Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 310384 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#282163 Feb 5, 2013
Doc Degall wrote:
<quoted text>
It's what I've been saying all along F. Lee.
Doc, if you changed your socks as often as you change what you've "been saying," I wonder whether you tow a Walmart store behind you when you walk.

Post 274777:

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...

How convenient of you to add the word "exclusively."
Doc Degall wrote:
You haven't got the patience my ass. You know it doesn't exist. If you thought it did, you'd find the patience alright.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Doc Degall wrote:
No, I don't think I'll live with it just because YOU don't have the balls to go back and look for posts that don't exist.
Nice try Doc. You'd better curtail that shit with your sock puppet Lynne.
Doc Degall wrote:
Reverting my position ? You don't have to lift a finger ball-less. I'll find the posts that show what my position has been all along.
You do that.
Doc Degall wrote:
You're really saying that my position has been the same as chicky's, Tinker Bell's, moncie, bitter, katie, et al ? Is THAT what you're saying ? That viability is defined as the ability to survive WITHOUT medical assistance ? That if a preemie requires medical assistance it cannot be viable ?
Is that what I'm saying?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#282164 Feb 5, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
I wasn't posting anything about the "one night stands" claim. But about your claim, "...Less than half of all abortions are performed on women who are not married, or living with someone, at the time."
My stats and yours proved your claim was wrong.
No, they did not. You only proved you had to dishonestly post old stats to find those that said differently than mine. They ALSO proved me right when I told the other poster there were no stats on "one night stands", so that his claim was baseless.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282165 Feb 5, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
My post had nothing to do with the stat about "1 or more children". Stop deflecting.
LOL, you are full of shit, Troll. Go crawl back under your bridge.
I wasn't deflecting, because I flat out proved you WRONG, with your own link.

YOU claimed, "Incorrect. Less than half of all abortions are performed on women who are not married, or living with someone, at the time."

"who are not married"

The stat that was relevant to your claim was the following, and it stats "NEVER" married. Which means, that stat AND the other about 1 or more children,(measning they could have BEEN married before, but nothing stating they were at time of abortion), did not prove your claim was correct.

Women who have never married and are not cohabiting account for 45% of all abortions [6]

You're the one posting bullshit lies and then arguing about it. I'm posting the facts. That's a fact, Jack.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282166 Feb 5, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
FROM YOUR LINK
"Education, Residence, and Income
----> Of the women obtaining abortions in 2000: <-----
57% had some college education;
88% were from metropolitan areas; and
57% percent were low-income.4
Marital Status
Most women getting abortions (83%) are unmarried; 67% have never married, and 16% are separated, divorced, or widowed.4 Married women are significantly less likely than unmarried women to resolve unintended pregnancies through abortion.6"
Wouldn't it have been pertinent of you to make sure you were in the current reporting period? You did not prove Bitner wrong, dolly.
Why don't you learn to keep your nose out of discussions you don't know anything about? Yes, I proved Bitner wrong, and used her own link to do it.

You only make others look as ignorant and senseless as you make yourself look when you try to stand up for them.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282167 Feb 5, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
She didn't even prove you wrong, Bitner. Bet she's crushed now. She showed numbers from the year 2000, not the current reporting year which is what? 2009 or 2010? I think 2009, but not positive.
Bitner's link also proved her wrong, you bumbling buffoon.
Katie

Spanaway, WA

#282168 Feb 5, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Good call. She's so full of shit.
As always, Bitner, as always.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282169 Feb 5, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>What happened to your pride in posting only facts to prove your claims? Yeah, okay... Pfft
It is a fact. People with no conscience and no sense of humanity would never recognize why a woman having her own unborn child killed just because they don't want it is wrong. You're proving me right.

Now, try proving me wrong, Toots.

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#282170 Feb 5, 2013
Doc Degall wrote:
<quoted text>
No, that's not what I'm saying at all. What you wrote doesn't even make sense.
What "I" was saying was exactly what you cut and pasted above. When you try to interpret it in your own convoluted way is when you get in trouble.
LMAO!! You mean, when I interpret it in less than a 2nd grade level, you get confused. Thanks. We already knew that.
Doc Degall wrote:
Oh I understand alright. You said it was the ONLY reason for their existence. Now you're backpedalling by saying it is the "crux" of their existence, but there are other reasons.
Oh I understand perfectly.
You don't understand jack shit. I said what I said, I meant what I said. YOu don't agree with it? Fine. Let that be your problem.
Doc Degall wrote:
It was ALWAYS the "Unlawful Termination of a Wanted Pregnancy" F. Lee. I never said anything differently
I'm glad you got it. There isn't much you do get.
You're really learning a lot from dweebiekins; ain't you? "ooops, I f*cked up...better change my tune to make it look like I didn't."
Doc Degall wrote:
There you go trying to interpret again.
What I'm saying is that you must explain when the actions you defend blatantly contradict your own.

The way you do?

[QUOTE who="Doc Degall"]Nice try Mr. Numbnuts.
" without something to protect and for which to punish anyone, what is the point of punishment?"
So you preface your question by saying that without the "protection" aspect, what is the point of punishment ?
And when I answer "strictly punitive" you try to imply that I meant it was the only point of punishment.
Pretty sneaky there F. Lee.
I don't imply jackshit. You denied saying something and I proved you did say it. There's no need to be sneaky when the facts are plain as the nose on your face.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282171 Feb 5, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
You sure have a strange perspective, dolly. Of course the relation is important. It's what gives women the civil right to determine their own outcome. By determining their own outcome, they are determining the ZEF's outcome. That's a given. It doesn't deny anything.
It is your side's false premises trying to deny women their civil rights to determine their own pregnancies and the fates of their offspring. Women can morally, legally, and emotionally accept or reject pregnancy without any interference by clergy, the gov't, or nosy parkers like you.
Katie: "It is your side's false premises trying to deny women their civil rights to determine their own pregnancies and the fates of their offspring."

"...trying to deny women their civil rights to...determine the fates of their offspring".

^^^YES, I absolutely am trying to deny women the right to kill their own child. It's not a "civil" right to kill your child.

You, Katie, are one scary ass nut case.
Katie

Spanaway, WA

#282172 Feb 5, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
No e-mail posted by you, Foo, no matter who you claim it's from, would ever prove your claim here about "mutual abuse".
Proving you e-mailed with Lynne still would never prove that.
So every single thing you said and did, posting King's gate trying to claim it's a picture Lynne took; the impotent "threat" of posting a picture of her house; and the impotent "threat" of posting e-mails is all IRRATIONAL.
No matter what you post, it still won't ever prove your claim of mutual abuse. Unless you can provide something posted HERE in the forum that you can link, your claim is unproven.
Re: the past conversations of "mutual abuse" in relation to Lynne/Persever's posts, those posts are all that's needed to show good cause of "mutual abuse". It lends credibility to the theory that Lynne mouthed off to a drunk who in turn punched her in the stomach which, according to Lynne, caused a miscarriage. Now, you claim NOT to be Lynne/Persevere, you claim NOT to've posted with her, so you have absolutely nothing to show for or against any claims of "mutual abuse".

But you keep on keeping on. It is interestingly humorous.
Guppy

Englewood, FL

#282173 Feb 5, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Yes. Most pro-choice people do. Have you ever seen an intestinal resection? FAR grosser...and life-saving.
Most medicalprocedures are unpleasant to laymen. It doesn't mean they shouldn't be done.
<quoted text>
Could one of you pro-choice people explain it to me?

No, I've never seen an intestinal resection, nor do I know what it is.
Katie

Spanaway, WA

#282174 Feb 5, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Katie: "It is your side's false premises trying to deny women their civil rights to determine their own pregnancies and the fates of their offspring."
"...trying to deny women their civil rights to...determine the fates of their offspring".
^^^YES, I absolutely am trying to deny women the right to kill their own child. It's not a "civil" right to kill your child.
You, Katie, are one scary ass nut case.
It is a civil right to "kill your own" ZEF, though. It is self-defense.

Would you prefer a born child killed over something undeveloped and unrealized, something the size of a Tic Tac?

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282175 Feb 5, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
Hey, folks. Let's not get facts mixed up with personal morals. I understand that some of you feel that abortion is morally wrong. However, moral philosophies aren't factual evidence, either against or for abortion rights.
No one's mixing anything up but you, Toots. You think it's not a fact that you've displayed you don't have a conscience or sense of humanity about your own unborn child killed by abortion?

You'd be wrong.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hum...

"1: marked by compassion, sympathy, or consideration for humans or animals"

You show no compassion, sympathy or considereation toward the unborn human, your unborn child that you had killed, and your conscience doesn't indicate to you that that's wrong. That's a fact, jack.

You people can't understand how a mother of born children could kill them and feel nothing. That's what we can see in women who kill their children in utero and feel nothing.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282176 Feb 5, 2013
Katie: "Wouldn't it have been pertinent of you to make sure you were in the current reporting period? You did not prove Bitner wrong, dolly. "
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Good call. She's so full of shit.
LOL good call? I showed how YOUR link proved YOU wrong AND Katie, and it was "in the current reporting period", you lambrain.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282177 Feb 5, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
No, they did not. You only proved you had to dishonestly post old stats to find those that said differently than mine. They ALSO proved me right when I told the other poster there were no stats on "one night stands", so that his claim was baseless.
YOUR link proved YOU wrong.

Your link stated "never married", and that's a far cry from "not married" as you claimed, you lying fool.
Guppy

Englewood, FL

#282178 Feb 5, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes I do. The death of a human baby is the result of an abortion.
OK

Can you answer my question?

During an abortion. What takes place during an abortion.

No one seems to know. I find that odd. Especially for the posters who have been here since 1962.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#282179 Feb 5, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
As always, Bitner, as always.
LOL, you're both ignorant buffoons. I proved you both wrong in one fell swoop.

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

#282180 Feb 5, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
I know you truly want to believe that this is true, but it isn't.
Many women regret having an abortion.
I've never helped anyone in this matter, and I even admit, that for years I was "for " abortion.o
There was a time, that I would've helped and condoned abortion.
Abortion and many other issues were changed in me, when the Holy Spirit of God moved in, and my soul was saved.
Many women tell a different story about what all they knew they were getting into. Many suffer from depression and other negative issues, becouse of abortion, even suicide, so no, not all women knew full well what they were getting into, and not all women are ok with it.
Many were pressured into an abortion, in the same way ocean says many are pressured into having babies.
Plus an unborn child, is just that a child, infant, baby.
And yes the bible says so.
I know you desperately want for your personal opinion to be fact. It's not, honey. Just be honest and admit that you think women should feel guilty about having abortions. Most do not. I volunteered at a women's clinic that provided abortion services. I, as a student, trained alongside a clinical social worker, doing followup interviews with post-abortion clients. What experience do you have specific to abortion clients?
Guppy

Englewood, FL

#282181 Feb 5, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well then listen to sto.
He's a "christian " who enjoys agreeing with folks as the head toward Hell, without God.
He will even try and get the bible to say abortion is ok.
I still believe with all that's in me, that if he is saved, then he will be forever saved, but as I talked earlier "some of our works will burn up like hay and stubnle ".
Thomas Jefferson was a very bright guy. He was an atheist.
Gtown71

United States

#282182 Feb 5, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
The bible says nothing about abortion. We know that, in biblical times, life was considered to begin at the first breath, which is also when the soul entered the body. So we know getting rid of a pregnancy wasn't a sin.
<quoted text>
The first man and woman was not born, so your theory about life at birth is wrong.
When a woman is pregnant, then she is with child. She talks often of her baby.
God considers the unborn as a child or baby or life.

John the baptist "leaped " IN HIS MOTHERS WOMB, and was to be named John, before His birth.

The bible speaks as the unborn child as an infant.
It also calls the unborn child in the womb a babe

It speaks about how children are a heritage of the Lord, and the fruit of the womb as a reward.

God formed Jeremiah, and BEFORE he came from his mothers womb -God sanctified him and ordained him as a prophet unto the nations.

God is No respector of persons.

When someone chooses to abort a child, they choose to play God.
not that abortion is an unforgivable sin, since waaay before a person reaches the point of abortion they have done enough to warrent Hell, but I don't think a country should simply legalize things, just becouse others want to do it.

If they do legalize things as important as this, there should be alittle more involved then a handful of judges the are pro death.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hartford Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min TheIndependentMaj... 1,265,134
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) Mon Oh well 20,085
News How Black Women Have Been Leaning In Forever Mon Fart news 8
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) Mon Ariel Sharon 70,149
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) Sun budd 54,341
News Memorable Nights At The Shaboo -- Courant.com (Aug '07) Aug 2 Neil SS Bluesfest 151
News Dining Detour: Restaurants near Nassau Coliseum (Jan '09) Jul 31 Joan 12
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hartford Mortgages