Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 310347 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

#284636 Feb 18, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
You haven't posted here in months, and your 1st post since being back was about me. Yes, obsessed comes to mind, since the last time you were here, I was the subject matter of your posts then too. It's not about what I post, but about me.
Your opinions of me are meaningless, and it's obvious you haven't had a thing to say about anything I've posted on topic, or your posts would contain rebuttals. They don't. You're much more obvious than you think you are.
You're much more ignorant than you think you are. Do I care to rebut your posts kissing Doc's ass? No. I like Doc by the way so this is nothing against him. As for your other posts? You mean the long string of verbose missives that go on about the "mind boggling" ignorance and stupidity of anyone who dares to disagree with your most superior and learned opinions? The endless manifestos about the people you deem too stupid and too lacking in "comprehension skills" to be even worthy to walk in your most eminent shadow? The pages and pages of posts where you pat yourself on the back and exert your grandiose perceptions of self-importance? You want rebuttals to those posts? The very posts where you obsess endlessly over the lowly status of those ignorant members of the PC camp who in your mind clearly are not even worthy of wiping your royal ass? And then there's the petulant posts where you stomp your feet like a middle schooler and rage because people have the nerve to be friends with Foo. That is the content of your posts in a nutshell. The posts you think make you seem to superior in intelligence to everyone else, but only in your own little detestable mind, when they merely are screams for attention.

Enjoy your massive delusions of grandeur, Lynne. And yes, by now most everyone here "with any intelligence" seems to know you're the pathetic creature know as Lynn. Your pendulum has swung from one extreme to the other.

It's absolutely "mind boggling" that you still cling to this deception that you're not Lynne.

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

#284637 Feb 18, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, and here comes Eddie, who hasn't been here in how long, and first post is to me about my supposedly being "obnoxious", also ignoring the obnoxiousness coming from PCers. Both John and Eddie made no mention of the most obnoxious PC posters: CD, Cpeter, Foo etc. No, those people are ignored by both John and Eddie, and John calls Foo "friend". How sweet.
What a coinkidink that both John and Eddie think I'm obnoxious, both made sure they posted to me letting me know they think I'm "obnoxious", they did so posting to me with their own obnoxiousness about my supposed obnoxiousness. I can't make that stupidity up.
I haven't seen either posting here in awhile, I haven't posted to or about either of them, both post to me about the same thing; what's supposedly so "obnoxious" coming from me, and neither sees it from any other PLer or from anyone in the PC camp.
Their senseless stupidity couldn't be more obvious if they had tried for it to be.
Oh, come on, Lily... You seem to pride yourself on being honest. If you deny that you are very obnoxious, you're either lying or deluding yourself. Your obnoxiousness stands on its own and needs no comparison. I always thought you knew what you were doing, but apparently, this is the real Lily, unplugged and without paint. You can't help being a jerk. That's just you.
feces for jesus

Bellmore, NY

#284638 Feb 18, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well sto, if you want to know if I want to learn from a person who says God is ok with abortion, and tries to use verses that say nothing about abortion, to back it up, then no, I don't want that kind of knowledge.
The Spirit of God dwells in all believers, and will lead them in into all truths.
He does that, through His power and His word, and if you don't think Gods Word is under attack, then just look at most "christian" book stores, and all the different versions.
Acts 8: 37 is one of my favorite verses to show how so many new versions have removed the verse entirely.
It could be, becouse it is one of tbe most important verses.
It could be becouse those who put more faith in baptizm, then God had influence on the versions.
It could be the god of this world, had an influence in those peoples lives.
Until you can provide evidence that your favorite storybook is the "word of God", you're just talking out of your gaping behind.
grumpy

Stony Point, NY

#284639 Feb 18, 2013
SapphireBlue wrote:
<quoted text>
If you have to join a union, and in many places you do, the dues go directly to the Democrat Party whether the employee paying those dues is a Democrat or not.
All taxpayers fund Planned Parenthood whether they believe in abortion or not.
If your dues went to the Republican Party or your taxes funded anti-abortion organizations, you'd be singing a different song.
We all want the same things when it comes fairness, civil rights and protecting the environment. Too many liberals think they own the market on all of these things and the opposition is pure evil.
Even though you don't think that, I'm sure.
Which party is for workers' benefits?
If Democrats vote for equal opportunity, it's for all employees, Democrat and Republican.
If pregnant women need help, Planned Parenthood is available for all women, Democrat and Republican.

“Never look back unless”

Since: Sep 09

you're in a rough neighborhood

#284640 Feb 18, 2013
Pity, pity, pity.

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

#284641 Feb 18, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
I disagree. Using an artificial womb would remove the need to use her womb. Also, if a woman agrees to using an artificial womb, her desire to abort would be non-existant. Obviously using an artificial womb means she wants the child, so abortion would not be an issue. No more than it would be using a gestational carrier.
Hey, yeah. And Lily could start a cottage industry crocheting artificial womb colors.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#284642 Feb 18, 2013
Doc and STO were talking about artificial wombs and viability. Both stating the possibility of limits of viability possibly becoming a non-issue if artificial wombs could gestate from beginning to end. Doc also suggested that abortion would also become a non-issue.

If using an artifcial womb, viability of a fetus is a non-issue since aborting that fetus would be a non-issue. Why would a woman go through using an artificial womb, just to end the life of her developing child? She wouldn't.

Foo jumps in disagreeing that abortion would be a non-issue, and give a reason that has nothing to do with the artificial womb discussion.

Obviously, if it's just women getting pregnant, abortion and viability would still be an issue.

STO was talking sci-fi hypotheticals about artificial wombs and viability no longer being an issue. Artificial wombs would be the ALS that would keep a fetus alive.

Foo's comment disagreeing with Doc had nothing to do with the hypothetical artificial womb discussion.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#284643 Feb 18, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>Oh, come on, Lily... You seem to pride yourself on being honest. If you deny that you are very obnoxious, you're either lying or deluding yourself. Your obnoxiousness stands on its own and needs no comparison. I always thought you knew what you were doing, but apparently, this is the real Lily, unplugged and without paint. You can't help being a jerk. That's just you.
You people think I over use the phrase that none of you can read for comprehension, and I do, because not one of you can, and you all keep displaying it.

I never denied being obnoxious. I said that for John and Eddie to claim I was, and do that while ignoring they and all you PC are as well, was hypocritical and it's stupid.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#284644 Feb 18, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
You haven't posted here in months, and your 1st post since being back was about me.
Given the proliferation of your insane rantings, you find that ODD?@@
Your opinions of me are meaningless,
ROFLMAO Obviously not, since you've chosen to respond to EVERY ONE OF THEM so far! LOL

You lie like a rug Lynniekins. Methinks thou dost protest too much! <<grin>>

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#284645 Feb 18, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
and it's obvious you haven't had a thing to say about anything I've posted on topic,.
You're saying the same bullshit you've been saying since 2006 Lynnekins! Its not like you have ANYTHING new to offer! LOLOLOL!
Katie

Spanaway, WA

#284646 Feb 18, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Thats because your full of hate Katie, so it comes easy to you.
What do you mean? Hating censorship for adults does not mean I am full of hate? Man, should I start giving you a hard time for using the possessive form rather than the correct contraction?
Katie

Spanaway, WA

#284647 Feb 18, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>Psssssssst....dummy... .....they're not her posts. In fact, one is yours that's missing. LOLOL
Oh, is that what he meant? He thought those were my missing posts? If they were mine, I wouldn't know they weren't showing up because I'd be able to see them. What a doofus!

Hi Foo!!
Guppy

Englewood, FL

#284648 Feb 18, 2013
I see Eddie and Johnnie are taking turns posting comments. Before, they were posting at the same time. That is, until they were caught red-handed.

They are condescending and very effeminate. They remind me of Pete.

On the other hand, you have Goo-Goo eyes. She's very masculine. A know it all. Always ready for a fight. Although, she does suck up to the men. Even though she is a lesbian - she seems to have way more respect for men than women.. Strange, ain't it?

Goo-Goo eyes has two gears. Forward and Backward.

She needs to tone it down a bit. Maybe she's a rough dude??!! If she is a lesbian, she is the husband in the marriage. Funny, ain't it?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#284649 Feb 18, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't believe in freedom of speech, or you idiots wouldn't be reporting PLers trying to get them banned.
ROFLMAO Fk you Lynniekins, I've NEVER reported your kind. The ONLY people I have EVER reported are those of your kind that post private information without permission, and the KKK dude that was here some time back.

I certainly DO believe in Freedom of Speech, which INCLUDES my freedom to ridicule you and your kind. Hell, I WANT you to keep babbling, since you are your own worst enemy! LOL!!!
Agreeing with the viability restriction is a contradiction of the arguments you PCers here have made.
No actually it is not for reasons already explained.
Explain how the PC arguments of "medical privacy", "personal autonomy", and "fetus doesn't have rights" isn't contradicted at the point of viability?
I already have. Try moving your lips when you read, maybe it'll help.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#284650 Feb 18, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, is that what he meant? He thought those were my missing posts? If they were mine, I wouldn't know they weren't showing up because I'd be able to see them. What a doofus!
Hi Foo!!
No, they're not all yours. The only reason I know one was that idiot's was becasue I responded to one that's not there nor is the post I responded to. LOL!
SapphireBlue

Orlando, FL

#284651 Feb 18, 2013
grumpy wrote:
<quoted text>Which party is for workers' benefits?
If Democrats vote for equal opportunity, it's for all employees, Democrat and Republican.
If pregnant women need help, Planned Parenthood is available for all women, Democrat and Republican.
Thing is, unions once had a purpose. Now they milk the taxpayers to give government workers higher salaries and better benefits than the rest of us.

Employees feel they are compelled to join the union or risk not "being in good standing" in their positions of employment because of misleading wording in the contracts.

If a substantial amount of union dues were donated to support both parties, you might have a point. This isn't the case.

Planned Parenthood manipulates its numbers to show how much they provide preventative women's health care. They do provide some counseling and contraceptive pills and condoms but, for the most part, they are in the business of abortions. Oftentimes with no questions asked and the age of minors overlooked and unreported to the authorities. Minors are often abused by someone they know and are too afraid to say who their abusers are.
Katie

Spanaway, WA

#284652 Feb 18, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
^^^Said to Obskeptic.
You just blew LNM and Katie's conspiracy theroy.
I don't have a conspiracy theory.

Have been waiting for those on the PL side to mention their pulled posts. That's why I listed what is missing. So everyone could speak up and we could work together on stopping this senseless censorship.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#284653 Feb 18, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
You people think I over use the phrase that none of you can read for comprehension, and I do, because not one of you can, and you all keep displaying it.
Want to try that one again - this time in somehting resembling comprehenisble English? Or maybe you shouldn't have dropped out of school, and you would be able to speak in simple sentences coherently.
I never denied being obnoxious.
ROFOMAO!! And THERE'S something to be proud of!

LMFAO!!!

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#284654 Feb 18, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
Doc and STO were talking about artificial wombs and viability. Both stating the possibility of limits of viability possibly becoming a non-issue if artificial wombs could gestate from beginning to end. Doc also suggested that abortion would also become a non-issue.
If using an artifcial womb, viability of a fetus is a non-issue since aborting that fetus would be a non-issue.
Clearly YOU can't read for comprehension you moron.

He said "abortion would become a non-issue". I pointed out that it would NOT become a non-issue since many women would NOT opt to USE it.

Unless of course you're suggesting forcing women to use one?
SapphireBlue

Orlando, FL

#284655 Feb 18, 2013
Have any pro-choicers on here ever seen an actual abortion or a sonogram of a fetus in the process of being aborted?

Just curious.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hartford Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min USAsince1680 1,263,861
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 23 min Earthling-1 54,329
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 2 hr scirocco 70,147
News Dining Detour: Restaurants near Nassau Coliseum (Jan '09) Fri Joan 12
Review: Nirenstein Horowitz And Associates (Sep '12) Fri psuzanne790 47
MK hot handbag cheap MK wallets Watch on iluxsh... Jul 30 Dicy 1
News FBI at Carabetta Office Building on Center and ... (Jun '11) Jul 29 zippy 16
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hartford Mortgages