I've answered you already but what the hell....<quoted text>Why do you argue so incessently about the definition of "vability" when you are for the " protection for the most innocent and helpless human life."?
Certainly there is human life before viability.
While I may be for the protection of innocent human life I'm also a realist and recognize that the law of the land right now recognizes the right to elective abortion....and viability remains at the heart of when that life is currently afforded any level of legal protection, so you're damn right I'm gonna argue what the proper definition is. Besides that, just the tearing down of the credibility of the opposition by demonstrating that they don't even have the ability or the intelligence to grasp the meaning of such a fundamental concept.....is alone worth arguing it.
Get it now grumpster ? Or are ya gonna ask me again?