Romney should have taken the Bull(shit) by the horns and simply called a spade a spade by declaring "Mr. President, you are a damned liar".<quoted text>
I know the whole story, leosnana, and exactly what words were said.
The problem is Obama was still talking about a video two weeks later in front of the UN. How could he have been referring to Benghazi specifically as a terror attack the next day when he was blaming a video and "spontaneous mob protests" because of it two weeks later?
Obama's idea of "acts of terror" is any form of violence. He has a hard time even speaking the word. The new code name is "self-radicalized". Fort Hood is still regarded as "workplace violence". Mob violence in Obama's version of Benghazi was an "act of terror".
Romney should have said that and then looked Obama straight in the eye and asked, "Was Benghazi a coordinated terror attack or mob violence?".
Then we wouldn't be talking about it now. The die would have been cast...the initial lies exposed.
But he chose not to for whatever reason.