Who do you support for Governor in Pe...

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40981 Nov 1, 2012
Obama, idiot or liar?

Obama’s Election-Year Lie That Never Dies

Obama’s Assertion That Companies Get Tax Breaks To Ship Jobs Overseas Is A Political Ploy He Never Does Anything About

THE CLAIM: Today, Obama Presented As Fact The Notion That There Are “Tax Breaks To Corporations That Move Jobs And Profits Overseas.” OBAMA:“He says there’s no way that he would close the loophole to give — that gives oil companies billions each year in corporate welfare. Any tax breaks to corporations that move jobs and profits overseas, he had never heard of such a thing. Who knew? Who knew?”(President Barack Obama, Presidential Debate, Denver, CO, 10/5/12)

THE FACTS:“ Under Present Law, There Are No Tax Credits Or Disallowance Of Deductions Specific To Locating Jobs In The United States Or Transferring Jobs Overseas.”“Under present law, there are no tax credits or disallowance of deductions specific to locating jobs in the United States or transferring jobs overseas. However, Congress has provided various credits to encourage certain activities or behavior and has disallowed deductions to curtail behavior deemed inappropriate or to discourage certain economic choices.”(“Descriptions Of Revenue Provisions Contained In The President’s Fiscal Year 2013 Budget Proposal,” Joint Committee On Taxation, p.73, 6/12)

Fox News

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40982 Nov 1, 2012
OBAMA HAS RECYCLED THIS PROMISE FOR YEARS

2004: Obama Said He Wanted To Ensure That “We Close Tax Loopholes To Companies Moving Jobs Overseas, And Making Them Invest Right Here In The United States.” OBAMA:“The fact of the matter is, it’s more fun being in the majority. You can get more stuff done. And to the extent that I can lend my assistance to these other candidates so that we can promote some of the policies that we’ve talked about: making sure that we close tax loopholes to companies moving jobs overseas, and making them invest right here in the United States. Then, I’m going to do everything I can to make that happen.”(State Sen. Barack Obama, Remarks In Illinois Senate Debate, Chicago, IL, 10/21/04)

2007: Obama Said “ That’s Why We’ve Got To Stop Giving Tax Breaks To Companies That Send Jobs Overseas.” OBAMA:“That’s why we’ve got to give unions the power to do what they do best, which is organize workers to lift themselves up into the middle class. That’s why we’ve got to stop giving tax breaks to companies that send jobs overseas. Save those tax breaks for companies that invest right here in the United States of America.”(Sen. Barack Obama, Remarks At Campaign Event, Columbus, OH, 10/26/07)

2008: Candidate Obama Again Presented His Economic Plan As One That Ends “Tax Breaks For Companies That Ship Our Jobs Overseas And Give Them To Companies That Create Jobs Here In America.” OBAMA:“At this defining moment in our history, the question is not,‘Are you better off than you were four years ago’– we all know the answer to that. The real question is,‘will our country be better off four years from now?’ How will we lift our economy and restore America’s place in the world? Here’s what I’ll do as President.…I’ll end the tax breaks for companies that ship our jobs overseas and give them to companies that create jobs here in America.”(Obama For America Ad,“Barack Obama: Defining Moment,” 10/24/08)

Since: Jul 12

Portland, Oregon

#40983 Nov 1, 2012
President Obama rigged the election to beat flipper, huh racist rogers? You just make sure to remember that excuse when Obama officially wins again next week. I'm pretty sure your high level of ignorance can accomplish that, but on some days i have my doubts. Your ignorant

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40984 Nov 1, 2012
EVEN AS PRESIDENT, OBAMA USED THE SAME TALKING POINT

2009: Obama Said “ We Need To Stop Giving Tax Breaks To Companies That Stash Profits Or Ship Jobs Overseas…” OBAMA:“We’re also doing away with the unnecessary giveaways that have thrown our tax code out of balance. I said this during the campaign, I’m now saying it as President: We need to stop giving tax breaks to companies that stash profits or ship jobs overseas so we can invest in job creation here at home.”(President Barack Obama, Remarks On Taxes, Washington, D.C., 4/15/09)

2010: Obama Said “That’s Why We Want To End Tax Breaks Going To Companies That Are Shipping Jobs Overseas…” OBAMA:“And that means a future where we encourage American innovation and American ingenuity. That’s why we want to end tax breaks going to companies that are shipping jobs overseas and start giving those tax breaks to companies that are investing in jobs and research and plants and equipment right here in the United States of America.”(President Barack Obama, Remarks By The President At Finance Reception For Congressman Sestak , Washington, D.C., 9/20/10)

2011: Obama Said That Voters Have A Choice To “ Go Back To The Ideas We Tried In The Last Decade — Where Corporations Got To Write Their Own Rules And The Most Fortunate Among Us Got All Of Our Tax Breaks, And Jobs Got Shipped Overseas…” OBAMA:“We can go back to the ideas we tried in the last decade — where corporations got to write their own rules and the most fortunate among us got all of our tax breaks, and jobs got shipped overseas, and incomes and wages flat-lined as the cost of everything went up, and this society became less equal, and opportunity was diminished for too many.(President Barack Obama, Remarks By The President And The First Lady At A DNC Event , New York, NY, 9/20/11)

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40985 Nov 1, 2012
OBAMA’S RHETORIC ON INSOURCING TAX BREAKS ARE A “FANTASY”

TRUTH: FactCheck.org :“Obama’s ‘Jobs Overseas’ Fantasy, Again”(Brooks Jackson, Lori Robertson, Joe Miller and Viveca Novak “Closing Arguments: Obama,” FactCheck.org , 11/3/08)

FactCheck.org : The Tax Breaks That Obama Is Referring To Have Nothing To Do With Why Companies Ship Jobs Overseas.“Back in 2004 when we criticized John Kerry for using a similar iteration of this claim against President Bush, we pointed out that Christian Weller, a senior fellow at the Democratic-leaning Center for American Progress, had said taxes ‘are a very small part’ of companies’ decisions to move jobs offshore. Those at a 2005 Brookings Institution summit on trade also said taxes had little to do with outsourcing. Joel Slemrod, a tax expert at the University of Michigan’s business school, summed it up by saying:‘For those who see [offshoring] as a problem, this is not a solution.’”(Justin Bank,“Obama’s Trade Trickery,” FactCheck.org , 9/26/08)

Factcheck.Org :“Eliminating This Incentive Would Have Very Little Effect On U.S. Employment .”“The claim that the tax code favors locating jobs overseas has been a Democratic mantra since at least 2004, when John Kerry brought it up constantly in his campaign against then-President George W. Bush. It has some truth to it – but not much. As we reported in 2004, eliminating this incentive would have very little effect on U.S. employment.”(Brooks Jackson,“A False Tax Attack,” FactCheck.org , 4/9/10)

Factcheck.Org :“As We’ve Been Saying For More Than Four Years Now… Eliminating Them Won’t Do Much To Keep Jobs In The U.S.”“Obama’s infomercial, and his closing TV ads, continue to harp on the theme of ‘tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas,’ which Obama proposes to eliminate. We can’t say whether or not he can deliver on that promise, but as we’ve been saying for more than four years now,(and most recently on Sept. 26) eliminating them won’t do much to keep jobs in the U.S. In a recent exchange of e-mails with us, Eric Toder of the Tax Policy Center concluded that eliminating such tax breaks ‘is a nice political slogan, but will do little or nothing for U.S. employment or incomes.’”(Brooks Jackson, Lori Robertson, Joe Miller and Viveca Novak “Closing Arguments: Obama,” FactCheck.org , 11/3/08)

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40986 Nov 1, 2012
My little comment is this. Look at what the form is called. So even when he is out of office he found a way to keep his name around. What an ego. Hopefully they change it to a number.

Here's why the IRS will require Americans to disclose their personal health ID information starting in 2014

When Obamacare’s individual mandate takes effect in 2014, all Americans who file income tax returns must complete an additional IRS tax form. The new form will require disclosure of a taxpayer’s personal identifying health information in order to determine compliance with the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate.

As confirmed by IRS testimony to the tax-writing House Committee on Ways and Means,“taxpayers will file their tax returns reporting their health insurance coverage, and/or making a payment”.

So why will the Obama IRS require your personal identifying health information?

Simply put, there is no way for the IRS to enforce Obamacare’s individual mandate without such an invasive reporting scheme. Every January, health insurance companies across America will send out tax documents to each insured individual. This tax document—a copy of which will be furnished to the IRS—must contain sufficient information for taxpayers to prove that they purchased qualifying health insurance under Obamacare.

This new tax information document must, at a minimum, contain: the name and health insurance identification number of the taxpayer; the name and tax identification number of the health insurance company; the number of months the taxpayer was covered by this insurance plan; and whether or not the plan was purchased in one of Obamacare’s “exchanges.”

This will involve millions of new tax documents landing in mailboxes across America every January, along with the usual raft of W-2s, 1099s, and 1098s. At tax time, the 140 million families who file a tax return will have to get acquainted with a brand new tax filing form. Six million of these families will end up paying Obamacare’s individual mandate non-compliance tax penalty.

As a service to the public, Americans for Tax Reform has released a projected version of this tax form to help families and tax specialists prepare for this additional filing requirement. Taxpayers may view the projected IRS form at http://www.ObamacareTaxForm.com or see below. On the form, lines 3-4 show where taxpayers will disclose their personal identifying health information.

http://www.atr.org/new-obamacare-tax-form-man...

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40987 Nov 1, 2012
Only 14 Voted NAY for Katrina Relief

http://www.senate.gov/legislat.....ion=1&...

Measure Number: H.R. 2206 (U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007 )

Measure Title: Making emergency supplemental appropriations and additional supplemental appropriations for agricultural and other emergency assistance for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2007, and for other purposes.

Vote Counts: YEAs 80

NAYs 14

Not Voting 6

Guess what Obama voted?

For once it wasn't PRESENT because he actually HAD an opinion.

-----

Obama visited Joplin a week after the deadly 2010 tornado.(KC Star)

It took Barack Obama 7 days to visit Joplin, Missouri after a tornado wiped out half of the town and killed 120 people.

It took Barack Obama fourteen days to visit the gulf coast after the BP oil spill.

Obama declined to visit Tennessee after the historic 2010 1000 year floods.

Obama ignored the Texas wildfires when over 400 homes were lost.

And, of course, Obama ignored the calls for help from Benghazi.

But it took Barack Obama only one day to visit the hurricane damage on the east coast.

Then again, there’s an election next week.

http://rubinoworld.com/2012/10/31/it-took-oba...

It looks like Hoboken NJ and Staten Island are about to explode because they are getting little help. It won't be long it's going to get real ugly there. No place to live.

Very few tv stations showed the people on the building rooftops like Katrina. It looks like New Orleans in Katrina.

Better hold your opinion of the "Great One". People can't even get food, water or gas. The looting is going to start soon. It looks like they are more concerned about the NY Marathon than helping people. Nj resorts and Ocean City Maryland just destroyed.

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40988 Nov 2, 2012
bobby6464 wrote:
President Obama rigged the election to beat flipper, huh racist rogers? You just make sure to remember that excuse when Obama officially wins again next week. I'm pretty sure your high level of ignorance can accomplish that, but on some days i have my doubts. Your ignorant


BOO HOO HOO Bobby pisspants has doubt.

BOO HOO HOO Bobby wide load is worried the half breed is going to lose.

BOO HOO HOO Bobby dum dum is afraid he will lose his welfare.
Dave Rogers

Chambersburg, PA

#40989 Nov 2, 2012
Ted wrote:
<quoted text>
!LOL!
Hey, bonehead, try READing the content you plagiarize! Obviously you are copying and pasting old but accurate data.
You prove boxhard's point regarding the Rassmussen poll, you fool: "In the month of October, their polling will more accurate and neutral."
Here is Rasmussen Reports data from their site:
"Thursday, November 01, 2012
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows Mitt Romney attracting support from 49% of voters nationwide, while President Obama earns the vote from 47%. One percent (1%) prefers some other candidate, and three percent (3%) remain undecided."
Such are the embarrassing mistakes plagiarists like you make.
Every election cycle has its winners and losers: not just the among the candidates, but also the pollsters.

On Tuesday, polls conducted by the firm Rasmussen Reports — which released more than 100 surveys in the final three weeks of the campaign, including some commissioned under a subsidiary on behalf of Fox News — badly missed the margin in many states, and also exhibited a considerable bias toward Republican candidates.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2010...
Mr Crumpets

Baltimore, MD

#40991 Nov 2, 2012
boxhard wrote:
oh i think you do care. must suck to see the most accurate poll having your hero behind. well next tues you wil know. you libs sure are testy these days.<quoted text>
Hey sing along....

Blue, Blue song sung blue

Its going to happen and you'll feel blue too

Hahahahahaa

Don't mistake testiness for confidence...

Hahaha you are really funny
Seriously your funny...I mean that too
Your hilarious....no kidding
FAUX NEWS

West Mifflin, PA

#40992 Nov 2, 2012
Rasmussen Polls Were Biased and Inaccurate; Quinnipiac, SurveyUSA Performed Strongly

Every election cycle has its winners and losers: not just the among the candidates, but also the pollsters.

On Tuesday, polls conducted by the firm Rasmussen Reports — which released more than 100 surveys in the final three weeks of the campaign, including some commissioned under a subsidiary on behalf of Fox News — badly missed the margin in many states, and also exhibited a considerable bias toward Republican candidates.

Other polling firms, like SurveyUSA and Quinnipiac University, produced more reliable results in Senate and gubernatorial races. A firm that conducts surveys by Internet, YouGov, also performed relatively well.

What follows is a preliminary analysis of polls released to the public in the final 21 days of the campaign. Our process here is quite simple: we’ve taken all such polls in our database, and assessed how accurate they were, on average, in predicting the margin separating the two leading candidates in each race. For instance, a poll that had the Democrat winning by 2 percentage points in a race where the Republican actually won by 4 would have an error of 6 points.

We’ve also assessed whether a company’s polls consistently missed in either a Democratic or Republican direction — that is, whether they were biased. The hypothetical poll I just described would have had a 6 point Democratic bias, for instance.

The analysis covers all polls issued by firms in the final three weeks of the campaign, even if a company surveyed a particular state multiple times. In our view, this provides for a more comprehensive analysis than focusing solely on a firm’s final poll in each state, since polling has a tendency to converge in the final days of the campaign, perhaps because some firms fear that their results are an outlier and adjust them accordingly.

(After a couple of weeks, when results in all races have been certified, we’ll update our official pollster ratings, which use a more advanced process that attempts to account, for instance, for the degree of difficulty in polling different types of races.)
FAUX NEWS

West Mifflin, PA

#40993 Nov 2, 2012
The 105 polls released in Senate and gubernatorial races by Rasmussen Reports and its subsidiary, Pulse Opinion Research, missed the final margin between the candidates by 5.8 points, a considerably higher figure than that achieved by most other pollsters. Some 13 of its polls missed by 10 or more points, including one in the Hawaii Senate race that missed the final margin between the candidates by 40 points, the largest error ever recorded in a general election in FiveThirtyEight’s database, which includes all polls conducted since 1998.

Moreover, Rasmussen’s polls were quite biased, overestimating the standing of the Republican candidate by almost 4 points on average. In just 12 cases, Rasmussen’s polls overestimated the margin for the Democrat by 3 or more points. But it did so for the Republican candidate in 55 cases — that is, in more than half of the polls that it issued.

If one focused solely on the final poll issued by Rasmussen Reports or Pulse Opinion Research in each state — rather than including all polls within the three-week interval — it would not have made much difference. Their average error would be 5.7 points rather than 5.8, and their average bias 3.8 points rather than 3.9.

LQQK HERE:

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2010...

Fox news and Rasmussen are the same...... They only say and do things to keep their puppet base in place. It's like a Nazi news channel. Their audience is mostly comprised of low IQ people that they lure in and tell them what they what to hear.
And it works. Fox news watchers are for the very weak,simple minded and low educational watchers. The Fox news pigeons take their news and spread it all over the countryside hoping to lure in more idiots,and it works for these small minded people.
FAUX NEWS

West Mifflin, PA

#40994 Nov 2, 2012
November 1, 2012, 10:16 A.M.
Oct. 31: Obama’s Electoral College ‘Firewall’ Holding in Polls

There were 12 polls published on Wednesday among Iowa, Nevada, Ohio and Wisconsin. Mr. Obama held the lead in 11 of the 12 surveys; the exception was a survey by the University of Iowa, which had Mr. Obama down by about one point there, but also had a very small sample size (about 300 likely voters). On average, Mr. Obama led in the polls of these states by 3.9 percentage points.

None of this ought to have been surprising, exactly, if you have been attentive to the polls rather than the pundits. It was a pretty good day of surveys for Mr. Obama but not a great one: for the most part, the polls were coming in close to FiveThirtyEight forecasts in each state, give or take a modest outlier here and there.

Rather, the polls in these states confirmed what we already knew: that Mr. Obama remains the favorite in the Electoral College.

The more debatable cases are Pennsylvania, Michigan and Minnesota. Mr. Romney is the clear underdog in each one. But his campaign has so much money that it probably doesn’t hurt Mr. Romney much to spend a little bit of it there to maximize whatever residual chances he might have in case the polls are wrong.(Arguably, it was a poor strategic decision for Mr. Romney to make a half-hearted effort to compete in these states.)

LQQK HERE:

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012...

Folks you cant make this shit up!

THE CLEAR CHOICE
OBAMA 2012 !!!!!!!!!!
YEAHHHHHHHH BABYYYYYYYYYYY!!!
FAUX NEWS

West Mifflin, PA

#40995 Nov 2, 2012
Update NOvember 2 , 2012 at 9:10 a.m. ET. Another Way Of Looking At Why The Jobless Rate Went Up:

— 578,000 people reported they had joined the labor force, either by finding work or just by looking for a job.

— 410,000 people said they had found employment.

— So, the ranks of the unemployed grew by about 170,000.

Reminder: BLS is really reporting on two surveys. One of households and one of employers. Two surveys mean two sets of results that sometimes seem to say different things. In this case, though, both surveys are showing job growth in October.

This is great news for Obama 170,000 jobs created in October. Nearly 50,000 more than economists had expected.

Seems like this will seal the deal and President Obama will be elected for another term.
Ted

Meyersdale, PA

#40996 Nov 2, 2012
Mitt vs Mutt wrote:
<quoted text>
Rassmussen is a Republican Poster and for this election cycle is clearly biased; however I find their polling interesting in that when Obama is ahead, I know he’s way ahead, when they say he’s tied, I know just ahead, when they say he’s 1-2 points behind, that means he’s tied, Obama behind 4-5 points means Obama down by 2-3 points. At this phase in the election this is state of accuracy. In the month of October, their polling will more accurate and neutral. The Rassmussen Polling will show the truth that they alreadyb know; that is Obama winning the popular vote by lest than four points and winning the Electoral Vote by a land slide.
FAUX NEWS wrote:
The 105 polls released in Senate and gubernatorial races by Rasmussen Reports and its subsidiary, Pulse Opinion Research, missed the final margin between the candidates by 5.8 points, a considerably higher figure than that achieved by most other pollsters. Some 13 of its polls missed by 10 or more points, including one in the Hawaii Senate race that missed the final margin between the candidates by 40 points, the largest error ever recorded in a general election in FiveThirtyEight’s database, which includes all polls conducted since 1998.
Moreover, Rasmussen’s polls were quite biased, overestimating the standing of the Republican candidate by almost 4 points on average. In just 12 cases, Rasmussen’s polls overestimated the margin for the Democrat by 3 or more points. But it did so for the Republican candidate in 55 cases — that is, in more than half of the polls that it issued.
If one focused solely on the final poll issued by Rasmussen Reports or Pulse Opinion Research in each state — rather than including all polls within the three-week interval — it would not have made much difference. Their average error would be 5.7 points rather than 5.8, and their average bias 3.8 points rather than 3.9.
LQQK HERE:
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2010...
Fox news and Rasmussen are the same...... They only say and do things to keep their puppet base in place. It's like a Nazi news channel. Their audience is mostly comprised of low IQ people that they lure in and tell them what they what to hear.
And it works. Fox news watchers are for the very weak,simple minded and low educational watchers. The Fox news pigeons take their news and spread it all over the countryside hoping to lure in more idiots,and it works for these small minded people.
!LOL!

Now you're arguing with YOURSELF, bonehead!

YOU'RE the one who posted the comment that stated "In the month of October, their [Rasmussen] polling will more accurate and neutral."

Keep plagiarizing--but first try to read it to assure you aren't contradicting whatever point you're trying to make--to avoid exposing your "low IQ" this way: "It's like a Nazi news channel. Their audience is mostly comprised of low IQ people that they lure in and tell them what they what to hear. And it works. Fox news watchers are for the very weak,simple minded and low educational watchers."

Since: Jul 12

Portland, Oregon

#40997 Nov 2, 2012
Racist rogers, your a moron boo boo. The president does not need to concern himself with any racist ignorant tea bag such as yourself. There is nothing you can do to save your flipper, remember ow your vote helped mccain so vent. Ha ha ha ha he he you dumb ass
Dave Rogers

West Mifflin, PA

#40998 Nov 2, 2012
Davey is still sleeping he was up late posted bogus bullshit..........LMAO

WAKIE WAKIE Davey.......come join the breakfast club......
We need your input LOL!
Ted

Meyersdale, PA

#40999 Nov 2, 2012
FAUX NEWS wrote:
Update NOvember 2 , 2012 at 9:10 a.m. ET. Another Way Of Looking At Why The Jobless Rate Went Up:
— 578,000 people reported they had joined the labor force, either by finding work or just by looking for a job.
— 410,000 people said they had found employment.
— So, the ranks of the unemployed grew by about 170,000.
Reminder: BLS is really reporting on two surveys. One of households and one of employers. Two surveys mean two sets of results that sometimes seem to say different things. In this case, though, both surveys are showing job growth in October.
This is great news for Obama 170,000 jobs created in October. Nearly 50,000 more than economists had expected.
Seems like this will seal the deal and President Obama will be elected for another term.
LOL

Thanks for posting that Obama's under skilled, inept and inadequate unemployment and economic 'leadership' is leading to INCREASED unemployment.

The release of today's increased unemployment percentage erases any lingering doubt about Obama's incompetence in reducing it.

23 MILLION long-suffering Americans continue unemployed or underemployed.

Obama's clueless, isn't he.

He's like a five year old child sitting in the front seat of a car imagining he's driving.
Mr Swish

New Kensington, PA

#41000 Nov 2, 2012
Yoo Hoo Teabaggers

An Ode to Mitt

Yes, Mitt's so slick of speech and slick of garb, he
Reminds us all of Ken, of Ken and Barbie--
So quick to shed his conservative regalia,
He may, like Ken, be lacking genitalia.

Some words of wisdom:

"These are not candidates. These are the empty stand-ins for lobbyists' policies to be legislated later." - Chimpy, 9/24/10

These are troubling times. Corporations are treated like people. People are treated like things.... If we ever needed to vote we sure do need to vote now.— Rev. Dr. William Barber, II to the NAACP, July 11, 2012

"Hello 9 1 1? There's an old man beating a child on my tv" -Bill Maher tweet, Biden/Ryan Debate, 10/12/12

Fous le camps et morte!

Peace and Blessings--XOXO--Mr. Swish
Dan the Man

Shippensburg, PA

#41003 Nov 2, 2012
171,000 jobs created in October - the strongest private-sector job growth since February.
...
The unemployment rate went up slightly because of good news -- more Americans got back in the game, re-entering the labor market as the job landscape improves.
...
Job growth dramatically exceeded analysts' expectations.

.

Job Growth Crushes Expectations

Job growth in the United States blew past expectations in October. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, payrolls rose by 171,000.
...
The consensus estimates were for unemployment to edge up to 7.9% and non-farm payrolls to rise 125,000.
...
August's payroll increases were revised up to 192,000 from 142,000. September's 114,000 was revised up to 148,000.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hanover Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Snyder's of Hanover (Aug '09) 4 hr I b o suckered no... 5,788
Snyder lance May 25 Torts 3
Review: Dean's Auto Plaza (Sep '13) May 7 Scott123 10
News 12-time DUI repeater gets up to 7 years in prison (Sep '08) Apr 30 Trista Biddle 23
News Half Pint Creamery plans second ice cream shop Mar '15 Fannie Pak 2
Second eagle Mar '15 Vlossak 1
Rachel Caltrider????? Mar '15 Just looking 1
More from around the web

Hanover People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]