The difference is, our team(democrats) do not all support the ideas of policing soft drink and painkillers. BTW, your team is agains the painkiller marijuana. Our team is not.<quoted text>
Pro, do you find it peculiar the government is trying to control the consumption of soft drinks or painkillers if needed, but we can't make people have proper ID to vote? Bloomberg and the Obumma crowd can find to time to send out the soft drink police and painkiller police (when there's a genuine need), but can't help people get an ID that would not only keep them from being victims of identity theft, etc and use this same ID for voting and also verify that the correct person is getting the proper medical care for them by using an ID. I think there should be an ID required for everything and there wouldn't be this cry of discrimination.
Seems your team is for anything that makes it hard to vote, our team is for making voting easier.
I think the lack of people voting is more of a problem than the idea some may be voting that should not be. As studies keep showing your fears are not warrented anyways. Just as with marijuana.
Your team is always in fear of what has no evidence, yet your team is in denial of what has evidence. The trend is clear.