Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1497466 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

John Galt

Temecula, CA

#951092 Jul 22, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"leosampleanus"
rachel madcow has knowledge?
What does her phd stand for;
p honey
h ating
d emocrat
Peace
KMA
Degree in politics, useless except on MSNBC

Since: Feb 08

Spokane, WA

#951093 Jul 22, 2013
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>
Zimmerman is a fat racist wimp, kinda like your wrinkled up un-educated azz.
"poop"
And you are not a limp dicked uneducated racist?
Peace
KMA
PS: What summer is your bio/fantasy due to be released?
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#951094 Jul 22, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"leosampleanus"
rachel madcow has knowledge?
What does her phd stand for;
p honey
h ating
d emocrat
Peace
KMA
What a pathetically stupid person!!!Thanks for being a bagger...You and idiots like you are why it's not likely that you racist bigoted backwoods morons will ever win the presidency again.
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#951096 Jul 22, 2013
Obama is nothing. A leader to demise.

More poverty, more "part time jobs".

More race "hustling".

More division.

I thought maybe having a black president would be a good thing.

This black president is nothing more than a low class slob.

No solutions, no hope, no change.

Huge disappointment.

“Peace on Earth”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#951097 Jul 22, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
You would not hear him back when Reagan was president, as there was no public internet like there is today, idiot.
As far as redistributing the "wealth" upwards, you need to be corrected for your lie.
The people who earn more money paid more in taxes then and they pay more than lower income earners do even today, so for you to say "redistributing the wealth upwards" is a lie.
It's actually simply "taking" less from the wealthy to encourage growth & jobs - something your Democrats can't seem to get right.
I think the year was 2007 when the USA under GW Bush took in more tax revenue than ever, hence more for your communist "redistribution", blood sucker.
Taking money in is not our problem, spending is, moron.
This will go right over your socialist, teet sucking mush brain, but here you go anyways, needy twit:
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/displ...
You have no clue what you are talking about.
Until such time as the "wealthy" are taxed on their actual income rather than their earnings after the accounting for subsidies, credits and deductions, they will not pay their fair share.

As a reminder, Mitt Romney made $13.7 million and paid $1.94 million in federal income taxes, giving him an effective tax rate of 14.1%. No matter how you look at it, that is not "fair" taxation.

FACT: According to the Center for Budget and Policy Practices, the top 1% control 43% percent of the financial wealth in America. The wealthiest 400 Americans have the same combined wealth as the poorest half of Americans -- over 150 million people. The top 10% control 83% of the financial wealth in America. So, to be "fair" the top 1% should be paying 43% of Federal income taxes instead of 36.73%. And the top 10% should be paying 83% instead of 71%.

Eventually, the top The top 1 percent will learn that their income depends on how the other 99% live but, if history is any indication, it will be too late.

Oh, as far as 2007 earnings are concerned, thanks to the Bush tax cuts, the wealthiest 1% were able to take their Bush windfall and invest it in the stock market. "In 2007, the average household in the top 1 percent had an income of $1.3 million, up $88,800 from the prior year."
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#951098 Jul 22, 2013
Waxman wrote:
Black youth commit murder at a rate 10 times that of both white & Hispanic populations combined.
Obama is no help. He is a racist bigot.
Obama is trying to make the USA like Detroit.
If you are a Democrat Obama supporter, you are a moron.
You Dumbfks don't like to hear the truth, do you?
Love your misery...Get used to it you one nut crybaby.I'll bet you have a very high voice,,,HUH...Little pee pee?
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#951099 Jul 22, 2013
Obama:

There is no IRS ‘scandal’

You Democrats love fascist presidents, eh?

“Peace on Earth”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#951100 Jul 22, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Shareholders own the business and should receive the profits.
If not, might as well sell the business to the highest bidder.
Workers are even every payday. They owe the company nothing and vice versa.
The companies manipulate the system to pay profits to shareholders when there wouldn't be any if they paid their fair share in taxes.
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#951101 Jul 22, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"poop"
And you are not a limp dicked uneducated racist?
Peace
KMA
PS: What summer is your bio/fantasy due to be released?
Grey Ghost is a sick person. This thread has more sick & nasty communist anti-Americans than any place on the web I've seen.

They hate me, and you EasyEed.

But we are not leaving, are we?
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#951102 Jul 22, 2013
Waxman wrote:
DailyKos is now using a trademark for lies & propaganda, propaganda queen?
Baawaaahhh!!!!!
<quoted text>
Biggest Obama Scandals That Never Were!™

FOX Propaganda Fails Again!™

FOXbots Can't Stop Crying About Nothing To Cry About!™
TheIndependentMa jority

Manchester, KY

#951103 Jul 22, 2013
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>\
It's way past time for you to come to grips with your personal demons.
Hey now-stop loserTically affronting Carol personally just because she has her own perspective of opinions that may differ from yours.
There really are people like that-manipulative, CONiving, twisted and distorted....kind of like that old coat hanger packing bat Joan Crawford--tales from the dark side of a "mommy dearest" control freak type--and like that freak in Ohio, or that vile beast that brainwashed and held those three females hostage in Ohio.

Not enough vials of holy water to pour over and into those evile types.
TheIndependentMa jority

Manchester, KY

#951104 Jul 22, 2013
Waxman wrote:
Obama:
There is no IRS ‘scandal’
You Democrats love fascist presidents, eh?
Was that before or after they decided to question the personal IRS appointee of?

Obama has only two appointees at the IRS. William Wilkins is one, and he is close enough to Obama personally, that he defended Obama’s Chicago church, Trinity United Church of Christ (TUCC) and Obama’s mentor, close friend and pastor, Jeremiah Wright – free, pro-bono, no cost – as in FREE when the IRS believed Senator Obama delivering a political speech inside the church may have violated TCCU’s 501(c)(3) status. Wilkins won the case.
NJ raider 1

Newark, NJ

#951105 Jul 22, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Racism on BOTH sides of that fence really.
And racism (and trumped up charges most likely resulting from politics) should've stayed out of it to start with.
True! That's why Zimmerman was never charged from the jump right? You're blind in your left eye. All you can see is what the right wants you to see! At least have the dignity to put on some shades so, everyone doesn't see your deficiency! We can see you from a mile away, the blind man of the independent minority!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#951106 Jul 22, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
Until such time as the "wealthy" are taxed on their actual income rather than their earnings after the accounting for subsidies, credits and deductions, they will not pay their fair share.
As a reminder, Mitt Romney made $13.7 million and paid $1.94 million in federal income taxes, giving him an effective tax rate of 14.1%. No matter how you look at it, that is not "fair" taxation.
FACT: According to the Center for Budget and Policy Practices, the top 1% control 43% percent of the financial wealth in America. The wealthiest 400 Americans have the same combined wealth as the poorest half of Americans -- over 150 million people. The top 10% control 83% of the financial wealth in America. So, to be "fair" the top 1% should be paying 43% of Federal income taxes instead of 36.73%. And the top 10% should be paying 83% instead of 71%.
Eventually, the top The top 1 percent will learn that their income depends on how the other 99% live but, if history is any indication, it will be too late.
Oh, as far as 2007 earnings are concerned, thanks to the Bush tax cuts, the wealthiest 1% were able to take their Bush windfall and invest it in the stock market. "In 2007, the average household in the top 1 percent had an income of $1.3 million, up $88,800 from the prior year."
But the poorest half pay no federal income taxes, and in fact get money back.
TheIndependentMa jority

Manchester, KY

#951107 Jul 22, 2013
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>
Love your misery...Get used to it you one nut crybaby.I'll bet you have a very high voice,,,HUH...Little pee pee?
Oh for the days of Jimmuh Carter-ethics, integrity, decency....and people FOR Americans and their families, NOT divide against it!
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#951108 Jul 22, 2013
Yo Communists (Democrat Obama Zombies)!

Like the Jive-Ass Punk Obama said, I could have been Trayvon Martin when I was 17 too!

But guess what?

I didn't go around punching people in the face and breaking their noses when I was on their property.

I didn't go on other people property period, and then have a racist attitude like Tray - Von did, either.

Guess what?

I'm still alive.

When you get your way and we become a country of chaos, anarchy and violence, Tray - Von will rule.

He will then come after you.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#951109 Jul 22, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
How so, propaganda queen?
Cue the Freak-Out: White Babies in the Minority



White People Problems: Census Finds More Whites Are Dying Than Being Born

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/...
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#951110 Jul 22, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
Until such time as the "wealthy" are taxed on their actual income rather than their earnings after the accounting for subsidies, credits and deductions, they will not pay their fair share.
As a reminder, Mitt Romney made $13.7 million and paid $1.94 million in federal income taxes, giving him an effective tax rate of 14.1%. No matter how you look at it, that is not "fair" taxation.
FACT: According to the Center for Budget and Policy Practices, the top 1% control 43% percent of the financial wealth in America. The wealthiest 400 Americans have the same combined wealth as the poorest half of Americans -- over 150 million people. The top 10% control 83% of the financial wealth in America. So, to be "fair" the top 1% should be paying 43% of Federal income taxes instead of 36.73%. And the top 10% should be paying 83% instead of 71%.
Eventually, the top The top 1 percent will learn that their income depends on how the other 99% live but, if history is any indication, it will be too late.
Oh, as far as 2007 earnings are concerned, thanks to the Bush tax cuts, the wealthiest 1% were able to take their Bush windfall and invest it in the stock market. "In 2007, the average household in the top 1 percent had an income of $1.3 million, up $88,800 from the prior year."
If you want to eliminate subsidies, tax credits, and deductions, you can't be selective. Eliminate them all. That's the Republican plan.
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#951111 Jul 22, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
The companies manipulate the system to pay profits to shareholders when there wouldn't be any if they paid their fair share in taxes.
Those Darn Companies!

Eh, Communist?

You do realize you can contribute your money, don't you?

You can send in extra money to the IRS, Communist!

Simply send a check with your IRS return, teet sucker.

Do you?
TheIndependentMa jority

Manchester, KY

#951112 Jul 22, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
Shouldn't a woman make an informed decision before making a life-changing decision and going through with an abortion?
Even if some think abortion is not killing a life - just in case it is?
Who would have a problem with that? Seriously. And, if so, why?
William and Kate-nice, refreshing change of news!

Dated each other, engaged to each other, then married each other, all in the right order! Now a new, little, mutually considered Legitmate addition for the Royal family..all in the right order.

God Bless their British doing it right hearts.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Hampton Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Navy Dr wife leaked pics/vids 1 hr norfolkfolk 9
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 10 hr Rshermr 63,271
I remember in Hampton (Jan '08) 11 hr Kim Mann-Douglas 836
News Libraries are about more than just books (Nov '08) Feb 18 Martin garey 7
Portsmouth Police LIVE free online scanner (Jul '10) Feb 16 Linda 2
Flashing Boobs (Jun '15) Feb 16 Martin garey 19
Justin E Nelson (Jan '16) Feb 13 Big Daddy Long St... 4

Hampton Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Hampton Mortgages