Who do you support for Governor in Pennsylvania in 2010?

[bobby64]

How much money you think Koch industries bet against president Obama with citizens united? They stood to rake in billions of dollars in a major way with a etch a sketch as president, huh racial hating warrior tea bag? You betcha your living off big government ass. They donate as much secret money as they could of ever dreamed of prior to citizens united supreme court case. The flipper promised that pipe line from Canada, but your pea brain must have forgotten.They failed big time

[Mutt 2016 LOL]

Dan Senor, Mitt Romney Adviser, Blasts Republicans For Deserting Candidate After Loss:


Dan Senor, a top adviser to former GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney, on Wednesday accused Republicans within the former presidential candidate's inner circle of being fair weather fans, all too eager to throw Romney under the bus only days after his defeat.

Speaking on MSNBC's "Morning Joe," Senor called the trend "stunning," before taking aim at unnamed Republican officials who he said sought to cozy up to Romney when they believed he was on his way to a victory over President Barack Obama.

LQQK HERE:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/21/dan-...

GEE! Dan Senor ever think this guy was all hot air and cold ideas? LMAO!

And after the election they eat their young LOL!

[TaxNoMore]

bobby64 wrote:

I'm sure the racial hating warrior tea bag really believes Charles and David Koch of Koch industries really invested all that money against president Obama only to be secretly preying for a Obama victory, huh warrior tea bag? It is no secret the heritage foundation funded started and heavily funded by the Koch brothers. The heritage foundation will say any thing in a study that promotes the wishes of deep pockets of David and Charles. President Obama wants to end there special tax breaks and big oil subsidies. How do you think they feel about that? Heritage think tank feels the same

//////////

President Obama wants to end there special tax breaks and big oil subsidies. How do you think they feel about that?

//////////

The White House denied it had obtained secret information about Koch's taxes, and told Politico's Ben Smith that its information came from Koch's own Web site as well as from the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board's report on tax reform.

The White House is right about the availability of information, but that doesn't excuse what went down Aug. 27.

.
.

Three disturbing things stand out from that briefing.

First, it smacks of the smear tactics taught by community organizer and Barack Obama mentor Saul Alinsky.

By singling out Koch, the White House appears to be making the company victim No. 1 of the "pick a target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize it" method that Alinsky used to silence an opponent.

Obama has practiced this before, with administration attacks on Fox News, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck. So it's not surprising his administration is going after the Koch brothers.

As they were taking direct fire from the White House, the Koches were subjects of poorly sourced and innuendo-filled articles in pro-Obama publications such as the New Yorker and the New York Times, all making the brothers the new bogeymen.

This wouldn't be so noteworthy if it weren't for the fact that these same outlets had participants on a secretive listserv called JournoList, whose members have been caught conspiring to manipulate political "narratives" and which had connections to the White House. JournoList is now supposedly defunct, but the White House reply to Koch came to Politico's Smith, who was known to be a list member.

.
.
.

Second, even if all the information gathered about Koch was public, the White House is still signaling it will try to dig up dirt on any company or individual it sees as an adversary.

Obama supporters showed they're capable of such vindictiveness in 2008, when some conducted illegal record searches on Joe Wurzelbacher, the plumber who asked embarrassing questions of Obama on the campaign trail.

.
.
.

Third, there was a sly semantic trick in implying that the company, which has registered several of its entities as "S" corporations, LLCs and LPs - all of which are perfectly legal and legitimate ways of doing business - was somehow evading taxes.

Though the White House official decried that Koch didn't pay corporate taxes, that doesn't mean it paid no taxes.

The private company does indeed pay taxes - through personal returns and alternative means rather than the corporate code.

The White House, in its reply to the Koch lawyer, asked that people read the August 2010 report on Tax Reform Options.

The report (which never mentions Koch Industries) suggests that the U.S. corporate tax code is so unworkable and inefficient that a company would be stupid to register under the corporate code when other tax regimes, such as those Koch has chosen, are available.

For a White House so keen on searching the Koch Web site, it's interesting that its operatives don't seem to have read that report.

Instead, they seem obsessed with silencing the political activities of a company simply exercising its rights of free speech.

//////////

President Obama wants to end there special tax breaks and big oil subsidies.

[TaxNoMore]

Dr Proctor wrote:

<quoted text>AS soon as Obama gets more of the Koch's tax money with a stroke of a pen he will be smilling...LOL! Close those loopholes..
yeahhhhhh babyyyyyyy!

//////////

President Obama wants to end there special tax breaks and big oil subsidies.

How do you think they feel about that?

//////////

The White House denied it had obtained secret information about Koch's taxes, and told Politico's Ben Smith that its information came from Koch's own Web site as well as from the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board's report on tax reform.

The White House is right about the availability of information, but that doesn't excuse what went down Aug. 27.

.
.

Three disturbing things stand out from that briefing.

First, it smacks of the smear tactics taught by community organizer and Barack Obama mentor Saul Alinsky.

By singling out Koch, the White House appears to be making the company victim No. 1 of the "pick a target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize it" method that Alinsky used to silence an opponent.

Obama has practiced this before, with administration attacks on Fox News, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck. So it's not surprising his administration is going after the Koch brothers.

As they were taking direct fire from the White House, the Koches were subjects of poorly sourced and innuendo-filled articles in pro-Obama publications such as the New Yorker and the New York Times, all making the brothers the new bogeymen.

This wouldn't be so noteworthy if it weren't for the fact that these same outlets had participants on a secretive listserv called JournoList, whose members have been caught conspiring to manipulate political "narratives" and which had connections to the White House. JournoList is now supposedly defunct, but the White House reply to Koch came to Politico's Smith, who was known to be a list member.

.
.
.

Second, even if all the information gathered about Koch was public, the White House is still signaling it will try to dig up dirt on any company or individual it sees as an adversary.

Obama supporters showed they're capable of such vindictiveness in 2008, when some conducted illegal record searches on Joe Wurzelbacher, the plumber who asked embarrassing questions of Obama on the campaign trail.

.
.
.

Third, there was a sly semantic trick in implying that the company, which has registered several of its entities as "S" corporations, LLCs and LPs - all of which are perfectly legal and legitimate ways of doing business - was somehow evading taxes.

Though the White House official decried that Koch didn't pay corporate taxes, that doesn't mean it paid no taxes.

The private company does indeed pay taxes - through personal returns and alternative means rather than the corporate code.

The White House, in its reply to the Koch lawyer, asked that people read the August 2010 report on Tax Reform Options.

The report (which never mentions Koch Industries) suggests that the U.S. corporate tax code is so unworkable and inefficient that a company would be stupid to register under the corporate code when other tax regimes, such as those Koch has chosen, are available.

For a White House so keen on searching the Koch Web site, it's interesting that its operatives don't seem to have read that report.

Instead, they seem obsessed with silencing the political activities of a company simply exercising its rights of free speech.

//////////

President Obama wants to end there special tax breaks and big oil subsidies.

[yoo hoo]

TaxNoMore wrote:

<quoted text>
//////////
President Obama wants to end there special tax breaks and big oil subsidies. How do you think they feel about that?
//////////
The White House denied it had obtained secret information about Koch's taxes, and told Politico's Ben Smith that its information came from Koch's own Web site as well as from the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board's report on tax reform.
The White House is right about the availability of information, but that doesn't excuse what went down Aug. 27.
.
.
Three disturbing things stand out from that briefing.
First, it smacks of the smear tactics taught by community organizer and Barack Obama mentor Saul Alinsky.
By singling out Koch, the White House appears to be making the company victim No. 1 of the "pick a target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize it" method that Alinsky used to silence an opponent.
Obama has practiced this before, with administration attacks on Fox News, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck. So it's not surprising his administration is going after the Koch brothers.
As they were taking direct fire from the White House, the Koches were subjects of poorly sourced and innuendo-filled articles in pro-Obama publications such as the New Yorker and the New York Times, all making the brothers the new bogeymen.
This wouldn't be so noteworthy if it weren't for the fact that these same outlets had participants on a secretive listserv called JournoList, whose members have been caught conspiring to manipulate political "narratives" and which had connections to the White House. JournoList is now supposedly defunct, but the White House reply to Koch came to Politico's Smith, who was known to be a list member.
.
.
.
Second, even if all the information gathered about Koch was public, the White House is still signaling it will try to dig up dirt on any company or individual it sees as an adversary.
Obama supporters showed they're capable of such vindictiveness in 2008, when some conducted illegal record searches on Joe Wurzelbacher, the plumber who asked embarrassing questions of Obama on the campaign trail.
.
.
.
Third, there was a sly semantic trick in implying that the company, which has registered several of its entities as "S" corporations, LLCs and LPs - all of which are perfectly legal and legitimate ways of doing business - was somehow evading taxes.
Though the White House official decried that Koch didn't pay corporate taxes, that doesn't mean it paid no taxes.
The private company does indeed pay taxes - through personal returns and alternative means rather than the corporate code.
The White House, in its reply to the Koch lawyer, asked that people read the August 2010 report on Tax Reform Options.
The report (which never mentions Koch Industries) suggests that the U.S. corporate tax code is so unworkable and inefficient that a company would be stupid to register under the corporate code when other tax regimes, such as those Koch has chosen, are available.
For a White House so keen on searching the Koch Web site, it's interesting that its operatives don't seem to have read that report.
Instead, they seem obsessed with silencing the political activities of a company simply exercising its rights of free speech.
//////////
President Obama wants to end there special tax breaks and big oil subsidies.

Feeling...dizzy...must...fight ...it...

[bobby64]

I wonder out of pure curiosity if any one is sick and tired of reading some one cut and pasting of others peoples words, just like the racial hating tea bag just did. I mean again and again and again and frigging again. I maybe doing that cut and paste but i don't know how, nor do i wish to learn. I like to attempt to think and then put my own words to use and i must admit some day are better

[TaxNoMore]

yoo hoo wrote:

<quoted text>
They should invent a posting school so you could go. Your posts give me Autism.

**********

"Actually"

It's called skull fu-king the Brain-dead obummer drones

.

(THAT'S YOU)
.

Brain-dead

A increadibly idiotic individual who hasn't a sustance for anything that is going on.

He or she is stupid, retarded, mental, ignorant, annoying, funny to make fun of, or any combination of the previous terms.

//////////

"yoo hoo" brain dead GE parasite

You live in eerie,PA.....

GE workers wipe their azzes with $100 bills and you feed your 30% poverty rated poor people turkey sandwiches and vodka, just to keep state and federal money flowing into the ghetto.

Perry Square......everyone lines up for free turkey!

less taxes in Texas, switch to toilet paper before it's too late

wink,.........wink

[Dave Rogers]

bobby64 wrote:

I wonder out of pure curiosity if any one is sick and tired of reading some one cut and pasting of others peoples words, just like the racial hating tea bag just did. I mean again and again and again and frigging again. I maybe doing that cut and paste but i don't know how, nor do i wish to learn. I like to attempt to think and then put my own words to use and i must admit some day are better

I'm sick and tired of scrolling past West Mifflin's posts. Does anyone on here actually read them?

[No Opinion]

Dave Rogers wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm sick and tired of scrolling past West Mifflin's posts. Does anyone on here actually read them?

I'm sick and tired of scrolling past TaxNoMoron's posts. Does anyone on here actually read them?

..And it takes a lot longer.

[Gringo]

xfactor wrote:

<quoted text>
Not at all Obama is another puppet, the controlled implosion of the economy is by design, these banks want all of our wealth. Look at Greece - it is their beta test - and Spain.
We 'borrow' the Federal Reserve Bank's fairy tale currency and they steal our land/gold/oil/labor and anything else of real substance they can grab. We get left having to repay an impossible debt.
Austerity coming to America soon.

That's an outright lie...

The implosion took place under your pal GW..

Obama was left to clean it up and that's a fact jack...

You're not thinking straight...

So, where do you get this friggin fairy tale information anyway.?
I know you're not making it up. Or is it coming from your vivid imagination?
I doubt that you probably have a "reliable" souce..

C'mon share your sources with us...this stuff is so friggin outlandish it must be Glenn Beck.
Id put money on the Beckster...do you watch his show on Direct TV?

[The Man from McAdoo]

Consumer confidence level is highest than in past 8 years. New home construction is up 41%. 13,000 Dow. Today I am thankful President Obama will have 8 years to fix 8 years of Bush misery.

[Input]

The Man from McAdoo wrote:

Consumer confidence level is highest than in past 8 years. New home construction is up 41%. 13,000 Dow. Today I am thankful President Obama will have 8 years to fix 8 years of Bush misery.

I suppose that is why Mifflin County voted 3 to 1 for Mitt Romney.

[Dan the Man]

Input wrote:

<quoted text>
I suppose that is why Mifflin County voted 3 to 1 for Mitt Romney.

That's what you think? You think Mifflin County went 3 to 1 for Romney because the US economy is better now by every objective measure than when Obama was elected the first time?

No, any county that went 3 to 1 for Romney was clearly voting on something OTHER than objective reality and the facts on the ground.

[TaxNoMore]

No Opinion wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm sick and tired of scrolling past TaxNoMoron's posts. Does anyone on here actually read them?
..And it takes a lot longer.

**********

"Actually"

It's called skull fu-king the Brain-dead obummer drones

.

(THAT'S YOU)
.

Brain-dead

A increadibly idiotic individual who hasn't a sustance for anything that is going on.

He or she is stupid, retarded, mental, ignorant, annoying, funny to make fun of, or any combination of the previous terms.

//////////

Give thanks

[TaxNoMore]

Consumer confidence level is highest than in past 8 years. New home construction is up 41%. 13,000 Dow. Today I am thankful President Obama will have 8 years to fix 8 years of Bush misery.

//////////

Brain-dead obummer drone

A increadibly idiotic individual who hasn't a sustance for anything that is going on.

He or she is stupid, retarded, mental, ignorant, annoying, funny to make fun of, or any combination of the previous terms.

[TaxNoMore]

The Man from McAdoo wrote:

Consumer confidence level is highest than in past 8 years. New home construction is up 41%. 13,000 Dow. Today I am thankful President Obama will have 8 years to fix 8 years of Bush misery.

.
.

November sentiment highest since 2007

.
.

You know,

free turkeys at the homeless shelters,

obummercare,

free phones,

free food,

free condoms,

free gas,

free mortgage payments,

free education for illegals,

open borders,

cash for clunkers,

cash for caulkers,

cash for houses.

The dummies, yuppies and gimmies who voted for Obama are in the Christmas spirit.

[TaxNoMore]

The Man from McAdoo wrote:

Consumer confidence level is highest than in past 8 years. New home construction is up 41%. 13,000 Dow. Today I am thankful President Obama will have 8 years to fix 8 years of Bush misery.

//////////

The Fed is buying $40 billion of mortgage-backed securities a month to boost housing and fuel growth and employment.

40 billion = 200,000 toxic or under valued $200,000 mortgages per month.
Or
40 billion = 400,000 toxic or under valued $100,000 mortgages per month.
.
180,427 New Foreclosures Sep 2012....$186,754 Foreclosure Avg Sales Price

http://www.realtytrac.com/home/

//////////

//////////

New home construction is up 41%.

.........

Builder confidence rose to its highest level in six and a half years, according to a survey by the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo.

Their index of builder sentiment rose to 46 this month, up from 41 in October.

It was the highest reading since May 2006, just before the housing bubble burst.
.
.
.

Readings below 50 signal negative sentiment about the housing market.

.
.
.

The index has been rising since October 2011, when it was 17. It has surged 27 points in the past 12 months, the sharpest annual increase on record.

..........

Housing starts are 87 percent above the annual rate of 478,000 in April 2009, the recession low.

That's still short of the 1.5 million annual rate considered healthy.

[TaxNoMore]

The Fed is buying $40 billion of mortgage-backed securities a month to boost housing and fuel growth and employment.

Bernanke said the open-ended purchases would continue until the labor market improved significantly.

“We’re not going to rush to begin to tighten policy,” he said.

“We’re going to give it some time to make sure that the economy is well established.”

//////////

Today I am thankful President Obama will have 4 years to fix 4 years of obummer misery.

[TaxNoMore]

.
.
.
.
Today I am thankful President Obama will have 4 years to fix 4 years of obummer misery.

[TaxNoMore]

.
.

Obama is the greatest failure in the history of this country.