Who do you support for Governor in Pe...
Mr Crumpets

Arlington, VA

#40953 Nov 1, 2012
Dave Rogers wrote:
<quoted text> Giving yourself a pat on the back Muffins? LMAO So obvious.
So, where are all my misspellings?

Hahahaha.

Zing....wrong as usual

I wouldn't have been able to go that long with misspelling at least 10 words

You're so smart. Aren't you?
Or are you now?

You're voting for Romney....couldn't be that bright

But I admit my spelling sucks...but Mitch he spells well, doesn't he?

So..
Am I Mitch?
You betcha not....hahahahaa

The maps turning blue

Hey Davey....feeling Blue these days

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40954 Nov 1, 2012
A fair and balanced Electoral Map.

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2012/cust...

I'm Dave Rogers and I approved this message.
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#40955 Nov 1, 2012
Dave Rogers wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, I really don't have any faith in polls or electoral maps. Polls are only as good as those taking the polls. Polls are usually bias and this applies to both parties and party supporters.
I've seen to many elections where polls showed their candidate way ahead and no chance for the other candidate, only to show the exact opposite on election day. The insider polls are about as accurate as you will find and the insider polls are rarely ever released to the public and you can't trust those releases. I do know what I'm talking about here.
I post polls and electoral maps as a way of responding to those who swear by them and to have some fun.
Not even Fox polls? WOW! I thought they were 'straight up' and honest and would conduct a nonpartisan poll..........

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#40956 Nov 1, 2012
In the 2004 presidential election, "Rasmussen...beat most of their human competitors in the battleground states, often by large margins," according to Slate magazine.[38] Rasmussen projected the 2004 presidential results within one percentage point of the actual vote totals earned by both George W. Bush and John Kerry.[39]

In 2004, Slate said they “publicly doubted and privately derided Rasmussen” polls because of the methodology. However, after the election, they concluded that Rasmussen’s polls were the most accurate.[38]

2008According to Politico, "Rasmussen’s final poll of the 2008 general election — showing Obama defeating Arizona Sen. John McCain 52 percent to 46 percent — closely mirrored the election’s outcome."[40] In reference to the 2008 presidential election, a Talking Points Memo article said, "Rasmussen's final polls had Obama ahead 52%-46%, which was nearly identical to Obama's final margin of 53%-46%, and made him one of the most accurate pollsters out there."[41] An initial Nov.5, 2008 Fordham University analysis ranked 23 survey research organizations on the accuracy of their final, national pre-election polls, assuming a 6.15% margin of victory by Obama. Rasmussen Reports and Pew Research Center tied as the most accurate.--wikipedia

can you spot the poll that has been the most accurate since 2004 ?

LMAO !!! that darn rasmussen pollsters accuracy. why cant they be more like cbs/abc/cnn and the other pretenders.

tuesday will be the most accurate poll.
Mitt vs Mutt wrote:
Quick quiz for poll fans: Can you spot the Ohio poll that is different from the rest?
Ohio Poll/Univ of Cin. 10/25 - 10/30 1182 LV 2.9 48 46 Obama +2
Rasmussen Reports 10/28 - 10/28 750 LV 4.0 48 50 Romney +2
SurveyUSA 10/26 - 10/29 603 LV 4.1 48 45 Obama +3
Gravis Marketing 10/27 - 10/27 730 LV 3.6 50 49 Obama +1
PPP (D) 10/26 - 10/28 718 LV 3.7 51 47 Obama +4
CBS/NYT/Quinnipiac 10/23 - 10/28 1110 LV 3.0 50 45 Obama +5
Purple Strategies 10/23 - 10/25 600 LV 4.0 46 44 Obama +2
CNN/Opinion Research 10/23 - 10/25 741 LV 3.5 50 46 Obama +4
ARG 10/23 - 10/25 600 LV 4.0 49 47 Obama +2
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#40957 Nov 1, 2012
boxhard wrote:
In the 2004 presidential election, "Rasmussen...beat most of their human competitors in the battleground states, often by large margins," according to Slate magazine.[38] Rasmussen projected the 2004 presidential results within one percentage point of the actual vote totals earned by both George W. Bush and John Kerry.[39]
In 2004, Slate said they “publicly doubted and privately derided Rasmussen” polls because of the methodology. However, after the election, they concluded that Rasmussen’s polls were the most accurate.[38]
2008According to Politico, "Rasmussen’s final poll of the 2008 general election — showing Obama defeating Arizona Sen. John McCain 52 percent to 46 percent — closely mirrored the election’s outcome."[40] In reference to the 2008 presidential election, a Talking Points Memo article said, "Rasmussen's final polls had Obama ahead 52%-46%, which was nearly identical to Obama's final margin of 53%-46%, and made him one of the most accurate pollsters out there."[41] An initial Nov.5, 2008 Fordham University analysis ranked 23 survey research organizations on the accuracy of their final, national pre-election polls, assuming a 6.15% margin of victory by Obama. Rasmussen Reports and Pew Research Center tied as the most accurate.--wikipedia
can you spot the poll that has been the most accurate since 2004 ?
LMAO !!! that darn rasmussen pollsters accuracy. why cant they be more like cbs/abc/cnn and the other pretenders.
tuesday will be the most accurate poll.
<quoted text>
Welcome back to the conversation there Boxturd........I heard you were masturbating and your hand slipped of the knob and you broke your nose,,,,,,,get better quick and go out n vote! yeahhhh babyyyyy!
Mr Crumpets

Arlington, VA

#40958 Nov 1, 2012
boxhard wrote:
In the 2004 presidential election, "Rasmussen...beat most of their human competitors in the battleground states, often by large margins," according to Slate magazine.[38] Rasmussen projected the 2004 presidential results within one percentage point of the actual vote totals earned by both George W. Bush and John Kerry.[39]
In 2004, Slate said they “publicly doubted and privately derided Rasmussen” polls because of the methodology. However, after the election, they concluded that Rasmussen’s polls were the most accurate.[38]
2008According to Politico, "Rasmussen’s final poll of the 2008 general election — showing Obama defeating Arizona Sen. John McCain 52 percent to 46 percent — closely mirrored the election’s outcome."[40] In reference to the 2008 presidential election, a Talking Points Memo article said, "Rasmussen's final polls had Obama ahead 52%-46%, which was nearly identical to Obama's final margin of 53%-46%, and made him one of the most accurate pollsters out there."[41] An initial Nov.5, 2008 Fordham University analysis ranked 23 survey research organizations on the accuracy of their final, national pre-election polls, assuming a 6.15% margin of victory by Obama. Rasmussen Reports and Pew Research Center tied as the most accurate.--wikipedia
can you spot the poll that has been the most accurate since 2004 ?
LMAO !!! that darn rasmussen pollsters accuracy. why cant they be more like cbs/abc/cnn and the other pretenders.
tuesday will be the most accurate poll.
<quoted text>
Nobody cares...
Please babble on idiot boy
Reverend Irreverent

State College, PA

#40959 Nov 1, 2012
...So I had a comment regarding Bible-based voters. Anyone want to comment on that, or are we simply going on more copied biased blog opinions? I mostly want to hear the opinion of people on the Romney side. TaxNoMore would work well.

That said, I haven't seen much of him in a while since I mostly don't follow this one. Not since he posted in a topic outside of this one and was chased out to take residence solely back in this one. Being as I see little from this particular poster except clippings from blogs and repeated postings with little added feedback, is TaxNoMore just some badly coded bot?

TaxNoMore, focus on this one momentarily and give me an opinion. I mean a humanized one. Leave the copy-and-paste jobs behind and tell us why Biblical voters should swing Romney.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#40960 Nov 1, 2012
ROMNEY gona take your free cheese away muffins. ROMNEY gonna cancel your free phone. ROMNEY gonna hide your food stamps in your work boots ensuring you starve. i can see why you so nervous with all thats on the line 4 u. good thing your mom still lets you sleep on the futon in the basement. LMAO @ MUFFIN HEAD !!!
Mitt vs Mutt wrote:
<quoted text>Welcome back to the conversation there Boxturd........I heard you were masturbating and your hand slipped of the knob and you broke your nose,,,,,,,get better quick and go out n vote! yeahhhh babyyyyy!
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#40961 Nov 1, 2012
boxhard wrote:
In the 2004 presidential election, "Rasmussen...beat most of their human competitors in the battleground states, often by large margins," according to Slate magazine.[38] Rasmussen projected the 2004 presidential results within one percentage point of the actual vote totals earned by both George W. Bush and John Kerry.[39]
In 2004, Slate said they “publicly doubted and privately derided Rasmussen” polls because of the methodology. However, after the election, they concluded that Rasmussen’s polls were the most accurate.[38]
2008According to Politico, "Rasmussen’s final poll of the 2008 general election — showing Obama defeating Arizona Sen. John McCain 52 percent to 46 percent — closely mirrored the election’s outcome."[40] In reference to the 2008 presidential election, a Talking Points Memo article said, "Rasmussen's final polls had Obama ahead 52%-46%, which was nearly identical to Obama's final margin of 53%-46%, and made him one of the most accurate pollsters out there."[41] An initial Nov.5, 2008 Fordham University analysis ranked 23 survey research organizations on the accuracy of their final, national pre-election polls, assuming a 6.15% margin of victory by Obama. Rasmussen Reports and Pew Research Center tied as the most accurate.--wikipedia
can you spot the poll that has been the most accurate since 2004 ?
LMAO !!! that darn rasmussen pollsters accuracy. why cant they be more like cbs/abc/cnn and the other pretenders.
tuesday will be the most accurate poll.
<quoted text>
Rassmussen is a Republican Poster and for this election cycle is clearly biased; however I find their polling interesting in that when Obama is ahead, I know he’s way ahead, when they say he’s tied, I know just ahead, when they say he’s 1-2 points behind, that means he’s tied, Obama behind 4-5 points means Obama down by 2-3 points. At this phase in the election this is state of accuracy. In the month of October, their polling will more accurate and neutral. The Rassmussen Polling will show the truth that they alreadyb know; that is Obama winning the popular vote by lest than four points and winning the Electoral Vote by a land slide.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#40962 Nov 1, 2012
oh i think you do care. must suck to see the most accurate poll having your hero behind. well next tues you wil know. you libs sure are testy these days.
Mr Crumpets wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody cares...
Please babble on idiot boy
gshoes

Pittsburgh, PA

#40963 Nov 1, 2012
boxhard wrote:
<quoted text>oh i think you do care. must suck to see the most accurate poll having your hero behind. well next tues you wil know. you libs sure are testy these days.
Obama way ahead. Four more years. Go cry Taliban teabagger

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#40964 Nov 1, 2012
sorry buddy but unlike the obama slobberers i wont be cryin over a politician.

i can always tell a gman by his shoes....
gshoes wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama way ahead. Four more years. Go cry Taliban teabagger

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40965 Nov 1, 2012
Mr Crumpets wrote:
<quoted text>
So, where are all my misspellings?
Hahahaha.
Zing....wrong as usual
I wouldn't have been able to go that long with misspelling at least 10 words
You're so smart. Aren't you?
Or are you now?
You're voting for Romney....couldn't be that bright
But I admit my spelling sucks...but Mitch he spells well, doesn't he?
So..
Am I Mitch?
You betcha not....hahahahaa
The maps turning blue
Hey Davey....feeling Blue these days
Lets see if you are “Mitch M?

Mitch M
West Mifflin, PA
Mitch M wrote:
"Politics is like driving. To go backward put it in R. To go forward put it in D."
6 days to go! Do something EVERY SINGLE DAY to bring this home for the blue team!!!
GO DEMS!
THE CLEAR CHOICE
OBAMA 2012 !!!!
YEAH BABYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!

1. Mitch M posted from West Mifflin.
2. THE CLEAR CHOICE
OBAMA 2012 !!!!
YEAH BABYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!! is your trade mark, Muffins from West Mifflin. lol

Then we have this reply to Mitch M’s post above, from
Mr Crumpets
Columbia, MD
Excellent analogy Mitch...

Now we both know you are Mitt vs Mutt from West Mifflin, PA.

We know this because the one day you were bragging how easy it was to have another ID with a different IP address showing.

Showing off post after post, back to back different IP and user ID’s. While you were bragging and telling me how stupid I was for not being able to do this you were posting as “Mr Crumpets from Columbia MD” aka Mitt vs Mutt from West Mifflin, PA.

Then came my reply to the above post
Mr Crumpets wrote: <quoted text>
Excellent analogy Mitch...

Giving yourself a pat on the back Muffins? LMAO So obvious.

So in conclusion you are Mitch M, Mr Crumpets aka Mitt vs Mutt from West Mifflin of PA.

Now to address this post.

Zing.....I'm not wrong. You are lying as usual.

Yes, I am smart, and very smart to see through your multiple personalities, or ID"’s if you prefer.

You post under one ID then reply to yourself using another ID. When you post and you’re getting hit with facts that prove you are lying, you leave and come right back using a different ID and many times several ID’s to defend yourself or have it appear you have other liberals supporting your lie.

As for Mitch spelling well all you do there is use spell check. You started using spell check after I made fun of your spelling and grammar. A grammar check is your next tool.

You asked.
So..
Am I Mitch?
You betcha not....hahahahaa

Yes, you’re Mitch M, Mr Crumpets, Mitt vs. Mutt and many others too. Keep denying and creating other ID’s I’m having fun figuring out who you are while you look like a total imbecile.

The definition for imbecile is:

1. Imbecile was a medical term used to describe a person with moderate to severe mental retardation, as well as for a type of criminal.

2. It arises from the Latin word imbecillus, meaning weak, or weak-minded. "Imbecile" was once applied to people with an IQ of 26–50, between "moron" (IQ of 51–70) and "idiot" (IQ of 0–25).

3. The term was further refined into mental and moral imbecility. The concepts of "moral insanity", "moral idiocy"," and "moral imbecility", led to the emerging field of eugenic criminology, which held that crime can be reduced by preventing "feeble-minded" people from reproducing.

I suggest from now on you refer to yourself as Mr. Imbecile. I think it describe you perfectly. Don’t you?

Oh, and Mr. Imbecile I do have some days I feel blue/sad but today is not one of them.

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40966 Nov 1, 2012
Mr Crumpets wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody cares...
Please babble on idiot boy
Please babble on idiot boy...the famous words of bobby6464 aka Mitch M, Mr Crumpets, Mitt vs. Mutt and many other posters on here.

Will the real Mitt vs. Mutt please stand up. Then go get bent. LMAO

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40967 Nov 1, 2012
Mitt vs Mutt wrote:
<quoted text>Welcome back to the conversation there Boxturd........I seen you masturbating and your hand slide,yeahhhh babyyyyy!
LMAO. Whats wrong with Mitt vs Mutt's post?
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#40969 Nov 1, 2012
DAY 2130 of the ROMNEY for President Campaign and still NO sign of President Cheney or Bush W.....LOL!
Ted

Davidsville, PA

#40970 Nov 1, 2012
Mitt vs Mutt wrote:
<quoted text>
Rassmussen is a Republican Poster and for this election cycle is clearly biased; however I find their polling interesting in that when Obama is ahead, I know he’s way ahead, when they say he’s tied, I know just ahead, when they say he’s 1-2 points behind, that means he’s tied, Obama behind 4-5 points means Obama down by 2-3 points. At this phase in the election this is state of accuracy. In the month of October, their polling will more accurate and neutral. The Rassmussen Polling will show the truth that they alreadyb know; that is Obama winning the popular vote by lest than four points and winning the Electoral Vote by a land slide.
!LOL!

Hey, bonehead, try READing the content you plagiarize! Obviously you are copying and pasting old but accurate data.

You prove boxhard's point regarding the Rassmussen poll, you fool: "In the month of October, their polling will more accurate and neutral."

Here is Rasmussen Reports data from their site:
"Thursday, November 01, 2012
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows Mitt Romney attracting support from 49% of voters nationwide, while President Obama earns the vote from 47%. One percent (1%) prefers some other candidate, and three percent (3%) remain undecided."

Such are the embarrassing mistakes plagiarists like you make.
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#40971 Nov 1, 2012
Good news....Mitt is going to cut loopholes........
BAD news.....Mitt considers FEMA a loophole......
heeeeee
TaxNoMore

South El Monte, CA

#40972 Nov 1, 2012
Mitt vs Mutt wrote:
Good news....Mitt is going to cut loopholes........
BAD news.....Mitt considers FEMA a loophole......
heeeeee
.
.
.

FEMA

.
.
.
Where does the money come from??

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#40973 Nov 1, 2012
Mitt vs Mutt wrote:
<quoted text>your clueless Davey.......LMAO
I'm clueless? LOL

You're the Topix jerk.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hanover Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Snyder's of Hanover (Aug '09) Nov 30 Keep dreaming 7,190
Is Sam's Club Still Planned for Gateway? (Nov '13) Nov 22 Amanda 2
News Power outage hits rush hour (May '10) Nov 20 David Dell 16
News Ex-security guard charged in thefts at Hanover ... (May '11) Oct '16 Private 6
News Police: Littlestown woman bites child as discip... Oct '16 privone2001 3
Ummmm......yeah Oct '16 waitwhatwhowhenho... 1
Utz buys Golden Flake Jul '16 jim thompson 1

Hanover Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hanover Mortgages