River bend RV park

[Rapid Cheryl]

For Undecided Until Now.

I just went over your questions with Clifton and here is what he said:

His office removal is being put off until the property owners got all their water and elec. Block 6 got the rest of the elec. completed last week. Plus he felt like maintaining the common areas was more important.

The block 9 pool: Has some major problems and the only stopping this is money. If he can get more people to pay their assessments this is a fixable problem.

3rd Bathhouse: First he's heard of the water standing and no hot water. He will check it out.(I verified the no hot water, my husband tried to shower there 2 nights ago...no hot water) Clifton said, "why didn't you tell me". I said I just haven't had time.

Back gate: Again lack of money to staff it full time. If people have suggestions like a permanent lock let him know. he said if a permanent lock goes on it would have to come off when the train area is unpassable for the Block 8, 9 & 10 owners to use.

Hope this answers your questions. Please feel free to ask anything else you feel is necessary. I will do my best to get an answer for you.

[Rapid Cheryl]

Everyone have a good weekend. I'm going to help hubby build us a deck in RiverBend.

[witch hunter]

you people change names like you (hopefully) change socks.

[UpTheRiverNoPadd le]

Rapid Cheryl wrote:

<quoted text>Who is the buyer and I'll check my notes.

You're the one who gave me their initials on here. The ones you tried to "help". I assure you that they haven't forgotten the "help" they got from you when you "sold" them their lot.

[witch hunter]

I just readd where CJ did not take over until 2005. please tell me why I have a letter dated 9-24-04 that is signed CJ, park manager?

[petty_renee]

Email it to me and maybe I can help explain it. Authority was not transferred officially until 2005. Remember, you made your payments to the beach club for assessments and beach club dues in 2005.

witch hunter wrote:

I just readd where CJ did not take over until 2005. please tell me why I have a letter dated 9-24-04 that is signed CJ, park manager?

[happy bird]

petty_renee wrote:

Email it to me and maybe I can help explain it. Authority was not transferred officially until 2005. Remember, you made your payments to the beach club for assessments and beach club dues in 2005.
<quoted text>

email it to renee and she will put a little spin to it!

[petty_renee]

C'mon, BD, it's Friday. Cheer up and shake of the sarcasm. You'll be a much happier bird if you do.

happy bird wrote:

<quoted text>
email it to renee and she will put a little spin to it!

[khubbard]

If witch hunter were to email you, you'd wonder what you'd gotten yourself into by the time it was all said and done. I know them. They own property just down the road from Mr. Poole and Bill and Mary. They have no use for you, Renee.

[khubbard]

Oh, and before you think it's me, it's kind of between them and where that big white deck washed away on the river.

[petty_renee]

I wasn't asking them to have use for me. He/she asked a question and I offered to check it out. I don't think it's dated 04, I think it's dated 06 because Clifton sent one out 9/24/06 if memory serves me correctly.

Since when are you worried about me unless it serves a purpose for you?

khubbard wrote:

If witch hunter were to email you, you'd wonder what you'd gotten yourself into by the time it was all said and done. I know them. They own property just down the road from Mr. Poole and Bill and Mary. They have no use for you, Renee.

[Lawyer Pants]

UpTheRiverNoPaddle wrote:

<quoted text>That is a bald-faced LIE. I've been there since 2003 and he's the only manager I have EVER met. If he wasn't the manager, who was?

He was. Don't fall for it. The common properties in the park started getting transferred to Johnson as eary as February 2003 -- the plan was in effect from as early as that, and probably earlier.

Operated correctly, the assessments can be lowered, substantially, and you pay for your own power -- for most of you that will be a large reduction in yearly costs. And you get an income/expense statement presented each year (like you're supposed to) before your assessments are set. That's how it always should have operated, but johnson refused to account and his supporters advised him he didn't have to account. Now his attorney has advised him he must.

Now that I think back on it, if he had simply accounted, it is possible none of the other problems would have been discovered ... the mortgages on common properties, the transfer of ownership of common properties, including the most recent transfers of the water tower, tanks, utilities to the park, and front gate ----- all to Griffin right out from under Johnson's nose. And, still today, Johnson has done nothing to take those properties back from Griffin. I suppose he would have just let them go until one day when Griffin decided to cut them off and it would have been too late.

He's been sailing the ship since 2003 - and it's been slowly sinking since then, with the passengers jumping overboard all along the way, replaced by others who have no idea how far that park's fallen since it's hey-day.

Remember, you are just as guilty as the trigger man even if you are only driving the getaway car --- Watkins couldn't borrow any more, so Johnson mortaged park property for him ... gave him the money, so he testified under oath. Pledged the assessments to secure the notes, then gave Johnson an assignment to be able to collect the assessments to pay back the note. So, we, in effect, loaned watkins the money to skip the country.

Just my opinion of what we might find after a close examination of bank records, receipts, etc., that should have been produced without the necessity of having a court force it.

I would venture to guess that the AG has already gotten those records, and you can see what the result was .... Common law Fraud, Deceptive Trade Practices, Arkansas Fraudulent Land Transfers; I recall even the words "intimidation" and "extort" in his complaint -- which are signal words for the criminal statute against "theft of proeprty" ...

Oh, and aren't there already two felony counts of theft out there against Watkins?

It's not over.

[Scout]

Twiddledee and Twiddledum have many pow wow to plan scheme that chief is victum and save his teepee. Trinkets, buffaloe dung, and firewater help soothe happy camper anxiety. Shamin cast spell on all who oppose the tribe council.

[Scotty P]

After reading this trash talk as somebody else said on here, No way am I subjecting my family and my lord's good graces to you corrupt, self-indulgent princes and princesses. The moral decay that has run through a once fine family park is too much to take. This lawyer here talks good when he says that new people come in and don;t have a clue as to how far the park has fallen down to the gutter and that lawyer is right. I will be selling my lot and I won't be subject to giving it away at any firesale price. I think my title is ok and I will wait it out and get my price. I will also not be getting it listed for sale with that rapid woman as she does act like she is not fit to sell my old tractor at the flea market. Some of the comments on this message place are so out in left field, I have my douts about the mental stability of the owners of all these lots and I won't have my family subjected to this moral decay and rampant filth of humanity and some of you think you are serving the Lord, you need to better think that over again. I have not read one post in the last few days that looked like it was writen by someone who was God fearing and a nice person to sit by the river with.
Shame on all you wicked people, shame, shame, shame.
Keep thee far from a false matter; and the innocent and righteous slay thou not: for I will not justify the wicked.

[property owner]

What about water and waste disposal?

Lawyer Pants wrote:

<quoted text>He was. Don't fall for it. The common properties in the park started getting transferred to Johnson as eary as February 2003 -- the plan was in effect from as early as that, and probably earlier.
Operated correctly, the assessments can be lowered, substantially, and you pay for your own power -- for most of you that will be a large reduction in yearly costs. And you get an income/expense statement presented each year (like you're supposed to) before your assessments are set. That's how it always should have operated, but johnson refused to account and his supporters advised him he didn't have to account. Now his attorney has advised him he must.
Now that I think back on it, if he had simply accounted, it is possible none of the other problems would have been discovered ... the mortgages on common properties, the transfer of ownership of common properties, including the most recent transfers of the water tower, tanks, utilities to the park, and front gate ----- all to Griffin right out from under Johnson's nose. And, still today, Johnson has done nothing to take those properties back from Griffin. I suppose he would have just let them go until one day when Griffin decided to cut them off and it would have been too late.
He's been sailing the ship since 2003 - and it's been slowly sinking since then, with the passengers jumping overboard all along the way, replaced by others who have no idea how far that park's fallen since it's hey-day.
Remember, you are just as guilty as the trigger man even if you are only driving the getaway car --- Watkins couldn't borrow any more, so Johnson mortaged park property for him ... gave him the money, so he testified under oath. Pledged the assessments to secure the notes, then gave Johnson an assignment to be able to collect the assessments to pay back the note. So, we, in effect, loaned watkins the money to skip the country.
Just my opinion of what we might find after a close examination of bank records, receipts, etc., that should have been produced without the necessity of having a court force it.
I would venture to guess that the AG has already gotten those records, and you can see what the result was .... Common law Fraud, Deceptive Trade Practices, Arkansas Fraudulent Land Transfers; I recall even the words "intimidation" and "extort" in his complaint -- which are signal words for the criminal statute against "theft of proeprty" ...
Oh, and aren't there already two felony counts of theft out there against Watkins?
It's not over.

[khubbard]

I have a copy of it. It's dated 2oo4 and signed CJ, park manager. They were nice enough to furnish me with one.

petty_renee wrote:

I wasn't asking them to have use for me. He/she asked a question and I offered to check it out. I don't think it's dated 04, I think it's dated 06 because Clifton sent one out 9/24/06 if memory serves me correctly.
Since when are you worried about me unless it serves a purpose for you?
<quoted text>

[khubbard]

May I field this one? Discussions with the appropriate parties at the ADEQ have taken place. We have all the information necessary about the transfers of permits, we have people in place with the appropriate licenses. The DOR grants the use of the common elements to the property owners in perpetuity no matter who owns or claims to own them. In any event, in the short term if there's a problem we can contract with someone to come in and pump 2 times a week for a reasonable fee.(yes, we've already gotten in writing quotes) until such time as it all gets in place...that is plan B. Plan A is that hopefully the judge agrees that's what the wording of the DOR states, and that CJ can't prevent us from using them even if he wants to. There's also a plan C, but I highly doubt it will be necessary.

property owner wrote:

What about water and waste disposal?
<quoted text>

[khubbard]

Appearances can be deceiving. How about
Judge ye not lest ye be judged by the same measure.

I know I fail Him everyday. I know I don't always shine His light. I don't claim to be anything other than I am, which is the wretch the song talks about. And, such are you, LP, BD, Renee, Cheryl...all of us.

By the way, are you the person I took up the collection for when your house burned down?

Scotty P wrote:

After reading this trash talk as somebody else said on here, No way am I subjecting my family and my lord's good graces to you corrupt, self-indulgent princes and princesses. The moral decay that has run through a once fine family park is too much to take. This lawyer here talks good when he says that new people come in and don;t have a clue as to how far the park has fallen down to the gutter and that lawyer is right. I will be selling my lot and I won't be subject to giving it away at any firesale price. I think my title is ok and I will wait it out and get my price. I will also not be getting it listed for sale with that rapid woman as she does act like she is not fit to sell my old tractor at the flea market. Some of the comments on this message place are so out in left field, I have my douts about the mental stability of the owners of all these lots and I won't have my family subjected to this moral decay and rampant filth of humanity and some of you think you are serving the Lord, you need to better think that over again. I have not read one post in the last few days that looked like it was writen by someone who was God fearing and a nice person to sit by the river with.
Shame on all you wicked people, shame, shame, shame.
Keep thee far from a false matter; and the innocent and righteous slay thou not: for I will not justify the wicked.

[khubbard]

ooops. Missed the part where you asked about water.

There will be no problem getting water. There are laws about public works through the AG's office. That's not a valid concern.

property owner wrote:

What about water and waste disposal?
<quoted text>

[JTT]

Yep.

khubbard wrote:

ooops. Missed the part where you asked about water.
There will be no problem getting water. There are laws about public works through the AG's office. That's not a valid concern.
<quoted text>