Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Full story: Newsday 305,687
Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision. Full Story
express

Chicopee, MA

#284380 Feb 16, 2013
http://wanderingtheoutskirts.blogspot.com/

From Eugenics to Birth Control to Designer Babies to IVF and ESCR to New World Order. Still a work in progress, with many posts waiting in the wings everyday.
Guppy

Englewood, FL

#284382 Feb 16, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Just keep swimming, Dori. You have no idea what you're talking about and I can tell you're obviously phishing. Not much subtlety to your posts.
Why so bitter, Katie?

Speaking of Ted Bundy. My ex-neighbors sister dated Ted Bundy one summer. Ted's aunt lived in Pennsylvania and he would visit. Someone suggested the two of them should go out. They did. He was too smart to kill her. It would have been too obvious who did it. They called him cousin Teddy.

Anger is bad for your health.
The Prince

Phillipsburg, NJ

#284383 Feb 16, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
What is a Holy Ghost? Seriously? Is a spirit a ghost? Are the soul and spirit the same thing? All you have is spiritual jargon. Empty words with no substance behind them.
eYt here you are promoting your pagan hate for all Chrisitians. They love you and pray for you. You are undeserving but that is waht Chrsitians do. You are a pagan and will never understand that. Satan has you now.
The Prince

Phillipsburg, NJ

#284384 Feb 16, 2013
Eddie M wrote:
<quoted text>
My God woman! You're just as obnoxious as ever. Nothing ever changes with you. No growth. No maturation process. Yes Lily, you are a victim. A pitiable victim. And your superiority over all other humans is duly noted. Have I stroked your ego sufficiently now?
Now plase give that little speech to your proabortion pagan friends.

“qui tacet consentire ”

Since: Oct 12

Detroit

#284385 Feb 16, 2013
Katie wrote:
I did not ever make a claim that "government forced a women to have an abortion prior to R v W". Therefore I don't need to "provide some examples".
Well, you said, "Roe v Wade also protects women against forced abortions", so who did R v W protect women from? You made the claim, I'm just asking you to elaborate on it.
Katie wrote:
Roe v Wade specifically addresses the issue of women having personal privacy and bodily autonomy over their pregnancies. The case from FL was provided to you last year in a different thread. Do you remember? Where the mentally unstable girl was legally able to refuse the abortion being forced upon her by her caregivers? I'm sure the court's ruling will provide you with the insight you seek, BA.
As I recall, the court case was about the care taker opting for an abortion because the pregnancy could endanger the woman's life she was charged to care for. On appeal, a court found that the woman was competent to make that decision for herself, even if it meant losing her own life. You've insisted this meant that the government was forcing an abortion on a woman, obviously, there were extraordinary circumstances.
Roe v Wade did not specifically address protecting a woman against forced abortions because it was not, and never has been, an issue in our country. You made the claim that "Roe v Wade also protects women against forced abortions", that was protected long before Roe v Wade, when abortion was illegal. I was asking you to provide something that challenged this. Your Florida case is irrelevant in regards to Roe v Wade, it was about protecting the womans right to life, a constitutional right established before R v W.

“qui tacet consentire ”

Since: Oct 12

Detroit

#284386 Feb 17, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
You're insane. You think your baseless opinions about the world are facts. Too bad you don't research anything before opening your big, fat mouth.
Many other people from other cultures can speak of their personal experience with God, just like you. And if their God is not the same as yours, do you think that makes their experience invalid? Remeber, you're the dimwit who talks about Hindus worshipping cows when that is total BS. Seems like you're the as$hat making Gods up in an effort to devalue other religions and their beliefs.
Wait a minute moron, your name, "Feces for Jesus" is disrespectful and intolerant of other's beliefs. You rant about bible thumpers yet you're no different in your attack on their beliefs. What makes you think your beliefs, or understanding, is so superior to others that you offer "feces" to theirs? You're just an intolerant, hypocritical POS, no different than those you hate.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#284387 Feb 17, 2013
Guppy is a raging homophobe and seems genuinely unaware that the rest of the world no longr lives in the 1950's. She'll say incredibly idiotic things and whine when her errors are pointed out.

My parents prized education more than probably any other factor. They encouraged us to learn things even if they weren't career-oriented, and to question anything that seemed incongruous.

I'm not sure they allow "take a child to work" day in medical facilities these days, but I can imagine it: "Now, honey, this is called a speculum--can you pronounce that? Now, you aren't going to BELIEVE what Mommy is going to do with this..."
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, <quoted text>
Wow, Cptr (and back atcha), is Guppy pouting because your post wasn't linked? I saw it, read it, and thought how similar it was to my own childhood. We had a big family. Most the women were educated and worked as nurses. Sometimes I even went to work with my mom or gramma. Probably wouldn't be legal these days, though.
Do you think Guppy's ever had anyone's real respect?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#284388 Feb 17, 2013
Neither has microsoft...
Katie wrote:
oops! ignore SB's post up there with Cptr's. not sure how it got there. haven't quite figured out all the bugs in Windows 8 yet.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#284389 Feb 17, 2013
So "guppy" is your real name?
Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you so afraid to use your real name? Is it a boys name?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#284390 Feb 17, 2013
If government would get out of the way of cloning research, we probably could grow hearts and other body parts.
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Would you want them to? Things are being done in labs that the public never hears about...so who knows?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#284391 Feb 17, 2013
Katie and I are the same person? That's news to me.
Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
Peter seems to be having a melt down. It's OK. Things will get better, they always do. Even for someone as mean as you.
Don't take your unhappiness out on other people. Learn to deal with it on your own.
Katie and Peter are the same people. It doesn't matter to me. They don't fool anyone.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#284392 Feb 17, 2013
I've had an internet stalker, back when I was young and naive and using my real name. Never again. My posting name is a permutation of elements in my real name, and I had someone actually look up a "c peter" in Indianapolis, which of course wasn't me.
Eddie M wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not prudent for people to be giving out full names on such a forum. Maybe you wouldn't stalk people, as you say, but there may be others who might so last names should not be given or solicited.
Ocean56

AOL

#284393 Feb 17, 2013
SapphireBlue wrote:
Are you, too, getting tired of this president continually talking about women as if any of us ever thought we were second-class citizens before he came on the scene? What's up with that? Even feminists are starting to say knock it off, Mr. President.
Nope, I'm not tired of the President speaking up for women at all. The regressive Republicans are the ones who think women are second-class citizens. They make that obvious whenever they come up with new ways to restrict abortion rights for women who WANT them.

So which feminists are saying "knock it off, Mr. President?" Specifics would be helpful.
Ocean56

AOL

#284394 Feb 17, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
What exactly is your problem? You are on here using a made up name while complaining that we are too. You're starting to act creepish and too interested in our personal information.
Exactly. People who solicit PERSONAL information really creep me out. It's NONE of their bleeping business.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#284395 Feb 17, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
So you are saying I'm dumb and you're smart, and that if anyone does an internet search about hindus worship cows, then absolutely no websights will say that SOME hindus DO worship cows, correct?
If you googled "Hindu's worship cows" and ignored the first dozen pages where effectively EVERY site acknowledges that they do NOT worship cows - then yes, you're dumb. Worse - you're being DELIBERATELY dumb.

If you recall, this is what many have tried to tell you - you ignore what you're being told and being shown, in your strange quest to alienate posters.

THe very first link that comes up, says:

http://www.religionfacts.com/hinduism/things/...

"Hindus do not worship the cow"

The second site listed - a Hindu site - says:

http://www.nhsf.org.uk/index.php...

"Hindus don't worship cows. We respect, honour and adore the cow. By honouring this gentle animal, who gives more than she takes, we honour all creatures.

Hindus regard all living creatures as sacred - mammals, fishes, birds and more. We acknowledge this reverence for life in our special affection for the cow. At festivals we decorate and honour her, but we do not worship her in the sense that we worship the Deity."

This is not unlike your attempts to demean and dimminish other's views of their faiths. Perhaps you should become familiar with the Nostra Aetate in which the Vatican affirms the validity of other faiths.

In your own stubbornness, you not only alienate posters, you alienate your own faith.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#284396 Feb 17, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course now the basta@rd has to actually see the post.
When I brought up one of Doc's past eff-ups he told me to forget the past. Funny coming from him, doncha think?
Now ? Didn't the "bastard" see the post originally and have it removed ? The bastard's just seeing it NOW ? Make up your mind. Which is it ?

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#284397 Feb 17, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Obviously my posts existed so your claims that I didn't answer you, or that it's my "MO" to leave your questions unanswered, was quite wrong. Again you forget how I tracked down one of my past posts answering one of your questions that you claimed I didn't answer, and proved you wrong back then.
What we really have is your "MO" of claiming your questions are going unanswered...and being wrong.
You were wrong that first time you claimed I didn't answer your question, and I proved it by digging up my unanswered post.
You were clearly wrong this time when you claimed I didn't answer your current question, as you well know.
You were wrong when you claimed I didn't provide the post number when you asked for it.
And you were wrong with the whole "took the bait/it wasn't bait per se" debacle.
What we have is a clear pattern of you being wrong quite often.
I can only go by what I see. If the alleged answer to my post is not visible to me, how am I to know you actually did answer ?
Only in hindsight, in consideration of evidence of post removal, will I admit I was wrong. But I'll never apologize for having said I never saw the posts....because I never did.
Obviously you were wrong about me removing the posts. So it appears there is enough wrong to go around for everyone.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#284398 Feb 17, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, their paranoid ideas about all that displayed just how irrational the PC nutcases are. Not once did they consider any rational explanation. It went stupid to completely irrational in 1 sec flat.
Logic would have told them, certain people here are not afraid to respond to posts. Why would they think others would report them and have their posts removed, and for the reasons they suggested? Because that's what they would do, and those would be the reasons why.
True. Haven't some of them actually admitted to reporting posts and trying to get some PL's bounced ?
I've demonstrated nothing but a willingness to answer and answer directly any question directed at me. Certainly cannot say the same for others ( Bitter, Tinker Bell, etc ). Now all of a sudden I'm going to be the one having posts removed ?
feces for jesus

Bellmore, NY

#284399 Feb 17, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
So you are saying I'm dumb and you're smart, and that if anyone does an internet search about hindus worship cows, then absolutely no websights will say that SOME hindus DO worship cows, correct?
No, I said you're insane. You blab on and on about things you don't know about, like starving children and hindus worshipping cows. Then again, the American use of the word worship has swayed from it's original meaning, but you wouldn't care to know about any of that either.

Maybe you can find a blog by a religous nut, like yourself, that says that Hindus worship cows, but that still won't be true. Do you ever check your sources or are do you just believe whatever you read...... as long as it fits into your world view and your beliefs?

Perhaps a very small percentage of Hindus might worship a cow. It's not as if I am in the Hindu nation taking a census of each person. I will not rule out the possibility. This is called keeping an open mind; something you know very little about.
feces for jesus

Bellmore, NY

#284400 Feb 17, 2013
The Prince wrote:
<quoted text>
eYt here you are promoting your pagan hate for all Chrisitians. They love you and pray for you. You are undeserving but that is waht Chrsitians do. You are a pagan and will never understand that. Satan has you now.
awwww, poor baby Tom Tom doesn't like people questioning the BS in his religion. Go cry to your zombie god, nancyboy.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hartford Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 min Kristy 46,755
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min mdbuilder 1,110,280
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 18 min Faith 68,521
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 1 hr scirocco 69,405
The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 17 hr Chuck 19,222
16 Members And Associates Of La Familia Gang Ar... (May '08) Fri Unknown 296
DCF Protest in CT & We want your stories!!! (Jul '12) Fri ryan 41
•••
•••
•••

Hartford Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Hartford People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Hartford News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Hartford
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••