Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 310231 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282236 Feb 5, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes you have answered it, but the same way as above ^^^^^^^^^^
You're LYING again. I've answered VERY specifically three times now.
YOU HAVE NO ANSWER.
Actually I do, and I've stated it. You IGNORE the answer, because you dont LIKE it, it dosen't fit in your religous bullshit box.
I DO! THE BIBLE DOES!
PEOPLE ARE BORN WITH A SIN NATURE.
No they are not. That's complete bullshit.

People LEARN "sinning" from those who raise them.

And to cut off your circular bullshit at the pass, AND to cover your religous garbage, in YOUR world and by YOUR logic, it would go back to Adam and Eve, the first sinners who were NOT "born", but they certainly TAUGHT their kin to sin.
This is why you have asked yourself "what is wrong with me? "
You may have asked yourself that, but I honestly have never had occasion to ask myself that, except for ONCE in my life - and I answered it by entering rehab over 20 years ago, and educating myself.

Your jebus bullshit is YOURS and you're welcome to it, but you're NOT welcome to ascribe it to others who reject your version of faith.

And your version of faith is rejected in large part BECAUSE of extremist idiots like yourself. Just sayin`.
Tom Tom

Phillipsburg, NJ

#282237 Feb 5, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Bitner, the more you post, the more unreasonable you become.
You claimed less than half of women "not married" had abortions.
The link said less than half of women "never" married.
There are MORE than half of "not married" (<your claim) women who had abortions, who were once married but not necesarily at the time of the abortion. So they aren't partof the "never" married stat.
Get your head out of your butt, will you? Holy cow.
Lily, you must have hit a nerve because she is giving you her classic proabrtion pagan answer. She is calling you a troll, biter is a very shortbus pagan and when she is cornered by her own ignornace and lies, she calls people trolls. It is common for the proabort pagans. At the end of the day it is all they have. With biter, it is her way. You must remeber, this is a woman who had her daughter get married dressed up at a pagan Ren Fair. Good God.
Tom Tom

Phillipsburg, NJ

#282239 Feb 5, 2013
Conservative Democrat wrote:
Reposted with the quotation errors corrected.
<quoted text>
The record will only show a futile attempt to dumb something down for your benefit and your perpetual inability to even comprehend that.
<quoted text>
Are you sure about that?
There are two cases in Florida that control;
Williams v. State, 15 So. 760 (Fla. 1894), and State v. McCall, 458 So.2d 875 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
In Williams the Florida Supreme Court stated in pertinent part:
"The proof shows further the premature birth and death, within a few hours after the assault and battery, of the child with which the wife was pregnant. The injury to the mother here, that resulted in the premature birth and death of the child, was inflicted upon her by the defendant under such circumstances as would have made it murder, had the injury resulted in the death of the mother, instead, simply, of producing the death of the child. When this is shown the crime is made out."
In McCall, the 2nd District Court of Appeals stated in pertinent part:
"Accordingly, we hold that in Florida there are no such crimes as vehicular homicide and DWI man-slaughter of a viable but unborn child. We do not hold that a viable fetus is not alive nor do we hold that a person should not be punished for causing its death. We simply adopt the traditional interpretation of the words “human being” under the homicide stat-utes as meaning one who has been born alive. There-fore, the court properly dismissed those counts of the information relating to the death of Michael Thomas Umbel."
In short, no birth followed by death of the "born" baby, no Fetal Homicide in Florida.
Good luck in charging the perp with "manslaughter" if the baby is born dead.
LMAO!!!
<quoted text>
Of course not. I only used that scenario to prove to you that the statute assumes a wanted pregnancy, which you emphatically deny. Yet, here you are conceding that, in Florida, if the mother sticks a coat hanger in her c*nt and kills her fetus, which unequivocally means an "unwanted pregnancy," she can't be charged with fetal homicide, or the "Unlawful Killing of an Unborn Quick Child." It has to be the actions of another, which unequivocally assumes she, meaning "mommy," didn't want the pregnancy ended.
And, I've shown you how even despite the language of the statute, the courts' interpretation is that there must first be a live birth, followed by death from the assault, for the statute to apply.
"Win some, lose some[?]" You haven't won one yet, errand boy.
;-)
Tough when a real lawyer tears your comments apart. Better go back to that online legal advice site to come up with more proabortion arguments.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282240 Feb 5, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
What's not relevant here is who you think is who, or why. What is relevant here is people POSTING the truth, which you don't do. What is relevant here is posting proof of your claims, and not trying to deflect like an ignorant buffoon using childish topics like who you think is who here, whenever you can't prove your claims. What is relevant and what you proved is that you have NO PROOF of your claim of mutual abuse, and no justification for attacks on a PLer's life and having been a victim of domestic violence. That's ALL you proved with your bullshit recently..
I'm just fine with a bunch of liars who are on the pro-choice side of the abortion issue thinking I have no credibility. Are you kidding? lol. PC LIARS thinking PL people who post the truth are not credible. In the words of Larry The Cable Guy, "I don't care who you are, that's funny, right there."
Lynne we are REALLY unclear which of Newton’s three laws keeps your ears apart. Now I'm guessing you wont have the first clue what that infer's, and that's okay, since so much goes over your head anyway.

And given you're as useful as an ashtray on a motorcycle, its not like your words, let alone your opinions carry much meaning here. Or ANYWHERE I suspect - and therein lies most of your issues.

Its not shocking you find "Larry the cable guy" to be high humor.@@

This whole thing regarding your lack of crediblity circles back around around to the FACT that everyone here know's you're a lying sack of shit. When its well known AND accepted that you ARE the OP that posted here as Lynne D, yet you continue to lie either directly or by omission about it, our opinions on who or what you are CERTAINLY IS relevant.

You can claim from now to your doomsday (and knowing you, you probably will) that you not having crediblity doesn't matter to you, but CLEARLY it does.

AGAIN, you're not here to debate, you're not here to discuss. You're here to try to "get back" at those you think have done you wrong.

AGAIN, if you actually WANTED discussion, you'd go somewhere where people gave a shit what you had to say, where you had an iota of respect.

You care VERY MUCH about what others think of you. You're the ULTIMATE MASOCHIST Lynne, and its really pathetic.
Tom Tom

Phillipsburg, NJ

#282241 Feb 5, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, you're such a Troll. You post nothing of substance at all, Delusional One.
Ah, your old fallback position. Dogs just roll on their backs when bested. Pagans call people one of their gods, "you are a troll". ROFLMAO, you are incapable of intelligent debate, since you lack intelligence. Tell some more lies and please cal lme a troll. It is an intellectual badge of courage coming from you.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282242 Feb 5, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Since when have you been here to discuss abortion, Toots?.
WHo the hell are YOU to talk Lynniekins?? ROFLMAO!

You're here to make it ALL ABOUT LYNNE! LOLOL!

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282243 Feb 5, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Bitner: "Incorrect. Less than half of all abortions are performed on women who are not married, or living with someone, at the time."
You have no stats on whether or not women are "living with someone", and you're wrong about ["less than half"] "...of all abortions are performed on women who are not married."
A site from your own PC camp says "83% unmarried". Do you need to be told that's more than half? These stats pretty much say SINGLE women.(unmarried, never married, divorced and widowed) all means single women. You have no stats on how many are "living with" a man, and guessing isn't proof. You can only go by what it states.
http://www.prochoice.org/about_abortion/facts...
ROFLMAO! Want to try something from THIS DECADE Lynne you moron?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282244 Feb 5, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
I have stats that say differenly.
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_induced_abo...
Wrong. Biologically, she is pregnant. Biology does not say she's a mother. You're full of shit, Troll.
I'm REALLLLLLY glad I read ahead.... LOL

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#282245 Feb 5, 2013
Doc Degall wrote:
<quoted text>
I just did numbnuts. I responded to a linked article from one of your fellow PC nincompoops about a man suing a catholic hospital for malpractice which revolved around the central point of the fetus as a person, and laid out what was, even if you didn't agree with it, a valid argument. Your response was some non sequitur about stocking up on condoms. There have been plenty of other times I've "gotten around" or at least attempted to debate and you've proved yourself an inept "fundie" jabbing nitwit.
I guess you forgot that time I called you on your bullshit 3 times in a row in one weekend. You conceded on 2 of the points and refused to see the light on the 3rd.

And I'm an atheist so I'm not a fundie.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282246 Feb 5, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
We can prove it, but people need a conscience and sense of humanity to be able to recognize the proof. You never will recognize it.
You certainly CANNOT prove it.

What is morally wrong to you, may not be to someone else.

There is no such thing as an "immoral" medical decision. That's just stupidity.

Billions of women have aborted in history, and have cleaner consciences and a higher senses of humanity than YOU ever will.

Who the hell do you think YOU are to judge others humanity OR conscience?

You're NOTHING Lynne. To coin one of your suck buddy No Relevence's old phrases, you're nothing but fly shit in the greater scheme of life Lynne.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282248 Feb 5, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Petey: "It's your opinion that there are babies in the womb. Science says otherwise."
"Babies" is subjective. There IS a "child" in the womb, and by definition, "child" includes "unborn fetus".
You have no point in claiming there's no baby in the womb, when anyone with sense knows exactly what the fetus is in relation to the woman. It's her child and whether or not you choose to deny that doesn't change that biological (scientific) fact, fool.
You don't have the knowledge to post facts, and that's proven each time you post.
Lynne, you're not only ridiculous, but you're redundant.

Nobody is talking about children here. Period. Zygotes, embryo's and fetus's are in the womb. People can call it a baby if they choose, but they're medically incorrect.

You're an idiot, and THATS proven every time you post.

Now I know you're hanging your hat on the one definition you could find in a website dictionary that fits your agenda, but your semantics are as full of shit as you are.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282250 Feb 5, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't state that as a fact when it's only an opinion. An opinion of a person who has no humanity toward her own child in utero killed by abortion, and no conscience about it, and would have no problem with women aborting all the way until full term labor.
You're not only wrong, you're stupid as well. Typical for you tho Lynne.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#282251 Feb 5, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
THe problem with trying to engage religous freaks in this topic is they think their version of "faith" hold the ONLY viable and valid arguments.
And they are, for the most part, right!

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282252 Feb 5, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
"• Women who have never married and are not cohabiting account for 45% of all abortions [6]
• About 61% of abortions are obtained by women who have one or more children.[6]"
In previous post you said,
Bitner: "Incorrect. Less than half of all abortions are performed on women who are not married, or living with someone, at the time."
The stats on your link are about "never" married and not living with someone at time of abortion.
The other stats on your link about 1 or more children does NOT state whether or not those women have been married and were then (divorced or widowed)= SINGLE when they had an abortion. So, you're still not correct, and haven't proven that you are. You can't guess and say those women were married or living with someone when they went for an abortion, just because they had children.
Wow. Your desperation is just stupifying.....
Bitner: "Wrong. Biologically, she is pregnant. Biology does not say she's a mother. You're full of shit, Troll."
You're the one full of shit if you think you can deny that the relation of a pregnant woman to the human life in her womb (talking biologically here), is that human life's mother. You're an uneducated fool if you really believe that.
You're wrong about that too. It takes more than gestation to make one a mom. The woman that gestated me is not my mother - the woman that raised me is that. The woman that gestated me was my birth parent, and that's for lack of a better word or phrase, but she was NOT my mother.

"MOTHERHOOD" is about MUCH more than birth and gestation. And clearly YOU are the uneducated fool (literally - dropout) since YOU dont know that.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282253 Feb 5, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
^^Great discussion you're having, there, Elise. Your "equal exchange of ideas" is so enthralling. Very worth the read.
LOL Its worth more than yours Lynniekins.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282254 Feb 5, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
FROM YOUR LINK
"Education, Residence, and Income
----> Of the women obtaining abortions in 2000: <-----
57% had some college education;
88% were from metropolitan areas; and
57% percent were low-income.4
Marital Status
Most women getting abortions (83%) are unmarried; 67% have never married, and 16% are separated, divorced, or widowed.4 Married women are significantly less likely than unmarried women to resolve unintended pregnancies through abortion.6"
Wouldn't it have been pertinent of you to make sure you were in the current reporting period? You did not prove Bitner wrong, dolly.
LOL GTMA!

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282255 Feb 5, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>What happened to your pride in posting only facts to prove your claims? Yeah, okay... Pfft
Elise, this is LYNNIEWORLD! She can change the rules for HER whenever she wants dontchaknow?

In Lynnieworld, EVERYONE is wrong that doesn't agree with her, no matter WHAT the topic is.
Kenose

Westbury, NY

#282256 Feb 5, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
The first man and woman was not born, so your theory about life at birth is wrong.
When a woman is pregnant, then she is with child. She talks often of her baby.
God considers the unborn as a child or baby or life.
John the baptist "leaped " IN HIS MOTHERS WOMB, and was to be named John, before His birth.
The bible speaks as the unborn child as an infant.
It also calls the unborn child in the womb a babe
It speaks about how children are a heritage of the Lord, and the fruit of the womb as a reward.
God formed Jeremiah, and BEFORE he came from his mothers womb -God sanctified him and ordained him as a prophet unto the nations.
God is No respector of persons.
When someone chooses to abort a child, they choose to play God.
not that abortion is an unforgivable sin, since waaay before a person reaches the point of abortion they have done enough to warrent Hell, but I don't think a country should simply legalize things, just becouse others want to do it.
If they do legalize things as important as this, there should be alittle more involved then a handful of judges the are pro death.
Look at all the zingers in this hilarious post!!!!

"The first man and woman was not born" - Evidence to support this? Where is it?

The rest of you post is just hearsay: God said this, John said that, Peter said blah blah blah, your dog told you you're saved, etc...

This "pro-death" phrase is pretty funny. This coming from someone who believes, without a doubt, that they have "eternal life". Again, you can't even accept death, and yet you and your fellow fake pro-life friends go on and on about "culture of death" and "pro-death" bull. It's just jargon. Death is part of life; it's too bad you're too scared to accept reality and instead cower behind your religions fear of death. Death is natural and nothing you can do will stop you from ceasing to exist. Blab all you want about all these gifts you think you have as a result of being Gods super special chosen dimwit; it means nothing and it will mean nothing when you pass away. Again, pro-death is just jargon, just like most of the religious nonsense you puke here each day.

Now, go cheat on your wife, have a child out of wedlock and pretend that you're holier-than-all because of your absurd beliefs.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282257 Feb 5, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
Foo: "LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Lynne, what's NOT RELEVANT is you trying to make the claim that any email's of yours that I'd post are lies BEFORE I EVEN POST THEM. ROFLMAO!"
Just to let the bumbling buffoon know:........ babbling redundant bullshit delted because her hot air is a waste of bandwidth....
Clearly, Lynnie was bored ROFLMAO!

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#282258 Feb 5, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
Hey, folks. Let's not get facts mixed up with personal morals. I understand that some of you feel that abortion is morally wrong. However, moral philosophies aren't factual evidence, either against or for abortion rights.
They think their personal morals ARE facts, as Lynniekins keeps trying (and failing) to prove.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hartford Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 9 min Bluestater 1,275,925
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 57 min IBdaMann 54,515
News More Advice On Acura TL Transmission Failures A... (Apr '09) 8 hr Bob 291
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 11 hr VINNY DINARDI 20,102
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 20 hr TRD 70,159
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Aug 27 Norbert of Norview 71,944
Review: Nirenstein Horowitz And Associates (Sep '12) Aug 26 juliaj887 50
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hartford Mortgages