Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Full story: Newsday

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Comments (Page 13,367)

Showing posts 267,321 - 267,340 of304,914
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#284644
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
You haven't posted here in months, and your 1st post since being back was about me.
Given the proliferation of your insane rantings, you find that ODD?@@
Your opinions of me are meaningless,
ROFLMAO Obviously not, since you've chosen to respond to EVERY ONE OF THEM so far! LOL

You lie like a rug Lynniekins. Methinks thou dost protest too much! <<grin>>

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#284645
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
and it's obvious you haven't had a thing to say about anything I've posted on topic,.
You're saying the same bullshit you've been saying since 2006 Lynnekins! Its not like you have ANYTHING new to offer! LOLOLOL!
Katie

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#284646
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Thats because your full of hate Katie, so it comes easy to you.
What do you mean? Hating censorship for adults does not mean I am full of hate? Man, should I start giving you a hard time for using the possessive form rather than the correct contraction?
Katie

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#284647
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>Psssssssst....dummy... .....they're not her posts. In fact, one is yours that's missing. LOLOL
Oh, is that what he meant? He thought those were my missing posts? If they were mine, I wouldn't know they weren't showing up because I'd be able to see them. What a doofus!

Hi Foo!!
Guppy

Rotonda West, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#284648
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

I see Eddie and Johnnie are taking turns posting comments. Before, they were posting at the same time. That is, until they were caught red-handed.

They are condescending and very effeminate. They remind me of Pete.

On the other hand, you have Goo-Goo eyes. She's very masculine. A know it all. Always ready for a fight. Although, she does suck up to the men. Even though she is a lesbian - she seems to have way more respect for men than women.. Strange, ain't it?

Goo-Goo eyes has two gears. Forward and Backward.

She needs to tone it down a bit. Maybe she's a rough dude??!! If she is a lesbian, she is the husband in the marriage. Funny, ain't it?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#284649
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't believe in freedom of speech, or you idiots wouldn't be reporting PLers trying to get them banned.
ROFLMAO Fk you Lynniekins, I've NEVER reported your kind. The ONLY people I have EVER reported are those of your kind that post private information without permission, and the KKK dude that was here some time back.

I certainly DO believe in Freedom of Speech, which INCLUDES my freedom to ridicule you and your kind. Hell, I WANT you to keep babbling, since you are your own worst enemy! LOL!!!
Agreeing with the viability restriction is a contradiction of the arguments you PCers here have made.
No actually it is not for reasons already explained.
Explain how the PC arguments of "medical privacy", "personal autonomy", and "fetus doesn't have rights" isn't contradicted at the point of viability?
I already have. Try moving your lips when you read, maybe it'll help.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#284650
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, is that what he meant? He thought those were my missing posts? If they were mine, I wouldn't know they weren't showing up because I'd be able to see them. What a doofus!
Hi Foo!!
No, they're not all yours. The only reason I know one was that idiot's was becasue I responded to one that's not there nor is the post I responded to. LOL!
SapphireBlue

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#284651
Feb 18, 2013
 
grumpy wrote:
<quoted text>Which party is for workers' benefits?
If Democrats vote for equal opportunity, it's for all employees, Democrat and Republican.
If pregnant women need help, Planned Parenthood is available for all women, Democrat and Republican.
Thing is, unions once had a purpose. Now they milk the taxpayers to give government workers higher salaries and better benefits than the rest of us.

Employees feel they are compelled to join the union or risk not "being in good standing" in their positions of employment because of misleading wording in the contracts.

If a substantial amount of union dues were donated to support both parties, you might have a point. This isn't the case.

Planned Parenthood manipulates its numbers to show how much they provide preventative women's health care. They do provide some counseling and contraceptive pills and condoms but, for the most part, they are in the business of abortions. Oftentimes with no questions asked and the age of minors overlooked and unreported to the authorities. Minors are often abused by someone they know and are too afraid to say who their abusers are.
Katie

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#284652
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
^^^Said to Obskeptic.
You just blew LNM and Katie's conspiracy theroy.
I don't have a conspiracy theory.

Have been waiting for those on the PL side to mention their pulled posts. That's why I listed what is missing. So everyone could speak up and we could work together on stopping this senseless censorship.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#284653
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
You people think I over use the phrase that none of you can read for comprehension, and I do, because not one of you can, and you all keep displaying it.
Want to try that one again - this time in somehting resembling comprehenisble English? Or maybe you shouldn't have dropped out of school, and you would be able to speak in simple sentences coherently.
I never denied being obnoxious.
ROFOMAO!! And THERE'S something to be proud of!

LMFAO!!!

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#284654
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

lil Lily wrote:
Doc and STO were talking about artificial wombs and viability. Both stating the possibility of limits of viability possibly becoming a non-issue if artificial wombs could gestate from beginning to end. Doc also suggested that abortion would also become a non-issue.
If using an artifcial womb, viability of a fetus is a non-issue since aborting that fetus would be a non-issue.
Clearly YOU can't read for comprehension you moron.

He said "abortion would become a non-issue". I pointed out that it would NOT become a non-issue since many women would NOT opt to USE it.

Unless of course you're suggesting forcing women to use one?
SapphireBlue

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#284655
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Have any pro-choicers on here ever seen an actual abortion or a sonogram of a fetus in the process of being aborted?

Just curious.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#284656
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
"Normal people go through their lives believing in freedoms for people WITH LIMITATIONS."
If this is true:
Why do pro"choicers" object to laws that limit who can provide abortions, safety measures on the places that provide abortions, and lowering the timeframe of when abortions are allowed as medical science advances?
I personally dont object to hose laws. I dont know any PC'er's that do.

I DO understand tho that some people DONT think there should BE limitations. I disagree with that.
"FOr MOST, the concept of viability as a limit is a perfectly reasonable one. There is nothing contradictory about it."
If this is true:
Why is it condradictory for a prolifer to defend allowing abortion in the cases of rape, incest, or the life of the mother?
Its not contradictory. At least not to me. Has anyone said it is? I honestly dont remember anyone saying or suggesting that, but I COULD be wrong.

You and other PL'ers like you Sue, are not like the extremists like some we see here, who dont think those exceptions should be allowed.
grumpy

Stony Point, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#284657
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
"Normal people go through their lives believing in freedoms for people WITH LIMITATIONS."
If this is true:
Why do pro"choicers" object to laws that limit who can provide abortions, safety measures on the places that provide abortions, and lowering the timeframe of when abortions are allowed as medical science advances?
"FOr MOST, the concept of viability as a limit is a perfectly reasonable one. There is nothing contradictory about it."
If this is true:
Why is it condradictory for a prolifer to defend allowing abortion in the cases of rape, incest, or the life of the mother?
It's only contradictory if you assume pro-choicers are not pro-life.
Guppy

Rotonda West, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#284658
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Want to try that one again - this time in somehting resembling comprehenisble English? Or maybe you shouldn't have dropped out of school, and you would be able to speak in simple sentences coherently.
<quoted text>
ROFOMAO!! And THERE'S something to be proud of!
LMFAO!!!
Tough, tough broad.

She doesn't have a nice bone in her body.

She feels inferior - that is why she puts on this big act of superiority. Transparent.

Ain't that something?
Katie

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#284659
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Ummmm......WHAT? If she's pregnant, she woudln't have to HAVE her ZEF implanted ANYWHERE Lynne, you idiot. Its already implanted via the pregnancy.
<quoted text>
What in the holy fk are you babbling about now Lynnekins? Nobody even REMOTELY suggested that an artifical womb would abort.
Isn't it YOU that's usually complaining that others jump into a discussion without knowing what's being said prior?@@
Doc said that an artifical womb could eliminate the need for abortion. I pointed out - respectfully and CORRECTLY - as he himself attested the point to - that while it would be another option for those women who - say - didn't want to getstate but didn't want to abort either, it would NOT eliminate the need for abortion.
Many women would STILL want to abort, since they dont WANT bring a child into the world only to give a child up for adoption, which would be the most likely scenerio for an artifical womb usage.
For the purposes of the discussion of abortion, women that might avail themselves of the option of an artifical womb, would be those that would be willing to allow a baby to be adopted out, but didn't want to gestate simply for that purpose.
Kind of like the sperm donor that doesn't want a kid - doesn't want to know about a kid, but wants to help others have one. If an artifical womb is to be developed (and science is VERY close to that for humans) it would create another OPTION for women. That's all. It wouldn't eliminate other options, nor the NEED for other options.
"Ummmm......WHAT? If she's pregnant, she woudln't have to HAVE her ZEF implanted ANYWHERE Lynne, you idiot. Its already implanted via the pregnancy."

Now wait, Foo. Seems to me you aren't considering women with high-risk pregnancies. If I were to get pregnant again, it may kill me. Therefore, I'd opt out of it. Unless there was an artificial womb available to gestate for me.

When I first read your links on artificial wombs, this is where my thinking was because of my own experiences. How cool it would be for women to actually have their natural children without the fatal risks some pregnancies bring (ie, high blood pressure, cardiac, stroke, etc).
Katie

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#284660
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't believe in freedom of speech, or you idiots wouldn't be reporting PLers trying to get them banned.
Agreeing with the viability restriction is a contradiction of the arguments you PCers here have made.
Explain how the PC arguments of "medical privacy", "personal autonomy", and "fetus doesn't have rights" isn't contradicted at the point of viability?
Why don't you explain how you see it as contradictory? I asked before and all you said was that it's contradictory. You didn't offer any explanation as to why or how you see it as such.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#284661
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

lil Lily wrote:
You posted to Doc about artificial womb and abortion:
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
I have to respectfully disagree. Abortion would certainly be an issue, because there are women that wouldn't want to have their ZEF transplanted. It would open another option, but it wouldn't eliminate many of the issues themselves.
I posted:
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
If a woman is going to go the route of using an artificial womb, not only would she not have to have her developing child implanted into their own womb, but she wouldn't want to abort her child.
You reply:
<quoted text>
The discussion was about "artificial womb" and your claim that abortion would be an issue if she refused to have the "ZEF" transplanted.
I said "implanted" talking about going from artificial womb to being implanted in her own womb. You said "transplanted", so beginning in artificial womb to where would it be "transplanted"?
I'm not reading the rest of your stupidity, because you couldn't even begin your post understanding what was said. Even if I provided definitions you wouldn't get it.
I understood just fine what was being said between Doc and I, and he acknowledged it.

YOU trying to twist it once again to "suit your motive" is typical, but nonsensical.

Once again, you're trying to create an argument where none exists.

Doc said that ALS womb would make abortions a non-issue, inferring that women would or could transplant their ZEF TO the artifical womb for the purpose of gestation.

I respectfully disagreed, saying that many women would NOT want to do that. Period. THat's ALL there was to it. He acknowledged the point.

And NO, I was NOT talking about it starting in the artifical womb to begin with you moron. Do NOT try to put words in my mouth. You dont speak well for yourself, you CERTAINLY dont speak for me and what I said.

You saying "implanted" while I said "transplanted" is immaterial.
It would have to be transplanted FIRST which was the point, and NOBODY was talking about it going FROM the artifical womb TO another woman for implant.

Perhaps you should try reading ALL the words before you say stupid shit.

Gotta love how you acknowledge you dont read the posts in their entirety, before you start your bullshit. No WONDER your comprehension is so fuckedup, you dont bother to read what you're responding to - AND YOU ADMIT IT.

Just one more bit of proof you're NOT HERE to actually have a discussion.
Guppy

Rotonda West, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#284662
Feb 18, 2013
 
hmm, little goo-goo resembles someone else. they both make the same mistake over and over again. interesting.

they ain't fooling anyone.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#284663
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Can't read for comprehension, Eddie? I didn't share Guppy's opinion.
Yet you said the exact same thing. Shocker.

....balance of your justifications delted for redundant stupidity.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 267,321 - 267,340 of304,914
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Hartford Discussions

Search the Hartford Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min RoxLo 1,072,422
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 2 hr HughBe 68,160
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 hr truth-facts 45,499
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 13 hr voice of peace 67,529
The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 17 hr toomanymistakes 18,494
FBI at Carabetta Office Building on Center and ... (Jun '11) Jul 8 Cahoots 15
B & D Automotive, Newington, Connecticut Jul 7 Byron Phillips 1
•••
•••
•••
•••

Hartford Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Hartford People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Hartford News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Hartford
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••