Dan the Man

Newville, PA

#41056 Nov 2, 2012
Latest Swing State Polls - and Romney isn't ahead in ANY of them...

Colorado: Obama 46%, Romney 46%(Reuters/Ipsos)

Colorado: Obama 50%, Romney 46%(Public Policy Polling)

Colorado: Obama 47%, Romney 45%(Denver Post/SurveyUSA)

Florida: Obama 48%, Romney 46%(Reuters/Ipsos)

Iowa: Obama 49%, Romney 45%(Gravis)

Michigan: Obama 52%, Romney 47%(Rasmussen)

Michigan: Obama 52%, Romney 46%(Public Policy Polling)

Nevada: Obama 50%, Romney 44%(Mellman)

New Hampshire: Obama 50%, Romney 44%(New England College)

New Hampshire: Obama 50%, Romney 49%(Gravis)

Ohio: Obama 50%, Romney 47%(CNN/ORC)

Ohio: Obama 49%, Romney 49%(Rasmussen)

Ohio: Obama 47%, Romney 45%(Reuters/Ipsos)

Ohio: Obama 50%, Romney 46%(We Ask America)

Virginia: Obama 48%, Romney 45%(Reuters/Ipsos)

Virginia: Obama 49%, Romney 48%(We Ask America)

Wisconsin: Obama 52%, Romney 45%(We Ask America)
Dan the Man

Newville, PA

#41057 Nov 2, 2012
Trending:

Why Romney Will Lose Ohio (Hint: Vroom, Vroom)

Latest Tracking Polls - And Romney isn't ahead in ANY of them...

ABC News/Washington Post: Obama 49%, Romney 48%

Public Policy Polling: Obama 49%, Romney 48%

Purple Strategies: Obama 47%, Romney 46%

Rasmussen: Obama 48%, Romney 48%

Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 46%, Romney 46%
Dan the Man

Newville, PA

#41058 Nov 2, 2012
FiveThirtyEight forecast:

Electoral vote:
Obama: 303.7; +8.3 since Oct 26
Romney: 234.3; -8.3 since Oct 26

Chance of winning:
Obama: 81.4%; +7.0 since Oct 26
Romney: 18.6%; -7.0 since Oct 26

Interpretation for math-challenged wingnuts:

When all the possible scenarios to win 270 electoral votes are calculated, Mitt Romney wins less than 1 time in 5.

Less than 1 in 5! LMAO!
Ted

Meyersdale, PA

#41059 Nov 2, 2012
Dan the Man wrote:
Latest Swing State Polls - and Romney isn't ahead in ANY of them...
Colorado: Obama 46%, Romney 46%(Reuters/Ipsos)
Colorado: Obama 50%, Romney 46%(Public Policy Polling)
Colorado: Obama 47%, Romney 45%(Denver Post/SurveyUSA)
Florida: Obama 48%, Romney 46%(Reuters/Ipsos)
Iowa: Obama 49%, Romney 45%(Gravis)
Michigan: Obama 52%, Romney 47%(Rasmussen)
Michigan: Obama 52%, Romney 46%(Public Policy Polling)
Nevada: Obama 50%, Romney 44%(Mellman)
New Hampshire: Obama 50%, Romney 44%(New England College)
New Hampshire: Obama 50%, Romney 49%(Gravis)
Ohio: Obama 50%, Romney 47%(CNN/ORC)
Ohio: Obama 49%, Romney 49%(Rasmussen)
Ohio: Obama 47%, Romney 45%(Reuters/Ipsos)
Ohio: Obama 50%, Romney 46%(We Ask America)
Virginia: Obama 48%, Romney 45%(Reuters/Ipsos)
Virginia: Obama 49%, Romney 48%(We Ask America)
Wisconsin: Obama 52%, Romney 45%(We Ask America)
Dan the Man wrote:
Trending:
Why Romney Will Lose Ohio (Hint: Vroom, Vroom)
Latest Tracking Polls - And Romney isn't ahead in ANY of them...
ABC News/Washington Post: Obama 49%, Romney 48%
Public Policy Polling: Obama 49%, Romney 48%
Purple Strategies: Obama 47%, Romney 46%
Rasmussen: Obama 48%, Romney 48%
Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 46%, Romney 46%
!LOL!

Desperate, danny BOY? You're perspiring.

The fear of Obama being lame duck! Your wet dream over!

Think of it, BOY.

Or go find another poll to distract yourself from that possibility.
Ted

Meyersdale, PA

#41060 Nov 2, 2012
Dan the Man wrote:
FiveThirtyEight forecast:
Electoral vote:
Obama: 303.7; +8.3 since Oct 26
Romney: 234.3; -8.3 since Oct 26
Chance of winning:
Obama: 81.4%; +7.0 since Oct 26
Romney: 18.6%; -7.0 since Oct 26
Interpretation for math-challenged wingnuts:
When all the possible scenarios to win 270 electoral votes are calculated, Mitt Romney wins less than 1 time in 5.
Less than 1 in 5! LMAO!
Dan the Man wrote:
FiveThirtyEight forecast:
Electoral vote:
Obama: 303.7; +8.3 since Oct 26
Romney: 234.3; -8.3 since Oct 26
Chance of winning:
Obama: 81.4%; +7.0 since Oct 26
Romney: 18.6%; -7.0 since Oct 26
Interpretation for math-challenged wingnuts:
When all the possible scenarios to win 270 electoral votes are calculated, Mitt Romney wins less than 1 time in 5.
Less than 1 in 5! LMAO!
Well, danny boy, now you're sweating.

Hearing the footsteps?

Lameduck!

Go find another wishful poll, BOY.
Mac from McVeytown

Lancaster, PA

#41061 Nov 2, 2012
Time to impeach Governor Corbett.
He is a criminal, didn't want to prosecute Sandusky because that would have wrecked his run for the Governor.
Ted Rogers

Baltimore, MD

#41062 Nov 2, 2012
Dan the Man wrote:
Behold the wingnut mind's infinite capacity for self-deception!
LMAO!
The ability of the wingnut mind to desperately distort reality to support their failed political ideology never ceases to amaze me.
Hopefully they'll snap back to reality next Tuesday.
But I doubt it. None of them has ever demonstrated a capacity to re-evaluate their extremist ideology even in the face of irrefutable reality.
BINGO....hold your cards

Talk about nailing it

Dan, you're one insightful individual...and I agree with this assertion about the wingnut baggers....

Bizzaro world in all its glory._full of distorted views that they absorb as truth because it conviently fits their inherent bias and predjudices.
Not hard to understand I guess its fairly obvious but I think the upcoming Romney fiasco will break their spirit and may fragment them even more.

But thanks for the insightful perspective of these wonderful nutjobs.
TaxNoMore

Los Angeles, CA

#41063 Nov 2, 2012
Dan the Man wrote:
Trending:
Why Romney Will Lose Ohio (Hint: Vroom, Vroom)
Latest Tracking Polls - And Romney isn't ahead in ANY of them...
ABC News/Washington Post: Obama 49%, Romney 48%
Public Policy Polling: Obama 49%, Romney 48%
Purple Strategies: Obama 47%, Romney 46%
Rasmussen: Obama 48%, Romney 48%
Reuters/Ipsos: Obama 46%, Romney 46%
**********

The President's numbers keep climbing.

Those two polls last week that over-sampled Republicans were just an aberration.

The President's right on track for another landslide victory.

LOL!
TaxNoMore

Los Angeles, CA

#41064 Nov 2, 2012
Dan the Man wrote:
FiveThirtyEight forecast:
Electoral vote:
Obama: 303.7; +8.3 since Oct 26
Romney: 234.3; -8.3 since Oct 26
Chance of winning:
Obama: 81.4%; +7.0 since Oct 26
Romney: 18.6%; -7.0 since Oct 26
Interpretation for math-challenged wingnuts:
When all the possible scenarios to win 270 electoral votes are calculated, Mitt Romney wins less than 1 time in 5.
Less than 1 in 5! LMAO!
**********

Would your Marxist leader renege on a deal he made the American people?

I'll be a One-Term President If I Don't Fix This Economy In Three Years;

I Will Be Held "Accountable"
Bain Capital

West Mifflin, PA

#41065 Nov 2, 2012
UAW Wants Romney To Disclose $15 Million Auto Bailout Profit:

BY Laura Matthews | November 01 2012 3:53 PM

It seems Republican nominee Mitt Romney still cannot shake the demons of the auto industry bailout he supposedly opposed, and a new one looks like it may well haunt him just days before the Presidential election.

The biggest auto workers' union and several government and public interest groups say that they have filed an ethics complaint against Romney, alleging “serious conflicts of interest” and calling for the presidential nominee to release information about what they say are millions he made from the industry bailout. At issue are alleged investments the Romneys made in a hedge fund that owned a controlling interest in Delphi Auto, the former GM auto parts division.

Through the money that the federal government provided to prop up the automakers and their suppliers, Delphi received huge payments -- ultimately $12.9 billion in taxpayer subsidies -- and the hedge fund that the Romneys had invested in received a significant return, according to published reports

Through the money that the federal government provided to prop up the automakers and their suppliers, Delphi received huge payments -- ultimately $12.9 billion in taxpayer subsidies -- and the hedge fund that the Romneys had invested in received a significant return, according to published reports.

The United Automobile Workers, or UAW, announced that it is calling upon the Office of Government Ethics to investigate Romney for alleged noncompliance with the Ethics in Government Act. They also want that authority to force the nominee to either “disclose his investments or divest them.”

The UAW has been joined by liberal watchdog groups such as Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, People for the American Way and The Social Equity Group, among others in the letter of complaint.

LQQK HERE:

http://www.ibtimes.com/uaw-wants-romney-discl...

This guy is an all around walking colostomy bag with ears
Bain Capital

West Mifflin, PA

#41066 Nov 2, 2012
Forget the Middle Class, It's Elite vs. Elite :

While all the television ads are about the middle class and who loves it more, the reality is a bit different. As Deepthroat told reporter Bob Woodward some 40 years ago: "Follow the money." In 2008, Wall Street bankers were divided between John McCain and Barack Obama, but this year they have come down clearly on the side of Mitt Romney. The five biggest sources of donations to Romney's campaign this year are Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse, and Wells Fargo, all giant financial institutions( that were bailed out by tax payer money under Bush ) that recognize Romney as one of their own. Clearly an elite group if ever there was one.

How does Obama compete with these financial powerhouses? He does get small donations, but he has his own elite team as well. His consists of people from the tech sector, government, and universities. His five biggest donors are the University of California, Microsoft, Google, government employees, and Harvard. These people made their money by dealing in ideas rather than by moving money around.
Ted

Meyersdale, PA

#41067 Nov 2, 2012
Hey danny BOY.

See how ridiculous polls can be?

Did you see that Susquehanna updated their Pennsylvania poll today?
http://goperiepa.com/archives/4499/

"Susquehanna Polling and Research results for Pennsylvania released today shows Mitt Romney leading President Obama 49% to 45% among 1376 likely voters. Two percent are undecided and 3% are for other candidates.

Wow. How unlikely is THAT, eh BOY, that Obama could possibly lose Pennsylvania. What an impossible catastrophe THAT would be.
Ted

Meyersdale, PA

#41068 Nov 2, 2012
Uh oh.

Get ready for a possible ten day delay in knowing the winner of Ohio's and possibly the nation's presidential election:
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/10/...

“Right click Left click Yay!”

Since: Dec 10

Nehwon

#41069 Nov 2, 2012
Ted wrote:
Hey danny BOY.
See how ridiculous polls can be?
Did you see that Susquehanna updated their Pennsylvania poll today?
http://goperiepa.com/archives/4499/
"Susquehanna Polling and Research results for Pennsylvania released today shows Mitt Romney leading President Obama 49% to 45% among 1376 likely voters. Two percent are undecided and 3% are for other candidates.
Wow. How unlikely is THAT, eh BOY, that Obama could possibly lose Pennsylvania. What an impossible catastrophe THAT would be.
Ok.

I clicked on your link. The Erie County Pennsylvania Republican Party posts some stuff claiming poll numbers.

And yet, they can't even put a link to the Susquehanna Polling to support their claim?

Color me skeptical.

“Right click Left click Yay!”

Since: Dec 10

Nehwon

#41070 Nov 2, 2012
Ted wrote:
Uh oh.
Get ready for a possible ten day delay in knowing the winner of Ohio's and possibly the nation's presidential election:
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/10/...
Don't worry.

If it's that close where the absentee ballots can swing the election, the lawyers have already been deployed to strategic locations nearby with their motions for any scenario already typed up.
Reverend Irreverent

Mount Morris, MI

#41071 Nov 2, 2012
xfactor wrote:
Obama/Romney - blah - does it really matter?
More police state, more federal power grabs, less civil rights, more foreign intervention, OBAMNEYCARE, less good jobs, decreasing wages, decreasing middle class, record poverty, TSA, Patriot Act, NDAA -
This is what either of these two will 'give' to America.
And some people think there is a 'choice'... LMAO!
This. It's actually frightening how similar they are in ideology. A one-party system masquerading as two-party, pawns for the corporate and social elite. If you want true change in the nation, actually read into the alternatives beyond Democrat and Republican. Abolishing the 'campaign donations'/bribes and the Super PAC shams needs to happen, but being as they're in the interest of essentially everyone with the influence to get rid of them, it's not happening in the near future.

Men like Jefferson, Madison and Washington are rolling in their graves. The national landscape is a disaster, and I don't mean Sandy's aftermath.
Weather

Greencastle, PA

#41072 Nov 2, 2012
Darn, it's cold tonight!
Steeler Fan

Greencastle, PA

#41073 Nov 2, 2012
The Sun. Giants game is on!
THE DICE MAN

Berwick, PA

#41074 Nov 3, 2012
Close it down wrote:
We need a good governor that is not going to tax us to death
How about pie us to death?
Ted Rogers

Baltimore, MD

#41075 Nov 3, 2012
Reverend Irreverent wrote:
<quoted text>
This. It's actually frightening how similar they are in ideology. A one-party system masquerading as two-party, pawns for the corporate and social elite. If you want true change in the nation, actually read into the alternatives beyond Democrat and Republican. Abolishing the 'campaign donations'/bribes and the Super PAC shams needs to happen, but being as they're in the interest of essentially everyone with the influence to get rid of them, it's not happening in the near future.
Men like Jefferson, Madison and Washington are rolling in their graves. The national landscape is a disaster, and I don't mean Sandy's aftermath.
We work with what we got...

If you think there's NO differnce in who better represents the middle class workers then you must not be of this world.
Maybe a visitor from the planet Youranus or from a place where the obvious become cloudy and out of focus...

You could be from the land where people wear bags fill with tea hanging from 18th Century colonial hats and complain about how they're being opressed by the poor and indigent and complaining about how absurd no letting health insurance providers (their overseers) drop people for pre-existing conditions...etc etc so on and so forth..

So your vote will count for someone but if you don't exercise your civic duty by voting that's certainly your perogative..

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hanover Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Snyder's of Hanover (Aug '09) 9 hr tattooed pretzel 5,617
Hanover man not guilty of assault (Jul '08) Jan 24 Greenmachine24 26
Church to collect for McSherrystown fire victims (Apr '13) Jan 22 bob 2
Former car dealer charged with theft (Mar '09) Jan 14 Neil Hoffstot 83
Hanover should trash its recycling program (Mar '08) Dec '14 RetiredRN 16
pump it powder (Jan '12) Dec '14 askmetray28 39
Two charged in heroin arrest Dec '14 lady 1

Winter Storm Watch for York County was issued at January 31 at 9:33AM EST

Hanover Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Hanover People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 8:23 am PST

NBC Sports 8:23AM
Ravens to terminate Terrence Cody's contract
NBC Sports 9:34 AM
Terrence Cody being investigated for animal cruelty
Bleacher Report10:03 AM
Terrence Cody Cut by Ravens Amid Animal Cruelty Investigation
ESPN10:31 AM
Ravens cut Cody amid animal cruelty probe
NBC Sports11:26 AM
Terrence Cody's agent denies reports of cruelty to dog