Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 310476 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Obskeptic

Troy, MI

#282579 Feb 6, 2013
Should you believe in him? Of course I would say yes, I think you should, but that is not my judgement call to make. It was not me that gave you free will, or started the miracle of what we know as the human experience through our ability to procreate. It's entirely your choice to forsake him, or even mock him, which you seem very adept at. When your soul is empty of his love because you have chased all feeling of him from it, its easy to rationalize killing your own baby to serve your own selfish interests. You may not have room or time for him, but he never stops loving you, and will forgive you if you ask him.
Gtown71

United States

#282580 Feb 6, 2013
Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
Pollyanna much?
Aides is a non issue? You are in denial. It's not always a death sentence, but it is a serious chronic disease. To say otherwise is just plain lying.
I make crap up? No I don't, but if you believe that go right ahead.
You don't mind saying derogatory things about me, but you don't want me saying derogatory things about gay people. Double standard. That's OK, but you look a little foolish.
I've just been told by an expert - that lesbians who adopt can be quite "militant." They have a lot of domestic abuse issues in their households. If you disagree, you are stupid and ignorant. Don't like to call people names, but in this instance I'll make an exception because that's all you do.
You must be pretty unhappy. I saw a comment you made to someone else, where you say you never liked kids. That's unusual.
You must be very self-centered.
Pity.
You've just hit the nail on the head.
Double standard ,militant,self centered, like saying derogatory things about you, but doesn't like it back, and my personal fav, is if they have no good answers they just call you a liar and hope you will go away. Lol

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282581 Feb 6, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
I find it interesting that the spelling of your name is constantly changing. That would indicate that for some reason you have to keep retyping it in. Hmmmm...
She thinks we wont be able to find her old posts if she changes it often enough.

She's a failure at that too LOL!

Of course she's been caught posting under other names quite a few times now. Remember "Pugsy"? ROFLMAO! The idiot.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282582 Feb 6, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Katie: "The psychiatry community has determined ..."
I realize you delude yourself into believing that your word alone should be taken as fact, but your unsubstantiated opinions are neither facts nor proof of facts. Your opinions of what we've posted are based on your ignorance and senselessness.
Lynne, you wouldnt know a fact if it walked up and punched you in the stomach.

Post-abortion syndrome: creating an affliction.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19594725

Is there an "abortion trauma syndrome"? Critiquing the evidence.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19637075

THERE'S some facts for ya dummy.

ROFLMAO!

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282583 Feb 6, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Not unfounded at all. You're lazy and a liar, and don't ever prove your claims. I'll ask for proof of the person making the claim, you, and when you can't provide it, you prove your own statements are "unsubstantiated".
I don't care either way, because it's your claim and your responsibility to substantiate it as an informed and competent claim, or leave it unsubstantiated, and have it be your opinion only.
Just don't try to claim your opinions are facts, without proving the facts, and proving those facts support the stupidity you posted.
I just proved the stupid one here is you Lynniekins.

Now go like a good little puppy and find something that fits your agenda from people with less credibility than you have and LESS science to back it up. LOL!
Gtown71

United States

#282584 Feb 6, 2013
Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
Why does judaism discourage converts?
It is all a word game with foo, notice what she writes, right after saying judaism discourages new converts?

BY ITS LAWS

Now if I made that statement she would blow it up and call me a liar, but I will be nice, and tell you that real Judaism doesn't discourage converts.
The "modern " Jew on the other hand, kinda does whatever they wish, and this is the sec foo is a member of, becouse,,,,,

Well, in her own words "by its laws " her lifestyle would not be looked at very favorable.:)

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#282586 Feb 6, 2013
Niether of the Above wrote:
<quoted text>In my original post, I never mention God, divinity or anything of that nature. What we really have here is the prejudice against Jesus Christ the man and his existence, because he has a claim to divinty as well. Do I have proof that there is a God? or do I have proof Jesus Christ was the son of God? The answer, to people like yourself, who demand some level of concrete evidence, is Nope. But you have aready shown your prejudice and preconcieved ideas so while you state Socrates and Aristotle existed, you have no proof, but still believe because of some external writings or artifacts. You don't allow however, those who believe Jesus Christ existed, the same level of proof, in otherwords you set the bar, just a little bit higher. To prove he was the Son of Man is beyond most people's comprehension and unless you spend years going to church and interepting the writings of the bible and Gospels you will never really understand how and why Catholics believe Jesus Christ is the son of God. Of course, if you don't believe in a God, it doens't matter if Jesus is his son or not, does it? I can understand, due to the lack of education/understanding, not believing in his divinity, but not believing he existed as a man, just befuddles me. But hey good luck, I will pray for the salvation of your soul.
Now you're just playing the fool.

here is your original post...

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
"THe problem with trying to engage religous freaks in this topic is they think their version of "faith" hold the ONLY viable and valid arguments."

Niether of the Above replied:
"And they are, for the most part, right!"

So you were claiming that the "religious freaks" are "for the most part, right".

I say they are not, and so you fall back on the over-used argument on here that I must be some kind of bigot against your dogma and as an atheist I must be uneducated. Jesus may or may not have existed, but his existence was not at all the crux of your "original post". It was to declare that the "religious freaks" are "for the most part, right"

Don't waste your time praying for my soul, fundie. I don't need any of your mythology to get through the day.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282587 Feb 6, 2013
Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
Why does judaism discourage converts?
Perhaps you could click some of the links in the post you quoted and find out?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282588 Feb 6, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Do whales like you ever come up for a breath? Either your an aderol addict or you sleep in the chair in front of the computer. Who subsidizes your marathons here on the computer?
@@ Yeah. Cuz two hours is a "marathon".

So what would Lynne's 6 hours be?

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#282589 Feb 6, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
She thinks we wont be able to find her old posts if she changes it often enough.
She's a failure at that too LOL!
Of course she's been caught posting under other names quite a few times now. Remember "Pugsy"? ROFLMAO! The idiot.
LMAO! Pugsy! I do remember.
Kenose

Bellmore, NY

#282590 Feb 6, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
The writings of Josephus the Jewish Historian gives a brief account about Jesus There is also the writings of Tacitus,Thallus, Philopon, Lucian of Samosata, Mara Bar-Serapion, and contemporary Rabbinical sources. One thing to note about those Contemporary sources: The miraculous events the surrounded Jesus were NEVER DENIED OR PROVEN WRONG by those contemporary sources. Instead they were explained away as sorcery. By the way, there is no sperating the 'nice guy'[(who chased money changers out of the temple with a whip twice!), with the miracle working God-man; they are inseperable.
Source(s):
Check out the impressive bibliography of "The Search For The Messiah" by Mark Eastman, M.D. and Chuck Smith
I did cut and paste this to be clear. I am not claiming to be the author, but I read so many that basically repeat the same historical references as to the existence of Jesus, before you even consider the bible, or the millions of followers of his teachings.
Tacitus was supposedly born after the "christos" he writes about, so it would not be accurate to say his writing is a first hand account.

You do know that Tacitus never travelled to "Germania", but you regard all of his testimony as absolute fact? Does that mean what he spoke of is inaccurate? No; but it does show that his information is likey from word of mouth, basically second hand sources.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282591 Feb 6, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
The writings of Josephus the Jewish Historian gives a brief account about Jesus There is also the writings of Tacitus,Thallus, Philopon, Lucian of Samosata, Mara Bar-Serapion, and contemporary Rabbinical sources. One thing to note about those Contemporary sources: The miraculous events the surrounded Jesus were NEVER DENIED OR PROVEN WRONG by those contemporary sources.
ROFLMAO! Joseph ben Matityahu never claimed that jebus was a messiah. In FACT, he only used the name "Jesus" twice in his writings, and once was only as the BROTHER of James.

Good try tho.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282592 Feb 6, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
You speak for normal people now?
Regarding your garbage? I certainly do!

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#282593 Feb 6, 2013
Pollyanna? Not at all. I just know what I'm talking about.

AIDS (not aides) is a non-issue in regard to the subject. There are plenty of people with chronic diseases out there; few even attempt to adopt.

I deride what you say because it's meaningless twaddle; you might as well be a wealthy norwegian describing lif in harlem. You're telling me things about MY community that I know aren't true, and that you can't back up.

Who is this expert? Kids aren't placed in homes with DV. As far as being "militant" is concerned, define "militant", and how it wold make a home a bad placement.

I didn't say I didn't like kids; I said I have no rapport with them.
Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
Pollyanna much?
Aides is a non issue? You are in denial. It's not always a death sentence, but it is a serious chronic disease. To say otherwise is just plain lying.
I make crap up? No I don't, but if you believe that go right ahead.
You don't mind saying derogatory things about me, but you don't want me saying derogatory things about gay people. Double standard. That's OK, but you look a little foolish.
I've just been told by an expert - that lesbians who adopt can be quite "militant." They have a lot of domestic abuse issues in their households. If you disagree, you are stupid and ignorant. Don't like to call people names, but in this instance I'll make an exception because that's all you do.
You must be pretty unhappy. I saw a comment you made to someone else, where you say you never liked kids. That's unusual.
You must be very self-centered.
Pity.
Gtown71

United States

#282594 Feb 6, 2013
Kenose wrote:
<quoted text>
When you met Jesus, did Elvis come over for dinner too?
Are you still yammering on about Hell and your religion? Amazing that you ignore the facts and refuse to accept that the word Hell is not in the original bible. It is a "pagan" concept that does not correlate to your relgions lie of a "biblical hell". You do not understand the word or it's origin and history.
Continue to boast about your "eternal life". Sounds mighty prideful of you to constantly boast about that. Then again, you're saved and you can do anything you want and you'll go to Gods super happy place for you regardless of your dishonorable actions.
What part of FOR BY GRACE ARE YE SAVED, NOT OF WORKS lest any should BOAST, that you don't understand?

What part of God changed my desire to sin, do you not understand.
People who are truly saved will still sin, since they are still in their earthen body, BUT the way they desire to sin, and how they feel after they sin is two different worlds.
As far as Hell.
I never even really thought very much about it untill the night God woke me up.

God is the one that let me know, that I was fixing to make a decision to accept His free gift "THAT I DO NOT AND CAN NOT BOAST ABOUT ",or Hell would be my home when I died.

So I have the written word of God, that does talk about Hell, regaurdless of how many wish it didn't , or try and discredit the word, PLUS I have God Himself, through His Holy Spirit, that let me know in the blink of an eye that Hell is real.

So, do I believe in a book, that just so happens to back up and tell me all that happened to me in person with God, OR do I believe some person on the internet who tells me this god is a liar about Hell, and has nothing better to offer at all.

I think a guy named Joshua, which lived long before I came along, said it best -when He said "as for me and my house we will serve the Lord ".

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282595 Feb 6, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
Should you believe .......babbling bullshit deleted for rundundant nonsense
Grow up dear. Not everyone believes in your deity and that's okay. That's the beauty of America.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#282596 Feb 6, 2013
Expert in what? Experience in what? Homosexuality isn't a major in ny instituti0on of higher learning.

Call me names if you want--I've been called worse names by better people.
Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you actually read or skim the comments before YOU comment?
The gay guy likes to call me names such as stupid and ignorant. I thought I would return the favor. If you know me, I don't like to call names. I think he was deserving of the name calling.
This person is an "expert" with about twenty years experience. I would listen to this person rather than the rest of you - who have no clue and just make stuff up as you go along.
No, not Lily's daughter. Who is Lilly?
Is Elise your real name? Very pretty.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#282597 Feb 6, 2013
sasylicious wrote:
<quoted text> For one I disagree with what you claimed about prolifers. What prolifers "like to start their argument at viability"? No they dont. The only reason viability is mentioned AT ALL is because that is where you proaborts get tripped in your deceit. I don't agree that "most PLets agree with exceptions" either.
It is also dishonest of you to refer to anti-choicers after viability(agreeing with restrictions) as PRochoicers.
What prolifer "considers a fertilized an infant"?. Stop being so dishonest STO.
Two humans can share ONE body wwithout "diminishing" the rights of the other.(As per mom and her child).
Think siamese twins.
Thx for reading it and responding.

"The only reason viability is mentioned AT ALL is because that is where you proaborts get tripped in your deceit."

What do you mean?

"I don't agree that "most PLets agree with exceptions" either."

Most do. I didn't say, you.

"It is also dishonest of you to refer to anti-choicers after viability(agreeing with restrictions) as PRochoicers."

What?

"What prolifer "considers a fertilized an infant"?."

That is the way most AC/PL frame their argument -- as if there is no difference.

"Two humans can share ONE body wwithout "diminishing" the rights of the other.(As per mom and her child)."

Obviously, I disagree with you. Reasons outlined in the post you responded to.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#282598 Feb 6, 2013
Gays don't live in trenches. What "goes on" are peoples' lives; those people just happen to be gay.
Guppy wrote:
Oh, this person is in the trenches everyday and knows exactly what goes on.
I guess you hate it when someone knows more than you do.
Suck it up.

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

#282599 Feb 6, 2013
Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you actually read or skim the comments before YOU comment?
The gay guy likes to call me names such as stupid and ignorant. I thought I would return the favor. If you know me, I don't like to call names. I think he was deserving of the name calling.
This person is an "expert" with about twenty years experience. I would listen to this person rather than the rest of you - who have no clue and just make stuff up as you go along.
No, not Lily's daughter. Who is Lilly?
Is Elise your real name? Very pretty.
Twenty years experience in what field?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hartford Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 hr CCC 1,275,000
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 5 hr Trey LaTrache 54,497
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 15 hr Ariel Sharon 70,157
News More Advice On Acura TL Transmission Failures A... (Apr '09) 17 hr Verna x 290
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Thu Norbert of Norview 71,944
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) Thu Mother Mcreeeeee 20,096
Review: Nirenstein Horowitz And Associates (Sep '12) Aug 26 juliaj887 50
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hartford Mortgages