Comments
38,281 - 38,300 of 51,184 Comments Last updated 15 hrs ago

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40945
Nov 1, 2012
 
Dan the Man wrote:
Latest swing state polls. Anyone on the right find that path to 270 for Romney yet? LOL!
Colorado: Romney 50%, Obama 47%(Rasmussen)
Colorado: Obama 49%, Romney 48%(CallFire)
Colorado: Obama 50%, Romney 48%(CNN/ORC)
Florida: Obama 47%, Romney 47%(Newsmax/Zogby)
Iowa: Obama 50%, Romney 44%(NBC/WSJ/Marist)
Iowa: Obama 50%, Romney 47%(CallFire)
Iowa: Romney 49%, Obama 48%(Rasmussen)
Michigan: Obama 53%, Romney 45%(Public Policy Polling)
Nevada: Obama 50%, Romney 46%(SurveyUSA)
New Hampshire: Obama 49%, Romney 47%(NBC/WSJ/Marist)
North Carolina: Romney 46%, Obama 45%(High Point University)
Ohio: Obama 50%, Romney 44%(Newsmax/Zogby)
Virginia: Obama 49%, Romney 46%(Public Policy Polling)
Virginia: Romney 48%, Obama 47%(Newsmax/Zogby)
Wisconsin: Obama 49%, Romney 46%(NBC/WSJ/Marist)
Wisconsin: Obama 49%, Romney 49%(Rasmussen)
Wisconsin: Obama 51%, Romney 42%(St. Norbert College)


You picked out a nice group of polls. To bad most are liberal leaning, out of date and just plain silly.
Mitt vs Mutt

Homestead, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40946
Nov 1, 2012
 
Davey......How's that electoral map working out for you?

LMAO!

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40947
Nov 1, 2012
 
bobby6464 wrote:
Racist rogers, vent on sweety. I find it entertaining sister
On another forum your posts have excellent spelling and grammar and they even make sense. I noticed as the day went on you grammar, spelling got worse and like this post makes no sense. Is this the Ripple and Colt 45 side effects that make you appear stupid?
Mitt vs Mutt

Homestead, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40948
Nov 1, 2012
 
Dave Rogers wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong as usual sonny. As a faithful viewer of fair and balanced news FOX your post is only partly correct. Do your homework this time then come back and tell me what's missing from your post.
Ailes of Fox News Cozied Up to Condi Rice in a Letter

Posted on Nov 1, 2012



A handwritten note from Fox News President Roger Ailes to George W. Bush’s secretary of state in 2005 reveals that the man who runs the cable news channel that touts itself as “fair and balanced” offered to help the administration.

The note from Ailes, which was sent to Condoleezza Rice shortly after she assumed the office, was obtained by Gawker via a Freedom of Information Act request. It reads in full:



Madam Secretary:

Great first month. You handled hearing beautifully. If I can be of help off the record—just call.

Warm Regards,

Roger

In response, Rice’s office sent what appears to be a generic form letter, thanking Ailes for his “kind note of congratulations.”

A Fox News spokeswoman on Thursday defended Ailes’ letter by arguing that he never actually mentioned the Bush administration, that the offer was a “personal media-related one” and that Rice never took him up on it (as if Fox News didn’t help the Bush administration enough already). The spokeswoman added:“As the head of a news organization, Roger speaks to powerful people from the left and the right all the time—if every other news chief wants to release their off-the-record correspondence and conversations, Roger will too.”

Surely then, Ailes must have sent a similar letter to current Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, offering the same “personal media-related” and “off-the-record help.” Don’t bet on it.

As John Cook, the Gawker reporter who uncovered the letters, noted:

It goes without saying, but: Please just imagine for a moment how Fox News would cover the publication of a private note from the editor of the New York Times to an Obama administration official offering “help off the record.”

Here’s guessing “Fox & Friends” would have a field day.

LQQK HERE:
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/f...

Folks you cant make this shit up!
LMAO
Mitt vs Mutt

Homestead, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40949
Nov 1, 2012
 
UAW to Hit Romney With Bailout Profiteer Accusation

The United Auto Workers is expected to file a complaint that accuses Mitt Romney of violating the federal Ethics in Government Act by concealing a multimillion dollar windfall he received in the auto industry bailout, journalist Greg Palast reports.

UAW President Bob King plans to announce that his union and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington have formally taken their concerns to the U.S. Office of Government Ethics in Washington, claiming that Romney hid a profit in the range of $15.3 million to $115.0 million in a so-called blind trust held by his wife, Ann.

“The American people have a right to know about Governor Romney’s potential conflicts of interest, such as the profits his family made from the auto rescue,” Palast quotes the union executive as saying.“It’s time for Governor Romney to disclose or divest.”

Added King:“While Romney was opposing the rescue of one of the nation’s most important manufacturing sectors, he was building his fortunes with his Delphi investor group, making his fortunes off the misfortunes of others.”

Greg Palast originally reported Romney’s windfall in an article in The Nation magazine last month. The UAW complaint will ask Romney to disclose exactly how much money he made.

LQQK HERE:

http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/u...
Ted

Meyersdale, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40950
Nov 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dan the Man wrote:
<quoted text>
It's hard to make rational, coherent arguments when you're a complete head-up-your-ass dipshit.
ev·i·dence
noun
- ground for belief
- an indication or a sign
Yes, good danny BOY! You've identified your problem: It's hard for you to make rational, coherent arguments when you're a complete head-up-your-ass dipshit.

You've self-diagnosed well.

Now. Try hard to understand, BOY, that what you call 'evidence' is merely information used in making a GUESS of a future outcome. It's NOT the outcome itself, now is it BOY, despite your gloating, premature celebration.

The critical word is 'GUESS', not 'evidence', BOY.

You copy and paste poll after poll desperately trying to 'prove' Obama's reelection is, in your word, "INEVITABLE."

It isn't, BOY.

All your poll-posting today hints at your deep anxiety about this election's outcome. Are you trying to convince YOURSELF, BOY, in quoting so many polls that your Obama wet dream isn't becoming a Romney nightmare?

Polls don't elect presidents. Votes do. Election day is next Tuesday, the day all polls become even more meaningless.

It's difficult for you to accept, isn't it BOY, that only a month ago before the first debate Obama had such a commanding lead in the polls.

No wonder you appear so unsettled. A week from now Obama may be lame duck. It's a frightening thought for you, BOY, but it's a possibility regardless of what polls today are guessing.
Mitt vs Mutt

Homestead, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40951
Nov 1, 2012
 
Greg Palast at Seniors for a Democratic Society:

According to ethics law expert Dan Curry who drafted the ethics complaint, Ann Romney does not have a federally-approved blind trust. An approved “blind” trust may not be used to hide a major investment which could be affected by Romney if he were to be elected President. Other groups joining the UAW and CREW include Public Citizen, the Service Employees International Union, Public Campaign, People for the American Way and The Social Equity Group.

... In 2009, Ann Romney partnered with her husband’s key donor, billionaire Paul Singer, who secretly bought a controlling interest in Delphi Auto, the former GM auto parts division. Singer’s hedge fund, Elliott Management, threatened to cut off GM’s supply of steering columns unless GM and the government’s TARP auto bail-out fund provided Delphi with huge payments. While the US treasury complained this was “extortion,” the hedge funds received, ultimately,$12.9 billion in taxpayer subsidies.

As a result, the shares Singer and Romney bought for just 67 cents are today worth over $30, a 4,000% gain. Singer’s hedge fund made a profit of $1.27 billion and the Romney’s tens of millions.

Read more here:

http://seniorsforademocraticsociety.wordpress...

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40952
Nov 1, 2012
 
Mitt vs Mutt wrote:
Davey......How's that electoral map working out for you?
LMAO!


Well, I really don't have any faith in polls or electoral maps. Polls are only as good as those taking the polls. Polls are usually bias and this applies to both parties and party supporters.

I've seen to many elections where polls showed their candidate way ahead and no chance for the other candidate, only to show the exact opposite on election day. The insider polls are about as accurate as you will find and the insider polls are rarely ever released to the public and you can't trust those releases. I do know what I'm talking about here.

I post polls and electoral maps as a way of responding to those who swear by them and to have some fun.
Mr Crumpets

Philadelphia, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40953
Nov 1, 2012
 
Dave Rogers wrote:
<quoted text> Giving yourself a pat on the back Muffins? LMAO So obvious.
So, where are all my misspellings?

Hahahaha.

Zing....wrong as usual

I wouldn't have been able to go that long with misspelling at least 10 words

You're so smart. Aren't you?
Or are you now?

You're voting for Romney....couldn't be that bright

But I admit my spelling sucks...but Mitch he spells well, doesn't he?

So..
Am I Mitch?
You betcha not....hahahahaa

The maps turning blue

Hey Davey....feeling Blue these days

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40954
Nov 1, 2012
 
A fair and balanced Electoral Map.

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2012/cust...

I'm Dave Rogers and I approved this message.
Mitt vs Mutt

Homestead, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40955
Nov 1, 2012
 
Dave Rogers wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, I really don't have any faith in polls or electoral maps. Polls are only as good as those taking the polls. Polls are usually bias and this applies to both parties and party supporters.
I've seen to many elections where polls showed their candidate way ahead and no chance for the other candidate, only to show the exact opposite on election day. The insider polls are about as accurate as you will find and the insider polls are rarely ever released to the public and you can't trust those releases. I do know what I'm talking about here.
I post polls and electoral maps as a way of responding to those who swear by them and to have some fun.
Not even Fox polls? WOW! I thought they were 'straight up' and honest and would conduct a nonpartisan poll..........

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40956
Nov 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

In the 2004 presidential election, "Rasmussen...beat most of their human competitors in the battleground states, often by large margins," according to Slate magazine.[38] Rasmussen projected the 2004 presidential results within one percentage point of the actual vote totals earned by both George W. Bush and John Kerry.[39]

In 2004, Slate said they “publicly doubted and privately derided Rasmussen” polls because of the methodology. However, after the election, they concluded that Rasmussen’s polls were the most accurate.[38]

2008According to Politico, "Rasmussen’s final poll of the 2008 general election — showing Obama defeating Arizona Sen. John McCain 52 percent to 46 percent — closely mirrored the election’s outcome."[40] In reference to the 2008 presidential election, a Talking Points Memo article said, "Rasmussen's final polls had Obama ahead 52%-46%, which was nearly identical to Obama's final margin of 53%-46%, and made him one of the most accurate pollsters out there."[41] An initial Nov.5, 2008 Fordham University analysis ranked 23 survey research organizations on the accuracy of their final, national pre-election polls, assuming a 6.15% margin of victory by Obama. Rasmussen Reports and Pew Research Center tied as the most accurate.--wikipedia

can you spot the poll that has been the most accurate since 2004 ?

LMAO !!! that darn rasmussen pollsters accuracy. why cant they be more like cbs/abc/cnn and the other pretenders.

tuesday will be the most accurate poll.
Mitt vs Mutt wrote:
Quick quiz for poll fans: Can you spot the Ohio poll that is different from the rest?
Ohio Poll/Univ of Cin. 10/25 - 10/30 1182 LV 2.9 48 46 Obama +2
Rasmussen Reports 10/28 - 10/28 750 LV 4.0 48 50 Romney +2
SurveyUSA 10/26 - 10/29 603 LV 4.1 48 45 Obama +3
Gravis Marketing 10/27 - 10/27 730 LV 3.6 50 49 Obama +1
PPP (D) 10/26 - 10/28 718 LV 3.7 51 47 Obama +4
CBS/NYT/Quinnipiac 10/23 - 10/28 1110 LV 3.0 50 45 Obama +5
Purple Strategies 10/23 - 10/25 600 LV 4.0 46 44 Obama +2
CNN/Opinion Research 10/23 - 10/25 741 LV 3.5 50 46 Obama +4
ARG 10/23 - 10/25 600 LV 4.0 49 47 Obama +2
Mitt vs Mutt

Homestead, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40957
Nov 1, 2012
 
boxhard wrote:
In the 2004 presidential election, "Rasmussen...beat most of their human competitors in the battleground states, often by large margins," according to Slate magazine.[38] Rasmussen projected the 2004 presidential results within one percentage point of the actual vote totals earned by both George W. Bush and John Kerry.[39]
In 2004, Slate said they “publicly doubted and privately derided Rasmussen” polls because of the methodology. However, after the election, they concluded that Rasmussen’s polls were the most accurate.[38]
2008According to Politico, "Rasmussen’s final poll of the 2008 general election — showing Obama defeating Arizona Sen. John McCain 52 percent to 46 percent — closely mirrored the election’s outcome."[40] In reference to the 2008 presidential election, a Talking Points Memo article said, "Rasmussen's final polls had Obama ahead 52%-46%, which was nearly identical to Obama's final margin of 53%-46%, and made him one of the most accurate pollsters out there."[41] An initial Nov.5, 2008 Fordham University analysis ranked 23 survey research organizations on the accuracy of their final, national pre-election polls, assuming a 6.15% margin of victory by Obama. Rasmussen Reports and Pew Research Center tied as the most accurate.--wikipedia
can you spot the poll that has been the most accurate since 2004 ?
LMAO !!! that darn rasmussen pollsters accuracy. why cant they be more like cbs/abc/cnn and the other pretenders.
tuesday will be the most accurate poll.
<quoted text>
Welcome back to the conversation there Boxturd........I heard you were masturbating and your hand slipped of the knob and you broke your nose,,,,,,,get better quick and go out n vote! yeahhhh babyyyyy!
Mr Crumpets

Philadelphia, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40958
Nov 1, 2012
 
boxhard wrote:
In the 2004 presidential election, "Rasmussen...beat most of their human competitors in the battleground states, often by large margins," according to Slate magazine.[38] Rasmussen projected the 2004 presidential results within one percentage point of the actual vote totals earned by both George W. Bush and John Kerry.[39]
In 2004, Slate said they “publicly doubted and privately derided Rasmussen” polls because of the methodology. However, after the election, they concluded that Rasmussen’s polls were the most accurate.[38]
2008According to Politico, "Rasmussen’s final poll of the 2008 general election — showing Obama defeating Arizona Sen. John McCain 52 percent to 46 percent — closely mirrored the election’s outcome."[40] In reference to the 2008 presidential election, a Talking Points Memo article said, "Rasmussen's final polls had Obama ahead 52%-46%, which was nearly identical to Obama's final margin of 53%-46%, and made him one of the most accurate pollsters out there."[41] An initial Nov.5, 2008 Fordham University analysis ranked 23 survey research organizations on the accuracy of their final, national pre-election polls, assuming a 6.15% margin of victory by Obama. Rasmussen Reports and Pew Research Center tied as the most accurate.--wikipedia
can you spot the poll that has been the most accurate since 2004 ?
LMAO !!! that darn rasmussen pollsters accuracy. why cant they be more like cbs/abc/cnn and the other pretenders.
tuesday will be the most accurate poll.
<quoted text>
Nobody cares...
Please babble on idiot boy
Reverend Irreverent

State College, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40959
Nov 1, 2012
 
...So I had a comment regarding Bible-based voters. Anyone want to comment on that, or are we simply going on more copied biased blog opinions? I mostly want to hear the opinion of people on the Romney side. TaxNoMore would work well.

That said, I haven't seen much of him in a while since I mostly don't follow this one. Not since he posted in a topic outside of this one and was chased out to take residence solely back in this one. Being as I see little from this particular poster except clippings from blogs and repeated postings with little added feedback, is TaxNoMore just some badly coded bot?

TaxNoMore, focus on this one momentarily and give me an opinion. I mean a humanized one. Leave the copy-and-paste jobs behind and tell us why Biblical voters should swing Romney.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40960
Nov 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

ROMNEY gona take your free cheese away muffins. ROMNEY gonna cancel your free phone. ROMNEY gonna hide your food stamps in your work boots ensuring you starve. i can see why you so nervous with all thats on the line 4 u. good thing your mom still lets you sleep on the futon in the basement. LMAO @ MUFFIN HEAD !!!
Mitt vs Mutt wrote:
<quoted text>Welcome back to the conversation there Boxturd........I heard you were masturbating and your hand slipped of the knob and you broke your nose,,,,,,,get better quick and go out n vote! yeahhhh babyyyyy!
Mitt vs Mutt

Homestead, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40961
Nov 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

boxhard wrote:
In the 2004 presidential election, "Rasmussen...beat most of their human competitors in the battleground states, often by large margins," according to Slate magazine.[38] Rasmussen projected the 2004 presidential results within one percentage point of the actual vote totals earned by both George W. Bush and John Kerry.[39]
In 2004, Slate said they “publicly doubted and privately derided Rasmussen” polls because of the methodology. However, after the election, they concluded that Rasmussen’s polls were the most accurate.[38]
2008According to Politico, "Rasmussen’s final poll of the 2008 general election — showing Obama defeating Arizona Sen. John McCain 52 percent to 46 percent — closely mirrored the election’s outcome."[40] In reference to the 2008 presidential election, a Talking Points Memo article said, "Rasmussen's final polls had Obama ahead 52%-46%, which was nearly identical to Obama's final margin of 53%-46%, and made him one of the most accurate pollsters out there."[41] An initial Nov.5, 2008 Fordham University analysis ranked 23 survey research organizations on the accuracy of their final, national pre-election polls, assuming a 6.15% margin of victory by Obama. Rasmussen Reports and Pew Research Center tied as the most accurate.--wikipedia
can you spot the poll that has been the most accurate since 2004 ?
LMAO !!! that darn rasmussen pollsters accuracy. why cant they be more like cbs/abc/cnn and the other pretenders.
tuesday will be the most accurate poll.
<quoted text>
Rassmussen is a Republican Poster and for this election cycle is clearly biased; however I find their polling interesting in that when Obama is ahead, I know he’s way ahead, when they say he’s tied, I know just ahead, when they say he’s 1-2 points behind, that means he’s tied, Obama behind 4-5 points means Obama down by 2-3 points. At this phase in the election this is state of accuracy. In the month of October, their polling will more accurate and neutral. The Rassmussen Polling will show the truth that they alreadyb know; that is Obama winning the popular vote by lest than four points and winning the Electoral Vote by a land slide.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40962
Nov 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

oh i think you do care. must suck to see the most accurate poll having your hero behind. well next tues you wil know. you libs sure are testy these days.
Mr Crumpets wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody cares...
Please babble on idiot boy
gshoes

Pittsburgh, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40963
Nov 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

boxhard wrote:
<quoted text>oh i think you do care. must suck to see the most accurate poll having your hero behind. well next tues you wil know. you libs sure are testy these days.
Obama way ahead. Four more years. Go cry Taliban teabagger

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40964
Nov 1, 2012
 
sorry buddy but unlike the obama slobberers i wont be cryin over a politician.

i can always tell a gman by his shoes....
gshoes wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama way ahead. Four more years. Go cry Taliban teabagger

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Hanover Discussions

Search the Hanover Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
PA Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Pennsylva... (Oct '10) 1 hr snag 3,810
Snyder's of Hanover (Aug '09) 2 hr Ssl 5,384
Suburban Life: Towns band together to share lov... Tue Black dude 1
bulllys at the work place. Jul 15 robert 1
State police probing pistol theft in Adams County Jul 14 Marilyn Newcomer 1
Paradise School 'riot': Police arrest six students (Apr '08) Jul 10 alan decker 29
Free Fourth of July fireworks shows (Jun '09) Jul 4 need to know 23
•••
•••
•••
•••

Hanover Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Hanover People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Hanover News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Hanover
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••