Who do you support for Governor in Pe...
TaxNoMore

South El Monte, CA

#40828 Nov 1, 2012
Mitch M wrote:
The Republicans’ blissful ignorance of the plight of the poor is stunning, and with 46.2 million Americans living in poverty, and America’s number two ranking in child poverty, they are determined to add to those numbers in an effort to relieve the suffering of the wealthiest 2% of income earners. However, the American people are not entirely convinced that giving the wealthy more tax breaks is the optimum means of reducing the nation’s debt and rebuilding the economy.
For the past two years, Americans overwhelmingly favor raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans and corporations to assuage the deficit and create jobs as President Obama has proposed, but Republicans have adhered to their unconstitutional Grover Norquist anti-tax pledge of never raising taxes or eliminating tax loopholes; except when they affect the poor and middle class. Eric Cantor rejects tax increases on the wealthy, but supports raising taxes on the poor to give the wealthy relief and help struggling families understand the need to start contributing to job creators for deficit reduction and economic growth.
//////////

When facts are shown that cannot be disputed you do not reply, disappear, switch topics or you resort to name-calling

Aaaaaaaaa Haaaaaaaaaaaaaa, ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha, ha,ha,ha

ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha, ha,ha,ha

ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha, ha,ha,ha

ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha, ha,ha,ha
Mitch M

West Mifflin, PA

#40830 Nov 1, 2012
Governor Mitt Romney -
"We’ve got to stop doing [disaster relief] because we’re jeopardizing the future of our kids, it is simply immoral".
Mitch M

West Mifflin, PA

#40831 Nov 1, 2012
Tea Party members often say that they want to restore fiscal responsibility, but when President George W. Bush approved the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and said the free market must be abandoned to preserve the free market, where were they? Why did the Tea Party only emerge a month after President Barack Obama took office?
TaxNoMore

South El Monte, CA

#40832 Nov 1, 2012
Mitch M wrote:
<quoted text>
For three years they held back their spending and investment to deliberately keep employment lagging and make the Democrats and President Obama look bad, but they couldn't help themselves from pouring all that money into election Super PAC's chasing the idea that they could actually win this. Now all those campaign contributions flowing into the system (not to mention those of ours to counter them) are juicing the economy just like a government stimulus would.
//////////

You are one stupid lib!

//////////

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/31/1153...
TaxNoMore

South El Monte, CA

#40833 Nov 1, 2012
You are one stupid lib!

.
.

are juicing the economy just like a government stimulus would.

.
.

In February, the Congressional Budget Office published its latest report on the "estimated impact" of the stimulus.

Although it had originally estimated the stimulus would cost $787 billion, CBO now says it will cost $831 billion.

In the second quarter of 2012, CBO estimates, somewhere between 200,000 to 1.2 million people have jobs they otherwise would not have were it not for the stimulus.

Assuming, optimistically, that the number is 1.2 million, that means each of those jobs cost taxpayers $692,500.

As time goes on, the maximum number of jobs sustained by Obama's stimulus will decline rapidly.

By the first quarter of 2013, it will sustain between 100,000 and 600,000 jobs, says CBO.

If it is 600,000, each of those jobs will have cost taxpayers $1,385,000.

By the fourth quarter of 2013, the maximum number of jobs it sustains will be 400,000 — at a cost to taxpayers of $2,077,500 per job.

It is true that Obama entered office in the midst of a deep recession.

But, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research, that recession ended in June 2009, almost three years ago.

//////////

juicing the economy
TaxNoMore

South El Monte, CA

#40834 Nov 1, 2012
You are one stupid lib!

.
.

As time goes on, the maximum number of jobs sustained by Obama's stimulus will decline rapidly.

By the first quarter of 2013, it will sustain between 100,000 and 600,000 jobs, says CBO.

If it is 600,000, each of those jobs will have cost taxpayers $1,385,000.

By the fourth quarter of 2013, the maximum number of jobs it sustains will be 400,000 — at a cost to taxpayers of $2,077,500 per job.
TaxNoMore

South El Monte, CA

#40835 Nov 1, 2012
You are one stupid lib!

.
.
CBO now says it will cost $831 billion.

By the fourth quarter of 2013, the maximum number of jobs it sustains will be 400,000 — at a cost to taxpayers of $2,077,500 per job.

juicing the economy just like a government stimulus would

..........

obummer, a four year failure.....just like you
TaxNoMore

South El Monte, CA

#40836 Nov 1, 2012
You are one stupid lib!

.
.

Juicing the economy at a cost to taxpayers of $2,077,500 per job.

You must be retarded, just like dannyboy

Since: Jul 12

Portland, Oregon

#40837 Nov 1, 2012
Tax payer, warrior tea bag. The tea bags are repukes and you know it. The tea bags were voting against president Obama in 08 but of course using another name, dumb asses.
Mitch M

West Mifflin, PA

#40838 Nov 1, 2012
Mitch M

West Mifflin, PA

#40839 Nov 1, 2012
New Batch of Polls Welcome News for Obama
A new batch of polls released yesterday (see below for the numbers) spells good news for President Obama. With Obama leading in Wisconsin by 5-8 points, it looks like Paul Ryan has failed to do the running mate's main job: bring in your home state. In Ohio, four new polls show Obama leading by an average of 3.8%. Obama is also leading in Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, and Pennsylvania. Two of the three polls put him ahead in Virginia and he is essentially tied in Florida and Colorado. It appears that Romney's post-debate momentum has now stopped, If the current numbers continue to hold over the weekend, the popular vote could be close but Obama is likely to win the electoral college because he needs to win only a few of the big swing states whereas Romney needs to win them all.

Poll: Obama Doing a Good Job Dealing with the Storm
About 80% of likely voters say that President Obama is doing a good or excellent job of dealing with the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy. Even 2/3 of those voters who support Mitt Romney give Obama credit for doing a fine job. These results are from the latest WaPo/ABC

THE CLEAR CHOICE
OBAMA 2012 !!!!!!!
YEAHHHHHHHH BABYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!
Mr Crumpets

Arlington, VA

#40840 Nov 1, 2012
TaxNoMore wrote:
<quoted text>
//////////
When facts are shown that cannot be disputed you do not reply, disappear, switch topics or you resort to name-calling
Aaaaaaaaa Haaaaaaaaaaaaaa, ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha, ha,ha,ha
ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha, ha,ha,ha
ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha, ha,ha,ha
ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha, ha,ha,ha
I know you think this poster is me...

You're wrong again and wrong about so many things. This isn't my style and even though you think its me. Its not.
I was Dr Sardonicus and jose menendez and The Great Gadsby...I sometimes swith names when I feel like it but I stay with that name.
This isn't my style...my style usually includes a scathing criticism of you and your wacko nutty postings...
TaxNoMore

South El Monte, CA

#40841 Nov 1, 2012
bobby6464 wrote:
Tax payer, warrior tea bag. The tea bags are repukes and you know it. The tea bags were voting against president Obama in 08 but of course using another name, dumb asses.
//////////

The president and his minions do not apologize for high unemployment, trillion dollar deficits, or the sacking of a U.S. consulate and the murder of an ambassador and three of his co-workers.

They do not apologize for the most anemic recovery in more than 60 years, or for wasting billions of dollars of taxpayer money on bankrupt "green" energy projects.

Instead they run around saying how much worse this country would be without them and their high-minded ideas about "fairness" and "social justice."

obummer is a four year loser.
Mr Crumpets

Arlington, VA

#40842 Nov 1, 2012
Mitch M wrote:
Tea Party members often say that they want to restore fiscal responsibility, but when President George W. Bush approved the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and said the free market must be abandoned to preserve the free market, where were they? Why did the Tea Party only emerge a month after President Barack Obama took office?
Mitch,

The idiot you're responding to isn't able to digest logical discussion. He might respond with some irrational Fox Newsian or Glenn Beckian propoganda lie.
Or better yet his recent most reliable source has been Dick friggin Morris..hahaha
How's that for living in the proper universe...
But I enjoy reading your objective and accurate posts...keep it up
Inundate him with undisputable facts..
See where it goes...with him it will fly straight over his head into to heavens.

But keep posting..its good information
Mitch M

West Mifflin, PA

#40843 Nov 1, 2012
Chrysler CEO Rebuts Romney on Jeeps
Mitt Romney is running an ad in Ohio saying that Chrysler is going to build a plant in China to manufacture Jeeps there and will ship jobs there. Now Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne has refuted Romney and said that the Chinese plant will manufacture Jeeps for sale in China and not affect U.S. workers, much as Toyota manufactures cars in the U.S. for sale in the U.S. The odd thing about this flap is that is brings up the subject of the auto bailout again, something that helps Obama and hurts Romney. Even Republicans don't understand why Romney wants to put the topic back in the spotlight.

When desperation sets in, a candidate will say just about anything.....but why change your ways now?
Romney has been lying or flip flopping since day one

THE CLEAR CHOICE
OBAMA 2012 !!
YEAHHHH BABYYYYYYY!

Since: Jul 12

Portland, Oregon

#40844 Nov 1, 2012
The racist warrior tea bag can only vent now that he is learning his tea bag vote in liberal California don't mean nothing, ha ha tea bag dumb asses. Tea bag tea bag tea bag tea bag tea bag yap yap yap yap ongoing. The tea bag excuse for flipper losing will be the storm or hurricane sandy, you betcha.that woman hates tea bags
Mitch M

West Mifflin, PA

#40845 Nov 1, 2012
Romney compares Sandy relief to cleaning up after high-school football game :

President Obama visited the Jersey shore Wednesday with Governor Chris Christie to get an up-close look at storm-damaged coastline. But a day earlier, Mitt Romney was already doing his part in Kettering, Ohio, at a campaign rally-turned fake disaster-relief event.

And to buff his own image as a disaster-relief specialist, Romney compared the Sandy relief effort to … his experience cleaning up the field after a high-school football game. Seriously.

I remember once we had a football field at my high school. The field was covered with rubbish and paper goods from people who’d had a big celebration there at the game. And there was a group of us there assigned to clean it up. And I thought,‘how are we going to clean up all the mess on this football field?’ There were just a few of us. And the person responsible for organizing the effort said,‘Just line up along the yard lines. You go between the goal line and the 10-yard line, and the next person between the 10 and 20, and just walk down and do your lane. And if everybody cleans their lanes, we’ll get it done.’ And so today, we’re cleaning one lane if you will.

MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell wasn’t buying it. In his Rewrite segment on Wednesday’s edition of The Last Word, he did a play-by-play on what he called the Romney campaign’s “fake” storm relief event.

“Because the desperate and shameless Romney campaign believes it cannot win the election without winning Ohio, Team Romney pushed their candidate out on a stage in Ohio yesterday,” O’Donnell explained.“Because the storm was still in progress in some states and the death count was climbing in New York and elsewhere, traditional political decency dictated that Mitt Romney be not caught campaigning yesterday.”

Buzzfeed also reported Romney campaign staffers stocked up beforehand on $5,000-worth of canned foods and other essentials at a Wal-Mart the night before —“to put on display while they waited for donations to come in.”

O’Donnell suggested these measures are the result of an extreme situation less than one week before the election:“It’s hard out there for a presidential candidate who is utterly irrelevant to the massive relief effort President Obama is running in the aftermath of this week’s historic storm.”

LQQK HERE:
http://tv.msnbc.com/2012/10/31/romney-compare...

Folks you cant make this shit up!
Mitch M

West Mifflin, PA

#40846 Nov 1, 2012
So here we have it Willard Romney compares picking up dirty cups and paper to fallen trees, crushed houses, flooded basements, and dead Americans. Next Ryan will jump in here and take stuff out of dumpsters and throw it back in.

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!
TaxNoMore

South El Monte, CA

#40847 Nov 1, 2012
Mitch M wrote:
Chrysler CEO Rebuts Romney on Jeeps
Mitt Romney is running an ad in Ohio saying that Chrysler is going to build a plant in China to manufacture Jeeps there and will ship jobs there. Now Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne has refuted Romney and said that the Chinese plant will manufacture Jeeps for sale in China and not affect U.S. workers, much as Toyota manufactures cars in the U.S. for sale in the U.S. The odd thing about this flap is that is brings up the subject of the auto bailout again, something that helps Obama and hurts Romney. Even Republicans don't understand why Romney wants to put the topic back in the spotlight.
When desperation sets in, a candidate will say just about anything.....but why change your ways now?
Romney has been lying or flip flopping since day one
THE CLEAR CHOICE
OBAMA 2012 !!
YEAHHHH BABYYYYYYY!
//////////

On June 10, 2009, Chrysler LLC emerged from a government backed Chapter 11 reorganization as Chrysler Group LLC,

in alliance with the Italian automaker Fiat.[4][5]

Initially holding a 20% interest in Chrysler Group,

Fiat's stake was increased to 58.5%(fully diluted) following acquisition of the equity interests held by the U.S. Treasury (6% on June 3, 2011) and Canada (1.5% on July 21, 2011)[6][7][8][9][10]

.
.

The stake was further increased to 61.8% in July 2012.[11]

.
.

Fiat's stake 61.8%, what does that mean??

.
.

..........

much as Toyota manufactures cars in the U.S. for sale in the U.S.

.
.

Fiat's stake 61.8%, what does that mean??
Mitch M

West Mifflin, PA

#40848 Nov 1, 2012
While Romney was packing bags for 2 hours (WOW ) for the flood victims on the east coast, as he was packing canned goods, such as beans,corn,soup,etc, he told one worker, "Do people actually eat his stuff?"
LOL!

No mitt they all have maids to do they shopping and never see the actual can..just the stuff that the butler heats up puts on your plate.........LOLOLOLOLOL!
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!
How dumb can a guy be? I mean come on!!!!!
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hanover Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Snyder's of Hanover (Aug '09) Apr 24 Cookieman 7,255
Shed foundation question Apr 19 Gettysburg Gay Bars 4
Ummmm......yeah (Oct '16) Feb '17 yawdim 3
News Tough economy forces Bentley's to close doors (Nov '09) Feb '17 Boo Hoo 58
News Woman accused of hitting man with belt at bar, ... Jan '17 Ed S 1
News Paradise School 'riot': Police arrest six students (Apr '08) Jan '17 Tommy 32
News Babies shaken or not? (Mar '08) Jan '17 Meep 17

Hanover Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hanover Mortgages