You don't believe in freedom of speech, or you idiots wouldn't be reporting PLers trying to get them banned.<quoted text>
You are, as usual, 100% wrong about this.
Normal people go through their lives believing in freedoms for people WITH LIMITATIONS.
We believe that people should be allowed the right to drink, but not to drink and drive. We believe in freedom of speech, until that speech hurts others - ie: inciting to riot or the like. That's just 2 of hundreds of examples that could be given.
FOr MOST, the concept of viability as a limit is a perfectly reasonable one. There is nothing contradictory about it.
But you're free to think otherwise. You have many views with NO basis in reality Lynne.
Agreeing with the viability restriction is a contradiction of the arguments you PCers here have made.
Explain how the PC arguments of "medical privacy", "personal autonomy", and "fetus doesn't have rights" isn't contradicted at the point of viability?