Who do you support for Governor in Pe...
Gay Rights

West Mifflin, PA

#52245 Aug 27, 2013
Lindsey Graham:‘Too much DC for SC’ says CCU Chairman Bruce Carroll:

The movement against South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham continues to grow as more candidates throw their hat in the ring to defeat Lindsey Graham.

Lindsey Graham Missing Milk Carton
Image/CCU
Their is also a grassroots campaign, DefeatLindseyGraham, which has been established to help remove the “not-so-conservative” Graham with a true small government conservative.

Carolina Conservative Union Chairman, Bruce Carroll, joined us this past Saturday on Dispatch Radio (Listen below) to talk about the Senator and the problems with his voting record and views on major issues of the day.

In addition, Carroll gave his perspective on the Graham challengers and the “word on the ground” in South Carolina saying that people are really “ticked off at him” and that he is in real

Take a peek here:

http://www.theglobaldispatch.com/lindsey-grah...
J McCain

West Mifflin, PA

#52249 Aug 27, 2013
yes obama is a great divider......

look at the votes he divided between him and Robme

332 electoral votes for Obama 65,917,257
206 electoral votes for Robme 60,932,235

Now that's a BIG divide!
LMAO!@
Bozo

West Mifflin, PA

#52250 Aug 27, 2013
vaginal discharge wrote:
<quoted text>
..........
Guilt-ridden-whiney-assed-bed wetters
Politically Liberal, a guilt-ridden-whiney-assed-bed wetter is often beyond liberal and nearly to the point of irrationality.
Typically the guilt-ridden-whiney-assed-bed wetter believes that a free ride can be provided to everyone, regardless of their motivation to work, create, innovate or to even wipe their own ass without help from the government.
Usually these guilt-ridden-whiney-assed-bed wetters love to "Help the poor" but always using resources obtained from others.
Statistically proven to give less of their own income to charity than the average conservatives.
Often white, often college educated and usually feels a misplaced sense of guilt at their own existence.
Normally dislikes the United States or any other place/people associated with freedom of thought, free markets or that horrid capitalistic system established in the Western World.
keep paying your taxes clown the welfare people thank you LMAO!
Lindsey G

West Mifflin, PA

#52251 Aug 27, 2013
well if the 47% of moochers voted for obama how did he get to winning the election by over 51%.....LMAO!

The 2012 presidential election has obviously come and gone, but before we move on entirely, there's a little tidbit of statistical trivia that struck me as interesting -- and chart worthy.

Bloomberg reports today that, thanks to some provisional ballots that have now been counted in New York City, President Obama's popular-vote total is up to 51.06%. That wouldn't be especially interesting, were it not for the fact that Obama is the first presidential candidate since Dwight Eisenhower to top 51% twice.

In fact, in American history, this is a feat that's only been pulled off by six presidents: Andrew Jackson, Ulysses S. Grant, William McKinley, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Eisenhower, and now, Barack Obama.

In case you're wondering if Reagan made the cut, he came close, but ended up with 50.7% in 1980

LMAO!
dbar

Perkasie, PA

#52252 Aug 27, 2013
The BHO Legacy wrote:
Fox News Poll: Phony scandals? Not to voters
August 08, 2013
Benghazi. Snooping on reporters. The IRS and NSA. The White House dismisses them as phony and fake scandals. Americans do not.
A Fox News national poll released Thursday finds that 78 percent of voters think the questions over the administration’s handling of the terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi should be taken seriously. Just 17 percent call it a phony scandal.
The attack, on the anniversary of September 11, killed four Americans -- including the U.S. ambassador.
Meanwhile, 69 percent of voters say the National Security Agency’s electronic surveillance of everyday Americans is serious, while 26 percent call that a fake scandal.
By a margin of 59-31 percent, voters are also more likely to view the seizure of reporters’ phone records by the Justice Department as serious rather than phony.
And while the White House sees a Congressional investigation of the IRS targeting of conservative groups as a “distraction,” 59 percent of voters take it seriously. Some 33 percent agree with the administration that it’s fake.
In each of the four situations, voters across the partisan spectrum -- Republicans, independents and Democrats -- are more likely to say the situation should be taken seriously.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/08/fo...
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2013/...

"there's no doubt about how mad Republicans are about Benghazi. 41% say they consider this to be the biggest political scandal in American history to only 43% who disagree with that sentiment."

"One interesting thing about the voters who think Benghazi is the biggest political scandal in American history is that 39% of them don't actually know where it is. 10% think it's in Egypt, 9% in Iran, 6% in Cuba, 5% in Syria, 4% in Iraq, and 1% each in North Korea and Liberia with 4% not willing to venture a guess."
C Christie

West Mifflin, PA

#52253 Aug 27, 2013
there just isnt enuff tea baggers and old white guys to vote for a republican president again...unless they embrace the blacks,gays,womens rights, womens equal pay, latinos, the elderly and disabled vets and immigrants.......
there is no one out there that can beat hillary in 2016,not one!
<crickets>
Hillary

West Mifflin, PA

#52255 Aug 27, 2013
dbar wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2013/...
"there's no doubt about how mad Republicans are about Benghazi. 41% say they consider this to be the biggest political scandal in American history to only 43% who disagree with that sentiment."
"One interesting thing about the voters who think Benghazi is the biggest political scandal in American history is that 39% of them don't actually know where it is. 10% think it's in Egypt, 9% in Iran, 6% in Cuba, 5% in Syria, 4% in Iraq, and 1% each in North Korea and Liberia with 4% not willing to venture a guess."
LMAO!
LOOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Rave Dogers

West Mifflin, PA

#52256 Aug 27, 2013
dbar wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2013/...
"there's no doubt about how mad Republicans are about Benghazi. 41% say they consider this to be the biggest political scandal in American history to only 43% who disagree with that sentiment."
"One interesting thing about the voters who think Benghazi is the biggest political scandal in American history is that 39% of them don't actually know where it is. 10% think it's in Egypt, 9% in Iran, 6% in Cuba, 5% in Syria, 4% in Iraq, and 1% each in North Korea and Liberia with 4% not willing to venture a guess."
and 1% think it's in Clearfield ,Pa LMAO!
Hillary C

West Mifflin, PA

#52257 Aug 27, 2013
Right-Wing Media Push New Benghazi Myths Ahead Of Hearings

Right-wing media are using a congressional hearing to push new myths about the Obama administration's response to the September 11, 2012 attacks on a U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya. In fact, these myths are discredited by previous congressional reports and testimony, which show that the politicized nature of the hearings come from right-wing media and Congressional Republicans, that the military could not have rescued personnel from the second attack, that the administration was in constant communication at all levels during the attacks, and that the intelligence community believed there was a link to an anti-Islam video at the time of the attacks

Lawyers Representing The "Whistleblowers" In Hearings Are Long-Time GOP Activists With History Of Pushing Discredited Claims. The lawyers claiming to represent some of the witnesses at the Benghazi hearing, Victoria Toensing and Joseph diGenova, are long-time Republicans known for pushing false claims in the media and for having conflicts of interest in their professional work. They have both served as advisors to Republican candidates and donated thousands of dollars to GOP candidates and causes, and have been criticized for a conflict of interest for serving in a dual role in separate Justice Department investigations and for dropping "the air of impartiality, non-partisanship, and professionalism required" by their roles as leaders of a congressional investigation.[Media Matters, 4/30/13; 5/6/13]

I also believe Members of Congress have an obligation to actually investigate claims before coming to conclusions and making public accusations. Unfortunately, House Republicans have taken the opposite approach. They issued a partisan report with reckless and false accusations against the former Secretary of State, they have completely concealed Mr. Thompson from Democratic Committee Members, and they have failed to make even basic inquiries to the Intelligence Community, the Defense Department, or the State Department to vet specific allegations. Instead, they have leaked snippets of interview transcripts to national media outlets in a selective and distorted manner to drum up publicity for their hearing. This is investigation by press release and does a disservice to our common goal of ensuring that our diplomatic corps serving overseas has the best protection possible to do its critical work.[House Oversight Committee, 5/6/13]

http://mediamatters.org/research/2013/05/08/r...
Hillary C

West Mifflin, PA

#52258 Aug 27, 2013
Fox Military Analyst Keane: CIA Base Was Evacuated Before Special Operations Force Could Reach Them. On Fox & Friends, Fox News military analyst retired Gen. Jack Keane responded to guest host Eric Bolling's claim that the Obama administration "did not call on the only response team that may have been able to intervene during the attack" by pointing out that "the CIA base was evacuated prior to their arrival at Sigonella, so they were never employed":

KEANE: Here's what did happen. The national security apparatus, at the request of General Hamm, who's the commander of AFRICOM -- and he's had responsibility from a security aspect to respond to this crisis -- our national mission response force, our most classified force on the highest state of readiness, was alerted and moved from the United States to Sigonella [Naval Air Station in Italy], and they bring with them their own aircraft, their own helicopters and C-17s. Another classified special operations force was moved out of Central Europe to Sigonella as well. The fact of the matter was the CIA base was evacuated prior to their arrival at Sigonella, so they were never employed.[Fox News, Fox & Friends, 11/2/12 via Media Matters]

http://mediamatters.org/research/2013/05/08/r...
Hillary C

West Mifflin, PA

#52259 Aug 27, 2013
MYTH: Clinton Never Spoke To Obama On Night Of The Attacks
Ingraham: "We Know That The Secretary Of State Had Not A Single Conversation With The Commander In Chief." During an interview with Republican Congressman Peter King on her radio show, Fox News contributor Laura Ingraham claimed "[w]e know that the Secretary of State had not a single conversation with the Commander in Chief. Not one during this attack":

INGRAHAM: We know that the Secretary of State had not a single conversation with the Commander in Chief. Not one during this attack. Not one conversation? That just seems bizarre to me. I mean that's just one point, but that's a pretty darn good question. Why?

KING: Absolutely, it's an excellent question, and to me it's one that, it's unfortunate that it even has to be asked. I mean you'd think they would have been on the phone continually.

INGRAHAM: My God.[Courtside Entertainment Group, The Laura Ingraham Show, 5/7/13]

http://mediamatters.org/research/2013/05/08/r...
Hillary C

West Mifflin, PA

#52260 Aug 27, 2013
FACT: Croatian Force Could Not Have Arrived Until After The Attack Was Over
Accountability Review Board: "There Simply Was Not Enough Time" For "Military Assets To Have Made A Difference." The Accountability Review Board, an independent group tasked with investigating the attacks, found that the "interagency response was timely and appropriate" but that there was not enough time for "armed U.S. military assets to have made a difference":

The interagency response was timely and appropriate, but there simply was not enough time given the speed of the attacks for armed U.S. military assets to have made a difference. Senior-level interagency discussions were underway soon after Washington received initial word of the attacks and continued through the night. The Board found no evidence of any undue delays in decision making or denial of support from Washington or from the military combatant commanders. Quite the contrary: the safe evacuation of all U.S. government personnel from Benghazi twelve hours after the initial attack and subsequently to Ramstein Air Force Base was the result of exceptional U.S. government coordination and military response and helped save the lives of two severely wounded Americans.[Accountability Review Board, accessed 5/7/13]

http://mediamatters.org/research/2013/05/08/r...
Hillary C

West Mifflin, PA

#52262 Aug 27, 2013
MYTH: CIA Never Linked Benghazi Attack To Anti-Islam Video
Weekly Standard's Stephen Hayes: "There Is No Mention Of Any 'Video' In Any Of The Many Drafts" Of CIA Talking Points. In a post on the Weekly Standard, Stephen Hayes claimed that the CIA talking points about the Benghazi attack made no reference to an anti-Islam YouTube video which was mentioned as a possible cause for the attacks by members of the Obama administration:

More troubling was the YouTube video.[Ambassador Susan] Rice would spend much time on the Sunday talk shows pointing to this video as the trigger of the chaos in Benghazi. "What sparked the violence was a very hateful video on the Internet. It was a reaction to a video that had nothing to do with the United States." There is no mention of any "video" in any of the many drafts of the

talking points.[The Weekly Standard, 5/13/13]

http://mediamatters.org/research/2013/05/08/r...
Hillary C

West Mifflin, PA

#52263 Aug 27, 2013
Fox's Chris Wallace: Reaction To The Anti-Islam Video "Had Never Been In Any Of The Talking Points." On the May 5 edition of Fox News Sunday, host Chris Wallace cited Hayes' Weekly Standard article to claim "U.N. Ambassador Rice came on this show and four other Sunday shows, never mentioned the al Qaeda extremists, which had been scrubbed from the -- from the talking points, but did mention a reaction to the anti-Islam video which had never been in any of the talking points." [Fox Broadcasting Co., Fox News Sunday, 5/5/13 via Media Matters]

FACT: Intelligence Community Believed Link Existed At The Time
CIA Talking Points Linked Attack To Protests In Cairo. The first bullet point from what The Weekly Standard described as "Version 1" of the CIA talking points says that "based on currently available information," the attacks were "spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo." The final version of the document made the same link:

The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the U.S. diplomatic post and subsequently its annex. There are indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations.[The Weekly Standard, 5/13/13 via Media Matters]

http://mediamatters.org/research/2013/05/08/r...

And now back to Fox News with the most trustworthy,up to the minute, non bias news stories from around the globe........LMAO!
dbar

Perkasie, PA

#52264 Aug 27, 2013
Zeituni Onyango wrote:
<quoted text>
..........
..........
Why Work?
December 10, 2010 11:12 A.M.
By Veronique de Rugy
Why, indeed?
Over at Zero Hedge, Tyler Durden has an interesting answer:
Emmerich analyzes disposable income and economic benefits among several key income classes and comes to the stunning (and verifiable) conclusion that “a one-parent family of three making $14,500 a year (minimum wage) has more disposable income than a family making $60,000 a year.”
And that excludes benefits from Supplemental Security Income disability checks.
America is now a country which punishes those middle-class people who not only try to work hard, but avoid scamming the system.
More data here:
http://www.marklevinshow.com/goout.asp...
..........
When it was reported in 2008 that Onyango was possibly in the country illegally, Mr. Obama said he had no knowledge of her status.
As a presidential candidate, Mr. Obama told CBS News' Katie Couric that he was not against the possible deportation of his aunt.
"If she has violated laws, then those laws have to be obeyed," he said.
"We are a nation of laws."
Onyango, however, told WBZ-TV,
"If I come as an immigrant, you have the obligation to make me a citizen."
Onyango was granted asylum earlier this year.
more right wing garbage.

http://www.jacksonfreepress.com/news/2011/feb...

"Problem is, the chart is full of errors. I traced it back to the man who made it, a newspaper publisher in Mississippi, and found that the math, methodology, and logic he used to generate the chart, as well as an op-ed he wrote to accompany it, are wholly unsound"

"- It starts with Emmerich overestimating the taxes that the $60,000-a-year family would pay. He was off by over $5k.(His calculation would be based on a taxable income of $60k, meaning a gross income considerably higher.)

#- He inaccurately suggests that the $14,500 household would get Medicaid.(They wouldn't -- in Mississippi, they're living high on the hog and don't qualify for Medicaid.)

#- He guestimated that the premiums on a medical policy for the $60k family would be $16,500 a year and then assigned that dollar amount to the family's Medicaid "benefit" (even though they're ineligible for Medicaid); Singal did a quick search and found a reasonable policy for under $500 a month, or about $6000.(Note that the poorer family would pay that same amount for health insurance --$6,000 a year -- since they don't qualify for Medicaid, although the kids might be about to get CHIP with the parent's insurance costs lower; under our current system, however, that parent and sole breadwinner would likely go without insurance, thus placing the family in more jeopardy for income lost due to illness.)

#In case you're counting, we're at about $15k that Emmerich has misapplied on his chart... and that's the easy stuff,
tea bagger

West Mifflin, PA

#52267 Aug 27, 2013
The BHO Legacy wrote:
First, defund Obamaphones
August 25, 2013
Nothing better illustrates the impossibility of killing a federal entitlement than the fraud-riddled Obamaphone program.
The $2.1 billion giveaway, funded by a tax on every cellphone service contract, is a well-documented boondoggle — an estimated 41 percent of the phones go to ineligible recipients.
Earlier this month, my former intern, Jillian Melchior, was able to obtain three of the free phones on the streets of New York City without telling a single fib. Melchior, now a reporter for National Review, says the service reps who signed her up seemed completely uninterested in whether she was eligible for the program — she isn’t.
While signing up for one of the phones, she was taking calls on her personal iPhone.
http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130825/O...
Wow another distorted fact and another blame it on President Obama and it's his fault hateful rhetoric, coming from this bottom of my shoe gum spittle N. Finley no less, and his right wing-nut mentality. He is all for giving out tax breaks and less and less regulations for multi-billion dollar corporations. Whom by the way stash their record breaking profits in overseas banking heavens. But is quick to bash and belittle the poor and less fortunate for receiving help. And then act as if this administration is the fault for all of the ills and woes of this country. To include hurricane Katrina and I bet that some these right wing nut jobs blame President Obama for the fall of the Roman empire... All they do is spew hate, lies and twisted facts. It's to the point where the GOP's double standard is now only exposing how full of crap they truly are and that they are now only hurting themselves and their brand.

Hillary 2016! LMAO!

Free Clinton phones in 2016.......LOL!
Dave Rogers

Clearfield, PA

#52270 Aug 27, 2013
[QUOTE who="Homestead, PA"]<quoted text>and 1% think it's in Clearfield ,Pa LMAO![/QUOTE]You're just as stupid when you post as the inbred bobby6464. Go back into the closet, DUDE>>>LMFAO @ the wanta be soldier.

No one cares what McCain says dickwad. Go find some more copy and paste articles and this time find some that are even older. You couldn't come up with an original thought even if it meant saving your monthly welfare check.
Dave Rogers

Clearfield, PA

#52271 Aug 27, 2013
dbar wrote:
<quoted text>
more right wing garbage.
http://www.jacksonfreepress.com/news/2011/feb...
"Problem is, the chart is full of errors. I traced it back to the man who made it, a newspaper publisher in Mississippi, and found that the math, methodology, and logic he used to generate the chart, as well as an op-ed he wrote to accompany it, are wholly unsound"
"- It starts with Emmerich overestimating the taxes that the $60,000-a-year family would pay. He was off by over $5k.(His calculation would be based on a taxable income of $60k, meaning a gross income considerably higher.)
#- He inaccurately suggests that the $14,500 household would get Medicaid.(They wouldn't -- in Mississippi, they're living high on the hog and don't qualify for Medicaid.)
#- He guestimated that the premiums on a medical policy for the $60k family would be $16,500 a year and then assigned that dollar amount to the family's Medicaid "benefit" (even though they're ineligible for Medicaid); Singal did a quick search and found a reasonable policy for under $500 a month, or about $6000.(Note that the poorer family would pay that same amount for health insurance --$6,000 a year -- since they don't qualify for Medicaid, although the kids might be about to get CHIP with the parent's insurance costs lower; under our current system, however, that parent and sole breadwinner would likely go without insurance, thus placing the family in more jeopardy for income lost due to illness.)
#In case you're counting, we're at about $15k that Emmerich has misapplied on his chart... and that's the easy stuff,
LMFAO....even your replies are copy and paste dannyboy.
dbar

Perkasie, PA

#52274 Aug 28, 2013
The BHO Legacy wrote:
Does Obama know he’s fighting on al-Qa’ida’s side?
27 August 2013
If Barack Obama decides to attack the Syrian regime, he has ensured – for the very first time in history – that the United States will be on the same side as al-Qa’ida.
Quite an alliance! Was it not the Three Musketeers who shouted “All for one and one for all” each time they sought combat? This really should be the new battle cry if – or when – the statesmen of the Western world go to war against Bashar al-Assad.
The men who destroyed so many thousands on 9/11 will then be fighting alongside the very nation whose innocents they so cruelly murdered almost exactly 12 years ago. Quite an achievement for Obama, Cameron, Hollande and the rest of the miniature warlords.
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/d...
and you missed

"In Iraq, we went to war on the basis of lies originally uttered by fakers and conmen."
dbar

Perkasie, PA

#52275 Aug 28, 2013
The BHO Legacy wrote:
Obama: MLK 'would like' ObamaCare
08/27/13
President Obama said in a radio interview airing Tuesday that civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. would approve of his signature health care reform law.
"Oh, he would like that," Obama told radio hosts Tom Joyner and Sybil Wilkes in an interview from the White House. "Well, because I think he understood that health care, health security is not a privilege; it’s something that in a country as wealthy as ours, everybody should have access to."
http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/health-r...
yes perhaps MLK would like a program taken largely from a Governors health care plan.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hanover Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Snyder's of Hanover (Aug '09) 13 hr just a thought 5,802
Snyder lance May 25 Torts 3
Review: Dean's Auto Plaza (Sep '13) May 7 Scott123 10
News 12-time DUI repeater gets up to 7 years in prison (Sep '08) Apr '15 Trista Biddle 23
News Half Pint Creamery plans second ice cream shop Mar '15 Fannie Pak 2
Second eagle Mar '15 Vlossak 1
Rachel Caltrider????? Mar '15 Just looking 1
More from around the web

Hanover People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]