Who do you support for Governor in Pe...
Reverend Irreverent

State College, PA

#41962 Nov 8, 2012
Mitt Romnuts wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm telling you now....fragment away
You're just masking a far right agenda because your party just flopped...
Need to dissassociate with your losing coalition of nut jobs.
Don't worry though there enough out there for you to from another crazy party to take votes away from the republican agenda..
We are on to your agendas now...
Please please be disatisfied with everything
We Democrats are happy very happy right now...
We Democrats do love our leaders too..
We Democrats do trust our leaders ...
We Democrats are loyal now and watch what hppens in 2016
We are not mindless drones contrary to your delusions...
But you're entitled to your bogus opinions I quess but hey so is Rush Limbaugh
xfactor has been a proponent of the third-party candidates for a long time. So I don't know where you're getting ideas about a 'far right agenda'. There's nothing 'far right' about his ideas; we share perspectives and are awaiting positive results from Obama as much as any Romney voter from this past Tuesday. He's equally criticized both sides for a long period now. That's what third-party neutrality is. It's simply a foreign idea in a nation where few are aware there are more than two options.

Neither side liked being questioned and critiqued. Both attacked third-party supporters. Obama won reelection and now we hope to see his idealistic goals come to fruition. But we're not optimistic that he won't essentially act as another dancing marionette, strings pulled by phantom corporate puppeteers.
TaxNoMore

Los Angeles, CA

#41963 Nov 8, 2012
Knuckles O Toole wrote:
<quoted text>
As with the idea that government doesn't create jobs, so too, government doesn't control investors. Are you seriously blaming government for the free will choices of individual investors?
If individuals choose to believe nutbags that say a Muslim is in charge and will turn over our economy to followers of Allah is it the government's place to stop that?
The government doesn't work to control individuals it works to react and control as it can DESPITE what individuals control...like Fox news. Politicians of all stripes work to keep the ship of state afloat no matter the cause of individuals.
E Pluribus Unum.
..........

Mail call!!!!!!
.
.

As with the idea that government doesn't create jobs, so too, government doesn't control investors.

..........

QE1: The Fed announced QE1 in March 2009, saying it would buy up to $300 billion in Treasuries. The purchases were combined with buying $175 billion worth of debt issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, known as agency debt, and $1.25 trillion in mortgage-backed securities backed by the two mortgage finance agencies as well as Ginnie Mae.
.
.

MARKET IMPACT

The S&P 500 index jumped 2.09 per cent to 794.35 on March 18, 2009, the day of the QE1 announcement.

By the end of October of that year, the S&P had soared 30 per cent to trade at 1,036 points.

......
oh my!!!!!!!

30 per cent

government doesn't control investors

.......

//////////

QE2: In November 2010, the Fed announced its QE2 program that involved the purchase of $600 billion in longer-dated Treasuries by the end of the second quarter of 2011.

This second round of Treasuries purchases was seen as critical at the time to avert deflation, a situation where a spiral of falling prices can cripple an economy for years, as was the case in Japan in the 1990s.

.
.

MARKET IMPACT

The S&P rose 0.37 per cent to end at 1,197.96 on Nov. 3, 2010, the day the Fed unveiled QE2.

When it wrapped up, the index was trading at 1,320.64, up about 10.2 per cent.

oh my!!!!!!!

10.2 per cent

government doesn't control investors

//////////

QE3: On Sept. 13, the Fed announced a purchase program to buy more mortgage-backed securities, and also said it would continue purchases until the labor market showed substantial improvement. Some top policymakers signaled the Fed might consider purchasing more bonds including possibly Treasuries if the economy needs more help.

.
.

MARKET BACKDROP

The S&P jumped 1.6 per cent at 1,459.99 on the day of the QE3 announcement. It rallied another 0.4 per cent the next day and touched its highest level since December 2007. A week later, it was down to 1,460.26.

..........
..........
..........

oh my!!!!!!!

government doesn't control investors

obummer's phony stock market

.
.
.

Primum viveri deinde philosophari
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#41964 Nov 8, 2012
DO NOT get rid of Fox!
Where else would Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann, Herman Cain and Donald Trump get a video soap box to go viral with. We can not allow them and their thoughts disappear into the ether.

Fox has done a superb job should be allowed to continue their excellent work.

I sincerely mean it. The country needs to see these people and have them tell America in their own words what they and especially the Republican Party stands for.
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#41965 Nov 8, 2012
Fox has been destroying the GOP since at least 2007. They are solely responsible for creating the hyper partisan MSNBC with Keith, then Rachel and then the ultimate dildo Lawrence O'Donnell.

But the biggest tragedy with Fox is that once in a while they actually break real news that nobody else will cover because of the other networks' slight or major left wing bias. But once you cry wolf as many times as Fox has, people won't be there to hear you when something real happens
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#41966 Nov 8, 2012
Sean Hannity is whining on TV now..........LMAO!
HAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!
Man this shit is funny stuff!!
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#41967 Nov 8, 2012
Just know that viewers of Fox News were recently proven (scientifically!) to be the LEAST INFORMED of any national newscast in the country.
Watch Fox, learn less.
Have you even watched PBS once? That's what straight down the middle news reporting looks like. It's kinda boring, true. That's probably why you left for Fox. Shiny things are cooler and more fun!

LMAO!

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#41968 Nov 8, 2012
Mitt vs Mutt wrote:
Fox has been destroying the GOP since at least 2007. They are solely responsible for creating the hyper partisan MSNBC with Keith, then Rachel and then the ultimate dildo Lawrence O'Donnell.
But the biggest tragedy with Fox is that once in a while they actually break real news that nobody else will cover because of the other networks' slight or major left wing bias. But once you cry wolf as many times as Fox has, people won't be there to hear you when something real happens
The election is over and you've had your fun. Are you done now or should we expect the same copy and paste messages that you are well know for?
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#41969 Nov 8, 2012
Fox News Is Killing The Republican Party !!!!!!!

LQQK HERE:
http://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-is-ki...
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#41970 Nov 8, 2012
For viewers with a taste for schadenfreude, Fox News was the only place to be on election night. From Karl Rove’s refusal to believe the network’s own projection that Mitt Romney had lost Ohio, to Bill O’Reilly’s assertion that the “white establishment is now the minority,” to Sarah Palin’s enormous new Joan Collins hairdo, there was a panicked and slightly unhinged quality to the evening's proceedings.

Folks you cant make this shit up!
LMAO
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#41971 Nov 8, 2012
Dave Rogers wrote:
<quoted text>
The election is over and you've had your fun. Are you done now or should we expect the same copy and paste messages that you are well know for?
Im talking about FOX news........ the right wingnut channel of news.......
I'd like to know where do you go for REAL news?
Mitt Romnuts

Baltimore, MD

#41972 Nov 9, 2012
Reverend Irreverent wrote:
<quoted text>
xfactor has been a proponent of the third-party candidates for a long time. So I don't know where you're getting ideas about a 'far right agenda'. There's nothing 'far right' about his ideas; we share perspectives and are awaiting positive results from Obama as much as any Romney voter from this past Tuesday. He's equally criticized both sides for a long period now. That's what third-party neutrality is. It's simply a foreign idea in a nation where few are aware there are more than two options.
Neither side liked being questioned and critiqued. Both attacked third-party supporters. Obama won reelection and now we hope to see his idealistic goals come to fruition. But we're not optimistic that he won't essentially act as another dancing marionette, strings pulled by phantom corporate puppeteers.
Ok

I'm not a mindless drone and neither are any that know that belong to our party.
I didn't hear much if any criticcism of thbird party ...exceot the well deserved Tea Party.
The Democratic Party is the best choice for defeating the parrty of the 1% er
Exploiter...ROMNEY types who sell out America for.$$$$$$.
We ARE the party of the people!!!!

I'm an middle, upper middle class white guy, not gay but I live in the city and I'm not bothered or feel threateded in any way by them.
I am an athiest though...not into religion.
So, my point here is the Democratic party is innclusive.

We are up against massive obtruction but our intent is proper and none are perfect.

If you think I'm a mindless drone let me refer you to a post from earlier today about Fox News that I responded to Mitt vs Mutt on. I will retreive it for you...

If you thnk there's no difference....
I can't fathom anyone thinking this unless you're one of them..the irrational
Mitt Romnuts

Baltimore, MD

#41973 Nov 9, 2012
Republican Bummer wrote:
<quoted text>
Fox News - Don't watch it...I skip over it all the time..
I never feel the need to check out the nonsense..
I may have spent one hour on that station in the past 3 years and I'm feeling pretty good.
When Democrates feel the need to check out the other side just keep this in mind:
1) its all misinformation presented sometimes with attractive empty headed bleach blondes to lure you in...but their heads are programmed like a parrots only to recite the republican party pablum.
TURN THE FAUX NEWS OFF -decreases their revenue stream from advertisers
Don't support these scum suckers by increasing their ratings.
They do not deserve our loyalty ..no matter how insane they get..this is their gig...making outrageous statements that make a Democrat say "Wow, How crazy is that?_ that's why some are attracted just to check in on the nonsense but don't do it...no matter how tempting...believe me you will feel better too.
2) this increases their ratings and lines the pockets of not only people like
Sean Hannity, Bill Oreilly and Steve Dufuss but you're also contributing to the famous 1%er Rupert Murdoch...
TURN THEM OFF
You don't need to know the garbage news...
Here's an example.....

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#41974 Nov 9, 2012
Mitt vs Mutt wrote:
<quoted text>Im talking about FOX news........ the right wingnut channel of news.......
I'd like to know where do you go for REAL news?
You're not talking about anything. You're just doing the same old shit you always do...copy and past all negative articles that deal with Romney, Republicans, conservatives, religious views, and Fox News. It does not matter to you if the article is bias or whatever. You don't even read what you post. That's a proven fact.

So you want to know where I go for real news? First off, what in the hell is real news as you put it? Get back to me on what real news means to you then I'll be able to answer your question.

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#41975 Nov 9, 2012
Mitt Romnuts wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok
I'm not a mindless drone and neither are any that know that belong to our party.
I didn't hear much if any criticcism of thbird party ...exceot the well deserved Tea Party.
The Democratic Party is the best choice for defeating the parrty of the 1% er
Exploiter...ROMNEY types who sell out America for.$$$$$$.
We ARE the party of the people!!!!
I'm an middle, upper middle class white guy, not gay but I live in the city and I'm not bothered or feel threateded in any way by them.
I am an athiest though...not into religion.
So, my point here is the Democratic party is innclusive.
We are up against massive obtruction but our intent is proper and none are perfect.
If you think I'm a mindless drone let me refer you to a post from earlier today about Fox News that I responded to Mitt vs Mutt on. I will retreive it for you...
If you thnk there's no difference....
I can't fathom anyone thinking this unless you're one of them..the irrational
A mindless drone....that's a great description of you.

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#41976 Nov 9, 2012
Mitt vs Mutt wrote:
Fox News Is Killing The Republican Party !!!!!!!
LQQK HERE:
http://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-is-ki...
For someone who does not watch Fox News you sure do have a lot to say. Oh wait, you copy and paste so you have all the inside information from your fair and balanced sources and all those blogs written from Joe Blow from Nowhere, USA.

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#41977 Nov 9, 2012
Mitt Romnuts wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok
I'm not a mindless drone and neither are any that know that belong to our party.
I didn't hear much if any criticcism of thbird party ...exceot the well deserved Tea Party.
The Democratic Party is the best choice for defeating the parrty of the 1% er
Exploiter...ROMNEY types who sell out America for.$$$$$$.
We ARE the party of the people!!!!
I'm an middle, upper middle class white guy, not gay but I live in the city and I'm not bothered or feel threateded in any way by them.
I am an athiest though...not into religion.
So, my point here is the Democratic party is innclusive.
We are up against massive obtruction but our intent is proper and none are perfect.
If you think I'm a mindless drone let me refer you to a post from earlier today about Fox News that I responded to Mitt vs Mutt on. I will retreive it for you...
If you thnk there's no difference....
I can't fathom anyone thinking this unless you're one of them..the irrational
LOL. Why did you post " not gay but I live in the city and I'm not bothered or feel threateded in any way by them." Still having trouble exiting the closet? It's okay...we could care less what your sexual attraction is.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#41978 Nov 9, 2012
welcome back Dave Rogers.

You posted with vitriol time and time against Nate Silver and Electoralvote dismissing them as bias while both predicted the election precisely, just as bth did in 2008.

You were vile and insulting toward anyone who posted a link to those sites because the information didn't fit the wrong headed narrative you were pushing.

Now your back bitching because someone is posting information that conflicts with your position?!

http://www.electoral-vote.com/

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/...

Since: May 09

Location hidden

#41979 Nov 9, 2012
Some highlights from a great interview I heard last night between Melissa Block and Republican strategist Mark McCinnon --

Well, in light of the Republican Party's losses from Mitt Romney on down, those are questions we thought we'd put to a Republican strategist: Mark McKinnon, who was a campaign adviser to John McCain in the 2008 primaries. Before that, he served as chief media adviser for the George W. Bush campaigns in 2000 and 2004.

BLOCK: Do you think there's another Republican primary candidate from this past field who would have fared any better?

MCKINNON: Oh, yeah. I think somebody like Jon Huntsman would have won, and I think would have won perhaps by a decisive margin.

BLOCK: Well, that always is the question then, right? Because in the Republican primaries, they're appealing to the conservative base and then have to pivot to try to appeal to the general electorate in November.

MCKINNON: Yeah. And that's the problems with the Republican primary, and primaries in general have just been drifting further and further to the extreme so that we nominate people that are unelectable in the general elections. I mean, it was inexplicable to me that we have a Republican Party whose strategy was to try to increase the number of old white men. You know, that's a strategy based on a coalition of voters that's shrinking and dying.

BLOCK: Is that where you see the GOP right now, the party of old white people and, in particular, old white men?

MCKINNON: Well, yeah. I mean, that's the only place where we saw any voter share increase. In all other demographics, we saw the number go down among women, among Hispanics, among African-Americans, among key and growing demographic constituencies. And demographics is destiny in politics, and it's important that the Republican Party recognize that. I think they will. You know, there's nothing like being in the desert to figure out how to get water.

BLOCK: Is there a more fundamental problem, though, for the Republican Party that if you're trying to attract younger voters who went strongly for Barack Obama, that population is much more accepting of, say, same-sex marriage and a number of social issues on which the Republican Party is just out of step?

MCKINNON: No question about it. I mean, I think those are issues that 20 years from now we'll look back on and just can't believe that they were ever an issue. It's definitely headed that direction. And Republicans are behind the curve on important civil rights issues like gay marriage and other issues where younger voters are looking at the Republican Party and just say, man, that seems like a party out of the '50s. That doesn't reflect my views or where I'm headed. So on all the growing demographics - younger voters, Hispanics - the Republican Party is out of step and out of sync.

BLOCK: If the Republican Party wants to close the gender gap, what would it need to do?

MCKINNON: The Republican Party needs to, first of all, quit electing people in primaries that have prehistoric notions about women's issues. And we had people like Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock, who were expressing views that literally sound like they came out of the Stone Age. And, you know, the problem for Mitt Romney is that that becomes a perception about the entire Republican Party.

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#41980 Nov 9, 2012
Dove Ragers wrote:
welcome back Dave Rogers.
You posted with vitriol time and time against Nate Silver and Electoralvote dismissing them as bias while both predicted the election precisely, just as bth did in 2008.
You were vile and insulting toward anyone who posted a link to those sites because the information didn't fit the wrong headed narrative you were pushing.
Now your back bitching because someone is posting information that conflicts with your position?!
http://www.electoral-vote.com/
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/
http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/...
I see you're back with the same old shit. Grow up idiot. The election is over. Move on and I don't mean moveon.org .
TaxNoMore

Los Angeles, CA

#41981 Nov 9, 2012
A 40% tax on "Cadillac Health Care Plans" starting in 2018.

Those whose employers pay for all or most of comprehensive healthcare plans (costing $10,200 for an individual or $27,500 for families) will have to pay a 40% tax on the amount their employer pays.

The 2018 start date is said to have been a gift to unions, which often have comprehensive plans.( ATR.org )

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/here-are-the-n...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hanover Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Snyder's of Hanover (Aug '09) 3 hr Blame multiple on... 5,897
News Heroin sentence 12 years (Jun '10) Jun 24 gab 93
Review: Happy Nails Jun 14 Beachgirl 1
Snyder lance May '15 Torts 3
Review: Dean's Auto Plaza (Sep '13) May '15 Scott123 10
News 12-time DUI repeater gets up to 7 years in prison (Sep '08) Apr '15 Trista Biddle 23
News Half Pint Creamery plans second ice cream shop Mar '15 Fannie Pak 2
More from around the web

Hanover People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Hanover Mortgages