River bend RV park

[JTT]

Interesting sentence in your post.

"Had there been help, Clifton and I would have had a lot less to do but that's ok because now I have a very good understanding of the system."

[Iknowwhereyouliv e]

happy bird wrote:

<quoted text>you better stick to changing them diapers and leave that lawyering alone.
you know you shouldn't be impersonating a lawyer.
who would so desperite as to put their home phone # & email address on topix.
call palo-alto quick to see if topix will take it off.

tell her she is not a U.S. citizen and she may give you here social security number.

[Nothanku]

1-4. Naaaaaah. Court will decide.

petty_renee wrote:

1. Rescind the bylaws that are not legal anyway
2. Get legal
3. Stop all the litigatory crap that is doing nothing but costing time and money that could benefit the park and property owners. The goals that need to be reached can be reached without the court proceedings and with all permits and licenses in tact. End result, the POA is managing the park.
4. Pay your assessments and go camping
<quoted text>

[petty_renee]

In no way would I be impersonating an attorney. I could simply provide some documentation for a property owner to take to their attorney and help the property owner. No, I have enough on my plate.

happy bird wrote:

<quoted text>you better stick to changing them diapers and leave that lawyering alone.
you know you shouldn't be impersonating a lawyer.
who would so desperite as to put their home phone # & email address on topix.
call palo-alto quick to see if topix will take it off.

[petty_renee]

Do you think this is the first time I have posted by phone number and email address. I'm not like you and hide.

Iknowwhereyoulive wrote:

<quoted text>tell her she is not a U.S. citizen and she may give you here social security number.

[Iknowwhereyouliv e]

petty_renee wrote:

Do you think this is the first time I have posted by phone number and email address. I'm not like you and hide.
<quoted text>

i just have better sense.

[Mind Games]

petty_renee wrote:

You would have to be out of your mind to think that is a topic that needs to be discussed on here. I can refer to the fact that WW attorney stated in the courtroom on May 21 that WW had no interest in the park because the properties in question had been turned over to Clifton Johnson either for management or legal ownership. WW knows the best thing he can do is wash his hands of Riverbend Park. However, if tempted by greedy folks that are looking for a way to get control of the park, he might step back into the financial picture long enough to collect a paycheck or two provided there were no paper trail left behind. You know, like the escrow accoung BD described. What were his words, "not even a paper trail leading to the POA".
I don't know what the end will bring but I do know that Clifton has saved the park more than once and if not for him we would not be having this conversation because there would be no park.
As far as your questions? I don't think your pfishing license covers that game.
<quoted text>

What WW's attorney said in that court room was that WW had no interest in the park anymore, and thought he had already turned it over to the POA.
Get the facts straight, ma'm. This whole post is hogwash. Sounds as though you are playing to the POSC. POA knows better.

[petty_renee]

That's yet to be seen.

Iknowwhereyoulive wrote:

<quoted text>i just have better sense.

[petty_renee]

What my post said is absolutely what happened. I was there and have it on recording and have heard it several times. LP stood there and said that is what WW attorney said but it is NOT what he said. Anyone wanting to hear it is welcome to. I don't post or say things that I cannot back up so maybe YOU need to get it right. Playing mind games is not my forte'. I don't have to, thank you. I deal in facts and provable ones at that. Now would you like to hear the judge and attorney's words or would you like to recant your accusation?

Mind Games wrote:

<quoted text>
What WW's attorney said in that court room was that WW had no interest in the park anymore, and thought he had already turned it over to the POA.
Get the facts straight, ma'm. This whole post is hogwash. Sounds as though you are playing to the POSC. POA knows better.

[Mind Games]

petty_renee wrote:

What my post said is absolutely what happened. I was there and have it on recording and have heard it several times. LP stood there and said that is what WW attorney said but it is NOT what he said. Anyone wanting to hear it is welcome to. I don't post or say things that I cannot back up so maybe YOU need to get it right. Playing mind games is not my forte'. I don't have to, thank you. I deal in facts and provable ones at that. Now would you like to hear the judge and attorney's words or would you like to recant your accusation?
<quoted text>

Thank you for the offer of the recording, thank you for the offer of my recantation, but, since I heard it very clearly from where I was sitting, and I am not LP, I will graciously decline your offer.

[happy bird]

petty_renee wrote:

What my post said is absolutely what happened. I was there and have it on recording and have heard it several times. LP stood there and said that is what WW attorney said but it is NOT what he said. Anyone wanting to hear it is welcome to. I don't post or say things that I cannot back up so maybe YOU need to get it right. Playing mind games is not my forte'. I don't have to, thank you. I deal in facts and provable ones at that. Now would you like to hear the judge and attorney's words or would you like to recant your accusation?
<quoted text>

she is lying!!!
we were sitting not five feet from renee and i never saw any tape recorder. believe me, i would have pointed out to the court what she was doing. nothing in the world would have given me more pleasure that seeing the bailiff throw he out of the court room. just another lie.

[Iknowwhereyouliv e]

copied this from previous post.
let me try this ctrl-v
**********
NO CHARGE!
5O1-3O5-35O2 or [e-mail]
**********
it works.
let's see where else i can put it.

[Iknowwhereyouliv e]

NO CHARGE!
5O1-3O5-35O2 or [e-mail]
NO CHARGE!
5O1-3O5-35O2 or [e-mail]
NO CHARGE!
5O1-3O5-35O2 or [e-mail]
NO CHARGE!
5O1-3O5-35O2 or [e-mail]
this works real good!

[Iknowwhereyouliv e]

Prison Inmates
Prisoninmates seeking pen pals ... If you are over age 18, you will see personal ... to verify information about prison pen pals through additional sources....
www.prisoninmates.com - Cached

[Noonecares]

petty_renee wrote:

What my post said is absolutely what happened. I was there and have it on recording and have heard it several times. LP stood there and said that is what WW attorney said but it is NOT what he said. Anyone wanting to hear it is welcome to. I don't post or say things that I cannot back up so maybe YOU need to get it right. Playing mind games is not my forte'. I don't have to, thank you. I deal in facts and provable ones at that. Now would you like to hear the judge and attorney's words or would you like to recant your accusation?
<quoted text>

The only illegal taping you can share with any one is a judge and only at his discretion.You must ALLWAYs get the Presiding Judges premission to tape.Other wise it is illegal.Smarty Pants!

[petty_renee]

Guess what dumbass, there are three attorneys that will disagree with that and even the court reporter said I could certainly take my tape and make my own court transcript so long as that transcript was not used in a courtroom. It could be used for an attorney information but not being certified should not be presented in court as evidence. I'm not planning to do that. All I want to do is educate people on what liars we are dealing with on the board and their supporters. She knew I did it and that would be the only problem, stepping on her toes since that is her career. SMARTY PANTS.

Noonecares wrote:

<quoted text>The only illegal taping you can share with any one is a judge and only at his discretion.You must ALLWAYs get the Presiding Judges premission to tape.Other wise it is illegal.Smarty Pants!

[petty_renee]

The TV station was there recording it. Now tell me I don't have one.

Noonecares wrote:

<quoted text>The only illegal taping you can share with any one is a judge and only at his discretion.You must ALLWAYs get the Presiding Judges premission to tape.Other wise it is illegal.Smarty Pants!

[petty_renee]

We have it transferred onto disc if you would like a copy of it.

happy bird wrote:

<quoted text>she is lying!!!
we were sitting not five feet from renee and i never saw any tape recorder. believe me, i would have pointed out to the court what she was doing. nothing in the world would have given me more pleasure that seeing the bailiff throw he out of the court room. just another lie.

[happy bird]

petty_renee wrote:

We have it transferred onto disc if you would like a copy of it.
<quoted text>

sure. why don't you put me a copy in the mail. my address is on the poa letter.

[Dogwood]

petty_renee wrote:

Guess what dumbass, there are three attorneys that will disagree with that and even the court reporter said I could certainly take my tape and make my own court transcript so long as that transcript was not used in a courtroom. It could be used for an attorney information but not being certified should not be presented in court as evidence. I'm not planning to do that. All I want to do is educate people on what liars we are dealing with on the board and their supporters. She knew I did it and that would be the only problem, stepping on her toes since that is her career. SMARTY PANTS.
<quoted text>

And whom might those E.s.Q. be less see Kissee fer one,Plumlee& the Lawyer in the log cabin strip mall ...welllllll thare ya go...dumbass!"The times they are achangin...if YOU didnt get the presidin judges permission iT IS ILLEGAL!!!!!!!!!!It is THAT judges court room.Have some respect for our judicial system .This is America not russia "Smarty Pants! Arent you supposed to be babysittin?