Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Full story: Newsday 307,005
Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision. Full Story

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#281897 Feb 3, 2013
There are plenty of schools in which you can yammer about your god all frigging day long--you just have to pay for the privilege. My parents sent all seven of us to RCC schools, mostly for educational purposes, not religious ones. Public schools aren't churches; kids don't have to be bothered by cults there.

SCIENCE shows that we evolved from lower mammals; schools just report the facts.
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree with this! Lol
As sad as straight folks have gotten, it still seems they are far better then gays.
Yea, the US has changed much in 50 years.
Can no longer talk about God in schools, but they do teach that we humans evolved from animals, soo might as well act like one.
Sad truth is, we can be far worse then animals
Guppy

Englewood, FL

#281898 Feb 3, 2013
OK, Lynne is a current poster. Glad you got that straightened out.

BTW - Is anyone having an abortion this week? It's not to late to make an appointment.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#281899 Feb 3, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well I don't subscribe to very much organized religion myself.
You're lying yet AGAIN. Every bit of the bullshit you've been spouting is part of ORGANIZED religon. Extremist specifically. YOu'd do pretty well as a member of the Westboro Baptist Church, follower of Fred Phelps.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#281900 Feb 3, 2013
Sex is a natural biological process. She shouldn't be punished at all. If she gets pregnant, she can terminate the process.
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
I geuss, if you consider motherhood as a punishment?
Youzze Guyzze have used this theory before, the ole "why should a young girl be punished for years and years for making one little mistake? "
What is a young girl only makes 2 mistakes?
Should She be punished?
Lets say a young girl makes the first mistake by getting pregnant, and the other by having the baby.
Why should she be 'punished ", if she changes her mind?
What if she changes her mind a little late in her pregnancy?
Youzze guyzzee theory doesn't hold water.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#281901 Feb 3, 2013
Who's washing THAT laundry? Not me!
Guppy wrote:
Ewww - the blood of jesus washing over you. Gives me the creeps.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#281903 Feb 3, 2013
[QUOTE who="Persevere/Lynne/Lily "]<quoted text>
I'm not going to be posting here anymore under any username, and I've only been here under 2, "Lynne" and "Persevere". That's it.
I hate what enters my spirit being around you pro-choice freaks, and I no longer will allow that negativity inside of me, just to try to counter the lies you people post about abortion, or about other pro-lifers. That negativity only exists in me when here. No more.[/QUOTE]

Thank you Lynne for proving once again, you THRIVE on the negativity Lynne/perverse/lily .....

You poor schmuck.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#281904 Feb 3, 2013
Guppy wrote:
OK, Lynne is a current poster. Glad you got that straightened out.
BTW - Is anyone having an abortion this week? It's not to late to make an appointment.
I COULD be ........ let me check my schedule... Wait, nope. Not my turn this week.... You sure it wasn't yours?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#281905 Feb 3, 2013
I was going to, but I'm booked solid.
Guppy wrote:
OK, Lynne is a current poster. Glad you got that straightened out.
BTW - Is anyone having an abortion this week? It's not to late to make an appointment.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#281906 Feb 3, 2013
You might as well ask fire to be wet.
John-K wrote:
<quoted text>
Be nice "Knit"...
:)
Guppy

Englewood, FL

#281907 Feb 3, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
I COULD be ........ let me check my schedule... Wait, nope. Not my turn this week.... You sure it wasn't yours?
Once a year is good for me and I had one last month, so I'm good.
Gtown71

United States

#281908 Feb 3, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>You're lying yet AGAIN. Every bit of the bullshit you've been spouting is part of ORGANIZED religon. Extremist specifically. YOu'd do pretty well as a member of the Westboro Baptist Church, follower of Fred Phelps.
I have attended and been part of organized religion, since my soul was saved by the touch of God,but organized religion did not and could've not saved me.
Some people experience the new birth, inside of an organized religion, but it is still a personal one on one "personal " experience with God and "?"

Most people do not want to experience this life changing event, becouse of their lifestyle "no, not only gays ",but most are afraid God will either ask them to stop doing certain things, or perhaps have their entire "core values "changed, if they do come to the Lord.

What would it profit to gain the whole world, but lose your soul.

Just imagine what all you would have to change, in order to be considered a good christian?

Many would have to change their entire way of life,but God gives all those who are born again, not only the desire to do so, but the power as well.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#281909 Feb 3, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>Actually, it would be on you to prove that I DID alter it since YOU are the one making THAT claim...
<quoted text>
lol, coming from the poster who claims to be a lawyer.
Wrong, CD. Not "Bravo". Ignorant. She claims e-mail would be legit, her burden of proof that it is. No way for her to prove it, not even if others of her friends posted they saw the e-mail. They couldn't prove that either.
A lawyer would know; anything claimed from e-mails is "inadmissable" in a forum like this. lol. It's very obvious you "don't know" anything, and more obvious that you didn't get an education at Harvard Law.
This isn't a courtroom geeze and no they are not inadmissable in a public forum lol.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#281910 Feb 3, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Good try Lynniekins. LOL!
Just because link didn't work doesn't mean peoploe couldn't google for themselves, nitwit.

The picture you had up WAS on google and yahoo search engines under Stephen King's gate. I notice you removed it from your avatar. You must have known you were caught in a lie, fool.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#281911 Feb 3, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Psssssssst.......Lynniekins, I posted it publically on Photobucket dear......
Carry on.
lol You got a photo from Google, you liar, and got caught, because I checked, as anyone else could have done.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#281912 Feb 3, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually that IS it. I posted it publically on Photobucket for just this purpose.
Ya moron.
Anyone that posts pictures on Photobucket and marks them for public use, can find them via a google search.
You're a moron Lynne, but an entertaining one!
This is FUN!!
You're SO easy! You take the bait EVERY time! <<grin>>
You're full of shit. lol.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#281913 Feb 3, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
So much for "not caring" huh Lynne?
YOu're preforming EXACTLY as expected ... just a little more now....
Toots, I'm OWNING you and you should expect it. It's always going to be that way.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#281914 Feb 3, 2013
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>This isn't a courtroom geeze and no they are not inadmissable in a public forum lol.
No, it it's not a courtroom, you nitwit. lol Yes, they are inadmissable, insomuch as looking at it intelligently and sensibily. Something you PC aren't capable of doing.

The point you missed, because you're so stuck on kissing up to Foo and defending her no matter how much she LIES, is that e-mails don't matter HERE, they're NOT credible [because] they can easily be altered.

CD likes to pretend to be a lawyer, so I enjoy using court references to prove what a bumbling lying buffoon he is, whenever he posts agreement to what would and wouldn't constitute proof here.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#281915 Feb 3, 2013
Foo claimed proof of her "mutual abuse" claim was IN THE THREADS here. She can pull them up and post those. The e-mail claim is stupid and just desperate bullshit because she knows she has NOTHING to prove her claim. She can post something and clasim it's an e-mail and she would still have NOTHING that proved her claim, because there's no doubt she'd create an e-mail out of thin air and claim Lynne wrote it. Just like she pulled that photo off the internet and claimed Lynne took it. Because if Foo's posting, she's lying.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#281916 Feb 3, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, what a bonehead. Your interest in what Lynne said and Foo's claims is much more than you claim mine is.
My interest when PCers make claims,(no matter the topic), is that they provide valid proof of their claims. E-mails aren't valid proof, and the whole thing is ridiculous.
Valid proof? I don't care about what the emails prove or disprove about mutual abuse or anything else. I just want to know what Lynne had to say lol. This forum isn't a court of law but it's hilarious to see you act like Judge Judy.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#281917 Feb 3, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it it's not a courtroom, you nitwit. lol Yes, they are inadmissable, insomuch as looking at it intelligently and sensibily. Something you PC aren't capable of doing.
The point you missed, because you're so stuck on kissing up to Foo and defending her no matter how much she LIES, is that e-mails don't matter HERE, they're NOT credible [because] they can easily be altered.
CD likes to pretend to be a lawyer, so I enjoy using court references to prove what a bumbling lying buffoon he is, whenever he posts agreement to what would and wouldn't constitute proof here.
Inadmissable has nothing to do with looking at something intelligently and sensibly which is a very good example as to why you probably shouldn't use legal terms to make someone else look like a buffoon. The same goes for proof. Your idea of proof is not the same thing the legal world would consider proof.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hartford Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min Grey Ghost 1,154,328
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 37 min Brian_G 49,239
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 1 hr Frijoles 71,119
The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 20 hr Bently 19,559
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 21 hr TRD 68,885
Review: Nirenstein Horowitz And Associates (Sep '12) Sun Ruth Jeanette L 12
Nassau County Court and Family Court judges (Nov '08) Dec 18 Careless Crecca 69
Hartford Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Hartford People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Hartford News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Hartford

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 5:09 am PST