Who do you support for Governor in Pe...

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#40960 Nov 1, 2012
ROMNEY gona take your free cheese away muffins. ROMNEY gonna cancel your free phone. ROMNEY gonna hide your food stamps in your work boots ensuring you starve. i can see why you so nervous with all thats on the line 4 u. good thing your mom still lets you sleep on the futon in the basement. LMAO @ MUFFIN HEAD !!!
Mitt vs Mutt wrote:
<quoted text>Welcome back to the conversation there Boxturd........I heard you were masturbating and your hand slipped of the knob and you broke your nose,,,,,,,get better quick and go out n vote! yeahhhh babyyyyy!
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#40961 Nov 1, 2012
boxhard wrote:
In the 2004 presidential election, "Rasmussen...beat most of their human competitors in the battleground states, often by large margins," according to Slate magazine.[38] Rasmussen projected the 2004 presidential results within one percentage point of the actual vote totals earned by both George W. Bush and John Kerry.[39]
In 2004, Slate said they “publicly doubted and privately derided Rasmussen” polls because of the methodology. However, after the election, they concluded that Rasmussen’s polls were the most accurate.[38]
2008According to Politico, "Rasmussen’s final poll of the 2008 general election — showing Obama defeating Arizona Sen. John McCain 52 percent to 46 percent — closely mirrored the election’s outcome."[40] In reference to the 2008 presidential election, a Talking Points Memo article said, "Rasmussen's final polls had Obama ahead 52%-46%, which was nearly identical to Obama's final margin of 53%-46%, and made him one of the most accurate pollsters out there."[41] An initial Nov.5, 2008 Fordham University analysis ranked 23 survey research organizations on the accuracy of their final, national pre-election polls, assuming a 6.15% margin of victory by Obama. Rasmussen Reports and Pew Research Center tied as the most accurate.--wikipedia
can you spot the poll that has been the most accurate since 2004 ?
LMAO !!! that darn rasmussen pollsters accuracy. why cant they be more like cbs/abc/cnn and the other pretenders.
tuesday will be the most accurate poll.
<quoted text>
Rassmussen is a Republican Poster and for this election cycle is clearly biased; however I find their polling interesting in that when Obama is ahead, I know he’s way ahead, when they say he’s tied, I know just ahead, when they say he’s 1-2 points behind, that means he’s tied, Obama behind 4-5 points means Obama down by 2-3 points. At this phase in the election this is state of accuracy. In the month of October, their polling will more accurate and neutral. The Rassmussen Polling will show the truth that they alreadyb know; that is Obama winning the popular vote by lest than four points and winning the Electoral Vote by a land slide.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#40962 Nov 1, 2012
oh i think you do care. must suck to see the most accurate poll having your hero behind. well next tues you wil know. you libs sure are testy these days.
Mr Crumpets wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody cares...
Please babble on idiot boy
gshoes

Pittsburgh, PA

#40963 Nov 1, 2012
boxhard wrote:
<quoted text>oh i think you do care. must suck to see the most accurate poll having your hero behind. well next tues you wil know. you libs sure are testy these days.
Obama way ahead. Four more years. Go cry Taliban teabagger

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#40964 Nov 1, 2012
sorry buddy but unlike the obama slobberers i wont be cryin over a politician.

i can always tell a gman by his shoes....
gshoes wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama way ahead. Four more years. Go cry Taliban teabagger

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40965 Nov 1, 2012
Mr Crumpets wrote:
<quoted text>
So, where are all my misspellings?
Hahahaha.
Zing....wrong as usual
I wouldn't have been able to go that long with misspelling at least 10 words
You're so smart. Aren't you?
Or are you now?
You're voting for Romney....couldn't be that bright
But I admit my spelling sucks...but Mitch he spells well, doesn't he?
So..
Am I Mitch?
You betcha not....hahahahaa
The maps turning blue
Hey Davey....feeling Blue these days
Lets see if you are “Mitch M?

Mitch M
West Mifflin, PA
Mitch M wrote:
"Politics is like driving. To go backward put it in R. To go forward put it in D."
6 days to go! Do something EVERY SINGLE DAY to bring this home for the blue team!!!
GO DEMS!
THE CLEAR CHOICE
OBAMA 2012 !!!!
YEAH BABYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!

1. Mitch M posted from West Mifflin.
2. THE CLEAR CHOICE
OBAMA 2012 !!!!
YEAH BABYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!! is your trade mark, Muffins from West Mifflin. lol

Then we have this reply to Mitch M’s post above, from
Mr Crumpets
Columbia, MD
Excellent analogy Mitch...

Now we both know you are Mitt vs Mutt from West Mifflin, PA.

We know this because the one day you were bragging how easy it was to have another ID with a different IP address showing.

Showing off post after post, back to back different IP and user ID’s. While you were bragging and telling me how stupid I was for not being able to do this you were posting as “Mr Crumpets from Columbia MD” aka Mitt vs Mutt from West Mifflin, PA.

Then came my reply to the above post
Mr Crumpets wrote: <quoted text>
Excellent analogy Mitch...

Giving yourself a pat on the back Muffins? LMAO So obvious.

So in conclusion you are Mitch M, Mr Crumpets aka Mitt vs Mutt from West Mifflin of PA.

Now to address this post.

Zing.....I'm not wrong. You are lying as usual.

Yes, I am smart, and very smart to see through your multiple personalities, or ID"’s if you prefer.

You post under one ID then reply to yourself using another ID. When you post and you’re getting hit with facts that prove you are lying, you leave and come right back using a different ID and many times several ID’s to defend yourself or have it appear you have other liberals supporting your lie.

As for Mitch spelling well all you do there is use spell check. You started using spell check after I made fun of your spelling and grammar. A grammar check is your next tool.

You asked.
So..
Am I Mitch?
You betcha not....hahahahaa

Yes, you’re Mitch M, Mr Crumpets, Mitt vs. Mutt and many others too. Keep denying and creating other ID’s I’m having fun figuring out who you are while you look like a total imbecile.

The definition for imbecile is:

1. Imbecile was a medical term used to describe a person with moderate to severe mental retardation, as well as for a type of criminal.

2. It arises from the Latin word imbecillus, meaning weak, or weak-minded. "Imbecile" was once applied to people with an IQ of 26–50, between "moron" (IQ of 51–70) and "idiot" (IQ of 0–25).

3. The term was further refined into mental and moral imbecility. The concepts of "moral insanity", "moral idiocy"," and "moral imbecility", led to the emerging field of eugenic criminology, which held that crime can be reduced by preventing "feeble-minded" people from reproducing.

I suggest from now on you refer to yourself as Mr. Imbecile. I think it describe you perfectly. Don’t you?

Oh, and Mr. Imbecile I do have some days I feel blue/sad but today is not one of them.

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40966 Nov 1, 2012
Mr Crumpets wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody cares...
Please babble on idiot boy
Please babble on idiot boy...the famous words of bobby6464 aka Mitch M, Mr Crumpets, Mitt vs. Mutt and many other posters on here.

Will the real Mitt vs. Mutt please stand up. Then go get bent. LMAO

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40967 Nov 1, 2012
Mitt vs Mutt wrote:
<quoted text>Welcome back to the conversation there Boxturd........I seen you masturbating and your hand slide,yeahhhh babyyyyy!
LMAO. Whats wrong with Mitt vs Mutt's post?
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#40969 Nov 1, 2012
DAY 2130 of the ROMNEY for President Campaign and still NO sign of President Cheney or Bush W.....LOL!
Ted

Meyersdale, PA

#40970 Nov 1, 2012
Mitt vs Mutt wrote:
<quoted text>
Rassmussen is a Republican Poster and for this election cycle is clearly biased; however I find their polling interesting in that when Obama is ahead, I know he’s way ahead, when they say he’s tied, I know just ahead, when they say he’s 1-2 points behind, that means he’s tied, Obama behind 4-5 points means Obama down by 2-3 points. At this phase in the election this is state of accuracy. In the month of October, their polling will more accurate and neutral. The Rassmussen Polling will show the truth that they alreadyb know; that is Obama winning the popular vote by lest than four points and winning the Electoral Vote by a land slide.
!LOL!

Hey, bonehead, try READing the content you plagiarize! Obviously you are copying and pasting old but accurate data.

You prove boxhard's point regarding the Rassmussen poll, you fool: "In the month of October, their polling will more accurate and neutral."

Here is Rasmussen Reports data from their site:
"Thursday, November 01, 2012
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows Mitt Romney attracting support from 49% of voters nationwide, while President Obama earns the vote from 47%. One percent (1%) prefers some other candidate, and three percent (3%) remain undecided."

Such are the embarrassing mistakes plagiarists like you make.
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#40971 Nov 1, 2012
Good news....Mitt is going to cut loopholes........
BAD news.....Mitt considers FEMA a loophole......
heeeeee
TaxNoMore

Los Angeles, CA

#40972 Nov 1, 2012
Mitt vs Mutt wrote:
Good news....Mitt is going to cut loopholes........
BAD news.....Mitt considers FEMA a loophole......
heeeeee
.
.
.

FEMA

.
.
.
Where does the money come from??

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40973 Nov 1, 2012
Mitt vs Mutt wrote:
<quoted text>your clueless Davey.......LMAO
I'm clueless? LOL

You're the Topix jerk.

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40974 Nov 1, 2012
Mitt vs Mutt wrote:
Good news....Mitt is going to cut loopholes........
BAD news.....Mitt considers FEMA a loophole......
heeeeee
You're clueless all the time.

You're wrong again West Mifflin. Mitt said he was going to cut fruitcakes and he considers you and those like you azzholes. LMAO

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40975 Nov 1, 2012
Obama is....well...LMAO

Obama eases off 'one-term proposition,' says economic fix takes more than 4 years

Despite saying in 2009 that failing to right the economy in three years would mean a "one-term proposition," President Obama on Thursday may have moved the goalposts.

"Now, we knew from the beginning that our work would take more than one year, or even one term -- because let's face it, the middle class was getting hammered long before the financial crisis hit," Obama said in Green Bay, Wis., as he ventured back onto the campaign trail after a three-day hiatus due to super storm Sandy.

The possible adjustment in the president's timetable for turning around the economy comes one day before the Labor Department is set to release the October jobs report. Last month's survey provided a dose of seemingly good news for the economy and for Obama's re-election campaign, showing the jobless rate dipping below 8 percent. Some economists, though, questioned the accuracy of the stat - and the report being released Friday is the last major economic survey to drop before Election Day.

The president has long been making the case that he just needs more time to finish the job he started. At an August 2011 fundraiser, he said: "When I said change we can believe in, I didn't say change we can believe in tomorrow."
The claim, though, that "we knew from the beginning" it would take more than one term is a departure from what Obama told NBC's Matt Lauer in February 2009. At the time, Obama said, "A year from now, I think people are going to see that we're starting to make some progress, but there's still going to be some pain out there. If I don't have this done in three years, then there's going to be a one-term proposition."

The Romney campaign hasn't forgotten about the 2009 remark.

"Four years ago, President Obama made a series of commitments to the nation and said that he didn't deserve a second term if he failed to keep them," Romney spokesman Ryan Williams told FoxNews.com in an email, following Obama's Green Bay remarks. "Now, faced with a record of broken promises and failed policies, the president is trying to reissue and repackage the same pledges and mislead Americans into believing that the results will somehow be different."

Thursday was the first day since Sandy hit that both candidates were out on the trail in full force, and they bickered over who can claim the mantle of the "change" candidate.

Romney's campaign says the former Massachusetts governor is the only one offering "real change." Obama, though, argued that his opponent is merely offering to return America to the policies of the George W. Bush administration -- policies that he claims unfairly favor the wealthy.

The president was campaigning Thursday in Wisconsin, Nevada and Colorado, while Romney made a three-stop swing through Virginia.

All four are important battlegrounds. But Romney's campaign also revealed Thursday that it's pushing into Pennsylvania, reportedly planning a rally for Sunday in the state that has backed Democrats in recent presidential races.

FoxNews.com

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40976 Nov 1, 2012
Who posted the Fox News poll earlier that showed Obama leading in Ohio today and I replied it was outdated?

I'm correct again.

Romney pulls ahead in Ohio

http://video.foxnews.com/v/1932156164001/romn...

You libroids who really believe Obama is going to win, you're living in fantasyland. You look at the bright colorful maps and numbers that are pulled out of thin air and get so excited you run to Topix to share the exciting news while pissing yourself.

You just can't see beyond the bubble you were put in by your masters.

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40977 Nov 1, 2012
Obama says I need larger government to fix this mess Bush and all the republicans got me into. LOL...what an ass.

-----

Romney blasts Obama's 'secretary of business' plan as just another layer of government.

The Romney campaign is ripping President Obama for calling for the creation of a secretary of business to handle the nation's economic ills -- running a TV ad saying that solution would only add more bureaucracy to a cluttered system.

Fox News....not for morons.

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40978 Nov 1, 2012
Obama loves the company of black racists. BLACK POWER!

It was a joke.....yeah right.

-----

Rev who gave Obama's inaugural benediction reportedly says he thinks whites going to hell.

The reverend and civil rights advocate who gave the benediction at President Obama’s inauguration suggested at a recent Obama re-election rally that he thinks white people are going to hell -- though he later said it was just a joke.

The Rev. Joseph Lowery spoke at a rally Saturday in Georgia. According to an account in the Monroe County Reporter, "Lowery said that when he was a young militant, he used to say all white folks were going to hell. Then he mellowed and just said most of them were.

"Now, he said, he is back to where he was," according to the newspaper.

"I don’t know what kind of a n----- wouldn’t vote with a black man running," he also told the audience in the St. James Baptist Church in Forsyth, Ga., according to the paper.

The 91-year-old Lowery, though, told an Atlanta-area TV station and the Daily Caller that the monologue was a joke and from the perspective of a young militant.

Lowery also said he made clear at the time that the comments -- at the event reportedly attended by hundreds of African Americans -- were intended as a joke.
Still, Forsyth Mayor John Howard said he was “pretty shocked” by the comments, according to the newspaper.

Lowery told the Daily Caller he doesn’t remember making the n-word comment.

“I never said that, I don’t remember saying that.”
Lowery was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2009 by President Obama. His benediction in 2009 for Obama's inauguration included one racially charged, though somewhat whimsical, line.
He closed with the following passage: "Lord, in the memory of all the saints who from their labors rest, and in the joy of a new beginning, we ask you to help us work for that day when black will not be asked to get in back, when brown can stick around, when yellow will be mellow, when the red man can get ahead, man -- and when white will embrace what is right."

Fox News.....the only fair and balanced news source.

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40979 Nov 1, 2012
How will Obama be able to reach the 270 electoral votes needed to win? I still haven't seen any liberal on here show how.

His only option is to rig the election. LMAO

-----

Presidential race tightens across the electoral map.

http://video.foxnews.com/v/1937306305001/pres...

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40980 Nov 1, 2012
Could ‘hidden vote’ lead to landslide Romney win?

http://video.foxnews.com/v/1939574254001/coul...

You libroids need to watch this video. Maybe you and I say maybe you will understand.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hanover Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Snyder's of Hanover (Aug '09) Aug 2 Ward Carl Lee 6,022
Review: Dean's Auto Plaza (Sep '13) Jul 10 Truthfull1 11
Review: Happy Nails Jul 8 George Costanza 2
News Heroin sentence 12 years (Jun '10) Jun '15 gab 93
Snyder lance May '15 Torts 3
News 12-time DUI repeater gets up to 7 years in prison (Sep '08) Apr '15 Trista Biddle 23
News Half Pint Creamery plans second ice cream shop Mar '15 Fannie Pak 2
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hanover Mortgages