't posted to or about either of them, both post to me about the same thing; what's supposedly so "obnoxious" coming from me, and neither sees it from any other PLer or from anyone in the PC camp.
Their senseless stupidity couldn't be more obvious if they had tried for it to be.

Oh, come on, Lily... You seem to pride yourself on being honest. If you deny that you are very obnoxious, you're either lying or deluding yourself. Your obnoxiousness stands on its own and needs no comparison. I always thought you knew what you were doing, but apparently, this is the real Lily, unplugged and without paint. You can't help being a jerk. That's just you.