Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

[LiIrabbitfoofoo]

Gtown71 wrote:

<quoted text>
Well I don't subscribe to very much organized religion myself.

You're lying yet AGAIN. Every bit of the bullshit you've been spouting is part of ORGANIZED religon. Extremist specifically. YOu'd do pretty well as a member of the Westboro Baptist Church, follower of Fred Phelps.

[cpeter1313]

Sex is a natural biological process. She shouldn't be punished at all. If she gets pregnant, she can terminate the process.

Gtown71 wrote:

<quoted text>
I geuss, if you consider motherhood as a punishment?
Youzze Guyzze have used this theory before, the ole "why should a young girl be punished for years and years for making one little mistake? "
What is a young girl only makes 2 mistakes?
Should She be punished?
Lets say a young girl makes the first mistake by getting pregnant, and the other by having the baby.
Why should she be 'punished ", if she changes her mind?
What if she changes her mind a little late in her pregnancy?
Youzze guyzzee theory doesn't hold water.

[cpeter1313]

Who's washing THAT laundry? Not me!

Guppy wrote:

Ewww - the blood of jesus washing over you. Gives me the creeps.

[LiIrabbitfoofoo]

[QUOTE who="Persevere/Lynne/Lily "]<quoted text>
I'm not going to be posting here anymore under any username, and I've only been here under 2, "Lynne" and "Persevere". That's it.
I hate what enters my spirit being around you pro-choice freaks, and I no longer will allow that negativity inside of me, just to try to counter the lies you people post about abortion, or about other pro-lifers. That negativity only exists in me when here. No more.[/QUOTE]

Thank you Lynne for proving once again, you THRIVE on the negativity Lynne/perverse/lily .....

You poor schmuck.

[LiIrabbitfoofoo]

Guppy wrote:

OK, Lynne is a current poster. Glad you got that straightened out.
BTW - Is anyone having an abortion this week? It's not to late to make an appointment.

I COULD be ........ let me check my schedule... Wait, nope. Not my turn this week.... You sure it wasn't yours?

[cpeter1313]

I was going to, but I'm booked solid.

Guppy wrote:

OK, Lynne is a current poster. Glad you got that straightened out.
BTW - Is anyone having an abortion this week? It's not to late to make an appointment.

[cpeter1313]

You might as well ask fire to be wet.

John-K wrote:

<quoted text>
Be nice "Knit"...
:)

[Guppy]

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
I COULD be ........ let me check my schedule... Wait, nope. Not my turn this week.... You sure it wasn't yours?

Once a year is good for me and I had one last month, so I'm good.

[Gtown71]

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>You're lying yet AGAIN. Every bit of the bullshit you've been spouting is part of ORGANIZED religon. Extremist specifically. YOu'd do pretty well as a member of the Westboro Baptist Church, follower of Fred Phelps.

I have attended and been part of organized religion, since my soul was saved by the touch of God,but organized religion did not and could've not saved me.
Some people experience the new birth, inside of an organized religion, but it is still a personal one on one "personal " experience with God and "?"

Most people do not want to experience this life changing event, becouse of their lifestyle "no, not only gays ",but most are afraid God will either ask them to stop doing certain things, or perhaps have their entire "core values "changed, if they do come to the Lord.

What would it profit to gain the whole world, but lose your soul.

Just imagine what all you would have to change, in order to be considered a good christian?

Many would have to change their entire way of life,but God gives all those who are born again, not only the desire to do so, but the power as well.

[AyakaNeo]

lil Lily wrote:

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>Actually, it would be on you to prove that I DID alter it since YOU are the one making THAT claim...
<quoted text>
lol, coming from the poster who claims to be a lawyer.
Wrong, CD. Not "Bravo". Ignorant. She claims e-mail would be legit, her burden of proof that it is. No way for her to prove it, not even if others of her friends posted they saw the e-mail. They couldn't prove that either.
A lawyer would know; anything claimed from e-mails is "inadmissable" in a forum like this. lol. It's very obvious you "don't know" anything, and more obvious that you didn't get an education at Harvard Law.

This isn't a courtroom geeze and no they are not inadmissable in a public forum lol.

[lil Lily]

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
Good try Lynniekins. LOL!

Just because link didn't work doesn't mean peoploe couldn't google for themselves, nitwit.

The picture you had up WAS on google and yahoo search engines under Stephen King's gate. I notice you removed it from your avatar. You must have known you were caught in a lie, fool.

[lil Lily]

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
Psssssssst.......Lynniekins, I posted it publically on Photobucket dear......
Carry on.

lol You got a photo from Google, you liar, and got caught, because I checked, as anyone else could have done.

[lil Lily]

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually that IS it. I posted it publically on Photobucket for just this purpose.
Ya moron.
Anyone that posts pictures on Photobucket and marks them for public use, can find them via a google search.
You're a moron Lynne, but an entertaining one!
This is FUN!!
You're SO easy! You take the bait EVERY time! <<grin>>

You're full of shit. lol.

[lil Lily]

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
So much for "not caring" huh Lynne?
YOu're preforming EXACTLY as expected ... just a little more now....

Toots, I'm OWNING you and you should expect it. It's always going to be that way.

[lil Lily]

AyakaNeo wrote:

<quoted text>This isn't a courtroom geeze and no they are not inadmissable in a public forum lol.

No, it it's not a courtroom, you nitwit. lol Yes, they are inadmissable, insomuch as looking at it intelligently and sensibily. Something you PC aren't capable of doing.

The point you missed, because you're so stuck on kissing up to Foo and defending her no matter how much she LIES, is that e-mails don't matter HERE, they're NOT credible [because] they can easily be altered.

CD likes to pretend to be a lawyer, so I enjoy using court references to prove what a bumbling lying buffoon he is, whenever he posts agreement to what would and wouldn't constitute proof here.

[lil Lily]

Foo claimed proof of her "mutual abuse" claim was IN THE THREADS here. She can pull them up and post those. The e-mail claim is stupid and just desperate bullshit because she knows she has NOTHING to prove her claim. She can post something and clasim it's an e-mail and she would still have NOTHING that proved her claim, because there's no doubt she'd create an e-mail out of thin air and claim Lynne wrote it. Just like she pulled that photo off the internet and claimed Lynne took it. Because if Foo's posting, she's lying.

[AyakaNeo]

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL, what a bonehead. Your interest in what Lynne said and Foo's claims is much more than you claim mine is.
My interest when PCers make claims,(no matter the topic), is that they provide valid proof of their claims. E-mails aren't valid proof, and the whole thing is ridiculous.

Valid proof? I don't care about what the emails prove or disprove about mutual abuse or anything else. I just want to know what Lynne had to say lol. This forum isn't a court of law but it's hilarious to see you act like Judge Judy.

[AyakaNeo]

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
No, it it's not a courtroom, you nitwit. lol Yes, they are inadmissable, insomuch as looking at it intelligently and sensibily. Something you PC aren't capable of doing.
The point you missed, because you're so stuck on kissing up to Foo and defending her no matter how much she LIES, is that e-mails don't matter HERE, they're NOT credible [because] they can easily be altered.
CD likes to pretend to be a lawyer, so I enjoy using court references to prove what a bumbling lying buffoon he is, whenever he posts agreement to what would and wouldn't constitute proof here.

Inadmissable has nothing to do with looking at something intelligently and sensibly which is a very good example as to why you probably shouldn't use legal terms to make someone else look like a buffoon. The same goes for proof. Your idea of proof is not the same thing the legal world would consider proof.

[AyakaNeo]

lil Lily wrote:

Foo claimed proof of her "mutual abuse" claim was IN THE THREADS here. She can pull them up and post those. The e-mail claim is stupid and just desperate bullshit because she knows she has NOTHING to prove her claim. She can post something and clasim it's an e-mail and she would still have NOTHING that proved her claim, because there's no doubt she'd create an e-mail out of thin air and claim Lynne wrote it. Just like she pulled that photo off the internet and claimed Lynne took it. Because if Foo's posting, she's lying.

Well alot ppl feel the same about you, so it's an even playing field.

[AyakaNeo]

Guppy wrote:

<quoted text>
Send me the e-mails. I will read them. I bet they are entertaining.

At least, who cares about proof.