Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#42204 Nov 11, 2012
TaxNoMore wrote:
Folks you cant make this shit up!
.
.
.
Obama touts fair pay for women, despite records showing women paid less in his own White House [VIDEO]
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/16/obama-touts ...
Wow, you are still the same old dumbf*ck.

You do know that equal pay for equal work has nothing to do with the average pay of men & women in the workplace.

Of course you don't. Because you area f*cking idiot.
Reverend Irreverent

State College, PA

#42205 Nov 11, 2012
And this coming from someone who despises socialism and communism. Russia Today as a news source from TaxNoMore of all people?

This one doesn't even require a punchline.
Dan the Man

Newville, PA

#42206 Nov 11, 2012
Obama declared winner of Florida.

Final: Obama 332, Romney 206

A landslide by any definition.
Dr Sardonicus

Baltimore, MD

#42207 Nov 11, 2012
RealDave wrote:
Can't wait until Kathleen Kane gets sworn in so she can start to nail Corbett for allowing a known pervert to molest boys for two years to protect the name of Penn State.
It will then be on to those Republicans in the legislature that blocked others there from investigations there.
Republicans protecting molesters.
Hey...somebody actually responded to the actual topic
Wow, I'm actually stunned....
It only took 40000 some posts to get back on topic...
I'm in the presence of greatness here... you might have a bright future on here -whoever you are RealDave..
But you have to ask yourself...what is the potential downside here
I'm truly impressed though and I agree with you..
Welcome on board but I must warn you its not for the squeemish or weakhearted... but you're welcome in
Dr Sardonicus

Baltimore, MD

#42208 Nov 11, 2012
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, you are still the same old dumbf*ck.
You do know that equal pay for equal work has nothing to do with the average pay of men & women in the workplace.
Of course you don't. Because you area f*cking idiot.
I see that you're already familiar with Sir Dumbass already.....

Hahahhaaha. Yeah, he's as dense as humanly possible and then some but I guess someone has to be that stupid.

But I'm still impressed with the post pertaining to the governor of PA post very impressive...

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#42209 Nov 11, 2012
Plea Deal For Jackson Jr. Would Include Jail Time

Jesse Jackson Jr. is currently being treated for health issues and while some have questioned whether he could ever return to Congress, a plea deal on charges of misuse of campaign funds may guarantee he does not return to Washington.

The just-re-elected congressman is negotiating a plea deal for misuse of campaign funds that would include resigning his seat in Congress, repaying the money, and spending time in jail, reported CBS Chicago.

Since June, Jackson has been on leave while receiving treatment for bi-polar disorder. He was re-elected last Tuesday despite not campaigning while taking care of his health.

Illinois Congressman Danny Davis told Reuters in October that Jackson appeared frail and emotional when he saw him and there was no way to know if he would be able to return to his seat in Congress.
"I think this rest at the Mayo Clinic may be just what the doctor ordered and may be just what he needs," Davis said. "But you can't tell."

The plea deal, currently being negotiated, would include Jackson resigning for health reasons, pleading guilty to misuse of campaign funds and repaying campaign contributions that were allegedly used for personal items.

Based on similar cases in the past, he likely will serve some jail time, according to the CBS report.

Lets hope he gets a long sentence. We need to set some examples.

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#42210 Nov 11, 2012
RealDave wrote:
Can't wait until Kathleen Kane gets sworn in so she can start to nail Corbett for allowing a known pervert to molest boys for two years to protect the name of Penn State.
It will then be on to those Republicans in the legislature that blocked others there from investigations there.
Republicans protecting molesters.
It's a good thing we have the Holy democrats to make sure republicans get what's coming to them.

RealDave, molesters come from all parties and so do those who protect them.
TaxNoMore

Los Angeles, CA

#42211 Nov 11, 2012
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, you are still the same old dumbf*ck.
You do know that equal pay for equal work has nothing to do with the average pay of men & women in the workplace.
Of course you don't. Because you area f*cking idiot.
...
....
...

The Equal Pay Act of 1963 is a United States federal law amending the Fair Labor Standards Act, aimed at abolishing wage disparity based on sex (see Gender pay gap).

.

It was signed into law on June 10, 1963 by John F. Kennedy as part of his New Frontier Program.[1]
.
In passing the bill, Congress denounces sex discrimination[citation needed] for the following reasons:

It depresses wages and living standards for employees necessary for their health and efficiency;

it prevents the maximum utilization of the available labor resources

it tends to cause labor disputes, thereby burdening, affecting, and obstructing commerce;

it burdens commerce and the free flow of goods in commerce; and

it constitutes an unfair method of competition.
.
.

The law provides (in part) that:

No employer having employees subject to any provisions of this section [section 206 of title 29 of the United States Code] shall discriminate, within any establishment in which such employees are employed, between employees on the basis of sex by paying wages to employees in such establishment at a rate less than the rate at which he pays wages to employees of the opposite sex in such establishment for equal work on jobs[,]

.

the performance of which requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and which are performed under similar working conditions, except where such payment is made pursuant to

(i) a seniority system;

(ii) a merit system;

(iii) a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality of production;

or (iv) a differential based on any other factor other than sex [....][2]

//////////

Wow, you are still the same old dumbf*ck.

dumbf*ck!

dumbf*ck!

dumbf*ck!

You do know that equal pay for equal work has nothing to do with the average pay of men & women in the workplace.

Of course you don't.

.
.

Because you area f*cking idiot and a dumbf*ck!
Dr Sardonicus

Baltimore, MD

#42212 Nov 11, 2012
Dave Rogers wrote:
<quoted text> It's a good thing we have the Holy democrats to make sure republicans get what's coming to them.
RealDave, molesters come from all parties and so do those who protect them.
Yeah but most of them live in Florida but there wernt enough of them to pull it out for Romney
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#42213 Nov 11, 2012
Dave Rogers wrote:
Plea Deal For Jackson Jr. Would Include Jail Time
Jesse Jackson Jr. is currently being treated for health issues and while some have questioned whether he could ever return to Congress, a plea deal on charges of misuse of campaign funds may guarantee he does not return to Washington.
The just-re-elected congressman is negotiating a plea deal for misuse of campaign funds that would include resigning his seat in Congress, repaying the money, and spending time in jail, reported CBS Chicago.
Since June, Jackson has been on leave while receiving treatment for bi-polar disorder. He was re-elected last Tuesday despite not campaigning while taking care of his health.
Illinois Congressman Danny Davis told Reuters in October that Jackson appeared frail and emotional when he saw him and there was no way to know if he would be able to return to his seat in Congress.
"I think this rest at the Mayo Clinic may be just what the doctor ordered and may be just what he needs," Davis said. "But you can't tell."
The plea deal, currently being negotiated, would include Jackson resigning for health reasons, pleading guilty to misuse of campaign funds and repaying campaign contributions that were allegedly used for personal items.
Based on similar cases in the past, he likely will serve some jail time, according to the CBS report.
Lets hope he gets a long sentence. We need to set some examples.
You mean like this guy ?

An internal investigation by the National Republican Congressional Committee has determined that $725,000 is missing from its fund-raising accounts, money that the group says was stolen as part of a six-year scheme carried out by its former treasurer.

The committee, which raises money for Republican Congressional candidates, announced on Thursday the results of a forensic audit, focusing on the activities of its former treasurer, Christopher J. Ward. It said Mr. Ward had fabricated financial statements to hide the missing money, which went undetected until

Mr. Ward oversaw the collection and distribution of over $360 million from Republican donors while collecting $120,000 a year as treasurer. He made $10,000 a year as treasurer for the President’s Dinner Committee, the party’s biggest annual fund-raising event. He also served as treasurer for the campaigns of 80 other Republican candidates, many of whom have also said money was missing.

The thefts are both embarrassing and painful for the committee, which has been struggling to raise money for what is expected to be a tough year for Republican House candidates. According to the most recent federal filings, the Republican committee has only $6.7 million in cash on hand; in contrast, its Democratic counterpart has $45 million.
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#42214 Nov 11, 2012
Dr Sardonicus wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah but most of them live in Florida but there wernt enough of them to pull it out for Romney
Did you know that if Romney would have won Florida, Ohio and Michigan,he still comes up short...LMAO

No one has seen nor heard from Romney since his concession speech...no interviews, no phone calls,nothing!
You'd think he'd be on FOX telling his lies why he lost,I'm sure they'd take it easy on the guy...LMAO!

Even Karl Rove ( who quaranteed a victory ) did interviews after Mutt lost....maybe explain to his poeple why the 400 million in donations didnt work.....LOL!

DAMN! Should have had 100K plate fund raising,,,,the 50K a plate wasnt enuff....LOL!
TaxNoMore

Los Angeles, CA

#42215 Nov 11, 2012
Reverend Irreverent wrote:
And this coming from someone who despises socialism and communism. Russia Today as a news source from TaxNoMore of all people?
This one doesn't even require a punchline.
.
.
.

11 Years On, Flat Tax 'Nothing Short of a Resounding Policy Success'

Key to the process was transforming the patchwork of taxation laws, most dating from the late-Soviet period, into a unified code that would promote investment and yet increase tax compliance at the personal and corporate level.

.
.

After years of alternative drafts of the Tax Code and heated debate, the first part of the new Tax Code was signed by President Boris Yeltsin on July 31, 1998, as part of an 11th hour anti-crisis package.

.

These measures were insufficient and too late.

On Aug. 17, 1998, the government defaulted on its state bonds.

With tax reform a clear priority, the second part of the Tax Code was eventually passed by the two chambers of parliament in the summer of 2000 and signed by newly elected President Vladimir Putin to go into effect on Jan. 1, 2001.

Among the key features of the code was a flat 13 percent personal income tax rate with mandatory employer withholding.

Read more: http://www.themoscowtimes.com/20th/special/le...
The Moscow Times

..........

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh after the election I will have more flex

.
.
.

Russia reminds Obama of missile defense promise

Russia expects President Obama to show more flexibility in a dispute over U.S. missile defense plans following his re-election, the country's deputy prime minister said Thursday.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57546892/...

..........

TMI..........

.
.
.

idiot?
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#42216 Nov 11, 2012
Big GOP donors see small return on investment:

Among the biggest losers on Tuesday was conservative strategist Karl Rove, and not just because his side lost. The Fox News analyst, who questioned his network's decision to call the election for President Obama on air after earlier incorrectly predicting a Romney victory, also has to reckon with the reality that his big-spending super PAC, American Crossroads, got almost no return on the more than $100 million it spent to influence the election.

A study by the Sunlight Foundation found that just 1.29 percent of the nearly $104 million it spent in the general election ended with the desired result. In addition to spending $85 million to defeat Mr. Obama and $6.5 million to support Mitt Romney, the group spent millions more opposing Democratic Senate candidates Bill Nelson in Florida, Jon Tester in Montana, Joe Donnelly in Indiana, Tammy Baldwin in Wisconsin, and Tim Kaine in Virginia - all of whom won. The only candidates it supported who won were Republicans Deb Fisher in Nebraska and Dean Heller in Nevada, who the group spent a combined $1.3 million to support.

The return for American Crossroads' sister group, Crossroads GPS, was not much better. Crossroads GPS, which keeps its donors secret, saw a 14 percent return on the $70 million it spent. Another conservative outside group, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, saw just a 6.9 percent return on its $33 million in spending. The National Rifle Association's return on its nearly $12 million in spending: 0.81 percent.

LQQK HERE:

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57547103/...
Dr Sardonicus

Baltimore, MD

#42217 Nov 11, 2012
TaxNoMore wrote:
<quoted text>
...
....
...
The Equal Pay Act of 1963 is a United States federal law amending the Fair Labor Standards Act, aimed at abolishing wage disparity based on sex (see Gender pay gap).
.
It was signed into law on June 10, 1963 by John F. Kennedy as part of his New Frontier Program.[1]
.
In passing the bill, Congress denounces sex discrimination[citation needed] for the following reasons:
It depresses wages and living standards for employees necessary for their health and efficiency;
it prevents the maximum utilization of the available labor resources
it tends to cause labor disputes, thereby burdening, affecting, and obstructing commerce;
it burdens commerce and the free flow of goods in commerce; and
it constitutes an unfair method of competition.
.
.
The law provides (in part) that:
No employer having employees subject to any provisions of this section [section 206 of title 29 of the United States Code] shall discriminate, within any establishment in which such employees are employed, between employees on the basis of sex by paying wages to employees in such establishment at a rate less than the rate at which he pays wages to employees of the opposite sex in such establishment for equal work on jobs[,]
.
the performance of which requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and which are performed under similar working conditions, except where such payment is made pursuant to
(i) a seniority system;
(ii) a merit system;
(iii) a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality of production;
or (iv) a differential based on any other factor other than sex [....][2]
//////////
Wow, you are still the same old dumbf*ck.
dumbf*ck!
dumbf*ck!
dumbf*ck!
You do know that equal pay for equal work has nothing to do with the average pay of men & women in the workplace.
Of course you don't.
.
.
Because you area f*cking idiot and a dumbf*ck!
Let me guess...I'm going out on a limb here ......

Tourrette's Syndrome

There is medication out there now to help you from regurgitating shit like that...
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#42218 Nov 11, 2012
Latino power: Suddenly, Sean Hannity wants immigration reform:

Now he wants reform???????? LOL!
If you cant beat 'em join 'em.....LMAO!

It is a cold, hard slap in the face to conservatives: 71 percent of Latinos voted for President Obama.

The result: Listen to how some leading conservative voices are tripping over each other to say that the Republican Party should step up and support immigration reform.

And no, not in the way that Mitt Romney suggested — through “self-deportation.” And it won’t help to keep talking about “anchor babies”— a discredited “phenomenon” which has sucked up a lot of time on Fox News

LQQK HERE:

http://blog.sfgate.com/nov05election/2012/11/...
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#42219 Nov 11, 2012
And then there’s House Speaker John Boehner, who told ABC News Thursday:

“This issue has been around far too long…A comprehensive approach is long overdue, and I’m confident that the president, myself and others can find the common ground to take care of this issue once and for all.”

Whoa! That was a bit too fast for Rep. John Fleming, R-La., who said Boehner was “getting ahead of House Republicans when he commits to getting a ‘comprehensive approach’ to immigration.”

“There’s been zero discussion of this issue within the conference, and I’m urging the speaker to talk with House Republicans before making pledges on the national news,” Fleming said.

But Grover Norquist, the conservative puppeteer and president of Americans for Tax Reform, is on board.“Republicans should approach it as the party of Reagan and Bush — the party that has historically been pro-immigration.” He’s been on board for a while. Even pre-election.

Immigration is a win-win-win. It can be the tip of an olive branch Republicans extend to Latinos. President Obama can finally fulfill his 2008 campaign promise on immigration reform. And it can provide hope to the 12-plus million undocumented immigrants.

LOL!
TaxNoMore

Los Angeles, CA

#42220 Nov 11, 2012
Folks you cant make this shit up!

.
.
.
Obama touts fair pay for women, despite records showing women paid less in his own White House [VIDEO]

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/16/obama-touts ...

.
.
.

obummer propaganda

...
....
...

The Equal Pay Act of 1963 is a United States federal law amending the Fair Labor Standards Act, aimed at abolishing wage disparity based on sex (see Gender pay gap).

.

It was signed into law on June 10, 1963 by John F. Kennedy as part of his New Frontier Program.[1]
.
In passing the bill, Congress denounces sex discrimination[citation needed] for the following reasons:

It depresses wages and living standards for employees necessary for their health and efficiency;

it prevents the maximum utilization of the available labor resources

it tends to cause labor disputes, thereby burdening, affecting, and obstructing commerce;

it burdens commerce and the free flow of goods in commerce; and

it constitutes an unfair method of competition.
.
.

The law provides (in part) that:

No employer having employees subject to any provisions of this section [section 206 of title 29 of the United States Code] shall discriminate, within any establishment in which such employees are employed, between employees on the basis of sex by paying wages to employees in such establishment at a rate less than the rate at which he pays wages to employees of the opposite sex in such establishment for equal work on jobs[,]

.

the performance of which requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and which are performed under similar working conditions, except where such payment is made pursuant to

(i) a seniority system;

(ii) a merit system;

(iii) a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality of production;

or (iv) a differential based on any other factor other than sex [....][2]

.
.
.

I admit that you just keep me coming back to read your hypocrisy and fringe theories, even if I'm starting to lose hope you'll dig up anything else of real interest.
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#42221 Nov 11, 2012
I guess now that the Republicans and Tea Baggers are starting to realize that even having the ability to anonymously dump hundreds of millions of dollars into the Election 2012 campaign cycle couldn't buy the United States for Rove, and Trump, and the Koch Brothers, they might have to start playing by the rules of the US Constitution again?

What a concept!

Face it, BOYS! You CAN'T BUY THE USA if you can't brainwash a majority of Americans into believeing your pandering BS! You had your chance, and you screwed it up by forgetting what the USA is all about! People working with each other and looking out after each other as we strive to always bring our nation closer to our cultural ideals of life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and equality between all citizens!
Mitt on the Titanic

West Mifflin, PA

#42222 Nov 11, 2012
So, what sank Romney?

Answer: Wall Street sank Romney (and McCain before him).

The Republicans need to learn to deal with that. They are fools if they let the Wall Street crowd deflect public anger with Wall Street toward lax immigration controls and more cheap labor for business. Ordinary middle-class Republicans need to tell Wall Street to take a hike, once and for all. And they need to let the Democrats raise taxes on the rich in Wall Street to pay for all the government bennies soaked up by the illegal immigrants doing all that cheap labor for the rich. After all, it was the business wing of the Republican party that kept pushing -- and still keeps pushing -- for lax immigration controls.

Meanwhile, lots of non-Hispanic Dems (and even some Hispanic Dems) do NOT support amnesty (whatever its thin disguise). Even when the Democrats had the House during Obama's first two years, the Congress did not pass it. And even during the last two years, the Democrats in the Senate never voted for it. Why not?? Because lots of non-Hispanic Dems do NOT want amnesty. Instead, they want immigration Control -- along with most independents and most Republicans (other than the Wall Street crowd and the Chamber of Commerce crowd and the Agribusiness crowd).
TaxNoMore

Los Angeles, CA

#42223 Nov 11, 2012
Let me guess...I'm going out on a limb here ......

Tourrette's Syndrome

There is medication out there now to help you from regurgitating shit like that...

...
...
...

Obama touts fair pay for women, despite records showing women paid less in his own White House [VIDEO]

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/16/obama-touts ...

,
,

vs

,
,

The Equal Pay Act of 1963 is a United States federal law amending the Fair Labor Standards Act, aimed at abolishing wage disparity based on sex (see Gender pay gap).

It was signed into law on June 10, 1963 by John F. Kennedy as part of his New Frontier Program.[1]
.
.
.
.

Folks you cant make this shit up!

//////////

obummer the phony

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hanover Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Snyder's of Hanover (Aug '09) Sat Oh well 5,575
pump it powder (Jan '12) Dec 15 askmetray28 39
Two charged in heroin arrest Dec 13 lady 1
power outage littlestown pa Nov 22 Pink Eye 6
Man hits boy, 4, in head with beer bottle at Ad... Nov '14 Pink Eye 7
13 charged in Littlestown drug bust (Jun '09) Nov '14 Just a thought 222
Police seize more than $250,000 in methamphetam... Nov '14 Just a thought 11
Hanover Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Hanover People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Hanover News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Hanover

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 6:35 pm PST

Bleacher Report 6:35PM
Steve Smith Calls Critical Ravens Fans 'Fat, Lazy, Sorry Couch Quarterbacks'
Bleacher Report 7:42 PM
Is Honeymoon Over for Chip, Philly?
Bleacher Report11:58 PM
Philadelphia Eagles 2014 Regression Was Easy to See Coming
Yahoo! Sports 1:30 AM
ICYMI: Ravens, Saints stumble; 3 titles to decide
NBC Sports 3:25 AM
Steve Smith expects criticism of Ravens offense, won't pay attention to it