Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Full story: Newsday

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.
Comments
264,541 - 264,560 of 305,183 Comments Last updated 3 hrs ago
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#281677
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
Freedom to do what?
I would rather be clothed and fed then be able to dance around my village in a piece of dirty old cloth, actually, maybe nothing.
Sorry you were sick for so long.
I can't believe that you are serious. I think you are just trying to make a bad joke.

Doing much better now, thanks.
Make my day

Brooklyn, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#281678
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

3

Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Where would you go if you were looking to place your child in a family, the local pub?
These pro-death advocates are really screwed up. The top Fukked up offenders are foofoo ,Katie, Bitner, Ladilulu, junket ,CD,Ocean,chicky and CPeter.

They are lying,menaces to society. They have no common sense and no sense of humor. Just pure unadulterated evil. No respect for anyone. One has to wonder just what went wrong in their lives.
Obskeptic

Northville, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#281679
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

1

Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
How does one round up and kill 11 million people? Doesn't sound possible.
Hitler seemed to like blonde, blued eyed little boys and girls. Hmmm. I find that interesting.
The same way the progressives co-opt the useful idiots that can rationalize that just because it's in the womb, that its not a human. Its not only possible, but the holocaust goes on still everyday. You couch the argument with ambiguities like "choice", "rights", "fairness" as if its just about you. The biggest challenge for the selfish to comprehend is that it always has to be about themselves, and be damned with anybody else. Rounding up and killing millions has happened in mans history to many times, and the ignorant and complacent will see to it that it happens again. It takes real courage to stand in opposition of the mobs thinking, and cowardice to stand with them even when your soul tells you their wrong.
Guppy

Rotonda West, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#281680
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Where would you go if you were looking to place your child in a family, the local pub?
The people who go to church on Sunday, were drinking at the local pub on Saturday night. Ha!
Obskeptic

Northville, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#281681
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

cpeter1313 wrote:
I believe guppy ws referring to the fact that hitler never actually killed anyone himself.
<quoted text>
The old degrees of culpability argument. You have to be kidding me. The other pathetic joke is you using the constitution to defend your argument when you could care less about the document. You have contempt for it unless you can conveniently use it to make a point. I dismiss your arguments in the same arrogant manner you wave your hand away at mine.
Obskeptic

Northville, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#281682
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Ocean56 wrote:
<quoted text>
So what. Since it is the WOMAN who takes on all the health risks and complications of carrying a pregnancy to term, it is only logical that it is the WOMAN who makes the choice whether or not to continue a pregnancy.
Like other conservative anti-choice guys, you're just pissed that you can't force a woman to gestate a pregnancy she may never have wanted to begin with and quite possibly used contraception to PREVENT. Too bad. Motherhood is OPTIONAL, not required, and no woman has to be a mother unless she WANTS to. The 1800's are over, and we women get to make our OWN sexual and reproductive choices. Get used to it.
So as long as its about "choices", it would only seem logical that if the man has no choice in the decision as to whether his unborn son or daughter is killed at the hands of the mother, he should be able to choose to not be financially obligated for that child if he never intended to create it, and the mother chooses to have it and raise it anyway, right? That would be fair, right?

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#281683
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Been sick for over ten days. On the computer very little in those ten days. Plus I scroll over much of what isn't part of my conversation. That would include many of your posts.
BTW, I don't see any reason to lie to you. For what purpose?
Yet the post you did reply to had within it Tom Tom's insults which you claim to not have seen, and then used the lame excuse that you were sick and so hadn't been here for a few days, yet I found that you indeed had been posting.

Your purpose was clear. While complaining that my remarks were "supercilious" you didn't want to have to acknowledge that they were in response to your fellow fundie who was insulting Bitner's beliefs. You wanted to cling to your double-standard. I saw through it so your lying was in vain.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#281684
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>She has a crush on Siggy Freud.
She NEEDS Siggy Freud.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#281685
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Make my day wrote:
<quoted text>These pro-death advocates are really screwed up. The top Fukked up offenders are foofoo ,Katie, Bitner, Ladilulu, junket ,CD,Ocean,chicky and CPeter.
Hey, I think I'm all that's left.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#281686
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, you're confused. I said there's nothing wrong with that to a post from Bitner, not to a post from Chicky.
Try again.

Wrong. While you did say that in response to Bitter, you also said there was nothing wrong with a statement from Tinker Bell defining viability exclusively WITHOUT medical assistance.(Post #274777)

Speaking of Bitter, why DID you say there was nothing wrong with her statement about a preemie being able to REACH viability with medical assistance ? When in fact you agreed that a preemie receiving medical assistance was ALREADY viable. Hmmmm ?

[QUOTE]You've finally seen the light. That's good, because my Duracell batteries were nearing the end of their useful life.
Thanks!
It's what I've been saying all along F. Lee.
I'd post a link to your post of slightly over a year ago, but I've not got the patience to swift through 10,000 pages to find it.
You haven't got the patience my ass. You know it doesn't exist. If you thought it did, you'd find the patience alright.
So you'll just have to live with the fact that everyone else who's read your posts knows you're just now reverting your position to agree with me.
No, I don't think I'll live with it just because YOU don't have the balls to go back and look for posts that don't exist.
Reverting my position ? You don't have to lift a finger ball-less. I'll find the posts that show what my position has been all along.
I will, however, say thanks. Again, you've finally seen the light.
<quoted text>
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Sure, sure sure.
You're really saying that my position has been the same as chicky's, Tinker Bell's, moncie, bitter, katie, et al ? Is THAT what you're saying ? That viability is defined as the ability to survive WITHOUT medical assistance ? That if a preemie requires medical assistance it cannot be viable ?

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#281687
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

cpeter1313 wrote:
And straight boys could keep it in their pants. Were you a virgin on your wedding night? How about your wife?

Hey Tink, his point was that if men can be told they have the choice to keep it in their pants then women can be told they have a choice to leave his dick alone.
And if he wasn't a virgin on his wedding night it either means he had a willing partner who chose to embrace his dick....or he was a rapist.

[QUOTE]But it's really about punishing women who enjoy sex, isn't it? As for "valuing" fetuses, that's a philosophical decision. You'remfree to worshipo them if you wish, but no one else has to follow your beliefs.
Is valuing an infant's life a philosophical decision Tink ?

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#281688
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
The old degrees of culpability argument. You have to be kidding me. The other pathetic joke is you using the constitution to defend your argument when you could care less about the document. You have contempt for it unless you can conveniently use it to make a point. I dismiss your arguments in the same arrogant manner you wave your hand away at mine.
The ignorant wretch you are speaking to thinks the Constitution applies only to U.S. citizens. It knows nothing.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#281689
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
The same way the progressives co-opt the useful idiots that can rationalize that just because it's in the womb, that its not a human. Its not only possible, but the holocaust goes on still everyday. You couch the argument with ambiguities like "choice", "rights", "fairness" as if its just about you. The biggest challenge for the selfish to comprehend is that it always has to be about themselves, and be damned with anybody else. Rounding up and killing millions has happened in mans history to many times, and the ignorant and complacent will see to it that it happens again. It takes real courage to stand in opposition of the mobs thinking, and cowardice to stand with them even when your soul tells you their wrong.
This is good. I like your style.

You hit it on the head with the selfish thing. Their abject selfishness is precisely the reason they cannot comprehend how it could be about anyone but themselves....and why they will never understand how anyone who doesn't share their narrow minded selfish mindset would desire protection for the most innocent and helpless human life.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#281690
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Then stock up on condoms or keep your zipper pulled up.
I use Durex. And what has THAT got to do with the issue of whether or not a fetus is considered a person ?
You're better off sticking to your cute little "fundie" jabs. Cause when you attempt to actually argue the facts or the actual merits of your position....you demonstrate you are woefully out of your league.

Next problem...
How can the Rangers start generating a little more offense ?
Guppy

Rotonda West, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#281691
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

3

1

Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
So as long as its about "choices", it would only seem logical that if the man has no choice in the decision as to whether his unborn son or daughter is killed at the hands of the mother, he should be able to choose to not be financially obligated for that child if he never intended to create it, and the mother chooses to have it and raise it anyway, right? That would be fair, right?
Life isn't always fair.

Sorry...
Guppy

Rotonda West, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#281692
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Doc Degall wrote:
<quoted text>
This is good. I like your style.
You hit it on the head with the selfish thing. Their abject selfishness is precisely the reason they cannot comprehend how it could be about anyone but themselves....and why they will never understand how anyone who doesn't share their narrow minded selfish mindset would desire protection for the most innocent and helpless human life.
You are such a little fairy.
grumpy

Stony Point, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#281693
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Doc Degall wrote:
<quoted text>
This is good. I like your style.
You hit it on the head with the selfish thing. Their abject selfishness is precisely the reason they cannot comprehend how it could be about anyone but themselves....and why they will never understand how anyone who doesn't share their narrow minded selfish mindset would desire protection for the most innocent and helpless human life.
Why do you argue so incessently about the definition of "vability" when you are for the " protection for the most innocent and helpless human life."?
Certainly there is human life before viability.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#281694
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

A PLM'er killed tiller. You are a PLM'er. What is your degree of culpability? Oh, and in point of fact, there were plenty of deaths hitler neither dictated or even knew about; he left such things to others.

Where have I shown contempt for the constitution? Link to it.
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
The old degrees of culpability argument. You have to be kidding me. The other pathetic joke is you using the constitution to defend your argument when you could care less about the document. You have contempt for it unless you can conveniently use it to make a point. I dismiss your arguments in the same arrogant manner you wave your hand away at mine.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#281695
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Nope. The BORN child has a legal right to be supported by both parents unless parental responsibility has been waived. Paying support does not affect the father's medical and physical risks.
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
So as long as its about "choices", it would only seem logical that if the man has no choice in the decision as to whether his unborn son or daughter is killed at the hands of the mother, he should be able to choose to not be financially obligated for that child if he never intended to create it, and the mother chooses to have it and raise it anyway, right? That would be fair, right?

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#281696
Feb 2, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Doc Degall wrote:
<quoted text>
I use Durex.
http://www.amazon.com/dgp-Extra-Small-Condoms...

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

7 Users are viewing the Hartford Forum right now

Search the Hartford Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 25 min Grey Ghost 1,084,412
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 43 min SpaceBlues 45,908
The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 3 hr Lumpy Churchhill 18,611
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 3 hr voice of peace 68,069
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 6 hr scirocco 68,453
The Trial of Heather Specyalski (Mar '13) Tue Cassie 22
Cher Calvin (Nov '08) Jul 29 Ron Wells 19
•••
•••
•••
•••

Hartford Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Hartford People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Hartford News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Hartford
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••