no right to an attorney
Posted in the Harrisburg Forum
#1 Mar 10, 2013
This case is disturbing and appauling and is on file in the York County Courthouse Pa. RE; @yorkcountypa.gov, civil case search docket #(2011-FC-000338-15) Order entered by Judge Kelly June 9th 2011(the same time Judge had PFA against himself).
This woman wanted an Attorney and the Judge said in Civil Matter you have no right to attorney.
So if your a criminal and RAPE, STEAL, or commit any other crime then your rights come into play. However if your a law abiding citizen who was falsly accused and no way to prove your innocence because your disabeled you have no right to have your rights enforced.
The whole free or low cost attorney is an illusion too.
The poor defendant has suffered with the burden of BEING Pro Se litigant and still is.
If you have money to spend an attorney will represent even if it's a waste of the Court's time but if your dirt poor and want to have a means of defence your out of luck no money no lawyer the Court system is sick isn't it.
#2 Mar 21, 2013
You should commmit a crime or maybe even steal at least then you could end up aquitted like O.J. and Casey anthony. Then you would gt a court appointed attorney,
IT DOESN'T PAY ANYMORE TO BE AN HONEST CITIZEN WHEN CRIMINALS HAVE MORE RIGHTS
#3 Apr 11, 2013
Unless a lawyer can make a lot of money off there client or the other side they will not take a case.
Now if you commit a crime the law-says you have he right to an attorney for a defence but a law abiding citizen who is a defendant of false alligations has no right to a court appointed attorney.
Judge Kelley of York Pa was removed from the criminal bench in 2011 because a public defender got a PFA against that judge.
This same judge was then move to the Civil Bench where he heard cases for PFA and also a case RE # 2011-FC-000338-15 (petition for prohibition of non-marital assets) where the attorney brought forth alligations concerning theft of fire arms and ammo by victim in PFA, during the time of the PFA even though there was a weapons reoinquishment ORder for Defendant not to own or posses these items.
So the victim is disabled with no way to work if she wanted to and a Judge who had a PFA against himself whicvh clearly caused a conflict of interest was allowed to Put an Order agaist her to pay her abuser for the fire arms and everything else on the list.
How is that Just????????
Any answers greatly appriciated
#4 Apr 11, 2013
Add your comments below
|Blue and Gray Bar & Grill opens in Gettysburg (Apr '12)||19 hr||Open to whatever||214|
|Pa. truckers take fuel price protest convoy to ... (Mar '08)||Fri||Underpaid Lady Tr...||257|
|Man's lawsuit: Woman shouldn't have watched me ... (Oct '10)||Jan 11||saifster||68|
|Pennsylvania sheriff's call for posse draws 452... (Apr '16)||Jan 7||Internet daycare||169|
|PSP trooper charged with DUI, was Troop H spoke...||Dec 30||bubba navy||3|
|Digging Leases||Dec 24||Digger||1|
|Grey Short Haired Women In Sunglasses Being Int...||Dec 24||Yeah||2|
Find what you want!
Search Harrisburg Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC